Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

9 US electric power sector issues to watch in 2025

Listen to the article 23 min This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback. 2024 was a busy year for the U.S. power sector with a number of significant policy advancements in renewables, transmission, nuclear energy and other areas. The year ahead will undoubtedly be an active one, too, as the […]

2024 was a busy year for the U.S. power sector with a number of significant policy advancements in renewables, transmission, nuclear energy and other areas.

The year ahead will undoubtedly be an active one, too, as the sector navigates ongoing business challenges and the impacts of the 2024 elections. Here are nine key issues to watch in 2025. 

Electricity prices continue perpetual ascent, driven by demand and gas exports

The price U.S. consumers pay for electricity will continue to ascend in 2025, driven by a range of factors including rising demand, transmission and distribution cost increases, and an anticipated rise in the price of natural gas, experts say.

Across all customer classes, U.S. electricity prices are expected to average 13.2 cents/kWh in 2025, up from 12.68 cents/kWh in 2023, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Residential electricity prices across all regions will average 16.7 cents/kWh in 2025, up from 15 cents/kWh in 2022.

“Both transmission and distribution cost increases are driven by decarbonization and that is expected to continue nationwide,” Paul Cicio, chair of the Electricity Transmission Competition Coalition, said in an email.

Natural gas prices were low in 2024 but as liquefied natural gas export terminals come on-stream in late 2025 and in 2026 and more U.S. natural gas is shipped out of the country, “we expect higher natural gas prices and resulting higher electricity prices,” Cicio said.

U.S. LNG exports have tripled over the past five years, are expected to double again by 2030 and could increase even further under existing authorizations, Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm said in December.

The rise in natural gas exports is also a threat to reliability, Cicio said, “because there is inadequate natural gas pipeline capacity on a regional basis, to add generation.”

The increased LNG exports are happening at a time when building and transportation electrification, data center growth, artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency mining and battery and fuel cell manufacturing are contributing to higher electricity consumption and rising electricity prices.

U.S. electricity demand is projected to grow 9% by 2028 and 18% by 2033, an increase of 2% per year, on average, relative to 2024 levels, consulting firm ICF said in a September report. Peak demand could grow 5% over the next four years, ICF said.

Rising demand threatens reliability as 2025 kicks off with grid warnings

The North American Electric Reliability Corp. rang in the New Year with a stark call to action for the electric power sector, signaling years of warnings may now be an immediate threat.

“I’m asking everyone in the electricity supply chain … to take all appropriate actions,” NERC CEO Jim Robb said in a Dec. 31 recorded address, ahead of the cold weather now blanketing parts of the United States.

After nearly two decades of stagnant electricity demand growth, the United States is seeing data centers and electrification drive consumption higher. Combined with generator retirements and a changing resource base, the nation’s grid reliability watchdog says this is a perilous moment for the power system.

Data centers could account for 44% of U.S. electricity load growth from 2023 to 2028, Bain & Co. said in an October analysis. U.S. utilities are facing “potentially overwhelming demand,” the consulting firm said.

NERC published an assessment in December concluding more than half of the U.S. electric grid could see energy shortfalls in the next five to 10 years, particularly under extreme weather conditions. Peak summer demand is forecast to rise by more than 122 GW in the next decade, adding 15.7% to current system peaks, NERC said, while generation retirements of up to 115 GW are possible by 2034.

Federal policies are needed to support energy production, manufacturing and infrastructure, according to National Rural Electric Cooperative Association CEO Jim Matheson. NERC’s report “continues painting a grim picture of our nation’s energy future and growing threats to reliable electricity,” he said.

NERC said it is now worried about the potential for arctic cold to bring extremely low temperatures, damaging winds, snow and freezing rain to Midwestern, Eastern, and Southern states.

“NERC is especially concerned about natural gas supply given the significant amount of [gas] production in the mid-Atlantic and Northeast,” the reliability organization said in a Dec. 31 warning

Natural gas producers have taken “a multitude of proactive measures to prepare for winter weather so that we can provide safe and reliable service to our customers,” according to Natural Gas Supply Association President and CEO Dena Wiggins.

Grid operators plan market changes amid challenging supply/demand dynamics

Making sure there is enough power supply to meet the growing needs of U.S. energy users is one of the top issues facing the operators of U.S. wholesale power markets.

With demand forecasts growing sharply for the first time in years, grid operators like the Midcontinent Independent System Operator are working to ensure their markets send appropriate signals to spur new generation while also working to unclog their interconnection queues.

The PJM Interconnection may be facing the most challenges as it is trying to overhaul its capacity market amid warnings that it may soon face major supply shortfalls.

PJM has for several years taken steps to reform its capacity markets — which led to capacity auction delays and a condensed auction schedule — but the record-high prices of its last capacity auction in July sparked unprecedented turmoil.

The auction will cost ratepayers across the grid operator’s footprint $14.7 billion for the delivery year that begins in June, up from $2.2 billion in the previous auction. Since the results were released, at least three market-related complaints were filed at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, PJM has proposed a one-time, fast-track process for shovel-ready projects and more market changes are in the works.

Other grid operators are responding to similar supply/demand challenges. MISO, for example, in November proposed, for a second time, setting a megawatt cap on its annual interconnection queue to limit its study size, as well as exemptions to the cap.

Meanwhile, the California Independent System Operator and the Southwest Power Pool are planning to expand wholesale markets in the West. CAISO aims to launch the Extended Day-Ahead Market in 2026 while SPP plans to start its Markets+ initiative in 2027, pending approval of the tariff by FERC.

Renewables sector is cautious but determined heading into Trump’s second term

In 2025, ongoing load growth in the U.S. will continue driving demand for renewable energy, while the sector simultaneously faces uncertainty due to President-elect Donald Trump’s vow to prioritize fossil fuel-based generation.

Beyond the incoming administration, connecting renewable energy to the grid remains a challenge, with wind and solar constituting the vast majority of capacity in interconnection queues across the country. A lack of sufficient transmission to deliver renewable energy to where it’s needed is also seen as a key challenge. Congress has been considering bipartisan permitting reform legislation that aims to facilitate transmission buildout, but the prospects for such legislation remain uncertain.

Advanced Energy United President and CEO Heather O’Neill said the renewable energy industry is currently “stymied” by bottlenecks, “whether it’s interconnection or siting.”

Despite federal uncertainty, work to solve these bottlenecks is ongoing at the state level, O’Neill said – bolstered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Order 1920, which affirmed states’ role in transmission planning, and by emerging solutions to get more out of the current power system like grid-enhancing technologies.

“We know we need to build more, but we also know that we can get a heck of a lot more out of the existing transmission grid,” she said. “When we talk to governors, their staff, commissioners – they want to attract economic development in their state.”

Felisa Sanchez, a partner with law firm K&L Gates’ maritime and finance groups, said that permitting reform legislations could play a significant role if Trump attempts to block offshore wind projects.

“One of the big, key ways that Trump could affect projects is by delaying that permitting process over the next four years,” she said. 

While Trump’s reelection and his strong anti-offshore wind stance have created concerns for the offshore wind industry, Sanchez said project developers “are still engaged in these conversations with the understanding that even if there is a slowdown or a halt to the industry, they anticipate being able to pick up again in four years.” 

Trump is expected to implement even stricter tariffs in his second term, including on imported solar components, which could increase costs and contribute to supply chain constraints. However, as solar technology advances and domestic supply grows to meet demand, prices continue to drop.

NRC reforms expected to benefit nuclear industry amid policy uncertainty

From game-changing federal legislation, to groundbreaking on what could be the United States’ first new grid-connected non-light-water reactor in decades, to commitments by some of the world’s biggest tech companies to power data centers with existing or next-generation reactors, 2024 was a busy year for the U.S. nuclear industry.

Momentum for nuclear energy gathered amid rapidly rising projections of future load growth due to the electrification of buildings and transport, reshoring and decarbonization of heavy industry, and above all, the expected proliferation of power-hungry AI models.

“2024 was the year that we all woke up to the need for nuclear,” said Craig Piercy, CEO of the American Nuclear Society. “2025 is the year we really get down to serious business.”

A reinvigorated U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will be instrumental, experts say. More than a dozen advanced reactor developers are engaging with the NRC on licensing-related matters, “but licensing timelines and costs remain uneven, often attributable to inconsistent quality in mundane but important practices,” Nuclear Innovation Alliance Executive Director Judi Greenwald said in a December paper

In 2025, the agency must continue work on the new, technology-neutral Part 53 licensing framework as Congress holds it accountable for implementing ADVANCE Act provisions like lower application fees, early-mover prizes and hiring incentives to expand its own workforce, Greenwald said. 

Developers of smaller-scale reactors, like Oklo and Last Energy, could begin to benefit in 2025 from an ADVANCE Act provision that establishes an 18-month licensing timeline for microreactors and may enable even faster approvals for subsequent microreactor license applications. 

“The NRC has acknowledged that these timelines are doable,” said Ryan Duncan, vice president of government relations at Last Energy. 

While it remains to be seen if the Trump administration will aim to maintain current funding levels for emerging nuclear technologies, the U.S. Department of Defense is likely to remain “very interested” in procuring nuclear reactors for on-base resiliency and could advance initiatives announced by the U.S. Army, Navy and Air Force, Duncan said. 

In the civilian world, Holtec could reactivate its 800-MW Palisades nuclear generating station in Michigan by the end of 2025, the company said last fall. Meanwhile, utilities are looking at about 2 GW of uprate opportunities to “wring as much performance out of the existing fleet as possible” and may propose additional nuclear capacity — possibly SMRs at existing nuclear or coal power sites — in integrated resource plans published this year, Piercy said.

Declining battery costs may counter tariff risk as emerging storage technologies look to break out

The United States installed 3,806 MW/9,931 MWh of energy storage in Q3 2024, and the industry is on track for 30% growth in storage deployments for the full year, Wood Mackenzie and the American Clean Power Association said in December.

Though Wood Mackenzie sees annual deployment growth decelerating to 10% from 2025 to 2028 due to “early-stage development constraints,” the industry has powerful tailwinds, including recent and expected future declines in battery input costs and ambitious storage procurement targets in states like New York, California and Massachusetts. Increasingly, state storage procurements focus on installations capable of full-power discharge over durations longer than four hours.

“No one in their right mind would bet against longer and longer duration energy storage at lower cost,” said Intersect Power CEO Sheldon Kimber, whose company in December announced plans to colocate gigawatt-scale wind, solar and battery plants with Google data centers beginning later this decade.

Non-lithium technologies like Form Energy’s iron-air and CMBlu’s redox flow battery are more economical for discharge durations beyond approximately four to eight hours, experts say. Form expects to commission a 1.5 MW/150 MWh commercial demonstration project in Minnesota later this year as it expands its West Virginia factory to meet near-term demand.

The potential for higher tariffs on imported lithium-ion battery components could benefit emerging storage technologies with simpler, easier-to-onshore supply chains, including iron-air, Kimber said. 

But “lithium-ion has a huge head start [and it will be] hard to overcome that leadership position,” especially with lithium battery costs expected to decline further, said Mark Repsher, partner and energy markets expert at PA Consulting.

Load growth prompts states, utilities to embrace virtual power plants

Only 19.5%, or 33 GW, of total North American distributed energy resource capacity — residential and commercial solar arrays and batteries, electric vehicles, smart thermostats, water heaters and more — is enrolled in a virtual power plant, according to a July report from Wood Mackenzie. Smart thermostats alone could provide up to 70 GW of dispatchable VPP capacity, said Renew Home CEO Ben Brown.

Inadequate policy, overcomplicated program design and technological challenges conspire to slow uptake, Wood Mackenzie said. But DER experts interviewed by Utility Dive are optimistic that the tide is turning as load growth outpaces generation capacity additions

“[Utilities] are running out of levers to flip to keep up with capacity and demand,” said Viridi CEO Jon Williams.

In November, Renew Home and NRG announced plans to deploy a 1-GW smart thermostat VPP in Texas by 2035. The following month, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas proposed a doubling of capacity in its aggregated distributed energy resource pilot program. In addition, the Electric Power Research Institute is leading two initiatives to advance common DER interoperability standards.

In 2025 and beyond, state policy could take center stage with DERs, Brown and Williams said. With most parts of the U.S. distribution grid running well below full capacity outside of peak periods and an average five-year wait for bulk interconnections, Williams said policymakers should incentivize distribution-connected energy storage over new transmission-connected generation assets.

“You can’t just add a gas plant because you’re too lazy to use technology,” Williams said.

In October, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, D, ordered the California Public Utilities Commission and other state agencies to find ways to reduce electricity bills in a move that could pave the way for CPUC to set new targets and incentives for utilities to adopt VPPs and make it easier for consumers to get rewarded for participating in VPPs, Brown said. 

FERC, DOE advance major transmission policies as permitting, other challenges remain

2024 saw several major developments in U.S. transmission with more to come in the year ahead as new policies move closer to implementation.

“With increased load from AI and other drivers, and resource adequacy needs as highlighted by NERC’s 2024 Long Term Reliability Assessment, transmission will continue to play a key role in meeting these needs as cost effectively as possible,” said Christina Hayes, executive director of Americans for a Clean Energy Grid.

In terms of interregional transmission, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Nov. 21, largely upheld its Order 1920 on transmission planning and cost allocation, first issued in May, but gave state regulators a bigger role in shaping scenario development and cost allocation. Grid operators must now file plans with FERC indicating how they will comply with the order.

In addition, on Oct. 3, the Department of Energy released the National Transmission Planning Study, which provides a framework for interregional transmission development.

Siting and permitting issues have been a persistent challenge for new transmission. While permitting reform legislation failed to pass in 2024, efforts will continue in the next Congress.

“It will be incumbent upon policymakers to streamline regulatory processes and actively and effectively incentivize investment in new transmission if meaningful progress is to be made on building a robust and modernized grid,“ said Larry Gasteiger, executive director at WIRES.

“The prior Trump administration took significant steps to streamline siting and permitting; the Biden administration pushed a number of individual projects over the finish line and issued [Coordinated Interagency Authorizations and Permits] rules on implementing section 216(h) of the Federal Power Act,” Hayes noted.

Some key questions around transmission, according to Hayes, include “how will the next administration support siting and permitting of transmission through the federal process …. Will it support backstop siting in FERC’s Order No. 1977? What else will this administration do to support siting and permitting of transmission projects?”

Momentum, private sector expected to drive electrification in 2025

The last four years have seen a major push to electrify building and transportation systems, with federal incentives helping to drive the popularity of heat pumps and electric vehicles. But with a second Trump administration set to begin this month, supporters of the shift away from fossil fuels are counting on momentum and the private sector to continue progress.

“As we move into the deployment phase and the implementation phase, it’s going to be more and more important that folks are using that money well,” said Jeff Allen, executive director of Forth, a nonprofit focused on EV adoption. “That’s probably going to be a lot of the funding you have to live off, for the next few years.”

“There’s also going to be a lot more people looking over your shoulder,” Allen said, speaking during a Dec. 17 webinar focused on the outlook for electrification.

Through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, President Biden has made billions available to support the clean energy transition. Heat pump incentives have been rolled out on the state-level and more than half of the authorized funds will be distributed to the states before Trump takes office, experts say.

But Trump has talked about ending EV tax credits, which can total up to $7,500 per vehicle. The incentives helped push sales of EVs to almost 9% of U.S. light-duty vehicle sales in the third quarter of last year. 

JD Power in August said it expects EV sales to achieve a 36% market share by 2030.

“I do think we’re going to see some of these tax incentives really come under fire,” said Lynda Tran, CEO of Lincoln Room Strategies.

But the bulk of the EV transition work will continue, Tran said, with the private sector continuing to ramp up investments in clean energy manufacturing. “They’re planning to double down,” she said.

Development of EV charging infrastructure is also key.

The $5 billion National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program authorized by the IIJA aims to install thousands of EV chargers around the country but relatively few have been rolled out so far, said Ryan McKinnon, spokesperson for the Charge Ahead Partnership. “The slow pace has turned the program into a poster child for sluggish federal bureaucracy,” he said.

If the NEVI program is scaled back “it will not have a major impact. Businesses that are poised to turn a profit, gain new customers and expand into a new revenue stream will continue to build, own and operate EV charging stations.”

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

Matador Resources names CFO, COO

@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:[email protected]&display=swap’); .ebm-page__main h1, .ebm-page__main h2, .ebm-page__main h3, .ebm-page__main h4, .ebm-page__main h5, .ebm-page__main h6 { font-family: Inter; } body { line-height: 150%; letter-spacing: 0.025em; } button, .ebm-button-wrapper { font-family: Inter; } .label-style { text-transform: uppercase; color: var(–color-grey); font-weight: 600; font-size: 0.75rem; } .caption-style { font-size: 0.75rem; opacity: .6; } #onetrust-pc-sdk

Read More »

ICYMI: RefComm Expoconference—why it’s the diamond of downstream events

In this ICYMI episode of Oil & Gas Journal’s ReEnterprised podcast, downstream editor Robert Brelsford explains why the technical content he has repeatedly encountered at one refining conference continues to deliver practical value for professionals responsible for refining operations. Drawing on more than 20 years covering the petroleum industry, he’s covered every facet of the refining operations, including delayed coking, fluid catalytic cracking, sulfur recovery units, and more. Brelsford describes technical sessions where refinery peer presenters candidly share detailed case studies, including operational challenges, how issues unfolded in real time, and the best practices recommended for operators facing similar conditions—allowing attendees to leave with actionable knowledge directly applicable to daily refinery operations. The episode also addresses the growing challenge of knowledge transfer as decades of hands‑on experience exit the workforce. Brelsford highlights targeted training and presentations designed for refinery personnel at all career stages, particularly newer operators who cannot rely on written documentation alone to replace lost unit expertise. Across training and technical sessions alike, the focus remains on real‑world solutions to real‑world problems, reinforcing safety, troubleshooting capability, and operational excellence long after the event ends.

Read More »

United Arab Emirates to leave OPEC

The United Arab Emirates (UAE), a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) since 1967 and one of its largest producers, said it will exit the organization effective May 1, citing a need for greater flexibility in managing its production strategy. The move comes at a time of heightened geopolitical tension and severe supply disruption tied to the ongoing Iran conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. UAE Energy Minister Suhail Mohamed al-Mazrouei said the decision followed a careful review of the country’s energy strategy. Stay updated on oil price volatility, shipping disruptions, LNG market analysis, and production output at OGJ’s Iran war content hub. The departure removes a key source of spare capacity from OPEC’s quota system and raises immediate questions about the group’s ability to coordinate supply policy. The UAE has in recent years invested heavily to expand upstream capacity, targeting production levels well above its current OPEC allocation. Tensions between the UAE and OPEC leadership—particularly over baseline production quotas—have persisted for several years, reflecting broader divergence in strategy among core Gulf producers. By exiting, Abu Dhabi gains full autonomy to align output with market conditions and national revenue objectives rather than collective targets set by the group. Market reaction Front-month crude futures showed limited immediate reaction following the announcement. At the time of writing, Brent crude had risen above $110/bbl—its highest level in 3 weeks—as stalled US-Iran negotiations showed little progress toward a deal that could restore oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. The market remains tightly focused on near-term disruptions stemming from restricted flows through Hormuz, which continues to constrain export volumes across the region. As a result, any incremental barrels from the UAE are unlikely to reach global markets in the immediate term. While the immediate market impact may be limited,

Read More »

Petrobras aims for additional ownership in defined portion of Campos basin

Petróleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras) has agreed to acquire 100% of a defined portion of the Argonauta field associated with the shared Jubarte reservoir in Brazil’s Campos basin from Shell Brasil Petróleo Ltda., ONGC Campos Ltda., and Brava Energia (formerly Enauta Petróleo e Gás Ltda.). The transaction involves assets within the BC‑10 concession linked to Petrobras’ existing unitization agreement for the presalt Jubarte reservoir, which has been in effect since Aug. 1, 2025. The acquired Argonauta portion represents a 0.86% interest in the Jubarte shared reservoir under the unitization agreement. Total consideration will be R$700 million and US$150 million, to be paid in three installments: R$100 million at closing; R$600 million on Jan. 15, 2027, or at closing, whichever occurs later; and US$150 million 2 years after closing. Following completion of the transaction, Petrobras will increase its interest in the Jubarte shared reservoir to 98.11%. The Brazilian federal government, represented by Pré‑Sal Petróleo SA (PPSA), will retain its 1.89% interest related to the extension of the reservoir into non‑contracted areas. Petrobras said the transaction will also simplify shared‑asset management. Upon closing, the negotiation process for equalization will be concluded, along with any remaining discussions related to unitization or production balancing between the Jubarte reservoir and the acquired Argonauta area. According to Petrobras, the acquisition offers attractive economic and financial terms and is aligned with the company’s strategy to strengthen and streamline its operations in the Campos basin. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval from Brazil’s National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (ANP) and the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE). Parque das Baleias The Jubarte shared reservoir is operated by Petrobras as part of the Parque das Baleias development in the northern Campos basin, in water depths of 1,220–1,400 m. Jubarte is the principal field

Read More »

Maurel & Prom discovers gas at Hechicero 1X on Sinú 9 block, Colombia

Maurel & Prom SA has made a gas discovery on Sinú‑9 block in Colombia, confirming gas across multiple intervals. The operator expects to bring the well into production in the coming days. The Hechicero‑1X well was spudded Feb. 24 and drilled to a total depth of 8,500 ft MD on Mar. 28. Electric logs confirmed gas across several intervals within the Ciénaga de Oro (CDO) formation, the primary target, with 288 ft of net pay, the operator said in a release Apr. 28. Additional gas‑bearing reservoirs were identified in the shallower Porquero formation and the deeper Pre‑CDO–San Cayetano interval, with net pay of 149 ft and 103 ft, respectively. Partner NG Energy International Corp., in a separate release Apr. 28, said results are consistent with the Magico‑1X and Brujo‑1X wells.  Hechicero‑1X was completed to allow selective production from five CDO intervals and the Pre‑CDO–San Cayetano interval. Initial tests conducted Apr. 24 on the Pre‑CDO–San Cayetano interval delivered an instantaneous rate of 26.4 MMcfd at 1,800 psi wellhead pressure through a restricted 43/128‑in. choke. Maurel & Prom plans to bring the well on stream from the Pre‑CDO–San Cayetano interval using existing infrastructure tied into Colombia’s national transportation system. The rig will next move to Magico‑2X, the second well in the six‑well exploration campaign.

Read More »

Golden Pass LNG ships first export cargo

Editor’s Note: Updated Apr. 23 to include information provided by the US Energy Information Administration.  Golden Pass LNG, a joint venture between QatarEnergy and ExxonMobil Corp., has loaded and shipped its first LNG export cargo from the plant in Sabine Pass, Tex. The departure comes following first LNG production from Train 1 late last month. Once fully operational, Golden Pass LNG expects to export about 18 million tons/year (tpy) of LNG. Golden Pass LNG is the 10th LNG plant in the US, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) noted in a separate release Apr. 23. It is the only new US LNG export plant currently expected to begin LNG shipments this year, EIA said. Construction and commissioning continue on Trains 2 and 3, which are expected to come online in turn, following stable operation of Train 1. EIA noted Golden Pass aims to start up Train 2 in second-half 2026 and Train 3 in first-half 2027. QatarEnergy holds 70% interest in Golden Pass LNG, while ExxonMobil holds the remaining 30%. LNG demand  ExxonMobil forecasts natural gas demand to rise 20% by 2050 and LNG demand to rise by 3% per year through 2050. The operator is developing four LNG projects and, by 2030, expects to double its supply compared to 2020 to more than 40 million tpy.

Read More »

Ecopetrol agrees to acquire equity stake in Brava Energia with plans for increased ownership

State-owned Ecopetrol SA, Bogotá, Colombia, has agreed to acquire a 26% equity stake in Brava Energia SA from a group of shareholders and plans to launch a tender offer to increase its ownership to 51%, which would give it control of the Brazilian oil and gas independent. The move would add exposure to roughly 81,000 boe/d of production and 459 MMboe of reserves, expanding Ecopetrol’s footprint in Brazil. Ecopetrol entered into share purchase agreement with Jive, Yellowstone, and Bloco Somah Printemps Quantum, which together constitute a group holding about 26% of the outstanding common shares of Brava Energia. Brava Energia, the second-largest independent company listed in the Brazilian market in terms of reserves and production, was incorporated in 2024 from the merger between 3R Petroleum Óleo e Gás SA and Enauta Participações SA. Completion of the deal is subject to certain conditions, including, among others, approval by Brazil’s Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), the grant of certain waivers and consents considering Brava’s financing instruments and relevant commercial agreements, as well as the purchase by Ecopetrol SA, or one of its affiliates or subsidiaries within the Ecopetrol Group, of the number of shares required to achieve a 51% controlling stake of Brava’s voting share capital. Ecopetrol plans to launch a voluntary tender offer on the B3 stock exchange in Brazil to buy additional shares to reach 51% controlling stake at R$23.00 per share, subject to regulatory requirements and certain conditions. Ecopetrol in Brazil In Brazil, Ecopetrol, through subsidiary Ecopetrol Óleo e Gás do Brasil Ltda., holds 30% interest in 11 blocks in the southern area of Santos basin in consortium with Shell Brasil Petróleo Ltda. (operator, 70%).  The company also holds a 30% non-operated interest in Gato do Mato (BM-S-54) and Sul de Gato do Mato (production sharing agreement), which

Read More »

The Power Certainty Premium: GPC Infrastructure CEO Jim Summers on Delivering Gas-Powered Compute at AI Scale

Reliability Is the Real Constraint Summers evaluates every large-scale power decision against four pillars: legal, economic, sustainable, and reliable. In the current market, one dominates. Reliability — defined not merely as uptime, but as certainty of project execution — has become the industry’s most pressing problem. “There’s a lot of noise in the market,” Summers says. “The question is whether a project is real; whether it can be delivered on time, and whether it can maintain multiple nines once it’s operating.” Legal frameworks for behind-the-meter generation are largely settled. Economics matter, particularly across multi-year development cycles. Sustainability factors in, though in many cases it has been deferred behind more immediate concerns. Execution, by contrast, is now existential. Hyperscalers are no longer evaluating power sources alone: they are evaluating delivery credibility. From Megawatts to Certainty, Speed, and Risk Transfer Historically, data centers relied on utilities to supply three things together: energy, predictable timelines, and manageable risk. That bundle has broken down. Utilities face long interconnection queues, uncertain delivery dates, and rising infrastructure costs. For developers, that uncertainty has created what industry observers and stakeholders are starting to call a “power certainty premium,” i.e. a willingness to pay more for guaranteed timelines. GPC’s customers, Summers says, are no longer buying megawatts alone. They are buying speed to market, certainty of delivery, and risk transfer. “Even if the timeline isn’t shorter, they want a date certain,” he notes. “Utilities often can’t provide that today.” That evolution is driving demand for on-site, behind-the-meter generation, where developers control timelines and cost structures rather than waiting on grid expansion. Supply Chain as the New Critical Path Remove the grid and a new constraint appears: equipment availability. For GPC, the primary gating factor is supply chain; specifically the “prime mover,” the generation equipment itself. Large industrial turbines

Read More »

AI data flows force rethink of data center networking at Backblaze

According to a report that Backblaze released this morning, traffic from content delivery networks and hosting and Internet services providers have stayed largely within historical norms over the past year. But traffic from hyperscalers and neoclouds fluctuated dramatically, with steep climbs in September and October and another uptick in March. Another network traffic change related to AI is geography. “Traditionally, it didn’t matter where cloud infrastructure was located,” says Nowak. But with AI workloads, if storage is close to compute, enterprises get lower latency and higher throughput. Today, Virginia and California have a high concentration of AI compute providers. This, in turn, brings in more storage companies. “In July, we chose to double our footprint in US East to increase the proximity to hyperscalers and neoclouds,” says Nowak. And that, in turn, leads to even more demand for compute, and even greater concentration. “There’s a snowball effect,” Nowak says. Why neoclouds for AI? Enterprises might think that they don’t need to worry about network traffic details if they’re using a hyperscaler for their AI workloads because the data and the processing both stay within the cloud. But there are advantages to using a third-party storage provider combined with neoclouds for the GPUs. According to a report released by Synergy Research Group in early April, neocloud revenues hit $9 billion in the fourth quarter of 2025, a 223% year-over-year increase. Revenues passed $25 billion for the whole year and are expected to hit $400 billion by 2031.

Read More »

TD Cowen: AI Adoption Is Already Here. Infrastructure Demand Is What Comes Next.

Enterprise AI adoption is no longer emerging. It is already embedded and beginning to scale in ways that will reshape data center demand. The latest TD Cowen GenAI Adoption Survey makes that clear. Across 689 U.S. enterprises, 92% are now using at least one major AI platform, with Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and ChatGPT forming the core triad of daily enterprise tooling. That’s the baseline. The more important story is what comes next. AI is moving quickly from assistive software to autonomous systems, and that shift carries direct implications for compute demand, power consumption, and infrastructure design. From Copilots to Autonomous Systems Today’s enterprise AI footprint is already broad, but it is still largely human-in-the-loop. That is beginning to change. Roughly a third of respondents say they already have semi-autonomous AI agents running in production, while another large cohort is piloting or planning deployments over the next 12 to 18 months. By 2027, more than three-quarters expect to be running AI agents capable of executing multi-step workflows without human intervention. This is not incremental adoption. It is a step-function shift. Autonomous agents don’t just respond to prompts; they execute tasks, interact with enterprise systems, and continuously access data. For data centers, that translates into more persistent, baseline load: exactly the kind of demand profile that stresses power delivery, increases utilization, and accelerates capacity planning timelines. To wit: AI is moving from a bursty workload to a continuous one. ROI Is No Longer the Question At the same time, the debate around AI return on investment is effectively over. Three-quarters of respondents report positive ROI, while only a small minority report negative outcomes. A meaningful share is already seeing multiples of return on their investments. The implication seems straightforward: AI budgets are becoming durable. This is no longer experimental spend that

Read More »

BYOP Moves to the Center of Data Center Strategy

Self-Sufficiency Becomes a Feature, Not a Risk Consider Wyoming’s Project Jade, where county commissioners approved an AI campus tied to 2.7 GW of new natural gas-fired generation being developed by Tallgrass Energy. Reporting from POWER described the project as a “bring your own power” model designed for a high degree of self-sufficiency, with a mix of natural gas generation and Bloom fuel cells. The campus is expected to scale significantly over time. What stands out is not only the size, but the positioning. Self-sufficiency is becoming a selling point both for developers seeking to de-risk timelines, and for local stakeholders wary of overloading existing utility infrastructure. Fuel Cells and Nuclear: The Middle Ground and the Long Game Fuel cells occupy an important middle ground in this shift. Bloom Energy’s 2026 report positions fuel cells as a leading onsite option due to shorter lead times, modular deployment, and lower local emissions. Market activity suggests that interest is real. For developers, fuel cells can be easier to permit than large turbine installations and can be deployed incrementally. That makes them effective as bridge-to-grid solutions or as permanent components of hybrid architectures. Advanced nuclear remains the most strategically significant, but least immediate, BYOP pathway. Companies including Switch and other data center operators have explored partnerships with Oklo around its Aurora small modular reactor design. Nuclear holds long-term appeal because it offers firm, low-carbon power at scale. But for current AI buildouts, it remains a future option rather than a near-term construction solution. The immediate reality is that gas and modular onsite systems are closing the time-to-power gap, while nuclear is being positioned as a longer-duration successor as licensing and deployment timelines evolve. The model itself is also evolving. BYOP is beginning to blur the line between developer, energy provider, and compute customer. Reuters

Read More »

Microsoft Builds for Two Worlds: Sovereign Cloud and AI Factories

So far in 2026, across the United States and overseas, Microsoft is building an infrastructure portfolio at full hyperscale. The strategy runs on two tracks. The first is familiar: sovereign cloud expansion involving new regions, local data residency, and compliance-driven enterprise infrastructure. The second is larger and more consequential: purpose-built AI factory campuses designed for dense GPU clusters, liquid cooling, private fiber, and power acquisition at a scale that extends far beyond traditional cloud infrastructure. Despite reports last year that Microsoft was pulling back on data center development, the company is accelerating. It is not only advancing its own large-scale campuses, but also absorbing premium AI capacity originally aligned with OpenAI. In Texas and Norway, projects tied to OpenAI’s infrastructure plans have shifted back into Microsoft’s orbit. Even after contractual changes gave OpenAI greater flexibility to source compute elsewhere, Microsoft remains the market’s most reliable backstop buyer for top-tier AI infrastructure. It no longer needs to control every OpenAI build to maintain its position. In 2026, Microsoft is still the company best positioned to turn uncertain AI demand into deployed capacity, e.g. concrete, steel, power, and silicon at scale. Building at Industrial Scale The clearest indicator of Microsoft’s intent is its capital spending. In its January 2026 earnings cycle, Reuters reported that Microsoft’s quarterly capital expenditures reached a record $37.5 billion, up nearly 66% year over year. The company’s cloud backlog rose to $625 billion, with roughly 45% of remaining performance obligations tied to OpenAI. About two-thirds of that quarterly capex was directed toward compute chips. To be clear: this is no speculative buildout. Microsoft is deploying capital against a massive, committed demand pipeline, even as it maintains significant exposure to OpenAI-driven workloads. The company is solving two infrastructure problems at once: supporting broad Azure and Copilot growth, while ensuring

Read More »

AI’s Execution Era: Aligned and Netrality on Power, Speed, and the New Data Center Reality

At Data Center World 2026, the industry didn’t need convincing that something fundamental has shifted. “This feels different,” said Bill Kleyman as he opened a keynote fireside with Phill Lawson-Shanks and Amber Caramella. “In the past 24 months, we’ve seen more evolution… than in the two decades before.” What followed was less a forecast than a field report from the front lines of the AI infrastructure buildout—where demand is immediate, power is decisive, and execution is everything. A Different Kind of Growth Cycle For Caramella, the shift starts with scale—and speed. “What feels fundamentally different is just the sheer pace and breadth of the demand combined with a real shift in architecture,” she said. Vacancy rates have collapsed even as capacity expands. AI workloads are not just additive—they are redefining absorption curves across the market. But the deeper change is behavioral. “Over 75% of people are using AI in their day-to-day business… and now the conversation is shifting to agentic AI,” Caramella noted. That shift—from tools to delegated workflows—points to a second wave of infrastructure demand that has not yet fully materialized. Lawson-Shanks framed the transformation in more structural terms. The industry, he said, has always followed a predictable chain: workload → software → hardware → facility → location. That chain has broken. “We had a very predictable industry… prior to Covid. And Covid changed everything,” he said, describing how hyperscale demand compressed deployment cycles overnight. What followed was a surge that utilities—and supply chains—were not prepared to meet. From Capacity to Constraint: Power Becomes Strategy If AI has a gating factor, it is no longer compute. It is power. “Before it used to be an operational convenience,” Caramella said. “Now it’s a strategic advantage—or constraint if you don’t have it.” That shift is reshaping executive decision-making. Power is no

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »