
In announcing the deal, Jensen Huang emphasized the client aspect of the deal, saying future Intel chips would have Nvidia GPUs baked into them instead of Intel’s own GPU technology. But there will be impact for the server business as well.
There are two things the analysts all agree on: AMD is the big loser in this deal. It had the advantage of CPU and GPU combination that Intel and Nvidia didn’t have individually. It was apparent in supercomputers like Frontier and El Capitan, which are an all-AMD design of CPUs and GPUs working in tandem. Now the two companies are joined at the hip and will have a competitive offering in due time.
The second area of agreement is that the future of Jaguar Shores, Intel’s AI accelerator based on its GPU technology and the Gaudi AI accelerator is uncertain. “Nvidia already has solutions here and it doesn’t make sense for Intel to work on a redundant product that needs to be marketed over an established one,” said Nguyen.
A significant event coming from this deal is that Intel is adopting the Nvidia proprietary NVlink high-speed interconnect protocols. “This means that Intel has essentially determined its ability to compete head-to-head with Nvidia in the current large scale AI marketplace, despite its best efforts, have mostly failed,” wrote Jack Gold of J. Gold Associates in a research note.
Gold notes that Nvidia already uses a few Xeon data center chips to power their largest systems, and the x86 chips provide most of the controls and pre-processing that their large-scale GPU racks require. By accelerating the performance of the Xeon, the GPU benefits as well.
That leaves the question mark hanging over Nvidia’s Arm CPUs, which is likely to continue for “niche areas,” Gold wrote. “But with this announcement, it now seems to admit that working with an established player like Intel is a better long-term bet for CPUs.”