Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

Practical SQL Puzzles That Will Level Up Your Skill

There are some Sql patterns that, once you know them, you start seeing them everywhere. The solutions to the puzzles that I will show you today are actually very simple SQL queries, but understanding the concept behind them will surely unlock new solutions to the queries you write on a day-to-day basis. These challenges are all based on real-world scenarios, as over the past few months I made a point of writing down every puzzle-like query that I had to build. I also encourage you to try them for yourself, so that you can challenge yourself first, which will improve your learning! All queries to generate the datasets will be provided in a PostgreSQL and DuckDB-friendly syntax, so that you can easily copy and play with them. At the end I will also provide you a link to a GitHub repo containing all the code, as well as the answer to the bonus challenge I will leave for you! I organized these puzzles in order of increasing difficulty, so, if you find the first ones too easy, at least take a look at the last one, which uses a technique that I truly believe you won’t have seen before. Okay, let’s get started. I love this puzzle because of how short and simple the final query is, even though it deals with many edge cases. The data for this challenge shows tickets moving in between Kanban stages, and the objective is to find how long, on average, tickets stay in the Doing stage. The data contains the ID of the ticket, the date the ticket was created, the date of the move, and the “from” and “to” stages of the move. The stages present are New, Doing, Review, and Done. Some things you need to know (edge cases): Tickets can move backwards, meaning tickets can go back to the Doing stage. You should not include tickets that are still stuck in the Doing stage, as there is no way to know how long they will stay there for. Tickets are not always created in the New stage. “`SQL CREATE TABLE ticket_moves ( ticket_id INT NOT NULL, create_date DATE NOT NULL, move_date DATE NOT NULL, from_stage TEXT NOT NULL, to_stage TEXT NOT NULL ); “` “`SQL INSERT INTO ticket_moves (ticket_id, create_date, move_date, from_stage, to_stage) VALUES — Ticket 1: Created in “New”, then moves to Doing, Review, Done. (1, ‘2024-09-01’, ‘2024-09-03’, ‘New’, ‘Doing’), (1, ‘2024-09-01’, ‘2024-09-07’, ‘Doing’, ‘Review’), (1, ‘2024-09-01’, ‘2024-09-10’, ‘Review’, ‘Done’), — Ticket 2: Created in “New”, then moves: New → Doing → Review → Doing again → Review. (2, ‘2024-09-05’, ‘2024-09-08’, ‘New’, ‘Doing’), (2, ‘2024-09-05’, ‘2024-09-12’, ‘Doing’, ‘Review’), (2, ‘2024-09-05’, ‘2024-09-15’, ‘Review’, ‘Doing’), (2, ‘2024-09-05’, ‘2024-09-20’, ‘Doing’, ‘Review’), — Ticket 3: Created in “New”, then moves to Doing. (Edge case: no subsequent move from Doing.) (3, ‘2024-09-10’, ‘2024-09-16’, ‘New’, ‘Doing’), — Ticket 4: Created already in “Doing”, then moves to Review. (4, ‘2024-09-15’, ‘2024-09-22’, ‘Doing’, ‘Review’); “` A summary of the data: Ticket 1: Created in the New stage, moves normally to Doing, then Review, and then Done. Ticket 2: Created in New, then moves: New → Doing → Review → Doing again → Review. Ticket 3: Created in New, moves to Doing, but it is still stuck there. Ticket 4: Created in the Doing stage, moves to Review afterward. It might be a good idea to stop for a bit and think how you would deal with this. Can you find out how long a ticket stays on a single stage? Honestly, this sounds intimidating at first, and it looks like it will be a nightmare to deal with all the edge cases. Let me show you the full solution to the problem, and then I will explain what is happening afterward. “`SQL WITH stage_intervals AS (     SELECT         ticket_id,         from_stage,         move_date          – COALESCE(             LAG(move_date) OVER (                 PARTITION BY ticket_id                  ORDER BY move_date             ),              create_date         ) AS days_in_stage     FROM         ticket_moves ) SELECT     SUM(days_in_stage) / COUNT(DISTINCT ticket_id) as avg_days_in_doing FROM     stage_intervals WHERE     from_stage = ‘Doing’; “` The first CTE uses the LAG function to find the previous move of the ticket, which will be the time the ticket entered that stage. Calculating the duration is as simple as subtracting the previous date from the move date. What you should notice is the use of the COALESCE in the previous move date. What that does is that if a ticket doesn’t have a previous move, then it uses the date of creation of the ticket. This takes care of the cases of tickets being created directly into the Doing stage, as it still will properly calculate the time it took to leave the stage. This is the result of the first CTE, showing the time spent in each stage. Notice how the Ticket 2 has two entries, as it visited the Doing stage in two separate occasions. With this done, it’s just a matter of getting the average as the SUM of total days spent in doing, divided by the distinct number of tickets that ever left the stage. Doing it this way, instead of simply using the AVG, makes sure that the two rows for Ticket 2 get properly accounted for as a single ticket. Not so bad, right? The goal of this second challenge is to find the most recent contract sequence of every employee. A break of sequence happens when two contracts have a gap of more than one day between them.  In this dataset, there are no contract overlaps, meaning that a contract for the same employee either has a gap or ends a day before the new one starts. “`SQL CREATE TABLE contracts (     contract_id integer PRIMARY KEY,     employee_id integer NOT NULL,     start_date date NOT NULL,     end_date date NOT NULL ); INSERT INTO contracts (contract_id, employee_id, start_date, end_date) VALUES      — Employee 1: Two continuous contracts     (1, 1, ‘2024-01-01’, ‘2024-03-31’),     (2, 1, ‘2024-04-01’, ‘2024-06-30’),     — Employee 2: One contract, then a gap of three days, then two contracts     (3, 2, ‘2024-01-01’, ‘2024-02-15’),     (4, 2, ‘2024-02-19’, ‘2024-04-30’),     (5, 2, ‘2024-05-01’, ‘2024-07-31’),     — Employee 3: One contract     (6, 3, ‘2024-03-01’, ‘2024-08-31’); “` As a summary of the data: Employee 1: Has two continuous contracts. Employee 2: One contract, then a gap of three days, then two contracts. Employee 3: One contract. The expected result, given the dataset, is that all contracts should be included except for the first contract of Employee 2, which is the only one that has a gap. Before explaining the logic behind the solution, I would like you to think about what operation can be used to join the contracts that belong to the same sequence. Focus only on the second row of data, what information do you need to know if this contract was a break or not? I hope it’s clear that this is the perfect situation for window functions, again. They are incredibly useful for solving problems like this, and understanding when to use them helps a lot in finding clean solutions to problems. First thing to do, then, is to get the end date of the previous contract for the same employee with the LAG function. Doing that, it’s simple to compare both dates and check if it was a break of sequence. “`SQL WITH ordered_contracts AS (     SELECT         *,         LAG(end_date) OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id ORDER BY start_date) AS previous_end_date     FROM         contracts ), gapped_contracts AS (     SELECT         *,         — Deals with the case of the first contract, which won’t have         — a previous end date. In this case, it’s still the start of a new         — sequence.         CASE WHEN previous_end_date IS NULL             OR previous_end_date < start_date – INTERVAL '1 day' THEN             1         ELSE             0         END AS is_new_sequence     FROM         ordered_contracts ) SELECT * FROM gapped_contracts ORDER BY employee_id ASC; “` An intuitive way to continue the query is to number the sequences of each employee. For example, an employee who has no gap, will always be on his first sequence, but an employee who had 5 breaks in contracts will be on his 5th sequence. Funnily enough, this is done by another window function. “`SQL — — Previous CTEs — sequences AS (     SELECT         *,         SUM(is_new_sequence) OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id ORDER BY start_date) AS sequence_id FROM     gapped_contracts ) SELECT * FROM sequences ORDER BY employee_id ASC; “` Notice how, for Employee 2, he starts his sequence #2 after the first gapped value. To finish this query, I grouped the data by employee, got the value of their most recent sequence, and then did an inner join with the sequences to keep only the most recent one. “`SQL — — Previous CTEs — max_sequence AS (     SELECT         employee_id,         MAX(sequence_id) AS max_sequence_id FROM     sequences GROUP BY     employee_id ), latest_contract_sequence AS (     SELECT         c.contract_id,         c.employee_id,         c.start_date,         c.end_date     FROM         sequences c         JOIN max_sequence m ON c.sequence_id = m.max_sequence_id             AND c.employee_id = m.employee_id         ORDER BY             c.employee_id,             c.start_date ) SELECT     * FROM     latest_contract_sequence; “` As expected, our final result is basically our starting query just with the first contract of Employee 2 missing!  Finally, the last puzzle — I’m glad you made it this far.  For me, this is the most mind-blowing one, as when I first encountered this problem I thought of a completely different solution that would be a mess to implement in SQL. For this puzzle, I’ve changed the context from what I had to deal with for my job, as I think it will make it easier to explain.  Imagine you’re a data analyst at an event venue, and you’re analyzing the talks scheduled for an upcoming event. You want to find the time of day where there will be the highest number of talks happening at the same time. This is what you should know about the schedules: Rooms are booked in increments of 30min, e.g. from 9h-10h30. The data is clean, there are no overbookings of meeting rooms. There can be back-to-back meetings in a single meeting room. Meeting schedule visualized (this is the actual data).  “`SQL CREATE TABLE meetings (     room TEXT NOT NULL,     start_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,     end_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL ); INSERT INTO meetings (room, start_time, end_time) VALUES     — Room A meetings     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 10:00', '2024-10-01 11:00'),     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 11:00', '2024-10-01 12:00'),     — Room B meetings     ('Room B', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 11:30'),     — Room C meetings     ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),     ('Room C', '2024-10-01 11:30', '2024-10-01 12:00'); “` The way to solve this is using what is called a Sweep Line Algorithm, or also known as an event-based solution. This last name actually helps to understand what will be done, as the idea is that instead of dealing with intervals, which is what we have in the original data, we deal with events instead. To do this, we need to transform every row into two separate events. The first event will be the Start of the meeting, and the second event will be the End of the meeting. “`SQL WITH events AS (   — Create an event for the start of each meeting (+1)   SELECT      start_time AS event_time,      1 AS delta   FROM meetings   UNION ALL   — Create an event for the end of each meeting (-1)   SELECT     — Small trick to work with the back-to-back meetings (explained later)     end_time – interval '1 minute' as end_time,     -1 AS delta   FROM meetings ) SELECT * FROM events; “` Take the time to understand what is happening here. To create two events from a single row of data, we’re simply unioning the dataset on itself; the first half uses the start time as the timestamp, and the second part uses the end time. You might already notice the delta column created and see where this is going. When an event starts, we count it as +1, when it ends, we count it as -1. You might even be already thinking of another window function to solve this, and you’re actually right! But before that, let me just explain the trick I used in the end dates. As I don’t want back-to-back meetings to count as two concurrent meetings, I’m subtracting a single minute of every end date. This way, if a meeting ends and another starts at 10h30, it won’t be assumed that two meetings are concurrently happening at 10h30. Okay, back to the query and yet another window function. This time, though, the function of choice is a rolling SUM. “`SQL — — Previous CTEs — ordered_events AS (   SELECT     event_time,     delta,     SUM(delta) OVER (ORDER BY event_time, delta DESC) AS concurrent_meetings   FROM events ) SELECT * FROM ordered_events ORDER BY event_time DESC; “` The rolling SUM at the Delta column is essentially walking down every record and finding how many events are active at that time. For example, at 9 am sharp, it sees two events starting, so it marks the number of concurrent meetings as two! When the third meeting starts, the count goes up to three. But when it gets to 9h59 (10 am), then two meetings end, bringing the counter back to one. With this data, the only thing missing is to find when the highest value of concurrent meetings happens. “`SQL — — Previous CTEs — max_events AS (   — Find the maximum concurrent meetings value   SELECT      event_time,      concurrent_meetings,     RANK() OVER (ORDER BY concurrent_meetings DESC) AS rnk   FROM ordered_events ) SELECT event_time, concurrent_meetings FROM max_events WHERE rnk = 1; “` That’s it! The interval of 9h30–10h is the one with the largest number of concurrent meetings, which checks out with the schedule visualization above! This solution looks incredibly simple in my opinion, and it works for so many situations. Every time you are dealing with intervals now, you should think if the query wouldn’t be easier if you thought about it in the perspective of events. But before you move on, and to really nail down this concept, I want to leave you with a bonus challenge, which is also a common application of the Sweep Line Algorithm. I hope you give it a try! Bonus challenge The context for this one is still the same as the last puzzle, but now, instead of trying to find the period when there are most concurrent meetings, the objective is to find bad scheduling. It seems that there are overlaps in the meeting rooms, which need to be listed so it can be fixed ASAP. How would you find out if the same meeting room has two or more meetings booked at the same time? Here are some tips on how to solve it: It’s still the same algorithm. This means you will still do the UNION, but it will look slightly different. You should think in the perspective of each meeting room. You can use this data for the challenge: “`SQL CREATE TABLE meetings_overlap (     room TEXT NOT NULL,     start_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,     end_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL ); INSERT INTO meetings_overlap (room, start_time, end_time) VALUES     — Room A meetings     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 10:00', '2024-10-01 11:00'),     ('Room A', '2024-10-01 11:00', '2024-10-01 12:00'),     — Room B meetings     ('Room B', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 11:30'),     — Room C meetings     ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),     — Overlaps with previous meeting.     ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 12:00'); “` If you’re interested in the solution to this puzzle, as well as the rest of the queries, check this GitHub repo. The first takeaway from this blog post is that window functions are overpowered. Ever since I got more comfortable with using them, I feel that my queries have gotten so much simpler and easier to read, and I hope the same happens to you. If you’re interested in learning more about them, you would probably enjoy reading this other blog post I’ve written, where I go over how you can understand and use them effectively. The second takeaway is that these patterns used in the challenges really do happen in many other places. You might need to find sequences of subscriptions, customer retention, or you might need to find overlap of tasks. There are many situations when you will need to use window functions in a very similar fashion to what was done in the puzzles. The third thing I want you to remember is about this solution to using events besides dealing with intervals. I’ve looked at some problems I solved a long time ago that I could’ve used this pattern on to make my life easier, and unfortunately, I didn’t know about it at the time. I really do hope you enjoyed this post and gave a shot to the puzzles yourself. And I’m sure that if you made it this far, you either learned something new about SQL or strengthened your knowledge of window functions!  Thank you so much for reading. If you have questions or just want to get in touch with me, don’t hesitate to contact me at mtrentz.com. All images by the author unless stated otherwise.

There are some Sql patterns that, once you know them, you start seeing them everywhere. The solutions to the puzzles that I will show you today are actually very simple SQL queries, but understanding the concept behind them will surely unlock new solutions to the queries you write on a day-to-day basis.

These challenges are all based on real-world scenarios, as over the past few months I made a point of writing down every puzzle-like query that I had to build. I also encourage you to try them for yourself, so that you can challenge yourself first, which will improve your learning!

All queries to generate the datasets will be provided in a PostgreSQL and DuckDB-friendly syntax, so that you can easily copy and play with them. At the end I will also provide you a link to a GitHub repo containing all the code, as well as the answer to the bonus challenge I will leave for you!

I organized these puzzles in order of increasing difficulty, so, if you find the first ones too easy, at least take a look at the last one, which uses a technique that I truly believe you won’t have seen before.

Okay, let’s get started.

I love this puzzle because of how short and simple the final query is, even though it deals with many edge cases. The data for this challenge shows tickets moving in between Kanban stages, and the objective is to find how long, on average, tickets stay in the Doing stage.

The data contains the ID of the ticket, the date the ticket was created, the date of the move, and the “from” and “to” stages of the move. The stages present are New, Doing, Review, and Done.

Some things you need to know (edge cases):

  • Tickets can move backwards, meaning tickets can go back to the Doing stage.
  • You should not include tickets that are still stuck in the Doing stage, as there is no way to know how long they will stay there for.
  • Tickets are not always created in the New stage.
```SQL

CREATE TABLE ticket_moves (
    ticket_id INT NOT NULL,
    create_date DATE NOT NULL,
    move_date DATE NOT NULL,
    from_stage TEXT NOT NULL,
    to_stage TEXT NOT NULL
);

```
```SQL

INSERT INTO ticket_moves (ticket_id, create_date, move_date, from_stage, to_stage)
    VALUES
        -- Ticket 1: Created in "New", then moves to Doing, Review, Done.
        (1, '2024-09-01', '2024-09-03', 'New', 'Doing'),
        (1, '2024-09-01', '2024-09-07', 'Doing', 'Review'),
        (1, '2024-09-01', '2024-09-10', 'Review', 'Done'),
        -- Ticket 2: Created in "New", then moves: New → Doing → Review → Doing again → Review.
        (2, '2024-09-05', '2024-09-08', 'New', 'Doing'),
        (2, '2024-09-05', '2024-09-12', 'Doing', 'Review'),
        (2, '2024-09-05', '2024-09-15', 'Review', 'Doing'),
        (2, '2024-09-05', '2024-09-20', 'Doing', 'Review'),
        -- Ticket 3: Created in "New", then moves to Doing. (Edge case: no subsequent move from Doing.)
        (3, '2024-09-10', '2024-09-16', 'New', 'Doing'),
        -- Ticket 4: Created already in "Doing", then moves to Review.
        (4, '2024-09-15', '2024-09-22', 'Doing', 'Review');
```

A summary of the data:

  • Ticket 1: Created in the New stage, moves normally to Doing, then Review, and then Done.
  • Ticket 2: Created in New, then moves: New → Doing → Review → Doing again → Review.
  • Ticket 3: Created in New, moves to Doing, but it is still stuck there.
  • Ticket 4: Created in the Doing stage, moves to Review afterward.

It might be a good idea to stop for a bit and think how you would deal with this. Can you find out how long a ticket stays on a single stage?

Honestly, this sounds intimidating at first, and it looks like it will be a nightmare to deal with all the edge cases. Let me show you the full solution to the problem, and then I will explain what is happening afterward.

```SQL

WITH stage_intervals AS (
    SELECT
        ticket_id,
        from_stage,
        move_date 
        - COALESCE(
            LAG(move_date) OVER (
                PARTITION BY ticket_id 
                ORDER BY move_date
            ), 
            create_date
        ) AS days_in_stage
    FROM
        ticket_moves
)
SELECT
    SUM(days_in_stage) / COUNT(DISTINCT ticket_id) as avg_days_in_doing
FROM
    stage_intervals
WHERE
    from_stage = 'Doing';
```

The first CTE uses the LAG function to find the previous move of the ticket, which will be the time the ticket entered that stage. Calculating the duration is as simple as subtracting the previous date from the move date.

What you should notice is the use of the COALESCE in the previous move date. What that does is that if a ticket doesn’t have a previous move, then it uses the date of creation of the ticket. This takes care of the cases of tickets being created directly into the Doing stage, as it still will properly calculate the time it took to leave the stage.

This is the result of the first CTE, showing the time spent in each stage. Notice how the Ticket 2 has two entries, as it visited the Doing stage in two separate occasions.

With this done, it’s just a matter of getting the average as the SUM of total days spent in doing, divided by the distinct number of tickets that ever left the stage. Doing it this way, instead of simply using the AVG, makes sure that the two rows for Ticket 2 get properly accounted for as a single ticket.

Not so bad, right?

The goal of this second challenge is to find the most recent contract sequence of every employee. A break of sequence happens when two contracts have a gap of more than one day between them. 

In this dataset, there are no contract overlaps, meaning that a contract for the same employee either has a gap or ends a day before the new one starts.

```SQL
CREATE TABLE contracts (
    contract_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
    employee_id integer NOT NULL,
    start_date date NOT NULL,
    end_date date NOT NULL
);

INSERT INTO contracts (contract_id, employee_id, start_date, end_date)
VALUES 
    -- Employee 1: Two continuous contracts
    (1, 1, '2024-01-01', '2024-03-31'),
    (2, 1, '2024-04-01', '2024-06-30'),
    -- Employee 2: One contract, then a gap of three days, then two contracts
    (3, 2, '2024-01-01', '2024-02-15'),
    (4, 2, '2024-02-19', '2024-04-30'),
    (5, 2, '2024-05-01', '2024-07-31'),
    -- Employee 3: One contract
    (6, 3, '2024-03-01', '2024-08-31');
```

As a summary of the data:

  • Employee 1: Has two continuous contracts.
  • Employee 2: One contract, then a gap of three days, then two contracts.
  • Employee 3: One contract.

The expected result, given the dataset, is that all contracts should be included except for the first contract of Employee 2, which is the only one that has a gap.

Before explaining the logic behind the solution, I would like you to think about what operation can be used to join the contracts that belong to the same sequence. Focus only on the second row of data, what information do you need to know if this contract was a break or not?

I hope it’s clear that this is the perfect situation for window functions, again. They are incredibly useful for solving problems like this, and understanding when to use them helps a lot in finding clean solutions to problems.

First thing to do, then, is to get the end date of the previous contract for the same employee with the LAG function. Doing that, it’s simple to compare both dates and check if it was a break of sequence.

```SQL
WITH ordered_contracts AS (
    SELECT
        *,
        LAG(end_date) OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id ORDER BY start_date) AS previous_end_date
    FROM
        contracts
),
gapped_contracts AS (
    SELECT
        *,
        -- Deals with the case of the first contract, which won't have
        -- a previous end date. In this case, it's still the start of a new
        -- sequence.
        CASE WHEN previous_end_date IS NULL
            OR previous_end_date < start_date - INTERVAL '1 day' THEN
            1
        ELSE
            0
        END AS is_new_sequence
    FROM
        ordered_contracts
)
SELECT * FROM gapped_contracts ORDER BY employee_id ASC;
```

An intuitive way to continue the query is to number the sequences of each employee. For example, an employee who has no gap, will always be on his first sequence, but an employee who had 5 breaks in contracts will be on his 5th sequence. Funnily enough, this is done by another window function.

```SQL
--
-- Previous CTEs
--
sequences AS (
    SELECT
        *,
        SUM(is_new_sequence) OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id ORDER BY start_date) AS sequence_id
FROM
    gapped_contracts
)
SELECT * FROM sequences ORDER BY employee_id ASC;
```

Notice how, for Employee 2, he starts his sequence #2 after the first gapped value. To finish this query, I grouped the data by employee, got the value of their most recent sequence, and then did an inner join with the sequences to keep only the most recent one.

```SQL
--
-- Previous CTEs
--
max_sequence AS (
    SELECT
        employee_id,
        MAX(sequence_id) AS max_sequence_id
FROM
    sequences
GROUP BY
    employee_id
),
latest_contract_sequence AS (
    SELECT
        c.contract_id,
        c.employee_id,
        c.start_date,
        c.end_date
    FROM
        sequences c
        JOIN max_sequence m ON c.sequence_id = m.max_sequence_id
            AND c.employee_id = m.employee_id
        ORDER BY
            c.employee_id,
            c.start_date
)
SELECT
    *
FROM
    latest_contract_sequence;
```

As expected, our final result is basically our starting query just with the first contract of Employee 2 missing! 

Finally, the last puzzle — I’m glad you made it this far. 

For me, this is the most mind-blowing one, as when I first encountered this problem I thought of a completely different solution that would be a mess to implement in SQL.

For this puzzle, I’ve changed the context from what I had to deal with for my job, as I think it will make it easier to explain. 

Imagine you’re a data analyst at an event venue, and you’re analyzing the talks scheduled for an upcoming event. You want to find the time of day where there will be the highest number of talks happening at the same time.

This is what you should know about the schedules:

  • Rooms are booked in increments of 30min, e.g. from 9h-10h30.
  • The data is clean, there are no overbookings of meeting rooms.
  • There can be back-to-back meetings in a single meeting room.

Meeting schedule visualized (this is the actual data). 

```SQL
CREATE TABLE meetings (
    room TEXT NOT NULL,
    start_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
    end_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL
);

INSERT INTO meetings (room, start_time, end_time) VALUES
    -- Room A meetings
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 10:00', '2024-10-01 11:00'),
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 11:00', '2024-10-01 12:00'),
    -- Room B meetings
    ('Room B', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 11:30'),
    -- Room C meetings
    ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),
    ('Room C', '2024-10-01 11:30', '2024-10-01 12:00');
```

The way to solve this is using what is called a Sweep Line Algorithm, or also known as an event-based solution. This last name actually helps to understand what will be done, as the idea is that instead of dealing with intervals, which is what we have in the original data, we deal with events instead.

To do this, we need to transform every row into two separate events. The first event will be the Start of the meeting, and the second event will be the End of the meeting.

```SQL
WITH events AS (
  -- Create an event for the start of each meeting (+1)
  SELECT 
    start_time AS event_time, 
    1 AS delta
  FROM meetings
  UNION ALL
  -- Create an event for the end of each meeting (-1)
  SELECT 
   -- Small trick to work with the back-to-back meetings (explained later)
    end_time - interval '1 minute' as end_time,
    -1 AS delta
  FROM meetings
)
SELECT * FROM events;
```

Take the time to understand what is happening here. To create two events from a single row of data, we’re simply unioning the dataset on itself; the first half uses the start time as the timestamp, and the second part uses the end time.

You might already notice the delta column created and see where this is going. When an event starts, we count it as +1, when it ends, we count it as -1. You might even be already thinking of another window function to solve this, and you’re actually right!

But before that, let me just explain the trick I used in the end dates. As I don’t want back-to-back meetings to count as two concurrent meetings, I’m subtracting a single minute of every end date. This way, if a meeting ends and another starts at 10h30, it won’t be assumed that two meetings are concurrently happening at 10h30.

Okay, back to the query and yet another window function. This time, though, the function of choice is a rolling SUM.

```SQL
--
-- Previous CTEs
--
ordered_events AS (
  SELECT
    event_time,
    delta,
    SUM(delta) OVER (ORDER BY event_time, delta DESC) AS concurrent_meetings
  FROM events
)
SELECT * FROM ordered_events ORDER BY event_time DESC;
```

The rolling SUM at the Delta column is essentially walking down every record and finding how many events are active at that time. For example, at 9 am sharp, it sees two events starting, so it marks the number of concurrent meetings as two!

When the third meeting starts, the count goes up to three. But when it gets to 9h59 (10 am), then two meetings end, bringing the counter back to one. With this data, the only thing missing is to find when the highest value of concurrent meetings happens.

```SQL
--
-- Previous CTEs
--
max_events AS (
  -- Find the maximum concurrent meetings value
  SELECT 
    event_time, 
    concurrent_meetings,
    RANK() OVER (ORDER BY concurrent_meetings DESC) AS rnk
  FROM ordered_events
)
SELECT event_time, concurrent_meetings
FROM max_events
WHERE rnk = 1;
```

That’s it! The interval of 9h30–10h is the one with the largest number of concurrent meetings, which checks out with the schedule visualization above!

This solution looks incredibly simple in my opinion, and it works for so many situations. Every time you are dealing with intervals now, you should think if the query wouldn’t be easier if you thought about it in the perspective of events.

But before you move on, and to really nail down this concept, I want to leave you with a bonus challenge, which is also a common application of the Sweep Line Algorithm. I hope you give it a try!

Bonus challenge

The context for this one is still the same as the last puzzle, but now, instead of trying to find the period when there are most concurrent meetings, the objective is to find bad scheduling. It seems that there are overlaps in the meeting rooms, which need to be listed so it can be fixed ASAP.

How would you find out if the same meeting room has two or more meetings booked at the same time? Here are some tips on how to solve it:

  • It’s still the same algorithm.
  • This means you will still do the UNION, but it will look slightly different.
  • You should think in the perspective of each meeting room.

You can use this data for the challenge:

```SQL
CREATE TABLE meetings_overlap (
    room TEXT NOT NULL,
    start_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
    end_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL
);

INSERT INTO meetings_overlap (room, start_time, end_time) VALUES
    -- Room A meetings
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 10:00', '2024-10-01 11:00'),
    ('Room A', '2024-10-01 11:00', '2024-10-01 12:00'),
    -- Room B meetings
    ('Room B', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 11:30'),
    -- Room C meetings
    ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:00', '2024-10-01 10:00'),
    -- Overlaps with previous meeting.
    ('Room C', '2024-10-01 09:30', '2024-10-01 12:00');
```

If you’re interested in the solution to this puzzle, as well as the rest of the queries, check this GitHub repo.

The first takeaway from this blog post is that window functions are overpowered. Ever since I got more comfortable with using them, I feel that my queries have gotten so much simpler and easier to read, and I hope the same happens to you.

If you’re interested in learning more about them, you would probably enjoy reading this other blog post I’ve written, where I go over how you can understand and use them effectively.

The second takeaway is that these patterns used in the challenges really do happen in many other places. You might need to find sequences of subscriptions, customer retention, or you might need to find overlap of tasks. There are many situations when you will need to use window functions in a very similar fashion to what was done in the puzzles.

The third thing I want you to remember is about this solution to using events besides dealing with intervals. I’ve looked at some problems I solved a long time ago that I could’ve used this pattern on to make my life easier, and unfortunately, I didn’t know about it at the time.


I really do hope you enjoyed this post and gave a shot to the puzzles yourself. And I’m sure that if you made it this far, you either learned something new about SQL or strengthened your knowledge of window functions! 

Thank you so much for reading. If you have questions or just want to get in touch with me, don’t hesitate to contact me at mtrentz.com.

All images by the author unless stated otherwise.

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

IBM aims to simplify mainframe modernization with AI-powered insight

“IBM Z Atlas’ system intelligence is built on a foundation of automated discovery, topology modeling, dependency analysis, natural-language interactions, and AI-powered workflows to create impact assessments and change evidence. Together, these capabilities are intended to create a continuously updated understanding of the IBM Z environment and the relationships between its

Read More »

NaaS hasn’t lived up to the hype. Is it still worth it?

Meter, for example, offers LAN hardware such as switches, firewalls, wireless access points, and power distribution units, security tools,  as well as services such as network design, configuration and installation, and management. It connects to outside providers for Internet and cellular connectivity and with Lumen for integrated WAN connectivity. Chief

Read More »

MARAD approves ST LNG’s deepwater port license application

The US Maritime Administration (MARAD) on Oct. 28 approved ST LNG LLC’s application for a deepwater port license for an $8.2-billion LNG export plant planned about 10.4 miles offshore Matagorda County, Tex. MARAD said construction would begin in 2027 with in-service in 2029. At full capacity of 8.4 million tonnes/year (tpy), the plant would include 20 fixed offshore platforms, 4 LNG floating storage units, 4 mooring systems, 4 liquefaction systems, and 7.7 miles of pipeline. ST LNG expects to develop the project in 4 independent phases, each with a nominal liquefaction capacity of 2.1-million tpy.   The approval clears a major federal regulatory hurdle, but ST LNG still must meet outstanding federal and state requirements, secure customer commitments, arrange financing and reach a final investment decision. The privately held company’s proposed plant would be its first LNG export project. ST LNG plans to obtain feed gas from the Tres Palacios Natural Gas Storage and Trading Hub and the Williams Markham Gas Processing Plant through an existing 36-in. OD Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line (Transco) pipeline about 5.6 miles northeast of the port. The project includes a proposed 5.6-mile pipeline lateral connecting the offshore plant to the existing pipeline, along with 2.1 miles of interconnecting pipelines between the four phases. MARAD said it completed the project’s Final Environmental Impact Statement in 410 days, about 3.7 years faster than the historical average. The agency called it the fastest deepwater port license review in more than 20 years. In a statement, MARAD Administrator Stephen M. Carmel said ST LNG represents the Trump administration’s third deepwater port license approval. The US Department of Energy on Apr. 22 authorized ST LNG to export LNG equivalent to 460 bcf/year of natural gas to countries with which the US has qualifying free trade agreements (FTA). DOE is separately

Read More »

ADIPEC 2026: ADNOC takes FID on Ruwais Diyab unconventional gas development

Abu Dhabi National Oil Co. (ADNOC) has taken final investment decision (FID) on its Ruwais Diyab unconventional gas development in Abu Dhabi. The company made this announcement at Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (ADIPEC), underway now, and described the project as “advancing its integrated global gas growth strategy and unlocking a new source of reliable energy for the domestic and international markets.” Ruwais Diyab will deliver 345 MMscfd of raw gas from 2029 over a 25-year span, with the potential to reach up to 1 bscfd, ADNOC said. Gas will be processed on site and connected to the UAE’s gas network through new pipeline infrastructure, strengthening domestic supply and supporting the company’s LNG export plans. FID followed technical studies, field testing, and subsurface analysis, delivered by ADNOC Onshore under a design-build-operate model, to reduce development risk. ADNOC’s 9.6-million tonne/year Ruwais LNG project will be the region’s first all-electric plant, with commercial production expected by second-half 2028. The plant will more than double ADNOC Gas PLC’s LNG production. The company earlier this year took FID on Phases 2 and 3 of its rich-gas development project and let an engineering, procurement, and construction contract to Maire SPA subsidiary Tecnimont SPA, describing the project as its largest-ever gas processing expansion. The UAE holds the seventh-largest gas reserves in the world, according to ADNOC, with 298 tscf of conventional gas and 160 tscf of unconventional gas resources.

Read More »

San Mateo to expand Delaware basin gas processing capacity under new producer agreements

Subject to permitting, procurement, and construction activities, the Marlan expansion is targeted for completion by yearend 2028. The company said the project will increase its expected 2026 midstream capital expenditures by about $25 million, raising its estimated midstream capital budget for the year to $170-190 million. Commercial agreements The agreements consist of a new long-term fixed-fee gas gathering and processing contract and an extension of an existing gas gathering and processing agreement. Under the new agreement, San Mateo will gather and treat natural gas from newly dedicated acreage in Lea and Eddy Counties, NM, and process the volumes at the Marlan complex. The agreement includes a large-scale acreage dedication in the northern Delaware basin. Separately, San Mateo amended an existing gas gathering and processing agreement covering production from Eddy County. Under the extension, gas will continue to be gathered, treated, and processed at the Black River gas processing plant in Eddy County for several years beyond the original contract term. The extension builds on a gas gathering and processing agreement San Mateo announced in October 2018, the company noted. Upon completion of the Marlan expansion, San Mateo’s total natural gas processing capacity will exceed 1.3 bcfd, nearly tripling the 460-MMcfd capacity it had before Matador contributed Pronto Midstream LLC to the venture in December 2024.

Read More »

ADIPEC 2026: TotalEnergies to acquire operated interest in gas fields offshore Malaysia

TotalEnergies has agreed to acquire an operated stake in the SK410B Lang Lebah and B14 fields off the coast of Sarawak, offshore East Malaysia, through a series of farm-out agreements. The agreements, signed with Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd (PCSB), PTTEP, and KUFPEC, will give TotalEnergies a 30% operated interest in Lang Lebah, one of Malaysia’s largest offshore gas discoveries, and the nearby B14 field. An integrated development plan is expected to unlock more than 6.5 tcf of gas resources to supply the existing Malaysia LNG liquefaction plant with a production plateau of around 10 billion cu m/year, the company said. “The development of Lang Lebah and B14 resources will allow the creation of another large-scale gas hub in Malaysia, leveraging shared infrastructure, to supply gas to Malaysia LNG and meet the growing LNG demand in Asia,” and follow previous deals in the country with SapuraOMV in 2024 and Petronas in 2025, said Patrick Pouyanné, chairman and chief executive officer of TotalEnergies.  Upon completion of the transactions, which are subject to regulatory approvals, TotalEnergies will hold a 30% operated interest in both fields, alongside PTTEP (25%), KUFPEC (25%) and PCSB (20%). The parties commemorated the agreements during a signing ceremony Nov. 1, 2026, in conjunction with Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (ADIPEC) under way in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Read More »

Utilities need to become project developers. Are they ready?

Load growth is no longer an abstract number in an electricity market report or forecast; it’s a reality. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. electricity load will increase nearly 2 percent in 2026 and 2.5 percent next year, driven by large loads like data centers and manufacturing as well as increased electrification of transportation and building heating and cooling. To put that number in perspective, annual load growth between 2005 and 2019 was about 0.1 percent, meaning the next two years will see nearly 50 times the growth that the industry experienced in the last 15 years. Rapid load growth changes nearly everything for utilities, from how they plan and invest to how they engage and communicate with customers. Load growth is also compelling many utilities to do something they haven’t done at this scale and pace before: develop their own generation. “Utilities are used to designing and building a gas plant once every five or 10 years, and then they would contract via PPAs (power purchase agreement) everything else,” said Alex Pope, Manager of Power Development Portfolios 1898 & Co. “But the systems utilities have in place to self-develop generation projects were never built to handle the volume necessary to meet the demand and timelines of today’s customer needs.” Building from scratch is hard As PPAs and BTAs (Build-Transfer Agreement) alone become insufficient to close the generation and load gap, many utilities that recognize the need to build more projects themselves face an important question: how do we start? One avenue is to focus inward and develop the internal expertise and resources needed to move projects from concept to commercialization—everything from land acquisition and permitting to financing, regulatory approvals, procurement strategies, and construction. While this approach gives utilities complete control over the development of new generation,

Read More »

Rethinking the outage map for a multi-hazard world

For many, fall means sweater weather and all things pumpkin spice. For utilities, these months have other, less festive sides. Hurricane season, wildfire season and the start of the heating season all converge in the same 8-12-week window.   Hurricane season may be quieter this year, thanks to El Niño, but data shows climate change hasintensified Atlantic hurricanes. Meanwhile, fall is peak wildfire season, particularly in California, when Santa Ana winds kick up. And the northern half of the country is switching furnaces back on after months of inactivity. Individually, these are known risks utilities plan for. Layered together, they’re a bigger threat.  Because of this, utilities are starting to ask more of their outage maps, moving beyond “when will my power be back on?” to “what’s happening around me?” Maps are becoming less of a status tracker and more of a situational awareness tool.  The outage map levels up  For decades, utility outage maps told customers when their power would be back on, along with repair status and outage cause. That’s still valuable, but outages aren’t the only thing causing sleepless nights. Hazards now stack and planned maintenance often lands in the same week and region as storms, wildfires and seasonal gas-related risk.   Historically, customers pieced this information together from disconnected sources like text alerts, county web pages, weather apps and wildfire trackers. Now, hazard layers bring it together in one place, drawing on GIS, OMS and weather feeds.   This shift isn’t just about the growing frequency and overlap of hazards. It also reflects rising customer expectations for self-service, with the map as their first stop before the call center.  Self-service isn’t optional in a crisis  During a crisis, utility customers want access to whichever channel responds fastest and most clearly. If the utility’s map can’t deliver, their next stop

Read More »

OCP 2026: Cooler Master Scales Liquid Cooling from Cold Plates to 2.5 MW CDUs

Modular Air-Assisted Cooling Targets Existing Data Centers One of the most instructive systems examined during the tour was Cooler Master’s 300 kW Air-Assisted Liquid Cooling (AALC) CDU, a modular liquid-to-air design intended for data centers without an existing facility water distribution system. Rather than transferring server heat into a building’s chilled-water or facility-water loop, the AALC system circulates coolant through the IT equipment and rejects the captured heat through fan-driven radiators. The distinction matters for operators seeking to introduce liquid-cooled AI racks into facilities that were not built with dedicated liquid cooling infrastructure. Although air-assisted systems still require sufficient facility airflow and heat rejection capacity, they offer an alternative to extending a new water distribution network throughout the data hall. The approach is already finding applications in the field. As DCF recently reported, Corvex deployed liquid-cooled NVIDIA Blackwell infrastructure inside an existing air-cooled data center, using Lenovo Neptune technology to avoid a conventional facility-wide liquid cooling conversion. Cooler Master’s 300 kW design separates the pumping equipment from its radiator assemblies. During the tour, a company representative explained that the system can be configured with a central pump rack and either one or two radiator racks, each providing a nominal 150 kW of cooling capacity. This modular arrangement allows cooling capacity to be matched more closely to the installation, rather than requiring every deployment to use the full 300 kW configuration. Serviceability is a major feature of the design. The system uses redundant pumps in a 2+1 arrangement, with two pumps supporting normal operation and a third providing standby capacity. Pump modules are designed for replacement without interrupting cooling operations. Other field-replaceable components include fans, filters, expansion tanks, and power-related assemblies. The product also incorporates redundant filtration and monitoring capabilities intended to help operators identify faults and maintain cooling performance. The

Read More »

7×24 Fall 2026: AI Frontier Futurist Meets Data Center OG

A 1988 Data Center Becomes a 20 MW AI Asset The second presentation, Converting a 1990 Enterprise Data Center to 20MW AI Workloads, featured Coe alongside Ari Chernikoff, vice president of development at Legacy Investing, and Dan Amundson, project manager at Gardner Builders. The project centered on 1001 Third Avenue South in downtown Minneapolis, a financial-services computing facility originally constructed in 1988. The building had supported earlier generations of enterprise computing before portions were converted to commercial office space and smaller colocation operations. Although its remaining operating data center load had declined to approximately 500 kilowatts by the time the AI redevelopment began, the property retained substantial infrastructure inherited from its original mission-critical design. Tall ceilings, robust floor loading, raised access floors, existing medium-voltage substations, and established utility connections made the building an unusually strong candidate for conversion. These characteristics, Chernikoff explained, can determine whether an existing building offers a practical path to high-density computing or proves economically unsuitable for redevelopment. Legacy Investing had identified a market opportunity in what Chernikoff called the industry’s “missing middle”: facilities generally ranging from 20 MW to 80 MW, rather than the 100 MW-plus campuses increasingly associated with hyperscale and frontier AI development. The company viewed existing buildings with available power and favorable infrastructure characteristics as potential shortcuts to deployment, particularly where demand for AI inference and other latency-sensitive workloads favored proximity to major urban markets. Following an AI tenant commitment in summer 2024, the development team faced an aggressive initial requirement: Deliver the first 5 MW of capacity by the end of that year. The first phase was ready for service approximately four months after Gardner’s involvement became formalized, followed by another 5 MW in 2025 and an expansion program ultimately reaching 20 MW over roughly 20 months. All of this had to

Read More »

Gartner warns $3.5T in AI infrastructure spending could be at risk by 2030

Musk predicted that more than 200 neocloud companies could face significant financial distress, predicting that only a small number would survive the coming shakeout. He also said SpaceX would not acquire any of the companies, describing such purchases as “pointless.” The chickens are already coming home to roost on the neoclouds. CoreWeave, Nebius, Applied Digital and TeraWulf have reported quarterly losses over the past year, while IREN has failed to turn a profit in its past three quarters. Shares of CoreWeave, Nebius and IREN have fallen more than 30% during October, according to Reuters. Building AI data centers requires substantial upfront investment in GPUs, networking equipment, power systems, cooling infrastructure and facilities. Operators must then generate enough revenue from leasing computing capacity to cover operating expenses, interest payments and equipment replacement.

Read More »

The 50-Gigawatt Test: SemiAnalysis Sees a Historic Data Center Surge in 2027

The global data center industry is approaching a potentially historic test of its ability to turn artificial intelligence investment into operational infrastructure. In a provocative new forecast, semiconductor and AI infrastructure research firm SemiAnalysis predicts that approximately 51.2 gigawatts of net data center IT capacity will be added globally, excluding China, during 2027. That would represent more than double the 25 GW the firm expects to be added in 2026. Published October 19, the report, Datacenters 2027: The Year of Acceleration, +50GW in a Single Year, makes a forceful argument that much of this unprecedented expansion is already visible in the industry’s construction pipeline. Authored by Jeremie Eliahou Ontiveros, Reyk Knuhtsen and Dylan Patel, the analysis draws on SemiAnalysis’ proprietary tracking of construction starts, individual buildings, hyperscale leasing commitments, equipment procurement and project financing. Its researchers identify more than 60 GW of data center capacity under construction. Among the 40 largest campuses they examined, more than 24 GW is reportedly in advanced stages of development, with much of that capacity expected to be delivered in 2027. The forecast is not entirely composed of projects already under construction, however. SemiAnalysis’ capacity chart includes approximately 11.9 GW of 2027 additions associated with projects still classified as planned. The remainder is associated with facilities already operating or under construction, according to the model’s building-status categories. SemiAnalysis argues that the volume and maturity of projects already underway make a dramatic acceleration increasingly likely, despite well-documented constraints involving electricity, construction labor, equipment and capital. But the prediction has also become the subject of a revealing industry debate, with competing forecasts and new corporate disclosures raising questions about how much infrastructure can actually be delivered on schedule. The disagreement is no longer principally about whether AI infrastructure demand is real. It is about whether the industrial

Read More »

HPE’s Quantum Computing Bet: A Multi-Vendor Path to the Data Center

QuEra Deal Targets On-Premises Quantum Integration Under the expanded collaboration, HPE and QuEra intend to develop integrated testbeds, software interoperability, hybrid algorithms and performance benchmarks to support future quantum deployments alongside HPE Cray supercomputing infrastructure. The work is intended to address the practical requirements of coordinating quantum processors with the classical computing systems that prepare workloads, process results and support quantum error correction. QuEra Chief Commercial Officer Yuval Boger, who previously discussed the development of hybrid quantum-classical infrastructure on the DCF Show, emphasized that integrating quantum hardware into an HPC environment presents different engineering challenges than providing access through the cloud. Boger said, “HPE’s deep experience in supercomputing gives organizations the benefit of working with a partner who can solve that problem at the scale they need.” The collaboration envisions deploying future fault-tolerant quantum hardware at customer facilities rather than requiring organizations to rely exclusively on cloud-based quantum computing services. That option could appeal to national laboratories, defense organizations, pharmaceutical researchers and other institutions managing classified information, proprietary intellectual property or data subject to sovereignty requirements. QuEra’s neutral-atom architecture uses individual atoms as qubits, manipulating them with lasers and electromagnetic controls. Unlike superconducting quantum processors, which generally require dilution refrigerators operating at temperatures measured in millikelvin, neutral-atom systems can operate without extreme cryogenic refrigeration. They still require specialized laser systems, vacuum equipment, precision optics and environmental controls, presenting facility requirements substantially different from those of conventional servers. On-premises quantum-HPC integration is already being tested. In Japan, the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) operates QuEra’s 260-physical-qubit Gemini neutral-atom computer as part of its ABCI-Q research platform, which also incorporates an NVIDIA H100-based AI supercomputer. An October 26 case study published by QuEra describes Gemini operating in a separate building approximately 350 meters from the main GPU installation,

Read More »

At 7×24 Exchange, AI Data Center Growth Confronts New Realities of Power, Grid Reliability and Community Trust

DC BLOX: Community Engagement Must Go Beyond Public Relations The afternoon program shifted attention from electrical infrastructure to the growing challenges surrounding data center development and community acceptance. In a discussion moderated by Juli Ierulli, strategic account manager at Environmental Air Systems and vice president of 7×24 Exchange International, Michael Clark, senior vice president of data center construction at DC BLOX, described how the company has revised its approach to engaging communities as it expands into new markets. Clark acknowledged that DC BLOX had encountered significant opposition after entering markets where it lacked the established relationships that had supported earlier developments across the Southeast. “We made multiple stumbles in some of those new markets,” he said, describing how the company sometimes found itself responding to negative publicity rather than presenting a clear explanation of its plans and commitments. The experience led DC BLOX to develop a more systematic approach to community engagement, emphasizing early communication, site-specific websites, accessible explanations of resource consumption and written commitments that residents and officials can evaluate. Clark also pointed to what he called the industry’s “NDA hangover,” reflecting years of development activity conducted under confidentiality agreements that frequently left neighboring communities unaware of what was being planned. But perhaps the most revealing moment came when Clark recounted a conversation with residents near a DC BLOX development in Rockdale County, Georgia. After the company outlined the countywide economic and community benefits expected from the project, one neighbor challenged the distribution of those benefits. “So the rest of the county gets the benefit and we have to pay all the costs,” the resident observed, according to Clark. The question captured a fundamental tension in the industry’s community engagement efforts: tax revenues and economic development benefits may extend across a county, while nearby residents experience the immediate effects

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »