
The call for Tan’s resignation coincided with an Aug. 6 letter Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) sent to Intel Chairman Frank Yeary, in which he expressed concerns about “Intel’s operations and its potential impact on U.S. national security,” citing a report alleging Tan’s links to Chinese firms and the fact Cadence Design Systems, the company Tan previously led before joining Intel, had pled guilty to selling software to a Chinese university that had been on the U.S. Entity List.
In his letter, Cotton wrote: “Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations,” pointing out that Intel had received nearly $8 billion in grants from the CHIPS Act.
Cotton added that in becoming CEO of Intel, Tan reportedly controls dozens of Chinese companies and has a stake in hundreds of Chinese advanced-manufacturing and chip firms. At least eight of these companies reportedly have ties to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. “Mr. Tan’s associations raise questions about Intel’s ability to fulfill these obligations,” he stated.
Analyst reaction to initial call for resignation
Analysts did not hold back after Trump’s initial Aug. 7 comments demanding a change in Intel’s leadership:
“Trump doesn’t know what he’s talking about or what he’s calling for. This is the same man who, by his admission, wanted to break up NVIDIA until he met Jensen Huang. He posted that statement to Truth Social minutes after watching Tom Cotton on Fox News talk about the subject,” said Anshel Sag, senior analyst with Moor Research and Insights.
“I think this is all BS. Any CEO with ties to international VCs will have contacts with Chinese companies, especially if you are in tech. That is how modern-day tech works. If there is proof of some wrongdoing, then show it,” said Jack Gold, president of J. Gold Associates.