Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

Practical SQL Puzzles That Will Level Up Your Skill

There are some Sql patterns that, once you know them, you start seeing them everywhere. The solutions to the puzzles that I will show you today are actually very simple SQL queries, but understanding the concept behind them will surely unlock new solutions to the queries you write on a day-to-day basis. These challenges are all based on real-world scenarios, as over the past few months I made a point of writing down every puzzle-like query that I had to build. I also encourage you to try them for yourself, so that you can challenge yourself first, which will improve your learning! All queries to generate the datasets will be provided in a PostgreSQL and DuckDB-friendly syntax, so that you can easily copy and play with them. At the end I will also provide you a link to a GitHub repo containing all the code, as well as the answer to the bonus challenge I will leave for you! I organized these puzzles in order of increasing difficulty, so, if you find the first ones too easy, at least take a look at the last one, which uses a technique that I truly believe you won’t have seen before. Okay, let’s get started. I love this puzzle because of how short and simple the final query is, even though it deals with many edge cases. The data for this challenge shows tickets moving in between Kanban stages, and the objective is to find how long, on average, tickets stay in the Doing stage. The data contains the ID of the ticket, the date the ticket was created, the date of the move, and the “from” and “to” stages of the move. The stages present are New, Doing, Review, and Done. Some things you need to know (edge cases): Tickets can move backwards, meaning tickets can go back to the Doing stage. You should not include tickets that are still stuck in the Doing stage, as there is no way to know how long they will stay there for. Tickets are not always created in the New stage. “`SQL CREATE TABLE ticket_moves ( ticket_id INT NOT NULL, create_date DATE NOT NULL, move_date DATE NOT NULL, from_stage TEXT NOT NULL, to_stage TEXT NOT NULL ); “` “`SQL INSERT INTO ticket_moves (ticket_id, create_date, move_date, from_stage, to_stage) VALUES — Ticket 1: Created in “New”, then moves to Doing, Review, Done. (1, ‘2024-09-01’, ‘2024-09-03’, ‘New’, ‘Doing’), (1, ‘2024-09-01’, ‘2024-09-07’, ‘Doing’, ‘Review’), (1, ‘2024-09-01’, ‘2024-09-10’, ‘Review’, ‘Done’), — Ticket 2: Created in “New”, then moves: New → Doing → Review → Doing again → Review. (2, ‘2024-09-05’, ‘2024-09-08’, ‘New’, ‘Doing’), (2, ‘2024-09-05’, ‘2024-09-12’, ‘Doing’, ‘Review’), (2, ‘2024-09-05’, ‘2024-09-15’, ‘Review’, ‘Doing’), (2, ‘2024-09-05’, ‘2024-09-20’, ‘Doing’, ‘Review’), — Ticket 3: Created in “New”, then moves to Doing. (Edge case: no subsequent move from Doing.) (3, ‘2024-09-10’, ‘2024-09-16’, ‘New’, ‘Doing’), — Ticket 4: Created already in “Doing”, then moves to Review. (4, ‘2024-09-15’, ‘2024-09-22’, ‘Doing’, ‘Review’); “` A summary of the data: Ticket 1: Created in the New stage, moves normally to Doing, then Review, and then Done. Ticket 2: Created in New, then moves: New → Doing → Review → Doing again → Review. Ticket 3: Created in New, moves to Doing, but it is still stuck there. Ticket 4: Created in the Doing stage, moves to Review afterward. It might be a good idea to stop for a bit and think how you would deal with this. Can you find out how long a ticket stays on a single stage? Honestly, this sounds intimidating at first, and it looks like it will be a nightmare to deal with all the edge cases. Let me show you the full solution to the problem, and then I will explain what is happening afterward. “`SQL WITH stage_intervals AS (     SELECT         ticket_id,         from_stage,         move_date          – COALESCE(             LAG(move_date) OVER (                 PARTITION BY ticket_id                  ORDER BY move_date             ),              create_date         ) AS days_in_stage     FROM         ticket_moves ) SELECT     SUM(days_in_stage) / COUNT(DISTINCT ticket_id) as avg_days_in_doing FROM     stage_intervals WHERE     from_stage = ‘Doing’; “` The first CTE uses the LAG function to find the previous move of the ticket, which will be the time the ticket entered that stage. Calculating the duration is as simple as subtracting the previous date from the move date. What you should notice is the use of the COALESCE in the previous move date. What that does is that if a ticket doesn’t have a previous move, then it uses the date of creation of the ticket. This takes care of the cases of tickets being created directly into the Doing stage, as it still will properly calculate the time it took to leave the stage. This is the result of the first CTE, showing the time spent in each stage. Notice how the Ticket 2 has two entries, as it visited the Doing stage in two separate occasions. With this done, it’s just a matter of getting the average as the SUM of total days spent in doing, divided by the distinct number of tickets that ever left the stage. Doing it this way, instead of simply using the AVG, makes sure that the two rows for Ticket 2 get properly accounted for as a single ticket. Not so bad, right? The goal of this second challenge is to find the most recent contract sequence of every employee. A break of sequence happens when two contracts have a gap of more than one day between them.  In this dataset, there are no contract overlaps, meaning that a contract for the same employee either has a gap or ends a day before the new one starts. “`SQL CREATE TABLE contracts (     contract_id integer PRIMARY KEY,     employee_id integer NOT NULL,     start_date date NOT NULL,     end_date date NOT NULL ); INSERT INTO contracts (contract_id, employee_id, start_date, end_date) VALUES      — Employee 1: Two continuous contracts     (1, 1, ‘2024-01-01’, ‘2024-03-31’),     (2, 1, ‘2024-04-01’, ‘2024-06-30’),     — Employee 2: One contract, then a gap of three days, then two contracts     (3, 2, ‘2024-01-01’, ‘2024-02-15’),     (4, 2, ‘2024-02-19’, ‘2024-04-30’),     (5, 2, ‘2024-05-01’, ‘2024-07-31’),     — Employee 3: One contract     (6, 3, ‘2024-03-01’, ‘2024-08-31’); “` As a summary of the data: Employee 1: Has two continuous contracts. Employee 2: One contract, then a gap of three days, then two contracts. Employee 3: One contract. The expected result, given the dataset, is that all contracts should be included except for the first contract of Employee 2, which is the only one that has a gap. Before explaining the logic behind the solution, I would like you to think about what operation can be used to join the contracts that belong to the same sequence. Focus only on the second row of data, what information do you need to know if this contract was a break or not? I hope it’s clear that this is the perfect situation for window functions, again. They are incredibly useful for solving problems like this, and understanding when to use them helps a lot in finding clean solutions to problems. First thing to do, then, is to get the end date of the previous contract for the same employee with the LAG function. Doing that, it’s simple to compare both dates and check if it was a break of sequence. “`SQL WITH ordered_contracts AS (     SELECT         *,         LAG(end_date) OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id ORDER BY start_date) AS previous_end_date     FROM         contracts ), gapped_contracts AS (     SELECT         *,         — Deals with the case of the first contract, which won’t have         — a previous end date. In this case, it’s still the start of a new         — sequence.         CASE WHEN previous_end_date IS NULL             OR previous_end_date < start_date – INTERVAL '1 day' THEN             1         ELSE             0         END AS is_new_sequence     FROM         ordered_contracts ) SELECT * FROM gapped_contracts ORDER BY employee_id ASC; “` An intuitive way to continue the query is to number the sequences of each employee. For example, an employee who has no gap, will always be on his first sequence, but an employee who had 5 breaks in contracts will be on his 5th sequence. Funnily enough, this is done by another window function. “`SQL — — Previous CTEs — sequences AS (     SELECT         *,         SUM(is_new_sequence) OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id ORDER BY start_date) AS sequence_id FROM     gapped_contracts ) SELECT * FROM sequences ORDER BY employee_id ASC; “` Notice how, for Employee 2, he starts his sequence #2 after the first gapped value. To finish this query, I grouped the data by employee, got the value of their most recent sequence, and then did an inner join with the sequences to keep only the most recent one. “`SQL — — Previous CTEs — max_sequence AS (     SELECT         employee_id,         MAX(sequence_id) AS max_sequence_id FROM     sequences GROUP BY     employee_id ), latest_contract_sequence AS (     SELECT         c.contract_id,         c.employee_id,         c.start_date,         c.end_date     FROM         sequences c         JOIN max_sequence m ON c.sequence_id = m.max_sequence_id             AND c.employee_id = m.employee_id         ORDER BY             c.employee_id,             c.start_date ) SELECT     * FROM     latest_contract_sequence; “` As expected, our final result is basically our starting query just with the first contract of Employee 2 missing!  Finally, the last puzzle — I’m glad you made it this far.  For me, this is the most mind-blowing one, as when I first encountered this problem I thought of a completely different solution that would be a mess to implement in SQL. For this puzzle, I’ve changed the context from what I had to deal with for my job, as I think it will make it easier to explain.  Imagine you’re a data analyst at an event venue, and you’re analyzing the talks scheduled for an upcoming event. You want to find the time of day where there will be the highest number of talks happening at the same time. This is what you should know about the schedules: Rooms are booked in increments of 30min, e.g. from 9h-10h30. The data is clean, there are no overbookings of meeting rooms. There can be back-to-back meetings in a single meeting room. Meeting schedule visualized (this is the actual data).  “`SQL CREATE TABLE meetings (     room TEXT NOT NULL,     start_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,     end_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL ); INSERT INTO meetings (room, start_time, end_time) VALUES     — Room A meetings     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 10:00', '2024-10-01 11:00'),     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 11:00', '2024-10-01 12:00'),     — Room B meetings     ('Room B', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 11:30'),     — Room C meetings     ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),     ('Room C', '2024-10-01 11:30', '2024-10-01 12:00'); “` The way to solve this is using what is called a Sweep Line Algorithm, or also known as an event-based solution. This last name actually helps to understand what will be done, as the idea is that instead of dealing with intervals, which is what we have in the original data, we deal with events instead. To do this, we need to transform every row into two separate events. The first event will be the Start of the meeting, and the second event will be the End of the meeting. “`SQL WITH events AS (   — Create an event for the start of each meeting (+1)   SELECT      start_time AS event_time,      1 AS delta   FROM meetings   UNION ALL   — Create an event for the end of each meeting (-1)   SELECT     — Small trick to work with the back-to-back meetings (explained later)     end_time – interval '1 minute' as end_time,     -1 AS delta   FROM meetings ) SELECT * FROM events; “` Take the time to understand what is happening here. To create two events from a single row of data, we’re simply unioning the dataset on itself; the first half uses the start time as the timestamp, and the second part uses the end time. You might already notice the delta column created and see where this is going. When an event starts, we count it as +1, when it ends, we count it as -1. You might even be already thinking of another window function to solve this, and you’re actually right! But before that, let me just explain the trick I used in the end dates. As I don’t want back-to-back meetings to count as two concurrent meetings, I’m subtracting a single minute of every end date. This way, if a meeting ends and another starts at 10h30, it won’t be assumed that two meetings are concurrently happening at 10h30. Okay, back to the query and yet another window function. This time, though, the function of choice is a rolling SUM. “`SQL — — Previous CTEs — ordered_events AS (   SELECT     event_time,     delta,     SUM(delta) OVER (ORDER BY event_time, delta DESC) AS concurrent_meetings   FROM events ) SELECT * FROM ordered_events ORDER BY event_time DESC; “` The rolling SUM at the Delta column is essentially walking down every record and finding how many events are active at that time. For example, at 9 am sharp, it sees two events starting, so it marks the number of concurrent meetings as two! When the third meeting starts, the count goes up to three. But when it gets to 9h59 (10 am), then two meetings end, bringing the counter back to one. With this data, the only thing missing is to find when the highest value of concurrent meetings happens. “`SQL — — Previous CTEs — max_events AS (   — Find the maximum concurrent meetings value   SELECT      event_time,      concurrent_meetings,     RANK() OVER (ORDER BY concurrent_meetings DESC) AS rnk   FROM ordered_events ) SELECT event_time, concurrent_meetings FROM max_events WHERE rnk = 1; “` That’s it! The interval of 9h30–10h is the one with the largest number of concurrent meetings, which checks out with the schedule visualization above! This solution looks incredibly simple in my opinion, and it works for so many situations. Every time you are dealing with intervals now, you should think if the query wouldn’t be easier if you thought about it in the perspective of events. But before you move on, and to really nail down this concept, I want to leave you with a bonus challenge, which is also a common application of the Sweep Line Algorithm. I hope you give it a try! Bonus challenge The context for this one is still the same as the last puzzle, but now, instead of trying to find the period when there are most concurrent meetings, the objective is to find bad scheduling. It seems that there are overlaps in the meeting rooms, which need to be listed so it can be fixed ASAP. How would you find out if the same meeting room has two or more meetings booked at the same time? Here are some tips on how to solve it: It’s still the same algorithm. This means you will still do the UNION, but it will look slightly different. You should think in the perspective of each meeting room. You can use this data for the challenge: “`SQL CREATE TABLE meetings_overlap (     room TEXT NOT NULL,     start_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,     end_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL ); INSERT INTO meetings_overlap (room, start_time, end_time) VALUES     — Room A meetings     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 10:00', '2024-10-01 11:00'),     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 11:00', '2024-10-01 12:00'),     — Room B meetings     ('Room B', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 11:30'),     — Room C meetings     ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),     — Overlaps with previous meeting.     ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 12:00'); “` If you’re interested in the solution to this puzzle, as well as the rest of the queries, check this GitHub repo. The first takeaway from this blog post is that window functions are overpowered. Ever since I got more comfortable with using them, I feel that my queries have gotten so much simpler and easier to read, and I hope the same happens to you. If you’re interested in learning more about them, you would probably enjoy reading this other blog post I’ve written, where I go over how you can understand and use them effectively. The second takeaway is that these patterns used in the challenges really do happen in many other places. You might need to find sequences of subscriptions, customer retention, or you might need to find overlap of tasks. There are many situations when you will need to use window functions in a very similar fashion to what was done in the puzzles. The third thing I want you to remember is about this solution to using events besides dealing with intervals. I’ve looked at some problems I solved a long time ago that I could’ve used this pattern on to make my life easier, and unfortunately, I didn’t know about it at the time. I really do hope you enjoyed this post and gave a shot to the puzzles yourself. And I’m sure that if you made it this far, you either learned something new about SQL or strengthened your knowledge of window functions!  Thank you so much for reading. If you have questions or just want to get in touch with me, don’t hesitate to contact me at mtrentz.com. All images by the author unless stated otherwise.

There are some Sql patterns that, once you know them, you start seeing them everywhere. The solutions to the puzzles that I will show you today are actually very simple SQL queries, but understanding the concept behind them will surely unlock new solutions to the queries you write on a day-to-day basis.

These challenges are all based on real-world scenarios, as over the past few months I made a point of writing down every puzzle-like query that I had to build. I also encourage you to try them for yourself, so that you can challenge yourself first, which will improve your learning!

All queries to generate the datasets will be provided in a PostgreSQL and DuckDB-friendly syntax, so that you can easily copy and play with them. At the end I will also provide you a link to a GitHub repo containing all the code, as well as the answer to the bonus challenge I will leave for you!

I organized these puzzles in order of increasing difficulty, so, if you find the first ones too easy, at least take a look at the last one, which uses a technique that I truly believe you won’t have seen before.

Okay, let’s get started.

I love this puzzle because of how short and simple the final query is, even though it deals with many edge cases. The data for this challenge shows tickets moving in between Kanban stages, and the objective is to find how long, on average, tickets stay in the Doing stage.

The data contains the ID of the ticket, the date the ticket was created, the date of the move, and the “from” and “to” stages of the move. The stages present are New, Doing, Review, and Done.

Some things you need to know (edge cases):

  • Tickets can move backwards, meaning tickets can go back to the Doing stage.
  • You should not include tickets that are still stuck in the Doing stage, as there is no way to know how long they will stay there for.
  • Tickets are not always created in the New stage.
```SQL

CREATE TABLE ticket_moves (
    ticket_id INT NOT NULL,
    create_date DATE NOT NULL,
    move_date DATE NOT NULL,
    from_stage TEXT NOT NULL,
    to_stage TEXT NOT NULL
);

```
```SQL

INSERT INTO ticket_moves (ticket_id, create_date, move_date, from_stage, to_stage)
    VALUES
        -- Ticket 1: Created in "New", then moves to Doing, Review, Done.
        (1, '2024-09-01', '2024-09-03', 'New', 'Doing'),
        (1, '2024-09-01', '2024-09-07', 'Doing', 'Review'),
        (1, '2024-09-01', '2024-09-10', 'Review', 'Done'),
        -- Ticket 2: Created in "New", then moves: New → Doing → Review → Doing again → Review.
        (2, '2024-09-05', '2024-09-08', 'New', 'Doing'),
        (2, '2024-09-05', '2024-09-12', 'Doing', 'Review'),
        (2, '2024-09-05', '2024-09-15', 'Review', 'Doing'),
        (2, '2024-09-05', '2024-09-20', 'Doing', 'Review'),
        -- Ticket 3: Created in "New", then moves to Doing. (Edge case: no subsequent move from Doing.)
        (3, '2024-09-10', '2024-09-16', 'New', 'Doing'),
        -- Ticket 4: Created already in "Doing", then moves to Review.
        (4, '2024-09-15', '2024-09-22', 'Doing', 'Review');
```

A summary of the data:

  • Ticket 1: Created in the New stage, moves normally to Doing, then Review, and then Done.
  • Ticket 2: Created in New, then moves: New → Doing → Review → Doing again → Review.
  • Ticket 3: Created in New, moves to Doing, but it is still stuck there.
  • Ticket 4: Created in the Doing stage, moves to Review afterward.

It might be a good idea to stop for a bit and think how you would deal with this. Can you find out how long a ticket stays on a single stage?

Honestly, this sounds intimidating at first, and it looks like it will be a nightmare to deal with all the edge cases. Let me show you the full solution to the problem, and then I will explain what is happening afterward.

```SQL

WITH stage_intervals AS (
    SELECT
        ticket_id,
        from_stage,
        move_date 
        - COALESCE(
            LAG(move_date) OVER (
                PARTITION BY ticket_id 
                ORDER BY move_date
            ), 
            create_date
        ) AS days_in_stage
    FROM
        ticket_moves
)
SELECT
    SUM(days_in_stage) / COUNT(DISTINCT ticket_id) as avg_days_in_doing
FROM
    stage_intervals
WHERE
    from_stage = 'Doing';
```

The first CTE uses the LAG function to find the previous move of the ticket, which will be the time the ticket entered that stage. Calculating the duration is as simple as subtracting the previous date from the move date.

What you should notice is the use of the COALESCE in the previous move date. What that does is that if a ticket doesn’t have a previous move, then it uses the date of creation of the ticket. This takes care of the cases of tickets being created directly into the Doing stage, as it still will properly calculate the time it took to leave the stage.

This is the result of the first CTE, showing the time spent in each stage. Notice how the Ticket 2 has two entries, as it visited the Doing stage in two separate occasions.

With this done, it’s just a matter of getting the average as the SUM of total days spent in doing, divided by the distinct number of tickets that ever left the stage. Doing it this way, instead of simply using the AVG, makes sure that the two rows for Ticket 2 get properly accounted for as a single ticket.

Not so bad, right?

The goal of this second challenge is to find the most recent contract sequence of every employee. A break of sequence happens when two contracts have a gap of more than one day between them. 

In this dataset, there are no contract overlaps, meaning that a contract for the same employee either has a gap or ends a day before the new one starts.

```SQL
CREATE TABLE contracts (
    contract_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
    employee_id integer NOT NULL,
    start_date date NOT NULL,
    end_date date NOT NULL
);

INSERT INTO contracts (contract_id, employee_id, start_date, end_date)
VALUES 
    -- Employee 1: Two continuous contracts
    (1, 1, '2024-01-01', '2024-03-31'),
    (2, 1, '2024-04-01', '2024-06-30'),
    -- Employee 2: One contract, then a gap of three days, then two contracts
    (3, 2, '2024-01-01', '2024-02-15'),
    (4, 2, '2024-02-19', '2024-04-30'),
    (5, 2, '2024-05-01', '2024-07-31'),
    -- Employee 3: One contract
    (6, 3, '2024-03-01', '2024-08-31');
```

As a summary of the data:

  • Employee 1: Has two continuous contracts.
  • Employee 2: One contract, then a gap of three days, then two contracts.
  • Employee 3: One contract.

The expected result, given the dataset, is that all contracts should be included except for the first contract of Employee 2, which is the only one that has a gap.

Before explaining the logic behind the solution, I would like you to think about what operation can be used to join the contracts that belong to the same sequence. Focus only on the second row of data, what information do you need to know if this contract was a break or not?

I hope it’s clear that this is the perfect situation for window functions, again. They are incredibly useful for solving problems like this, and understanding when to use them helps a lot in finding clean solutions to problems.

First thing to do, then, is to get the end date of the previous contract for the same employee with the LAG function. Doing that, it’s simple to compare both dates and check if it was a break of sequence.

```SQL
WITH ordered_contracts AS (
    SELECT
        *,
        LAG(end_date) OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id ORDER BY start_date) AS previous_end_date
    FROM
        contracts
),
gapped_contracts AS (
    SELECT
        *,
        -- Deals with the case of the first contract, which won't have
        -- a previous end date. In this case, it's still the start of a new
        -- sequence.
        CASE WHEN previous_end_date IS NULL
            OR previous_end_date < start_date - INTERVAL '1 day' THEN
            1
        ELSE
            0
        END AS is_new_sequence
    FROM
        ordered_contracts
)
SELECT * FROM gapped_contracts ORDER BY employee_id ASC;
```

An intuitive way to continue the query is to number the sequences of each employee. For example, an employee who has no gap, will always be on his first sequence, but an employee who had 5 breaks in contracts will be on his 5th sequence. Funnily enough, this is done by another window function.

```SQL
--
-- Previous CTEs
--
sequences AS (
    SELECT
        *,
        SUM(is_new_sequence) OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id ORDER BY start_date) AS sequence_id
FROM
    gapped_contracts
)
SELECT * FROM sequences ORDER BY employee_id ASC;
```

Notice how, for Employee 2, he starts his sequence #2 after the first gapped value. To finish this query, I grouped the data by employee, got the value of their most recent sequence, and then did an inner join with the sequences to keep only the most recent one.

```SQL
--
-- Previous CTEs
--
max_sequence AS (
    SELECT
        employee_id,
        MAX(sequence_id) AS max_sequence_id
FROM
    sequences
GROUP BY
    employee_id
),
latest_contract_sequence AS (
    SELECT
        c.contract_id,
        c.employee_id,
        c.start_date,
        c.end_date
    FROM
        sequences c
        JOIN max_sequence m ON c.sequence_id = m.max_sequence_id
            AND c.employee_id = m.employee_id
        ORDER BY
            c.employee_id,
            c.start_date
)
SELECT
    *
FROM
    latest_contract_sequence;
```

As expected, our final result is basically our starting query just with the first contract of Employee 2 missing! 

Finally, the last puzzle — I’m glad you made it this far. 

For me, this is the most mind-blowing one, as when I first encountered this problem I thought of a completely different solution that would be a mess to implement in SQL.

For this puzzle, I’ve changed the context from what I had to deal with for my job, as I think it will make it easier to explain. 

Imagine you’re a data analyst at an event venue, and you’re analyzing the talks scheduled for an upcoming event. You want to find the time of day where there will be the highest number of talks happening at the same time.

This is what you should know about the schedules:

  • Rooms are booked in increments of 30min, e.g. from 9h-10h30.
  • The data is clean, there are no overbookings of meeting rooms.
  • There can be back-to-back meetings in a single meeting room.

Meeting schedule visualized (this is the actual data). 

```SQL
CREATE TABLE meetings (
    room TEXT NOT NULL,
    start_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
    end_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL
);

INSERT INTO meetings (room, start_time, end_time) VALUES
    -- Room A meetings
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 10:00', '2024-10-01 11:00'),
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 11:00', '2024-10-01 12:00'),
    -- Room B meetings
    ('Room B', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 11:30'),
    -- Room C meetings
    ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),
    ('Room C', '2024-10-01 11:30', '2024-10-01 12:00');
```

The way to solve this is using what is called a Sweep Line Algorithm, or also known as an event-based solution. This last name actually helps to understand what will be done, as the idea is that instead of dealing with intervals, which is what we have in the original data, we deal with events instead.

To do this, we need to transform every row into two separate events. The first event will be the Start of the meeting, and the second event will be the End of the meeting.

```SQL
WITH events AS (
  -- Create an event for the start of each meeting (+1)
  SELECT 
    start_time AS event_time, 
    1 AS delta
  FROM meetings
  UNION ALL
  -- Create an event for the end of each meeting (-1)
  SELECT 
   -- Small trick to work with the back-to-back meetings (explained later)
    end_time - interval '1 minute' as end_time,
    -1 AS delta
  FROM meetings
)
SELECT * FROM events;
```

Take the time to understand what is happening here. To create two events from a single row of data, we’re simply unioning the dataset on itself; the first half uses the start time as the timestamp, and the second part uses the end time.

You might already notice the delta column created and see where this is going. When an event starts, we count it as +1, when it ends, we count it as -1. You might even be already thinking of another window function to solve this, and you’re actually right!

But before that, let me just explain the trick I used in the end dates. As I don’t want back-to-back meetings to count as two concurrent meetings, I’m subtracting a single minute of every end date. This way, if a meeting ends and another starts at 10h30, it won’t be assumed that two meetings are concurrently happening at 10h30.

Okay, back to the query and yet another window function. This time, though, the function of choice is a rolling SUM.

```SQL
--
-- Previous CTEs
--
ordered_events AS (
  SELECT
    event_time,
    delta,
    SUM(delta) OVER (ORDER BY event_time, delta DESC) AS concurrent_meetings
  FROM events
)
SELECT * FROM ordered_events ORDER BY event_time DESC;
```

The rolling SUM at the Delta column is essentially walking down every record and finding how many events are active at that time. For example, at 9 am sharp, it sees two events starting, so it marks the number of concurrent meetings as two!

When the third meeting starts, the count goes up to three. But when it gets to 9h59 (10 am), then two meetings end, bringing the counter back to one. With this data, the only thing missing is to find when the highest value of concurrent meetings happens.

```SQL
--
-- Previous CTEs
--
max_events AS (
  -- Find the maximum concurrent meetings value
  SELECT 
    event_time, 
    concurrent_meetings,
    RANK() OVER (ORDER BY concurrent_meetings DESC) AS rnk
  FROM ordered_events
)
SELECT event_time, concurrent_meetings
FROM max_events
WHERE rnk = 1;
```

That’s it! The interval of 9h30–10h is the one with the largest number of concurrent meetings, which checks out with the schedule visualization above!

This solution looks incredibly simple in my opinion, and it works for so many situations. Every time you are dealing with intervals now, you should think if the query wouldn’t be easier if you thought about it in the perspective of events.

But before you move on, and to really nail down this concept, I want to leave you with a bonus challenge, which is also a common application of the Sweep Line Algorithm. I hope you give it a try!

Bonus challenge

The context for this one is still the same as the last puzzle, but now, instead of trying to find the period when there are most concurrent meetings, the objective is to find bad scheduling. It seems that there are overlaps in the meeting rooms, which need to be listed so it can be fixed ASAP.

How would you find out if the same meeting room has two or more meetings booked at the same time? Here are some tips on how to solve it:

  • It’s still the same algorithm.
  • This means you will still do the UNION, but it will look slightly different.
  • You should think in the perspective of each meeting room.

You can use this data for the challenge:

```SQL
CREATE TABLE meetings_overlap (
    room TEXT NOT NULL,
    start_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
    end_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL
);

INSERT INTO meetings_overlap (room, start_time, end_time) VALUES
    -- Room A meetings
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 10:00', '2024-10-01 11:00'),
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 11:00', '2024-10-01 12:00'),
    -- Room B meetings
    ('Room B', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 11:30'),
    -- Room C meetings
    ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),
    -- Overlaps with previous meeting.
    ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 12:00');
```

If you’re interested in the solution to this puzzle, as well as the rest of the queries, check this GitHub repo.

The first takeaway from this blog post is that window functions are overpowered. Ever since I got more comfortable with using them, I feel that my queries have gotten so much simpler and easier to read, and I hope the same happens to you.

If you’re interested in learning more about them, you would probably enjoy reading this other blog post I’ve written, where I go over how you can understand and use them effectively.

The second takeaway is that these patterns used in the challenges really do happen in many other places. You might need to find sequences of subscriptions, customer retention, or you might need to find overlap of tasks. There are many situations when you will need to use window functions in a very similar fashion to what was done in the puzzles.

The third thing I want you to remember is about this solution to using events besides dealing with intervals. I’ve looked at some problems I solved a long time ago that I could’ve used this pattern on to make my life easier, and unfortunately, I didn’t know about it at the time.


I really do hope you enjoyed this post and gave a shot to the puzzles yourself. And I’m sure that if you made it this far, you either learned something new about SQL or strengthened your knowledge of window functions! 

Thank you so much for reading. If you have questions or just want to get in touch with me, don’t hesitate to contact me at mtrentz.com.

All images by the author unless stated otherwise.

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

SolarWinds buys Squadcast to speed incident response

Squadcast customers shared their experiences with the technology. “Since implementing Squadcast, we’ve reduced incoming alerts from tens of thousands to hundreds, thanks to flexible deduplication. It has a direct impact on reducing alert fatigue and increasing awareness,” said Avner Yaacov, Senior Manager at Redis, in a statement. According to SolarWinds,

Read More »

Norway Opens Application for One CO2 Storage Exploration Area

Norway’s Energy Ministry has designated another area of the North Sea for application for licenses to explore the potential of carbon dioxide (CO2) storage. The acreage comprises defined blocks on the Norwegian side of the sea, upstream regulator the Norwegian Offshore Directorate said in an online statement. This is the eighth time acreage is being offered for CO2 storage exploration or exploitation on the Norwegian continental shelf, it noted. The application window for the latest acreage offer closes April 23. “In line with the regulations on transportation and storage of CO2 into subsea reservoirs on the continental shelf, the ministry normally expects to award an exploration license prior to awarding an exploitation license in a relevant area”, the Energy Ministry said separately. Norway has so far awarded 13 CO2 storage licenses: 12 for exploration and one for exploitation. Energy Minister Terje Aasland commented, “The purpose of allocating land is to be able to offer stakeholders in Europe large-scale CO2 storage on commercial terms”. Licensing for CO2 storage is part of Norwegian regulations passed December 2014 to support CO2 storage to mitigate climate change.  “Norway has great potential for storage on the continental shelf”, the ministry added. The Norwegian continental shelf holds a theoretical CO2 storage capacity of 80 billion metric tons, representing about 1,600 years of Norwegian CO2 emissions at current levels, according to a statement by the ministry April 30, 2024. In the latest awards two consortiums with Norway’s majority state-owned Equinor ASA won two exploration licenses in the North Sea. Equinor and London-based Harbour Energy PLC together won a permit straddling blocks 15/8, 15/9, 15/11 and 15/12. The permit, EXL012, lasts four years with three phases. Harbour Energy Norge AS holds a 60 percent stake as operator while Equinor Low Carbon Solution AS has 40 percent, according to a work

Read More »

MP for Truro and Falmouth calls for Cornwall offshore wind strategy

A Labour politician in Cornwall has called for the region to ramp up its domestic offshore wind supply chain. Jayne Kirkham, member of parliament for Truro and Falmouth, said: “At a recent Celtic Sea Power event, I saw just how many brilliant companies are doing amazing things here.” She made the comments months after The Crown Estate entered the second stage of leasing acreage in the Celtic Seas last autumn. “Cornwall has a long history of industrial innovation,” Kirkham said while meeting with marine construction firm MintMech in Penryn. “We’ve got the heritage and the expertise, now we need a strategy that ensures Cornwall maximises the benefits of offshore wind.” The Crown Estate entered the latest phase in its fifth offshore wind leasing round to establish floating offshore wind farms in the Celtic Sea, off the south-west of England and South Wales coast, in August. The second phase of the leasing round was launched, in which bidders must lay out plans to deliver new wind farms and explain how they will benefit local communities. The round has the potential to source up to 4.5GW of new wind capacity and spur investment in the local supply chain. Kirkham expressed hope that Cornish companies will soon be busy on UK projects. She said there are ongoing conversations with the National Energy System Operator (NESO) about ensuring potential wind energy hubs are well connected to the grid. The minister also referenced The Crown Estate’s £50 million Supply Chain Development Fund, which was launched to ensure the UK is prepared to meet offshore wind demands. The first £5m from the fund was awarded in 2024. Kirkham met with directors of Penryn-based marine construction firm MintMech in Jubilee Wharf to discuss the role Cornwall can play in the expansion of the UK’s offshore wind industry.

Read More »

Payroll in USA Oil and Gas Totals $168 Billion in 2024

Payroll in the U.S. oil and gas industry totaled $168 billion in 2024. That’s what the Texas Independent Producers & Royalty Owners Association (TIPRO) said in its latest State of Energy report, which was released this week, highlighting that this figure was “an increase of nearly $5 billion compared to the previous year”. Texas had the highest oil and gas payroll in the country in 2024, according to the report, which pointed out that this figure stood at $62 billion. The report outlined that California was “a distant second” with an oil and gas payroll figure of $15 billion, and that Louisiana was third, with an oil and gas payroll figure of $10 billion. Gasoline Stations with Convenience Stores had the highest U.S. oil and gas payroll by industry figure last year, at $26.8 billion, the report showed. Support Activities for Oil and Gas Operations had the second highest U.S. oil and gas payroll by industry figure in 2024, at $23.9 billion, and Crude Petroleum Extraction had the third highest, at $19.1 billion, the report outlined. The number of U.S. oil and gas businesses totaled 165,110, subject to revisions, TIPRO’s latest report stated. It highlighted that direct oil and natural gas Gross Regional Product exceeded $1 trillion last year and said the U.S. oil and natural gas industry purchased goods and services from over 900 different U.S. industry sectors in the amount of $865 billion in 2024. According to the report, Texas had the highest number of oil and gas businesses in the nation last year, with 23,549. This was followed by California, with 9,486 oil and gas businesses, Florida, with 7,695 oil and gas businesses, Georgia, with 6,453 oil and gas businesses, and New York, with 5,768 oil and gas businesses, the report outlined. The report noted that, in

Read More »

European Commission Proposes to Extend Gas Storage Regulation to 2027

The European Commission has formally proposed to prolong to 2027 a regulation requiring that natural gas storage facilities in the European Union be at least 90 percent full by November each year. “In the current geopolitical context and volatile situation in the global gas markets, this 2-year extension will contribute to ensuring continued security of energy supply across the EU and stability of the European gas market”, the Commission said in an online statement. “It will notably ensure that the EU prepares for the upcoming winter seasons in a coordinated manner”. The Gas Storage Regulation was adopted June 2022 at the height of the energy crisis. It will expire at the end of 2025. “The EU’s significant gas storage capacities and EU storage facilities are the main supply source of gas in winter, ensuring 30 percent of EU winter supply”, the Commission added. “Enabling companies to purchase and store cheaper gas in summer, when demand is lower in the EU, helps to make energy more affordable for EU citizens”. The regulation has helped the 27-member bloc resolve gas shortages and provided a cushion against market uncertainties and price volatility, says the proposal published on the Commission’s website. While the current situation has improved compared to 2022-23, “the European gas market remains tight”, thus the need to continue storing gas, according to the proposal. “More intense competition for global LNG supplies can increase Member States’ exposure to price volatility”, the proposal says. “The gas price development during the 2024/2025 winter may confirm the trend”. The regulation contains intermediary filling targets for the months of February, May, July and September. “Predictable filling trajectories increase transparency and prevent market distortion”, the proposal says. According to the intermediary targets this year, as announced by the Commission November 29, 2024, most member states including top gas consumers Germany, Italy and

Read More »

EnQuest launches bid for Serica Energy

Serica Energy and EnQuest are in discussions about a possible transaction to combine the two companies. According to a company statement, the board of Serica believes that a combined company will have greater scale and diversification, as well as unlocking synergies and providing a stronger platform for further growth. Although discussions are ongoing, the transaction will likely be structured as an all share offer by EnQuest for Serica by way of a reverse takeover under the UK Listing Rules. This would involve a return of capital to existing Serica shareholders conditional upon completion of the transaction, and that Serica shareholders would hold a majority of the shares in the enlarged company with shares listed on the equity shares (commercial companies) (ESCC) of the London Stock Exchange. The Serica Energy statement added that there is currently no certainty either that an offer will be made, nor as to the terms on which such offer will be made. EnQuest will need to make a firm intention of an offer for Serica or that it does not intend to make such an offer by 4 April 2025, though this deadline can be extended. Recommended for you Saipem and Subsea7 unveil €20bn merger plan

Read More »

Aramco CEO Says Company Is Deploying AI Tech at Scale

In Saudi Aramco’s latest results statement, which was posted on the company’s site this week, Aramco President and CEO Amin H. Nasser said Aramco is “adopting and deploying AI technologies and solutions at scale” across its operations. Nasser outlined in the statement that this is “unlocking greater efficiencies and value creation throughout” the company. In a statement posted on Aramco’s site in September, Aramco’s EVP of Technology & Innovation, Ahmad Al-Khowaiter, said “new digital technologies such as generative AI and the Industrial Internet of Things are expected to transform not only how we work, but also our commercial environment”. “Aramco is pioneering the use of these technologies at an industrial scale to add significant value across our operations. Our history of innovation inspires us to continue harnessing emerging technologies and help realize the Kingdom’s ambitions to become a global AI leader,” he added. The statement posted on Aramco’s site in September noted that, during the Global AI Summit (GAIN) – which took place in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in September 2024 – Aramco signed Memoranda of Understanding (MoU) with Cerebras Systems and FuriosaAI to explore collaboration in the supercomputing and AI domains. It said another MoU signed with Rebellions focuses on potential deployment of the latter’s Neural Processing Unit chips in Aramco’s data centers, with a view to enhancing digital infrastructure and driving advanced AI innovations, and noted that Aramco signed another MoU with SambaNova Systems to explore ways to accelerate AI capabilities, innovation, and Kingdom-wide adoption. “Aramco also announced the deployment of an AI supercomputer, one of the first systems of its kind in the region,” Aramco added in that statement. “Powered by some of the most powerful NVIDIA Graphical Processing Units (GPUs), it is designed to accelerate complex computing tasks like analyzing drilling plans and geological data to recommend

Read More »

Seven important trends in the server sphere

The pace of change around server technology is advancing considerably, driven by hyperscalers but spilling over into the on-premises world as well. There are numerous overall trends, experts say, including: AI Everything: AI mania is everywhere and without high power hardware to run it, it’s just vapor. But it’s more than just a buzzword, it is a very real and measurable trend. AI servers are notable because they are decked out with high end CPUs, GPU accelerators, and oftentimes a SmartNIC network controller.  All the major players — Nvidia, Supermicro, Google, Asus, Dell, Intel, HPE — as well as smaller vendors are offering purpose-built AI hardware, according to a recent Network World article. AI edge server growth: There is also a trend towards deploying AI edge servers. The Global Edge AI Servers Market size is expected to be worth around $26.6 Billion by 2034, from $2.7 Billion in 2024, according to a Market.US report. Considerable amounts of data are collected on the edge.  Edge servers do the job of culling the useless data and sending only the necessary data back to data centers for processing. The market is rapidly expanding as industries such as manufacturing, automotive, healthcare, and retail increasingly deploy IoT devices and require immediate data processing for decision-making and operational efficiency, according to the report. Liquid cooling gains ground: Liquid cooling is inching its way in from the fringes into the mainstream of data center infrastructure. What was once a difficult add-on is now becoming a standard feature, says Jeffrey Hewitt, vice president and analyst with Gartner. “Server providers are working on developing the internal chassis plumbing for direct-to-chip cooling with the goal of supporting the next generation of AI CPUs and GPUs that will produce high amounts of heat within their servers,” he said.  New data center structures: Not

Read More »

Data center vacancies hit historic lows despite record construction

The growth comes despite considerable headwinds facing data center operators, including higher construction costs, equipment pricing, and persistent shortages in critical materials like generators, chillers and transformers, CRBE stated. There is a considerable pricing disparity between newly built data centers and legacy facilities, reflecting the premium placed on modern, energy-efficient infrastructure. Specifically, liquid/immersion cooling is preferred over air cooling for modern server requirements, CRBE found. On the networking side of things, major telecom companies made substantial investments in fiber in the second half of 2024, reflecting the growing need for more network infrastructure and capacity to accommodate growing demand from AI and data providers. There have also been many notable deals recently: AT&T’s multi-year, $1 billion agreement with Corning to provide next-generation fiber, cable and connectivity solutions; Comcast’s proposed acquisition of Nitel; Verizon’s agreement to acquire Frontier, the largest pure-play fiber internet provider in the U.S.; and T-Mobile’s entry into the fiber internet market via partnerships with fiber-optic providers. In the quarter, Meta announced plans for a 25,000-mile undersea fiber cable that would connect the U.S. East and West coasts with global markets across the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific oceans. The project would mark the first privately owned and operated global fiber cable network. Data Center Outlook

Read More »

AI driving a 165% rise in data center power demand by 2030

Goldman Sachs Research estimates the power usage by the global data center market to be around 55 gigawatts, which breaks down as 54% for cloud computing workloads, 32% for traditional line of business workloads and 14% for AI. By 2027, that number jumps to 84 GW, with AI growing to 27% of the overall market, cloud dropping to 50%, and traditional workloads falling to 23%, Schneider stated. Goldman Sachs Research estimates that there will be around 122 GW of data center capacity online by the end of 2030, and the density of power use in data centers is likely to grow as well, from 162 kilowatts per square foot to 176 KW per square foot in 2027, thanks to AI, Schneider stated.  “Data center supply — specifically the rate at which incremental supply is built — has been constrained over the past 18 months,” Schneider wrote. These constraints have arisen from the inability of utilities to expand transmission capacity because of permitting delays, supply chain bottlenecks, and infrastructure that is both costly and time-intensive to upgrade. The result is that due to power demand from data centers, there will need to be additional utility investment, to the tune of about $720 billion of grid spending through 2030. And then they are subject to the pace of public utilities, which move much slower than hyperscalers. “These transmission projects can take several years to permit, and then several more to build, creating another potential bottleneck for data center growth if the regions are not proactive about this given the lead time,” Schneider wrote.

Read More »

Top data storage certifications to sharpen your skills

Organization: Hitachi Vantara Skills acquired: Knowledge of data center infrastructure management tasks automation using Hitachi Ops Center Automator. Price: $100 Exam duration: 60 minutes How to prepare: Knowledge of all storage-related operations from an end-user perspective, including planning, allocating, and managing storage and architecting storage layouts. Read more about Hitachi Vantara’s training and certification options here. Certifications that bundle cloud, networking and storage skills AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional The AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional certification from leading cloud provider Amazon Web Services (AWS) helps individuals showcase advanced knowledge and skills in optimizing security, cost, and performance, and automating manual processes. The certification is a means for organizations to identify and develop talent with these skills for implementing cloud initiatives, according to AWS. The ideal candidate has the ability to evaluate cloud application requirements, make architectural recommendations for deployment of applications on AWS, and provide expert guidance on architectural design across multiple applications and projects within a complex organization, AWS says. Certified individuals report increased credibility with technical colleagues and customers as a result of earning this certification, it says. Organization: Amazon Web Services Skills acquired: Helps individuals showcase skills in optimizing security, cost, and performance, and automating manual processes Price: $300 Exam duration: 180 minutes How to prepare: The recommended experience prior to taking the exam is two or more years of experience in using AWS services to design and implement cloud solutions Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert (CCIE) Data Center The Cisco CCIE Data Center certification enables individuals to demonstrate advanced skills to plan, design, deploy, operate, and optimize complex data center networks. They will gain comprehensive expertise in orchestrating data center infrastructure, focusing on seamless integration of networking, compute, and storage components. Other skills gained include building scalable, low-latency, high-performance networks that are optimized to support artificial intelligence (AI)

Read More »

Netskope expands SASE footprint, bolsters AI and automation

Netskope is expanding its global presence by adding multiple regions to its NewEdge carrier-grade infrastructure, which now includes more than 75 locations to ensure processing remains close to end users. The secure access service edge (SASE) provider also enhanced its digital experience monitoring (DEM) capabilities with AI-powered root-cause analysis and automated network diagnostics. “We are announcing continued expansion of our infrastructure and our continued focus on resilience. I’m a believer that nothing gets adopted if end users don’t have a great experience,” says Netskope CEO Sanjay Beri. “We monitor traffic, we have multiple carriers in every one of our more than 75 regions, and when traffic goes from us to that destination, the path is direct.” Netskope added regions including data centers in Calgary, Helsinki, Lisbon, and Prague as well as expanded existing NewEdge regions including data centers in Bogota, Jeddah, Osaka, and New York City. Each data center offers customers a range of SASE capabilities including cloud firewalls, secure web gateway (SWG), inline cloud access security broker (CASB), zero trust network access (ZTNA), SD-WAN, secure service edge (SSE), and threat protection. The additional locations enable Netskope to provide coverage for more than 220 countries and territories with 200 NewEdge Localization Zones, which deliver a local direct-to-net digital experience for users, the company says.

Read More »

Inside the Nuclear Race for Data Center Energy with Aalo Atomics CEO Matt Loszak

The latest episode of the DCF Show podcast delves into one of the most pressing challenges facing the data center industry today: the search for sustainable, high-density power solutions. And how, as hyperscale operators like Google and Meta contend with growing energy demands—and, in some cases, resistance from utilities unwilling or unable to support their expanding footprints—the conversation around nuclear energy has intensified.  Both legacy nuclear providers and innovative startups are racing to secure the future business of data center giants, each bringing unique approaches to the table. Our guest for this podcast episode is Matt Loszak, co-founder and CEO of Aalo Atomics, an Austin-based company that’s taking a fresh approach to nuclear energy. Aalo, which secured a $29.5 million Series A funding round in 2024, stands out in the nuclear sector with its 10-megawatt sodium-cooled reactor design—eliminating the need for water, a critical advantage for siting flexibility. Inspired by the Department of Energy’s MARVEL microreactor, Aalo’s technology benefits from direct expertise, as the company’s CTO was the chief architect behind MARVEL. Beyond reactor design, Aalo’s vision extends to full-scale modular plant production. Instead of just building reactors, the company aims to manufacture entire nuclear plants using prefabricated, LEGO-style components. The fully modular plants, shipped in standard containers, are designed to match the footprint of a data center while requiring no onsite water—features that could make them particularly attractive to hyperscale operators seeking localized, high-density power.  Aalo has already made significant strides, with the Department of Energy identifying land at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) as a potential site for its first nuclear facility. The company is on an accelerated timeline, expecting to complete a non-nuclear prototype within three months and break ground on its first nuclear reactor in about a year—remarkably fast progress for the nuclear industry. In our discussion,

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »