
Right now, she said, WoodMac’s projection is 22 bcfd.
“The biggest difference between those two [projections] is [Kinder Mogan] project LNG export growth of 20 bfcd…that’s a huge percentage of the 28 versus WoodMac at 15 [bcfd]. And if you look right now at the projects that are actually under construction plus one project that was recently FID [final investement decision], you’re over the WoodMac number, and you’re starting to approach our number.” On top of that, she said, there have been a number of supply agreement announced in 2025 that are not yet FID, but are seen as more and more likely.
Factors in Kinder Morgan’s projections include US administration support, growing power demand from data centers, population shifts south, reshoring of factories, and renewables backup needs.
The renewable development element related to the power growth estimate is one that likely differentiated Kinder Morgan’s projections versus WoodMac’s, she said.
WoodMac’s projections were done prior to the current administration’s reconciliation bill. “I think there was an expectation prior to that that there was going to be more renewable development. And now I think natural gas, predominantly, will have to fill that hole. And so I think there’s probably upside to what we’ve forecasted on the power side,” Dang said.
“I think it is a very nice environment to be a natural gas infrastructure company,” she said, reiterating a point she made in the company’s second-quarter earnings call. “I’ve been at Kinder Morgan, approaching 25 years, and this is the best opportunity set that I’ve seen during my career at Kinder Morgan.”