Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

US, Qatar Energy Chiefs Urge EU to Reconsider CSDDD

(Update) October 23, 2025, 8:25 AM GMT+1: Article updated with European Commission comment. The energy chiefs of leading liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters Qatar and the United States on Wednesday addressed a letter to European Union heads of state calling for the removal of provisions in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) that they […]

(Update) October 23, 2025, 8:25 AM GMT+1: Article updated with European Commission comment.

The energy chiefs of leading liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters Qatar and the United States on Wednesday addressed a letter to European Union heads of state calling for the removal of provisions in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) that they say curtail LNG trade.

The directive does not single out the LNG sector, or the energy industry. It compels any “large” EU company or that sources revenue from the EU to, as per the words of the European Commission, “identify and address adverse human rights and environmental impacts of their actions inside and outside Europe”.

According to the latest amendment to the CSDDD adopted by the European Parliament and Council on April 14, 2025, the new rules will not take effect for companies until 2028. That is a year after EU member states are required to transpose the directive into their national laws.

However, the U.S. and Qatar expressed concern over a lack of engagement on the EU side over “unintended consequences for LNG export competitiveness and the availability of reliable, affordable energy for EU consumers”, according to the letter.

“We have consistently and transparently communicated how the CSDDD, as it is worded today, poses a significant risk to the affordability and reliability of critical energy supplies for households and businesses across Europe and an existential threat to the future growth, competitiveness and resilience of the EU’s industrial economy”, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Qatar Energy Affairs Minister Saad Sherida Al-Kaabi said in the open letter, shared on the U.S. Energy Department’s website.

It said an omnibus revision package proposed by the European Commission to make the CSDDD workable for affected companies “falls grossly short of its aspirations”.

“The EU and its member states must now act swiftly to address these legitimate concerns, either by repealing the CSDDD in its entirety or removing its most economically damaging provisions”, the letter stated. In particular, we urge reconsideration of Article 2, on the Directive’s extraterritorial application; Article 22, on transition plans for climate change mitigation; Article 27, on penalties; Article 29, on civil liability of companies.

“Together, these provisions pose significant challenges and seriously undermine the ability of the American, Qatari and broader international energy community to maintain and expand their partnerships and operations within the EU”.

“Beyond the direct energy security risks, the CSDDD also threatens to disrupt trade and investments across nearly all the EU’s partner economies”, the letter claimed. “Its implementation could jeopardize existing and future investments, employment and compliance with recent trade agreements”.

Under the “framework agreement” on trade between EU countries and the U.S., the EU intends to buy American LNG, oil and nuclear energy products with an expected offtake value of $750 billion through 2028, according to a joint statement August 21, 2025. 

“These concerns are widely shared among the global business community; they extend far beyond the energy sector and are not limited to the U.S. and Qatar”, the letter added.

“We urge EU leaders to take immediate, decisive action by reopening substantive dialogue with your global partners, including the United States and Qatar, and the wider international business community, to address these critical provisions in the CSDDD”, it said.

In response to the letter, the European Commission stood firm with its proposed revisions in February and said it has “not committed to change the CSDDD or grant U.S. companies more favourable treatment under this regulation or any EU regulation”.

“It should be noted that concerns [and] issues outlined in the letter have already been expressed by the U.S. in the context of our ongoing trade talks”, the Commission said in reply to Rigzone’s comment request.

“These talks are focused on implementing the commitments laid out in the EU-US Joint Statement, as well as addressing any other trade or trade-related questions.

“As a general principle, the EU and U.S. have agreed to look at ways to cut red tape. In particular, the Commission has presented its ongoing work to simplify EU legislation and reduce administrative burden, including as it relates to third countries and businesses.

“We have committed to ensure that the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive does not pose undue restrictions on trans-Atlantic trade. 

“The guiding principle of our discussions with the U.S. has been to ensure that the CSDDD Directive does not result in an unnecessary administrative burden, especially for small and medium enterprises.

“On 26 February 2025, the European Commission presented a first package of proposals to simplify EU rules, including the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. The Commission’s proposal is now with the co-legislators. It is now for them to negotiate and adopt the substantive simplification changes proposed by the Commission. 

“We have also agreed to discuss with the U.S. issues of relevance to the implementation of the CSDDD, such as efforts undertaken by U.S. companies to comply”.

To contact the author, email [email protected]

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

AI helps IT teams resolve incidents faster, report finds

SolarWinds also collected data on the top 10 AI adopters. The results showed that the top 10 AI adopters experienced a 54.3% improvement in resolution time—dropping from nearly 51 hours per incident to a little more than 23 hours. These top 10 organizations differentiated from other organizations in the study

Read More »

Equinor starts production at Bacalhau field offshore Brazil

@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:[email protected]&display=swap’); a { color: #c19a06; } .ebm-page__main h1, .ebm-page__main h2, .ebm-page__main h3, .ebm-page__main h4, .ebm-page__main h5, .ebm-page__main h6 { font-family: Inter; } body { line-height: 150%; letter-spacing: 0.025em; font-family: Inter; } button, .ebm-button-wrapper { font-family: Inter; } .label-style { text-transform: uppercase; color: var(–color-grey); font-weight: 600; font-size: 0.75rem; } .caption-style

Read More »

AI’s dark side shows in Gartner’s top predictions for IT orgs

Increasing legal claims against AI-induced safety problems related to autonomous vehicle or medical accidents are also a mounting concern, Plummer stated. By the end of 2026, “death by AI” legal claims will exceed 1,000 globally due to insufficient AI risk guardrails, Plummer stated. “As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, organizations will face pressure

Read More »

Fresh USA Sanctions Reignite Strong Upside Momentum in Oil

In a Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (SEB) report sent to Rigzone by the SEB team on Thursday, SEB Commodities Analyst Ole R. Hvalbye outlined that “fresh U.S. sanctions reignited strong upside momentum” in the oil market. “The U.S. has now announced sanctions targeting Russia’s two largest oil producers, Rosneft PJSC and Lukoil PJSC, effectively blacklisting both companies,” Hvalbye said in the report. “Washington cited Moscow’s lack of progress toward peace in Ukraine, marking a significant escalation in pressure on President Vladimir Putin to enter negotiations,” he added. Hvalbye stated in the report that a full blacklisting would, at least in theory, make it very difficult for Rosneft and Lukoil barrels to reach the market. “Rosneft produced nearly 3.7 million barrels per day during the first half of 2025, while Lukoil’s Russian assets contributed roughly 1.6 million barrels per day of oil and condensate output (2024 data),” he noted. “Together, the two companies account for almost half of Russia’s total crude exports, underscoring the scale and impact of Washington’s move. Rosneft, led by Igor Sechin, and privately held Lukoil are by far Russia’s largest oil producers and central to the country’s energy income,” he added. “It is worth noting that oil and gas revenues make up around 24 percent of Russia’s federal budget, highlighting the strategic importance of these sanctions,” Hvalbye continued. The SEB analyst went on to state that, while the sanctions’ effectiveness remains uncertain, the move represents a clear shift in tone from the Trump administration and opens the door for even tougher measures ahead. “Trump has also stated his intention to raise the issue of Chinese purchases of Russian oil when he meets President Xi Jinping in South Korea next week,” Hvalbye highlighted. “Earlier this week, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi reportedly signaled that India would begin to

Read More »

EU Adopts New Sanctions on Russian Energy

The European Union adopted a new package of sanctions targeting Russia’s energy infrastructure, joining a new US push to chip away at Moscow’s ability to wage its war against Ukraine. The EU measures will ban LNG imports from 2027, according to a statement from European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The EU will also impose a full transaction ban on two major Russian oil companies, Rosneft PJSC and Gazpromneft, and sanction 118 additional so-called shadow fleet vessels, which have enabled Russia to evade previous measures. The move adds momentum to western allies’ renewed push to punish Moscow. On Wednesday, the US announced sanctions on Russia’s two largest oil producers, Rosneft and Lukoil PJSC, after a potential summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin was called off. Those penalties came a week after the UK also hit the same Russian oil giants. “The 19th package is very important,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy told reporters on Thursday before joining EU leaders at a summit in Brussels. “But American sanctions are also very important. And this is a good signal to other countries in the world to join the sanctions.”  The potential Trump-Putin gathering had unnerved European officials, who feared Trump may be adopting a more Putin-friendly stance after several months where he publicly threatened Russia with sanctions and appeared receptive to Ukraine’s pleas for additional weapons.  Still, Zelenskiy left a meeting with Trump last week without desired commitments on long-range missiles. Instead, Trump urged both Zelenskiy and Putin to declare an immediate ceasefire and begin negotiations. Zelenskiy is open to that approach and joined a statement with European leaders this week, when they all endorsed the suggestion. “A ceasefire is possible, of course, and I think all of us need a ceasefire,” Zelenskiy said Thursday. “But we need more pressure

Read More »

US, Qatar Energy Chiefs Urge EU to Reconsider CSDDD

(Update) October 23, 2025, 8:25 AM GMT+1: Article updated with European Commission comment. The energy chiefs of leading liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters Qatar and the United States on Wednesday addressed a letter to European Union heads of state calling for the removal of provisions in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) that they say curtail LNG trade. The directive does not single out the LNG sector, or the energy industry. It compels any “large” EU company or that sources revenue from the EU to, as per the words of the European Commission, “identify and address adverse human rights and environmental impacts of their actions inside and outside Europe”. According to the latest amendment to the CSDDD adopted by the European Parliament and Council on April 14, 2025, the new rules will not take effect for companies until 2028. That is a year after EU member states are required to transpose the directive into their national laws. However, the U.S. and Qatar expressed concern over a lack of engagement on the EU side over “unintended consequences for LNG export competitiveness and the availability of reliable, affordable energy for EU consumers”, according to the letter. “We have consistently and transparently communicated how the CSDDD, as it is worded today, poses a significant risk to the affordability and reliability of critical energy supplies for households and businesses across Europe and an existential threat to the future growth, competitiveness and resilience of the EU’s industrial economy”, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Qatar Energy Affairs Minister Saad Sherida Al-Kaabi said in the open letter, shared on the U.S. Energy Department’s website. It said an omnibus revision package proposed by the European Commission to make the CSDDD workable for affected companies “falls grossly short of its aspirations”. “The EU and its member states

Read More »

US, Qatar Energy Chiefs Urge Repeal of CSDDD Restrictions on LNG

The energy chiefs of leading liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters Qatar and the United States on Wednesday addressed a letter to European Union heads of state calling for the removal of provisions in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) that they say curtail LNG trade. The directive does not single out the LNG sector, or the energy industry. It compels any “large” EU company or that sources revenue from the EU to, as per the words of the European Commission, “identify and address adverse human rights and environmental impacts of their actions inside and outside Europe”. According to the latest amendment to the CSDDD adopted by the European Parliament and Council on April 14, 2025, the new rules will not take effect for companies until 2028. That is a year after EU member states are required to transpose the directive into their national laws. However, the U.S. and Qatar expressed concern over a lack of engagement on the EU side over “unintended consequences for LNG export competitiveness and the availability of reliable, affordable energy for EU consumers”, according to the letter. “We have consistently and transparently communicated how the CSDDD, as it is worded today, poses a significant risk to the affordability and reliability of critical energy supplies for households and businesses across Europe and an existential threat to the future growth, competitiveness and resilience of the EU’s industrial economy”, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Qatar Energy Affairs Minister Saad Sherida Al-Kaabi said in the open letter, shared on the U.S. Energy Department’s website. It said an omnibus revision package proposed by the European Commission to make the CSDDD workable for affected companies “falls grossly short of its aspirations”. “The EU and its member states must now act swiftly to address these legitimate concerns, either by repealing the

Read More »

Norway Gas Output Down in First 9 Months

Norway averaged 326.26 million standard cubic meters a day (MMscmd) in natural gas production in the first three quarters, down from 341.25 MMscmd in the same nine-month period last year, according to official data. Data is preliminary for September 2025, for which the Norwegian Offshore Directorate (NOD) estimated 282.1 MMscmd of gas output. That is down 15.6 percent from August 2025 but up 17.2 percent against September 2024. The September 2025 figure fell short of the NOD’s forecast for the month by 1.9 percent. Norway sold 8.5 billion scmd last month, down 1.9 billion scmd from August, according to the data published on the NOD’s website. According to the European Commission’s latest quarterly gas market report, covering the first quarter of 2025, the Nordic country remained the European Union’s top gas supplier, accounting for 31 percent or 21.7 Bcm. Norway remained the EU’s biggest pipeline gas supplier, accounting for 55 percent or 20.6 Bcm. Norway’s share of the EU’s piped gas imports increased by five percentage points compared to the fourth quarter of 2024 following the end of the Ukraine-Russia transit deal. Meanwhile Norway’s oil production in September averaged 1.82 million barrels per day (MMbpd), down seven percent from August but up 13.7 percent from September 2024. The figure exceeded the NOD projection by 5.4 percent. Total liquids production was 1.99 MMbpd, down 7.8 percent month-on-month but up 14.8 percent year-on-year. “Preliminary production figures for September 2025 show an average daily production of 1,991,000 barrels of oil, NGL [natural gas liquids] and condensate”, the NOD reported. “The total petroleum production so far in 2025 is about 176.2 million Sm3 oil equivalents (MSm3 o.e.), broken down as follows: about 78.5 MSm3 o.e. of oil, about 8.7 MSm3 o.e. of NGL and condensate and about 89.4 MSm3 o.e. of gas for sale”, it

Read More »

Matador surprises with third-quarter capex increase

Matador Resources Co., Dallas, ramped up operations and spending during the third quarter—topping the midpoint of the July capex guidance by $95 million—to take advantage of lower service prices. That decision resulted in Matador turning in line 34.5 net operated wells, which was 4.5 wells above executives’ guidance from 3 months ago. Those incremental wells added $15 million to capex during the quarter but executives said they also allocated $56 million to wells that they expect to turn in line this quarter. Also contributing to the spending increase was due to unexpected non-operated well activity of $15 million. Those factors contributed to third-quarter capex coming in at $430 million versus the $335 million midpoint of executives’ range from the summer. For the full year, chairman and chief executive officer Joe Foran and his team now expect the midpoint of spending to be a little more than $1.5 billion, up from nearly $1.28 billion after the year’s second quarter.  During the current quarter, Matador produced more than 119,500 b/d of oil, which was above the range of 116,500-118,000 b/d of production Foran and his lieutenants forecast 3 months ago but below second-quarter’s s nearly 123,000 b/d. Total production was flat with the spring quarter at about 209,000 boe/d. In midday trading, shares of Matador (Ticker: MTDR) were down about 10% to $39.42, the lowest level since early May. The company’s market capitalization, which was roughly $6.2 billion in late July, is now back to about $5 billion. The executive team is guiding for full-year production to be about 206,000 boe/d, slightly higher than the previous 202,500 boe/d estimate. For 2026, the company expects oil production growth of 2-5% and total production to be about 210,000 boe/d. Foran said the team will use the greater efficiency gained over the last quarter—Matador’s drilling and

Read More »

Inside Google’s multi-architecture revolution: Axion Arm joins x86 in production clusters

Matt Kimball, VP and principal analyst with Moor Insights and Strategy, pointed out that AWS and Microsoft have already moved many workloads from x86 to internally designed Arm-based servers. He noted that, when Arm first hit the hyperscale datacenter market, the architecture was used to support more lightweight, cloud-native workloads with an interpretive layer where architectural affinity was “non-existent.” But now there’s much more focus on architecture, and compatibility issues “largely go away” as Arm servers support more and more workloads. “In parallel, we’ve seen CSPs expand their designs to support both scale out (cloud-native) and traditional scale up workloads effectively,” said Kimball. Simply put, CSPs are looking to monetize chip investments, and this migration signals that Google has found its performance-per-dollar (and likely performance-per-watt) better on Axion than x86. Google will likely continue to expand its Arm footprint as it evolves its Axion chip; as a reference point, Kimball pointed to AWS Graviton, which didn’t really support “scale up” performance until its v3 or v4 chip. Arm is coming to enterprise data centers too When looking at architectures, enterprise CIOs should ask themselves questions such as what instance do they use for cloud workloads, and what servers do they deploy in their data center, Kimball noted. “I think there is a lot less concern about putting my workloads on an Arm-based instance on Google Cloud, a little more hesitance to deploy those Arm servers in my datacenter,” he said. But ultimately, he said, “Arm is coming to the enterprise datacenter as a compute platform, and Nvidia will help usher this in.” Info-Tech’s Jain agreed that Nvidia is the “biggest cheerleader” for Arm-based architecture, and Arm is increasingly moving from niche and mobile use to general-purpose and AI workload execution.

Read More »

AMD Scales the AI Factory: 6 GW OpenAI Deal, Korean HBM Push, and Helios Debut

What 6 GW of GPUs Really Means The 6 GW of accelerator load envisioned under the OpenAI–AMD partnership will be distributed across multiple hyperscale AI factory campuses. If OpenAI begins with 1 GW of deployment in 2026, subsequent phases will likely be spread regionally to balance supply chains, latency zones, and power procurement risk. Importantly, this represents entirely new investment in both power infrastructure and GPU capacity. OpenAI and its partners have already outlined multi-GW ambitions under the broader Stargate program; this new initiative adds another major tranche to that roadmap. Designing for the AI Factory Era These upcoming facilities are being purpose-built for next-generation AI factories, where MI450-class clusters could drive rack densities exceeding 100 kW. That level of compute concentration makes advanced power and cooling architectures mandatory, not optional. Expected solutions include: Warm-water liquid cooling (manifold, rear-door, and CDU variants) as standard practice. Facility-scale water loops and heat-reuse systems—including potential district-heating partnerships where feasible. Medium-voltage distribution within buildings, emphasizing busway-first designs and expanded fault-current engineering. While AMD has not yet disclosed thermal design power (TDP) specifications for the MI450, a 1 GW campus target implies tens of thousands of accelerators. That scale assumes liquid cooling, ultra-dense racks, and minimal network latency footprints, pushing architectures decisively toward an “AI-first” orientation. Design considerations for these AI factories will likely include: Liquid-to-liquid cooling plants engineered for step-function capacity adders (200–400 MW blocks). Optics-friendly white space layouts with short-reach topologies, fiber raceways, and aisles optimized for module swaps. Substation adjacency and on-site generation envelopes negotiated during early land-banking phases. Networking, Memory, and Power Integration As compute density scales, networking and memory bottlenecks will define infrastructure design. Expect fat-tree and dragonfly network topologies, 800 G–1.6 T interconnects, and aggressive optical-module roadmaps to minimize collective-operation latency, aligning with recent disclosures from major networking vendors.

Read More »

Study Finds $4B in Data Center Grid Costs Shifted to Consumers Across PJM Region

In a new report spanning 2022 through 2024, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) identifies a significant regulatory gap in the PJM Interconnection’s planning and rate-making process—one that allows most high-voltage (“transmission-level”) interconnection costs for large, especially AI-scale, data centers to be socialized across all utility customers. The result, UCS argues, is a multi-billion-dollar pass-through that is poised to grow as more data center projects move forward, because these assets are routinely classified as ordinary transmission infrastructure rather than customer-specific hookups. According to the report, between 2022 and 2024, utilities initiated more than 150 local transmission projects across seven PJM states specifically to serve data center connections. In 2024 alone, 130 projects were approved with total costs of approximately $4.36 billion. Virginia accounted for nearly half that total—just under $2 billion—followed by Ohio ($1.3 billion) and Pennsylvania ($492 million) in data-center-related interconnection spending. Yet only six of those 130 projects, about 5 percent, were reported as directly paid for by the requesting customer. The remaining 95 percent, representing more than $4 billion in 2024 connection costs, were rolled into general transmission charges and ultimately recovered from all retail ratepayers. How Does This Happen? When data center project costs are discussed, the focus is usually on the price of the power consumed, or megawatts multiplied by rate. What the UCS report isolates, however, is something different: the cost of physically delivering that power: the substations, transmission lines, and related infrastructure needed to connect hyperscale facilities to the grid. So why aren’t these substantial consumer-borne costs more visible? The report identifies several structural reasons for what effectively functions as a regulatory loophole in how development expenses are reported and allocated: Jurisdictional split. High-voltage facilities fall under the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), while retail electricity rates are governed by state public utility

Read More »

OCP Global Summit 2025 Highlights: Advancing Data Center Densification and Security

With the conclusion of the 2025 OCP Global Summit, William G. Wong, Senior Content Director at DCF’s sister publications Electronic Design and Microwaves & RF, published a comprehensive roundup of standout technologies unveiled at the event. For Data Center Frontier readers, we’ve revisited those innovations through the lens of data center impact, focusing on how they reshape infrastructure design and operational strategy. This year’s OCP Summit marked a decisive shift toward denser GPU racks, standardized direct-to-chip liquid cooling, 800-V DC power distribution, high-speed in-rack fabrics, and “crypto-agile” platform security. Collectively, these advances aim to accelerate time-to-capacity, reduce power-distribution losses at megawatt rack scales, simplify retrofits in legacy halls, and fortify data center platforms against post-quantum threats. Rack Design and Cooling: From Ad-Hoc to Production-Grade Liquid Cooling NVIDIA’s Vera Rubin compute tray, newly offered to OCP for standardization, packages Rubin-generation GPUs with an integrated liquid-cooling manifold and PCB midplane. Compared with the GB300 tray, Vera Rubin represents a production-ready module delivering four times the memory and three times the memory bandwidth: a 7.5× performance factor at rack scale, with 150 TB of memory at 1.7 PB/s per rack. The system implements 45 °C liquid cooling, a 5,000-amp liquid-cooled busbar, and on-tray energy storage with power-resilience features such as flexible 100-amp whips and automatic-transfer power-supply units. NVIDIA also previewed a Kyber rack generation targeted for 2027, pivoting from 415/480 VAC to 800 V DC to support up to 576 Rubin Ultra GPUs, potentially eliminating the 200-kg copper busbars typical today. These refinements are aimed at both copper reduction and aisle-level manageability. Wiwynn’s announcements filled in the practicalities of deploying such densities. The company showcased rack- and system-level designs across NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 (72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs with 800 Gb/s ConnectX-8 SuperNICs) for large-scale inference and reasoning, and HGX B300 (eight GPUs /

Read More »

Storage constraints add to AI data center bottleneck

AI deployment uses multiple storage layers, and each one has different requirements, says Dell’Oro’s Fung. For storing massive amounts of unstructured, raw data, cold storage on HDDs makes more sense, he says. SSDs make sense for warm storage, such as for pre-processing data and for post-training and inference. “There’s a place for each type of storage,” he says. Planning ahead According to Constellation’s Mehta, data center managers and other storage buyers should prepare by treating SSD procurement like they do GPUs. “Multi-source, lock in lanes early, and engineer to standards so vendor swaps don’t break your data path.” He recommends qualifying at least two vendors for both QLC and TLC and starting early. TrendForce’s Ao agrees. “It is better to build inventory now,” he says. “It is difficult to lock-in long term deals with suppliers now due to tight supply in 2026.” Based on suppliers’ availability, Kioxia, SanDisk, and Micron are in the best position to support 128-terabyte QLC enterprise SSD solutions, Ao says. “But in the longer term, some module houses may be able to provide similar solutions at a lower cost,” Ao adds. “We are seeing more module houses, such as Phison and Pure Storage, supporting these solutions.” And it’s not just SSD for fast storage and HDD for slow storage. Memory solutions are becoming more complex in the AI era, says Ao. “For enterprise players with smaller-scale business models, it is important to keep an eye on Z-NAND and XL-Flash for AI inference demand,” he says. These are memory technologies that sit somewhere between the SSDs and the RAM working memory. “These solutions will be more cost-effective compared to HBM or even HBF [high bandwidth flash],” he says.

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »