A new Microsoft chip could lead to more stable quantum computers

Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

A new Microsoft chip could lead to more stable quantum computers

Microsoft announced today that it has made significant progress in its 20-year quest to make topological quantum bits, or qubits—a special approach to building quantum computers that could make them more stable and easier to scale up. Researchers and companies have been working for years to build quantum computers, which could unlock dramatic new abilities to simulate complex materials and discover new ones, among many other possible applications. To achieve that potential, though, we must build big enough systems that are stable enough to perform computations. Many of the technologies being explored today, such as the superconducting qubits pursued by Google and IBM, are so delicate that the resulting systems need to have many extra qubits to correct errors. Microsoft has long been working on an alternative that could cut down on the overhead by using components that are far more stable. These components, called Majorana quasiparticles, are not real particles. Instead, they are special patterns of behavior that may arise inside certain physical systems and under certain conditions. The pursuit has not been without setbacks, including a high-profile paper retraction by researchers associated with the company in 2018. But the Microsoft team, which has since pulled this research effort in house, claims it is now on track to build a fault-tolerant quantum computer containing a few thousand qubits in a matter of years and that it has a blueprint for building out chips that each contain a million qubits or so, a rough target that could be the point at which these computers really begin to show their power. This week the company announced a few early successes on that path: piggybacking on a Nature paper published today that describes a fundamental validation of the system, the company says it has been testing a topological qubit, and that it has wired up a chip containing eight of them. “You don’t get to a million qubits without a lot of blood, sweat, and tears and solving a lot of really difficult technical challenges along the way. And I do not want to understate any of that,” says Chetan Nayak, a Microsoft technical fellow and leader of the team pioneering this approach. That said, he says, “I think that we have a path that we very much believe in, and we see a line of sight.” Researchers outside the company are cautiously optimistic. “I’m very glad that [this research] seems to have hit a very important milestone,” says computer scientist Scott Aaronson, who heads the Quantum Information Center at the University of Texas at Austin. “I hope that this stands, and I hope that it’s built up.” Even and odd The first step in building a quantum computer is constructing qubits that can exist in fragile quantum states—not 0s and 1s like the bits in classical computers, but rather a mixture of the two. Maintaining qubits in these states and linking them up with one another is delicate work, and over the years a significant amount of research has gone into refining error correction schemes to make up for noisy hardware. For many years, theorists and experimentalists alike have been intrigued by the idea of creating topological qubits, which are constructed through mathematical twists and turns and have protection from errors essentially baked into their physics. “It’s been such an appealing idea to people since the early 2000s,” says Aaronson. “The only problem with it is that it requires, in a sense, creating a new state of matter that’s never been seen in nature.” Microsoft has been on a quest to synthesize this state, called a Majorana fermion, in the form of quasiparticles. The Majorana was first proposed nearly 90 years ago as a particle that is its own antiparticle, which means two Majoranas will annihilate when they encounter one another. With the right conditions and physical setup, the company has been hoping to get behavior matching that of the Majorana fermion within materials. In the last few years, Microsoft’s approach has centered on creating a very thin wire or “nanowire” from indium arsenide, a semiconductor. This material is placed in close proximity to aluminum, which becomes a superconductor close to absolute zero, and can be used to create superconductivity in the nanowire. Ordinarily you’re not likely to find any unpaired electrons skittering about in a superconductor—electrons like to pair up. But under the right conditions in the nanowire, it’s theoretically possible for an electron to hide itself, with each half hiding at either end of the wire. If these complex entities, called Majorana zero modes, can be coaxed into existence, they will be difficult to destroy, making them intrinsically stable. ”Now you can see the advantage,” says Sankar Das Sarma, a theoretical physicist at the University of Maryland, College Park, who did early work on this concept. “You cannot destroy a half electron, right? If you try to destroy a half electron, that means only a half electron is left. That’s not allowed.” In 2023, the Microsoft team published a paper in the journal Physical Review B claiming that this system had passed a specific protocol designed to assess the presence of Majorana zero modes. This week in Nature, the researchers reported that they can “read out” the information in these nanowires—specifically, whether there are Majorana zero modes hiding at the wires’ ends. If there are, that means the wire has an extra, unpaired electron. “What we did in the Nature paper is we showed how to measure the even or oddness,” says Nayak. “To be able to tell whether there’s 10 million or 10 million and one electrons in one of these wires.” That’s an important step by itself, because the company aims to use those two states—an even or odd number of electrons in the nanowire—as the 0s and 1s in its qubits. If these quasiparticles exist, it should be possible to “braid” the four Majorana zero modes in a pair of nanowires around one another by making specific measurements in a specific order. The result would be a qubit with a mix of these two states, even and odd. Nayak says the team has done just that, creating a two-level quantum system, and that it is currently working on a paper on the results. Researchers outside the company say they cannot comment on the qubit results, since that paper is not yet available. But some have hopeful things to say about the findings published so far. “I find it very encouraging,” says Travis Humble, director of the Quantum Science Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. “It is not yet enough to claim that they have created topological qubits. There’s still more work to be done there,” he says. But “this is a good first step toward validating the type of protection that they hope to create.” Others are more skeptical. Physicist Henry Legg of the University of St Andrews in Scotland, who previously criticized Physical Review B for publishing the 2023 paper without enough data for the results to be independently reproduced, is not convinced that the team is seeing evidence of Majorana zero modes in its Nature paper. He says that the company’s early tests did not put it on solid footing to make such claims. “The optimism is definitely there, but the science isn’t there,” he says. One potential complication is impurities in the device, which can create conditions that look like Majorana particles. But Nayak says the evidence has only grown stronger as the research has proceeded. “This gives us confidence: We are manipulating sophisticated devices and seeing results consistent with a Majorana interpretation,” he says. “They have satisfied many of the necessary conditions for a Majorana qubit, but there are still a few more boxes to check,” Das Sarma said after seeing preliminary results on the qubit. “The progress has been impressive and concrete.” Scaling up On the face of it, Microsoft’s topological efforts seem woefully behind in the world of quantum computing—the company is just now working to combine qubits in the single digits while others have tied together more than 1,000. But both Nayak and Das Sarma say other efforts had a strong head start because they involved systems that already had a solid grounding in physics. Work on the topological qubit, on the other hand, has meant starting from scratch. “We really were reinventing the wheel,” Nayak says, likening the team’s efforts to the early days of semiconductors, when there was so much to sort out about electron behavior and materials, and transistors and integrated circuits still had to be invented. That’s why this research path has taken almost 20 years, he says: “It’s the longest-running R&D program in Microsoft history.” Some support from the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency could help the company catch up. Early this month, Microsoft was selected as one of two companies to continue work on the design of a scaled-up system, through a program focused on underexplored approaches that could lead to utility-scale quantum computers—those whose benefits exceed their costs. The other company selected is PsiQuantum, a startup that is aiming to build a quantum computer containing up to a million qubits using photons. Many of the researchers MIT Technology Review spoke with would still like to see how this work plays out in scientific publications, but they were hopeful. “The biggest disadvantage of the topological qubit is that it’s still kind of a physics problem,” says Das Sarma. “If everything Microsoft is claiming today is correct … then maybe right now the physics is coming to an end, and engineering could begin.” This story was updated with Henry Legg’s current institutional affiliation.

Researchers and companies have been working for years to build quantum computers, which could unlock dramatic new abilities to simulate complex materials and discover new ones, among many other possible applications.

To achieve that potential, though, we must build big enough systems that are stable enough to perform computations. Many of the technologies being explored today, such as the superconducting qubits pursued by Google and IBM, are so delicate that the resulting systems need to have many extra qubits to correct errors.

Microsoft has long been working on an alternative that could cut down on the overhead by using components that are far more stable. These components, called Majorana quasiparticles, are not real particles. Instead, they are special patterns of behavior that may arise inside certain physical systems and under certain conditions.

The pursuit has not been without setbacks, including a high-profile paper retraction by researchers associated with the company in 2018. But the Microsoft team, which has since pulled this research effort in house, claims it is now on track to build a fault-tolerant quantum computer containing a few thousand qubits in a matter of years and that it has a blueprint for building out chips that each contain a million qubits or so, a rough target that could be the point at which these computers really begin to show their power.

This week the company announced a few early successes on that path: piggybacking on a Nature paper published today that describes a fundamental validation of the system, the company says it has been testing a topological qubit, and that it has wired up a chip containing eight of them.

“You don’t get to a million qubits without a lot of blood, sweat, and tears and solving a lot of really difficult technical challenges along the way. And I do not want to understate any of that,” says Chetan Nayak, a Microsoft technical fellow and leader of the team pioneering this approach. That said, he says, “I think that we have a path that we very much believe in, and we see a line of sight.”

Researchers outside the company are cautiously optimistic. “I’m very glad that [this research] seems to have hit a very important milestone,” says computer scientist Scott Aaronson, who heads the Quantum Information Center at the University of Texas at Austin. “I hope that this stands, and I hope that it’s built up.”

Even and odd

The first step in building a quantum computer is constructing qubits that can exist in fragile quantum states—not 0s and 1s like the bits in classical computers, but rather a mixture of the two. Maintaining qubits in these states and linking them up with one another is delicate work, and over the years a significant amount of research has gone into refining error correction schemes to make up for noisy hardware.

For many years, theorists and experimentalists alike have been intrigued by the idea of creating topological qubits, which are constructed through mathematical twists and turns and have protection from errors essentially baked into their physics. “It’s been such an appealing idea to people since the early 2000s,” says Aaronson. “The only problem with it is that it requires, in a sense, creating a new state of matter that’s never been seen in nature.”

Microsoft has been on a quest to synthesize this state, called a Majorana fermion, in the form of quasiparticles. The Majorana was first proposed nearly 90 years ago as a particle that is its own antiparticle, which means two Majoranas will annihilate when they encounter one another. With the right conditions and physical setup, the company has been hoping to get behavior matching that of the Majorana fermion within materials.

In the last few years, Microsoft’s approach has centered on creating a very thin wire or “nanowire” from indium arsenide, a semiconductor. This material is placed in close proximity to aluminum, which becomes a superconductor close to absolute zero, and can be used to create superconductivity in the nanowire.

Ordinarily you’re not likely to find any unpaired electrons skittering about in a superconductor—electrons like to pair up. But under the right conditions in the nanowire, it’s theoretically possible for an electron to hide itself, with each half hiding at either end of the wire. If these complex entities, called Majorana zero modes, can be coaxed into existence, they will be difficult to destroy, making them intrinsically stable.

”Now you can see the advantage,” says Sankar Das Sarma, a theoretical physicist at the University of Maryland, College Park, who did early work on this concept. “You cannot destroy a half electron, right? If you try to destroy a half electron, that means only a half electron is left. That’s not allowed.”

In 2023, the Microsoft team published a paper in the journal Physical Review B claiming that this system had passed a specific protocol designed to assess the presence of Majorana zero modes. This week in Nature, the researchers reported that they can “read out” the information in these nanowires—specifically, whether there are Majorana zero modes hiding at the wires’ ends. If there are, that means the wire has an extra, unpaired electron.

“What we did in the Nature paper is we showed how to measure the even or oddness,” says Nayak. “To be able to tell whether there’s 10 million or 10 million and one electrons in one of these wires.” That’s an important step by itself, because the company aims to use those two states—an even or odd number of electrons in the nanowire—as the 0s and 1s in its qubits.

If these quasiparticles exist, it should be possible to “braid” the four Majorana zero modes in a pair of nanowires around one another by making specific measurements in a specific order. The result would be a qubit with a mix of these two states, even and odd. Nayak says the team has done just that, creating a two-level quantum system, and that it is currently working on a paper on the results.

Researchers outside the company say they cannot comment on the qubit results, since that paper is not yet available. But some have hopeful things to say about the findings published so far. “I find it very encouraging,” says Travis Humble, director of the Quantum Science Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. “It is not yet enough to claim that they have created topological qubits. There’s still more work to be done there,” he says. But “this is a good first step toward validating the type of protection that they hope to create.”

Others are more skeptical. Physicist Henry Legg of the University of St Andrews in Scotland, who previously criticized Physical Review B for publishing the 2023 paper without enough data for the results to be independently reproduced, is not convinced that the team is seeing evidence of Majorana zero modes in its Nature paper. He says that the company’s early tests did not put it on solid footing to make such claims. “The optimism is definitely there, but the science isn’t there,” he says.

One potential complication is impurities in the device, which can create conditions that look like Majorana particles. But Nayak says the evidence has only grown stronger as the research has proceeded. “This gives us confidence: We are manipulating sophisticated devices and seeing results consistent with a Majorana interpretation,” he says.

“They have satisfied many of the necessary conditions for a Majorana qubit, but there are still a few more boxes to check,” Das Sarma said after seeing preliminary results on the qubit. “The progress has been impressive and concrete.”

Scaling up

On the face of it, Microsoft’s topological efforts seem woefully behind in the world of quantum computing—the company is just now working to combine qubits in the single digits while others have tied together more than 1,000. But both Nayak and Das Sarma say other efforts had a strong head start because they involved systems that already had a solid grounding in physics. Work on the topological qubit, on the other hand, has meant starting from scratch.

“We really were reinventing the wheel,” Nayak says, likening the team’s efforts to the early days of semiconductors, when there was so much to sort out about electron behavior and materials, and transistors and integrated circuits still had to be invented. That’s why this research path has taken almost 20 years, he says: “It’s the longest-running R&D program in Microsoft history.”

Some support from the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency could help the company catch up. Early this month, Microsoft was selected as one of two companies to continue work on the design of a scaled-up system, through a program focused on underexplored approaches that could lead to utility-scale quantum computers—those whose benefits exceed their costs. The other company selected is PsiQuantum, a startup that is aiming to build a quantum computer containing up to a million qubits using photons.

Many of the researchers MIT Technology Review spoke with would still like to see how this work plays out in scientific publications, but they were hopeful. “The biggest disadvantage of the topological qubit is that it’s still kind of a physics problem,” says Das Sarma. “If everything Microsoft is claiming today is correct … then maybe right now the physics is coming to an end, and engineering could begin.”

This story was updated with Henry Legg’s current institutional affiliation.

Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy, bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

AMD agrees to buy World Labs to fill out its AI stack

This is where World Labs fits into AMD’s ecosystem, according to Parv Sharma, Senior Research Analyst at Counterpoint Research. “World Labs builds AI that understands space, where models need to understand geometry, physics and time, unlike LLMs, which understand languages. These world models are used for training in physical AI

Why a network digital twin is the missing piece for AI-era operations

The e-book draws an important distinction between two approaches that share the label. One emulates the network by running the actual device firmware against specific test scenarios. The other builds a deterministic mathematical model from the network’s configuration and state, computing all possible forwarding behaviors at once. The guide sums

NetScaler admins told to patch critical zero-days in ADC and Gateway now

NetScaler appliances are an important part of many enterprise networks, providing VPN and remote access, load balancing and other application delivery services. Citrix is tracking the two exploited vulnerabilities as CVE-2026-88771 and CVE-2026-88772. It has released fixes in NetScaler ADC and Gateway 14.1-73.37 and later, 13.1-64.23 and later, with corresponding

Tackling the three hidden mistakes when planning a GCC

The decisions that determine whether a global capability center (GCC) succeeds or stalls are rarely the ones that get boardroom attention. With the number of GCCs in India growing by nearly a third since 2021 – more than 500 of the Forbes Global 2000 operate in the country – the

Plains names Liollio to succeed Chandler as EVP, COO

Plains All American Pipeline LP and Plains GP Holdings have appointed Dean Liollio to serve as executive vice-president and chief operating officer effective Oct. 2, 2026. Liollio will succeed Chris Chandler, who is resigning from Plains to pursue other interests, the company said in a release Sept. 29. Chandler joined Plains in 2018 after previously serving in leadership roles at Phillips 66. Liollio previously served as senior vice-president, special projects, prior to his appointment as executive vice-president and COO. Prior, the served as president of Plains Midstream Canada from 2020 until 2024, as president of PAA Natural Gas Storage from 2008 until 2020 and as president of Plains Gas Solutions from 2016 until 2020. Prior to joining Plains in 2008, Liollio held a number of executive roles including serving as president, ceief executive officer and director of EnergySouth Inc. and as president and COO of Centerpoint’s natural gas distribution operations across a five-state area.

The United States Energy Department Continues Execution of Strategic Reserve Release Commitments

WASHINGTON—The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for an exchange of up to 40 million barrels of crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), continuing DOE’s execution of the 172-million-barrel release previously announced by President Trump in coordination with the International Energy Agency (IEA) member nations’ overall 400-million-barrel commitment. “With today’s actions, the United States continues to lead the coordinated efforts to stabilize oil markets for the benefit of Americans and people around the world,” U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said. “While the United States and Japan are delivering on their commitments, several European member countries have released only a fraction of the crude oil and petroleum products they pledged. We urge every member country to fulfill its commitments. Thanks to President Trump, these exchanges will also ensure America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve continues to be refilled, while saving taxpayers more than $3 billion.” Thanks to President Trump, DOE has advanced a series of large-scale SPR exchange solicitations at record speed. These actions have moved critical crude oil supplies into the market to address short-term supply disruptions and bolster energy security for the United States and its allies. The crude oil will originate from the SPR’s Big Hill and Bryan Mound sites. This action builds on the Department’s five previous solicitations that collectively awarded more than 133 million barrels across four completed exchanges. DOE’s earlier exchanges demonstrated the SPR’s ability to rapidly deliver crude under emergency authorities while achieving a 25 percent premium in returned barrels—expanding the reserve and saving taxpayers billions of dollars. Deliveries under awarded exchanges are scheduled for November and December 2026. Under DOE’s exchange authority, participating companies will return the 40 million borrowed barrels with additional premium barrels, ensuring immediate market supply while increasing the SPR’s long-term inventory at no cost to taxpayers. Bids for this solicitation are due no later than 11:00 A.M. Central Time on

ReconAfrica increases activity in Africa

Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd. (ReconAfrica) will sidetrack the Kavango West 1X well in Namibia, investigate a petroleum system in Angola, and reprocess seismic offshore Gabon. In Namibia, flow test samples from the Huttenberg and Elandshoek formations in the Kavango West 1X (KW1X) well in PEL 73 indicate that the natural gas collected in the samples are thermogenic with liquid potential and have maturities ranging from late oil to early gas. A horizontal well sidetrack will be drilled at KW1X in accordance with the continuing exploration of the Damara Fold Belt. The objectives of this horizontal well flow test are to determine deliverability of the well bore, liquid yield from the gas stream, and formation pressure response. ReconAfrica said required equipment has been procured and is on site or in transit. Rig maintenance is complete, and all permits have been filed with appropriate regulatory bodies for ongoing operations. With the Jarvie-1 rig having already resumed operations, work in the vertical well bore has begun with the removal of the casing, followed by the setting of the whipstock at about 2,500 m before horizontal drilling begins. Pending approvals and equipment arrival, horizontal drilling will take place in October and is scheduled to take about a month. The current design targets a horizontal wellbore of up to 1,000 m to optimally intersect natural fractures across the Kavango structure. The well will be completed open hole, without casing or cement, to maximize flow rate from the fractures and identified porosity zones. ReconAfrica said flow testing will occur immediately following completion of the well, which will be tested before acid washing. In Angola, preliminary results from the soil-sampling program conducted on the memorandum of understanding (MOU) acreage during May and June suggests there is a working petroleum system that is thermogenic with liquid content potential, like

S&P Global: Canadian oil sands output set for record 3.5 million b/d in 2026

Canadian oil sands production is expected to rise for a 25th consecutive year in 2026, reaching a record 3.5 million b/d as operators continue to optimize existing installations, according to S&P Global Energy. The forecast represents an increase of about 100,000 b/d, or 3%, from 2025. S&P Global expects production to reach about 3.9 million b/d by the early 2030s before broadly plateauing under its current outlook. Oil sands production has expanded steadily over the past quarter century. Annual output stood at about 300,000 b/d in 2001 and has increased every year since then except in 2020, when production was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of the anticipated 2026 growth is set to come from optimization of existing operations rather than major new projects. Much of Canada’s current oil sands capacity was built between 2009-18, while construction of large, new installations has been limited in recent years. S&P Global said, however, that the potential for renewed interest in capacity additions through new construction is creating additional upside to the longer-term outlook. “The Canadian oil sands has proven to be a resilient source of supply despite periods of low oil prices, regional price volatility and uncertainty over future Canadian energy and climate policy,” said Kevin Birn, chief Canadian oil markets analyst at S&P Global Energy. “The question today is not whether the oil sands will continue to grow, but rather how much additional growth could come should new projects once again come forward.” Factors contributing to that outlook include announced plans for expanded pipeline export capacity, greater clarity, reduction, and extension of carbon pricing through 2040, commitments to accelerate reviews of projects considered to be in the national interest, and potential changes to fiscal terms for new oil sands projects. S&P Global also said Canadian energy production is increasingly being

Insights: Prioritizing process safety management across the refining industry (Pt. II)

In this Insights episode of the Oil & Gas Journal ReEnterprised podcast, downstream editor and lead reporter Robert Brelsford concludes the conversation on process safety management with Joe Barnes, principal of Barnes’ Engineering Consultants and a veteran oil and gas operations, maintenance, reliability, and major-projects leader with more than 30 years of industry experience. Barnes outlines five priorities for senior leaders and plant managers: maintaining strong operating procedures and management-of-change practices; routinely auditing lockout/tagout procedures; providing effective operator and supervisor training; and preventing deferred maintenance, particularly on critical equipment. He also emphasizes the importance of leadership visibility in the field, encouraging executives and plant managers to regularly engage with operating personnel and understand the condition of equipment and processes firsthand. During the conversation, Robert and Joe examine the tension between profitability, market pressures, and the investments required to operate safely. Barnes explains why strong financial performance should support investment in equipment, maintenance, training, and people rather than encourage short-term decisions that could increase risk. He also discusses how management should evaluate efficiency measures, staffing changes, maintenance deferrals, turnaround modifications, and capital reductions while keeping process and personal safety central to decision-making. The two consider how facilities can demonstrate that process safety systems are working in practice through dedicated internal audits, periodic third-party reviews, corrective-action follow-through, and the use of real-world incident scenarios in operator training. Barnes explains how investigation findings can be converted into case-based exercises that help workers recognize hazards, assess risks, and develop the right responses before returning to the field. He also recommends reviewing procedures, emergency-response plans, and process hazards periodically to help ensure they remain current and effective. Robert and Joe further explore how leaders can create an environment in which employees and contractors feel comfortable reporting weak signals, near misses, and other bad news. Barnes

Kimmeridge: US shale oil reserve replacement weakens as gas remains abundant

US shale oil producers are finding it increasingly difficult to replace reserves even as operating efficiency improves, while natural gas resources remain comparatively abundant, Kimmeridge, an alternative asset manager focused on the energy sector, said in a new report. In the report titled “Shale’s Golden Years, Part II: The Cost of Aging,” Kimmeridge said cumulative oil reserve replacement since 2019 has averaged about 95%, compared with 126% for natural gas. Well-level data show a similar split, with oil recovery per foot generally declining over the past decade while gas productivity has remained broadly flat to improving. The deterioration comes despite majort cost and efficiency gains. Since 2018, SG&A expense per barrel of oil equivalent (boe) has fallen about 48%, interest expense 46%, and exploration expense 71%. Operators also have drilled longer laterals and increased drilling speeds. Even so, Kimmeridge’s 3-year, value-weighted recycle ratio for the US E&P sector fell to 167% in 2025 from 184% in 2019, despite higher revenue per boe. Oil-weighted producers generated a 164% recycle ratio in 2025 versus 186% in 2019, while gas-weighted producers improved to 179% from 165%. Reserve additions at oil-focused companies also are becoming gassier. Oil represented 41% of their reserve additions in 2025, compared with about 50% of current production. Kimmeridge said the conventional 6 Mcf-to-1 boe conversion can obscure that shift by giving lower-value gas the same energy-equivalent replacement credit as oil. Kimmeridge said weaker oil reserve replacement could reduce the responsiveness of US shale supply to higher prices over time, providing structural support for WTI and strengthening the case for renewed oil exploration. Natural gas faces the opposite backdrop. Efficient gas reserve replacement and rising associated-gas output point to continued supply abundance, potentially weighing on Henry Hub and increasing the value of LNG-linked sales, transportation, and other downstream exposure.

DCF Trends Summit: ON.energy’s Asser Elsamahy – Using AI UPS Systems to Tame AI Load Swings

The power challenge surrounding artificial intelligence is increasingly about more than finding enough megawatts. AI data centers can also introduce rapid changes in electricity demand as large clusters of accelerators ramp workloads up and down. Those swings create a different kind of infrastructure problem: how to serve highly dynamic compute loads without passing that volatility directly onto the electric grid. That challenge is helping move battery energy storage deeper into data center power architecture. In an onsite podcast interview recorded live at the Data Center Frontier Trends Summit 2026, DCF Contributing Editor Doug Black spoke with Asser Elsamahy, P.E., vice president of engineering at ON.energy, about the emerging role of battery-based power quality infrastructure for AI data centers. Elsamahy said battery power systems themselves are hardly new. Energy storage has been deployed at gigawatt scale around the world for roughly two decades. What is new is the way the technology is being adapted to the operating characteristics of large AI facilities. “They’re new to the data center industry, but they’re not necessarily new in the market,” Elsamahy said. “They’ve been deployed at gigawatt scale already, multiple gigawatts all over the world.” The difference now is the load. Major swings in AI computing demand can create additional stress for grid operators already confronting rapid growth in large-load interconnection requests. Elsamahy said that dynamic is accelerating interest in energy storage as a way to manage the interface between AI infrastructure and the grid. From Battery Storage to an “AI UPS” ON.energy’s approach is built around what the company calls an AI UPS, or medium-voltage uninterruptible power supply. The architecture differs from the parallel battery energy storage system, or BESS, configuration commonly used for standalone grid storage. ON instead uses a double-conversion design with two sets of inverters. One inverter set faces the

Q3 Executive Roundtable Recap

For Data Center Frontier’s Q3 2026 Executive Roundtable, three industry leaders examined a question increasingly central to the AI infrastructure buildout: What happens when data centers are asked to become larger, denser and faster at the same time? Across three discussions, a consistent theme emerged. AI is not simply increasing the amount of infrastructure required to support the modern data center. It is exposing assumptions that were easier to tolerate at lower densities, expanding the boundaries of what operators must consider mission-critical, and making the interaction between systems increasingly important to overall resilience. That begins with density. As the value and power concentrated in individual racks rises, traditional approaches to redundancy, monitoring and risk mitigation can leave less room for error. Resilience can no longer be measured simply by installed capacity or the presence of backup equipment. Operators increasingly need to understand how electrical, thermal and control systems behave together under dynamic AI workloads — and how quickly the facility can respond and recover when something goes wrong. The same shift is broadening the definition of critical infrastructure. Power generation, UPS systems and network connectivity remain fundamental, but energy storage, liquid cooling, leak detection, controls, monitoring and the interfaces connecting them are becoming part of the same reliability equation. A component can perform exactly as designed while the larger system still fails if coordination, communications or control logic break down. And all of this is happening while the market is demanding faster deployment. Standardization, modular construction, factory integration and earlier modeling can legitimately compress project schedules. But the Q3 panelists drew a clear distinction between eliminating unnecessary time and eliminating rigor. As infrastructure becomes more tightly coupled, commissioning, integrated systems testing, operational visibility and system-level validation may need to become more thorough precisely because projects are moving faster. Taken together,

DCF Tours: Inside CoolIT, Where AI Liquid Cooling Goes to Scale

How Long Can Single-Phase Go? The Liquid Lab also makes clear that CoolIT is not treating today’s architecture as permanent. The company’s R&D operation includes CNC machining, 3D printing, skiving equipment and friction stir welding, allowing engineers to move quickly from CAD designs to physical prototypes. Some work is aimed several processor generations ahead. CoolIT is also experimenting with two-phase thermal technologies. That does not mean the company expects two-phase cooling to displace single-phase DLC wholesale. Robison sees the technologies as potentially complementary. Two-phase techniques can be particularly effective for moving heat from localized areas, using approaches such as vapor chambers and heat pipes. But operating an entire data center cooling loop through repeated phase changes introduces another set of system-engineering challenges. CoolIT’s position is that single-phase cooling still has significant room to advance through better geometries, flow management and system design, while two-phase technologies may emerge where they provide a specific thermal advantage. That is a more useful way to think about the cooling transition than searching for a single architecture that wins outright. AI servers are becoming collections of thermal problems rather than a single thermal problem. Processors, memory, networking and storage may ultimately require different cooling approaches even within the same system. The thermal architecture is likely to become more diverse as density rises. Cooling Becomes Infrastructure Walking through the CoolIT campus in Calgary, the most striking feature was not any single cold plate, manifold or CDU. It was the amount of infrastructure now required to develop and validate the cooling infrastructure itself. A cold plate begins as a carefully engineered flow path measured in millimeters. Several steps later, that component has become part of a megawatt-scale thermal system involving pumps, controls, manifolds, piping, facility water and field technicians. And before that system reaches a data center,

Rewiring global capability centers for the AI era

When a global capability center (GCC) underdelivers, the diagnosis is usually people: wrong hires, wrong scope, not enough seniority. It’s rarely the honest answer. More often the center was wired like a branch office and asked to behave like a headquarters. The GCC has evolved from an offshore cost play to a strategic extension of HQ, owning engineering, product, and, increasingly, the AI build. This is no longer solely for the Fortune 500. Leaner centers of 50–200 people, as well as ‘GCC-as-a-service’ and managed models, put it within reach of many US midmarket companies. Demand for AI is accelerating this trend further. India alone now has more than 2,000 GCCs, generating $98.4 billion in revenue in the fiscal year 2026. “A GCC is never about cost effectiveness, it’s about tapping the best talent to take enterprises to the next technological orbit. The GCC model is shifting to intellectual arbitrage,” says Murali Krishnan, AVP & Head of Business – Enterprise Network at Tata Communications. With lower barriers to entry, midmarket companies are looking to tap into this opportunity. However, this size of business tends to carry a domestic, branch-office playbook into a GCC and wire it accordingly. While that network was good enough for a branch office, it actively limits what a GCC can do and can limit their return on investment. Midmarket companies looking to tap into this opportunity face a structural mismatch. Existing networks connect offices to a data center inside one country, with bandwidth sized accordingly. A GCC introduces AI workloads across several clouds and two continents, and the branch office network reaches its design limits. What AI-driven workflows demand from the network The growth in GCCs, alongside the rapid adoption of AI, has increased strain on the network, driving demand for high-performance connectivity across geographies. Model training, data-pipeline engineering,

Google’s first prototype satellite is going up, kicking off its space-based data center project

Google announced its Project Suncatcher space-based data center plan last November. The goal is to take advantage of the unlimited sunlight of space and to minimize the impact of data centers here on Earth. Next week, the first satellite is going up on the SpaceX Transporter-18 mission, Google announced yesterday. The prototype satellite will test how Google’s AI chips—its Tensor Processing Units—perform in space, says Travis Beals, Google’s Senior Director, Paradigms of Intelligence, in the announcement. Google has already conducted some testing here on Earth. The TPU chips were able to handle the level of vibration and acceleration that they would see during the launch, and be able to survive a bigger radiation dose than they would receive during a five-year space mission. In addition, the team has tested a cooling system—a combination of heat pipes and radiators—in a thermal vacuum chamber that simulates space.

Anthropic, OpenAI Keep Expanding the AI Data Center Map — and the Financing Gets Harder

September has offered one of the clearest pictures yet of what the frontier AI race looks like when translated from models and tokens into physical infrastructure. Anthropic has moved aggressively to lock down dedicated compute in the United States while establishing its first major data center foothold in Australia. OpenAI, meanwhile, has expanded into Malaysia through Nvidia-backed Firmus as the financing behind its much larger infrastructure ambitions continues to grow more complicated. All in all, the developments suggest that competition between the leading AI labs is entering another phase. Securing GPUs remains essential, but the harder problem is increasingly assembling the entire chain around them: land, power, cooling, networks, project finance and counterparties capable of delivering capacity measured in hundreds of megawatts — and increasingly gigawatts. That distinction is important for the data center industry. The AI infrastructure story is no longer simply about projected demand. It is increasingly about which commitments can actually become operating megawatts. Anthropic’s $45 Billion Bet Gets More Concrete The most revealing new detail came not from Anthropic itself, but from Nscale. The Nvidia-backed AI infrastructure provider filed for a U.S. initial public offering on Sept. 18, providing new financial and technical detail around a massive compute agreement first reported in August. Nscale’s SEC filing says it entered four GPU services agreements with Anthropic on Aug. 25 that could generate approximately $44.6 billion in aggregate payments. The agreements call for Nscale to provide Anthropic with dedicated infrastructure built around Nvidia Vera Rubin NVL72 systems at the company’s planned Monarch Compute Campus in Mason County, West Virginia. The deployments are structured in four tranches with multiyear service terms. Reuters previously reported the agreement at roughly $45 billion over six years, covering about 460 MW of compute capacity at Monarch. (The agreement follows Anthropic’s $19 billion, 401-MW

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs). In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE