Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

Why Data Scientists Should Care about Containers — and Stand Out with This Knowledge

“I train models, analyze data and create dashboards — why should I care about Containers?” Many people who are new to the world of data science ask themselves this question. But imagine you have trained a model that runs perfectly on your laptop. However, error messages keep popping up in the cloud when others access […]

“I train models, analyze data and create dashboards — why should I care about Containers?”

Many people who are new to the world of data science ask themselves this question. But imagine you have trained a model that runs perfectly on your laptop. However, error messages keep popping up in the cloud when others access it — for example because they are using different library versions.

This is where containers come into play: They allow us to make machine learning models, data pipelines and development environments stable, portable and scalable — regardless of where they are executed.

Let’s take a closer look.

Table of Contents
1 — Containers vs. Virtual Machines: Why containers are more flexible than VMs
2 — Containers & Data Science: Do I really need Containers? And 4 reasons why the answer is yes.
3 — First Practice, then Theory: Container creation even without much prior knowledge
4 — Your 101 Cheatsheet: The most important Docker commands & concepts at a glance
Final Thoughts: Key takeaways as a data scientist
Where Can You Continue Learning?

1 — Containers vs. Virtual Machines: Why containers are more flexible than VMs

Containers are lightweight, isolated environments. They contain applications with all their dependencies. They also share the kernel of the host operating system, making them fast, portable and resource-efficient.

I have written extensively about virtual machines (VMs) and virtualization in ‘Virtualization & Containers for Data Science Newbiews’. But the most important thing is that VMs simulate complete computers and have their own operating system with their own kernel on a hypervisor. This means that they require more resources, but also offer greater isolation.

Both containers and VMs are virtualization technologies.

Both make it possible to run applications in an isolated environment.

But in the two descriptions, you can also see the 3 most important differences:

  • Architecture: While each VM has its own operating system (OS) and runs on a hypervisor, containers share the kernel of the host operating system. However, containers still run in isolation from each other. A hypervisor is the software or firmware layer that manages VMs and abstracts the operating system of the VMs from the physical hardware. This makes it possible to run multiple VMs on a single physical server.
  • Resource consumption: As each VM contains a complete OS, it requires a lot of memory and CPU. Containers, on the other hand, are more lightweight because they share the host OS.
  • Portability: You have to customize a VM for different environments because it requires its own operating system with specific drivers and configurations that depend on the underlying hardware. A container, on the other hand, can be created once and runs anywhere a container runtime is available (Linux, Windows, cloud, on-premise). Container runtime is the software that creates, starts and manages containers — the best-known example is Docker.
Created by the author

You can experiment faster with Docker — whether you’re testing a new ML model or setting up a data pipeline. You can package everything in a container and run it immediately. And you don’t have any “It works on my machine”-problems. Your container runs the same everywhere — so you can simply share it.

2 — Containers & Data Science: Do I really need Containers? And 4 reasons why the answer is yes.

As a data scientist, your main task is to analyze, process and model data to gain valuable insights and predictions, which in turn are important for management.

Of course, you don’t need to have the same in-depth knowledge of containers, Docker or Kubernetes as a DevOps Engineer or a Site Reliability Engineer (SRE). Nevertheless, it is worth having container knowledge at a basic level — because these are 4 examples of where you will come into contact with it sooner or later:

Model deployment

You are training a model. You not only want to use it locally but also make it available to others. To do this, you can pack it into a container and make it available via a REST API.

Let’s look at a concrete example: Your trained model runs in a Docker container with FastAPI or Flask. The server receives the requests, processes the data and returns ML predictions in real-time.

Reproducibility and easier collaboration

ML models and pipelines require specific libraries. For example, if you want to use a deep learning model like a Transformer, you need TensorFlow or PyTorch. If you want to train and evaluate classic machine learning models, you need Scikit-Learn, NumPy and Pandas. A Docker container now ensures that your code runs with exactly the same dependencies on every computer, server or in the cloud. You can also deploy a Jupyter Notebook environment as a container so that other people can access it and use exactly the same packages and settings.

Cloud integration

Containers include all packages, dependencies and configurations that an application requires. They therefore run uniformly on local computers, servers or cloud environments. This means you don’t have to reconfigure the environment.

For example, you write a data pipeline script. This works locally for you. As soon as you deploy it as a container, you can be sure that it will run in exactly the same way on AWS, Azure, GCP or the IBM Cloud.

Scaling with Kubernetes

Kubernetes helps you to orchestrate containers. But more on that below. If you now get a lot of requests for your ML model, you can scale it automatically with Kubernetes. This means that more instances of the container are started.

3 — First Practice, then Theory: Container creation even without much prior knowledge

Let’s take a look at an example that anyone can run through with minimal time — even if you haven’t heard much about Docker and containers. It took me 30 minutes.

We’ll set up a Jupyter Notebook inside a Docker container, creating a portable, reproducible Data Science environment. Once it’s up and running, we can easily share it with others and ensure that everyone works with the exact same setup.

0 — Install Docker Dekstop and create a project directory

To be able to use containers, we need Docker Desktop. To do this, we download Docker Desktop from the official website.

Now we create a new folder for the project. You can do this directly in the desired folder. I do this via Terminal — on Windows with Windows + R and open CMD.

We use the following command:

Screenshot taken by the author

1. Create a Dockerfile

Now we open VS Code or another editor and create a new file with the name ‘Dockerfile’. We save this file without an extension in the same directory. Why doesn’t it need an extension?

We add the following code to this file:

# Use the official Jupyter notebook image with SciPy
FROM jupyter/scipy-notebook:latest  

# Set the working directory inside the container
WORKDIR /home/jovyan/work  

# Copy all local files into the container
COPY . .

# Start Jupyter Notebook without token
CMD ["start-notebook.sh", "--NotebookApp.token=''"]

We have thus defined a container environment for Jupyter Notebook that is based on the official Jupyter SciPy Notebook image.

First, we define with FROM on which base image the container is built. jupyter/scipy-notebook:latest is a preconfigured Jupyter notebook image and contains libraries such as NumPy, SiPy, Matplotlib or Pandas. Alternatively, we could also use a different image here.

With WORKDIR we set the working directory within the container. /home/jovyan/work is the default path used by Jupyter. User jovyan is the default user in Jupyter Docker images. Another directory could also be selected — but this directory is best practice for Jupyter containers.

With COPY . . we copy all files from the local directory — in this case the Dockerfile, which is located in the jupyter-docker directory — to the working directory /home/jovyan/work in the container.

With CMD [“start-notebook.sh”, “ — NotebookApp.token=‘’’”] we specify the default start command for the container, specify the start script for Jupyter Notebook and define that the notebook is started without a token — this allows us to access it directly via the browser.

2. Create the Docker image

Next, we will build the Docker image. Make sure you have the previously installed Docker desktop open. We now go back to the terminal and use the following command:

cd jupyter-docker
docker build -t my-jupyter .

With cd jupyter-docker we navigate to the folder we created earlier. With docker build we create a Docker image from the Dockerfile. With -t my-jupyter we give the image a name. The dot means that the image will be built based on the current directory. What does that mean? Note the space between the image name and the dot.

The Docker image is the template for the container. This image contains everything needed for the application such as the operating system base (e.g. Ubuntu, Python, Jupyter), dependencies such as Pandas, Numpy, Jupyter Notebook, the application code and the startup commands. When we “build” a Docker image, this means that Docker reads the Dockerfile and executes the steps that we have defined there. The container can then be started from this template (Docker image).

We can now watch the Docker image being built in the terminal.

Screenshot taken by the author

We use docker images to check whether the image exists. If the output my-jupyter appears, the creation was successful.

docker images

If yes, we see the data for the created Docker image:

Screenshot taken by the author

3. Start Jupyter container

Next, we want to start the container and use this command to do so:

docker run -p 8888:8888 my-jupyter

We start a container with docker run. First, we enter the specific name of the container that we want to start. And with -p 8888:8888 we connect the local port (8888) with the port in the container (8888). Jupyter runs on this port. I do not understand.

Alternatively, you can also perform this step in Docker desktop:

Screenshot taken by the author

4. Open Jupyter Notebook & create a test notebook

Now we open the URL [http://localhost:8888](http://localhost:8888/) in the browser. You should now see the Jupyter Notebook interface.

Here we will now create a Python 3 notebook and insert the following Python code into it.

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

x = np.linspace(0, 10, 100)
y = np.sin(x)

plt.plot(x, y)
plt.title("Sine Wave")
plt.show()

Running the code will display the sine curve:

Screenshot taken by the author

5. Terminate the container

At the end, we end the container either with ‘CTRL + C’ in the terminal or in Docker Desktop.

With docker ps we can check in the terminal whether containers are still running and with docker ps -a we can display the container that has just been terminated:

Screenshot taken by the author

6. Share your Docker image

If you now want to upload your Docker image to a registry, you can do this with the following command. This will upload your image to Docker Hub (you need a Docker Hub account for this). You can also upload it to a private registry of AWS Elastic Container, Google Container, Azure Container or IBM Cloud Container.

docker login

docker tag my-jupyter your-dockerhub-name/my-jupyter:latest

docker push dein-dockerhub-name/mein-jupyter:latest

If you then open Docker Hub and go to your repositories in your profile, the image should be visible.

This was a very simple example to get started with Docker. If you want to dive a little deeper, you can deploy a trained ML model with FastAPI via a container.

4 — Your 101 Cheatsheet: The most important Docker commands & concepts at a glance

You can actually think of a container like a shipping container. Regardless of whether you load it onto a ship (local computer), a truck (cloud server) or a train (data center) — the content always remains the same.

The most important Docker terms

  • Container: Lightweight, isolated environment for applications that contains all dependencies.
  • Docker: The most popular container platform that allows you to create and manage containers.
  • Docker Image: A read-only template that contains code, dependencies and system libraries.
  • Dockerfile: Text file with commands to create a Docker image.
  • Kubernetes: Orchestration tool to manage many containers automatically.

The basic concepts behind containers

  • Isolation: Each container contains its own processes, libraries and dependencies
  • Portability: Containers run wherever a container runtime is installed.
  • Reproducibility: You can create a container once and it runs exactly the same everywhere.

The most basic Docker commands

docker --version # Check if Docker is installed
docker ps # Show running containers
docker ps -a # Show all containers (including stopped ones)
docker images # List of all available images
docker info # Show system information about the Docker installation

docker run hello-world # Start a test container
docker run -d -p 8080:80 nginx # Start Nginx in the background (-d) with port forwarding
docker run -it ubuntu bash # Start interactive Ubuntu container with bash

docker pull ubuntu # Load an image from Docker Hub
docker build -t my-app . # Build an image from a Dockerfile

Final Thoughts: Key takeaways as a data scientist

👉 With Containers you can solve the “It works on my machine” problem. Containers ensure that ML models, data pipelines, and environments run identically everywhere, independent of OS or dependencies.

👉 Containers are more lightweight and flexible than virtual machines. While VMs come with their own operating system and consume more resources, containers share the host operating system and start faster.

👉 There are three key steps when working with containers: Create a Dockerfile to define the environment, use docker build to create an image, and run it with docker run — optionally pushing it to a registry with docker push.

And then there’s Kubernetes.

A term that comes up a lot in this context: An orchestration tool that automates container management, ensuring scalability, load balancing and fault recovery. This is particularly useful for microservices and cloud applications.

Before Docker, VMs were the go-to solution (see more in ‘Virtualization & Containers for Data Science Newbiews’.) VMs offer strong isolation, but require more resources and start slower.

So, Docker was developed in 2013 by Solomon Hykes to solve this problem. Instead of virtualizing entire operating systems, containers run independently of the environment — whether on your laptop, a server or in the cloud. They contain all the necessary dependencies so that they work consistently everywhere.

I simplify tech for curious minds🚀 If you enjoy my tech insights on Python, data science, Data Engineering, machine learning and AI, consider subscribing to my substack.

Where Can You Continue Learning?

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

Gluware tackles AI agent coordination with Titan platform

The first phase focused on configuration management and drift detection. Gluware’s system identified when network devices deviated from approved configurations and proposed fixes, but network operations teams manually reviewed and approved each remediation. The second phase introduced automatic remediation. As customers gained confidence, they allowed the system to automatically correct

Read More »

Ransomware gangs find a new hostage: Your AWS S3 buckets

To succeed, attackers typically look for S3 buckets that have: versioning disabled ( so old versions can’t be restored), object-lock disabled ( so files can be overwritten or deleted), wide write permissions (via mis-configured IAM policies or leaked credentials), and hold high-value data (backup files, production config dumps). Once inside,

Read More »

Cisco initiative targets device security

Cisco is announcing a security initiative that will push customers to update or replace aging infrastructure components, such as routers, switches and firewalls, as well as discourage them from using any insecure features. Called Resilient Infrastructure, the plan calls for Cisco to strengthen network security by increasing default protections, removing

Read More »

Baker Hughes Books 1.3 GW Gas Turbine Order from Dynamis

Dynamis Power Solutions LLC has awarded Baker Hughes Co a contract for the supply of 25 aeroderivative gas turbines with a combined capacity of 1.3 gigawatts (GW). The turbines, including LM2500, LM6000 and LM9000, will be deployed for “mobile power generation across a wide range of oil and gas applications, including upstream, refining and petrochemical”, said a joint statement Thursday. “Dynamis packages gas turbines and generators in its distinctive mobile power solutions. As part of the agreement, Dynamis will package 10 of Baker Hughes’ efficient and dry low emissions LM9000 gas turbines in a new offering called the DT70-70 MW, which will total 700 MW of gas turbine power generation capacity, delivering the oil and gas industry’s highest reported mobile power density (MW per square foot) to date”, the companies said.  Matthew Crawford, chief executive of The Woodlands, Texas-based Dynamis, said, “Through our decade-long collaboration with Baker Hughes, we are redefining what’s possible in the mobile power generation market for oil and gas through our delivery of a new solution with power density once thought unattainable. Our use of LM9000s will offer twice the power of our flagship solution – the best-in-class DT35 – without compromising flexibility, reliability or efficiency”. The statement said, “Designed to support unique and complex operational needs of industries requiring natural gas power solutions, the DT70 is based off Dynamis’ successful DT35 – a 1.5-GW installed base which has been in operation for nearly a decade in more than 1,200 locations throughout the North America region”. “Dynamis’ new application of Baker Hughes’ LM9000s boasts enhanced versatility for large power consumers in the oil and gas space, resilience in challenging environments and the ability to power – benefits that are emphasized by the unit’s compact footprint and record-setting short rig-up and commissioning times”, it added. The companies did not disclose the contract price. Baker

Read More »

Sasol Chief Exec Sees Chem Business Potentially Listing by 2028

Sasol Ltd. Chief Executive Officer Simon Baloyi said the South African company may spin off its international chemicals business as soon as 2028, depending on how quickly profit grows. Shares of the fuel and chemicals firm have gained about 47% this year — heading for its best performance since 2021 — as Baloyi, who became CEO last year, focuses on increasing output from the Secunda manufacturing hub in South Africa and turning around the international chemicals division ahead of a potential listing. That part of the company includes the $12.8 billion sprawling Lake Charles complex in Louisiana.  A listing could happen as early as 2028 or 2029, given efforts to strengthen the unit, Baloyi said in an interview at Bloomberg’s Johannesburg office on Thursday. It could be listed “once we have a resilient business that can withstand any cycle that comes its way,” and once earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization near the $800 million-to-$1 billion range, he said. Another factor that will affect the decision is reducing debt. The chemicals unit’s Ebitda has improved to around $400 million, though the market remains tough, the CEO said. Major oil producers recently said a downturn in the chemicals sector is showing little sign of easing, amid a surge in Chinese supplies and lackluster demand. A turnaround of the business would be a major achievement for Sasol. The Lake Charles chemicals project was originally designed to expand the company’s operational footprint abroad, but suffered from mismanagement issues, hurricanes and billions of dollars in cost overruns that ballooned debt. In 2020, the year the project reached completion, Sasol sold a $2 billion stake in the US based-chemicals business to form a joint venture with LyondellBasell Industries NV to cut debt. It also accelerated an asset-sale program that wrapped up the following year. Sasol could make “disciplined” investments to upgrade

Read More »

Oil Slides on Peace Deal Pressure

Oil fell as traders assessed the prospect of a Ukraine-Russia peace deal that would add supply to a saturated market, with reports emerging that the US threatened to stop supporting Kyiv unless it agrees to a pact that favors Moscow. The newly-active January West Texas Intermediate contract fell about 1.6% to settle near $58 a barrel, its fourth day down out of five. Prices pared some losses after President Donald Trump said he would not remove sanctions on Russia as talks continue. Curbs on the country’s two largest oil producers went into effect on Friday. Despite those sanctions taking hold without delay and Ukraine’s top European allies rejecting key parts of the US-Russian peace plan, markets are preparing for a deal, said Gregory Brew, a geopolitical analyst at the Eurasia Group. “The market is pricing in this peace plan, which appears to have more US energy behind it than was apparent earlier in this week,” Brew said. Trump, speaking on Fox News Radio, said he thinks Thursday is “an appropriate” deadline for Ukraine to agree to the US-proposed peace plan with Russia. Even if the pressure campaign doesn’t yield a pact, traders remain skeptical of concrete impacts from the sanctions, Brew said. Trump’s changing tone has underscored that perception, said Rebecca Babin, a senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth Group. “Regardless of whether a deal is ultimately reached, confidence in strict sanctions enforcement is fading,” Babin said. “As a result, shorts are adding to positions, betting that even without a deal, the rhetoric suggests Trump may be stepping back from actions that would materially impact crude and product flows.” Trend-following commodity trading advisers went completely short on WTI and Brent on Friday for the first time since May, according to data from Bridgeton Research Group. If there is progress

Read More »

Reliance Stops Using Russian Oil in Part of Jamnagar

India’s Reliance Industries Ltd. said it would stop processing Russian oil at part of its giant Jamnagar oil refinery as US sanctions force the company to shy away from dealings with Moscow. The export-focused part of the refinery, which accounts for about half of its 1.4 million barrels a day of capacity, took its last shipment of Russian crude on Thursday, the company said in statement.  The move would mean the site could keep supplying fuel to Europe when new sanctions banning the import of petroleum made from Russian crude come into effect early next year. It will also demonstrate compliance with a US effort to force processors away from Russian barrels.  Reliance isn’t currently buying Russian oil and hasn’t taken a view yet on whether it will resume doing so, a person with knowledge of the matter said, asking not to be identified because the information isn’t public. Together, the two sites at Jamnagar make it the world’s biggest oil refinery. Still, the company said in a statement that some purchases bought before the US put sanctions on Russia’s two largest oil companies would discharge at another part of the Jamnagar facility that supplies the domestic market, it added. The US announcement of sanctions on Lukoil PJSC and Rosneft PJSC last month sent shockwaves through Asian oil buyers, as it meant a swath of Russia’s flows are pumped by blacklisted firms. Processors in India and China had snapped up cheap Russian barrels in the aftermath of the war in Ukraine, denting the impact of rampant global inflation in 2022.  A deadline to wind down deals with the duo is set to pass on Friday, putting pressure on the companies and countries that had continued to buy barrels from Moscow after Russia invaded Ukraine. While Indian refiners have been booking

Read More »

DOE Seeks Input on Gas Turbine Manufacturing to Increase Domestic Energy Production

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy Office (HGEO) today issued a request for information (RFI) focused on evaluating challenges faced by U.S. manufacturers that currently constrain gas turbine production capacity. Natural gas turbines offer several benefits for domestic electricity generation, including high operational flexibility, efficiencies, and reliability. DOE will use stakeholder feedback to inform effective research and development that can increase the pace of manufacturing these crucial energy generating technologies. This effort supports President Trump’s commitment to boost production of our domestic energy resources to ensure affordable and reliable energy for all Americans and protect our national and economic security. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, electricity demand, which remained relatively flat for the last two decades, is now expected to grow at an average rate of 1.7% per year in the short-term forecast and to exceed 6,000 terawatt-hours by 2050, a 50% increase from 2024 levels. Such demand—due in part to rapid growth in data centers and artificial intelligence, reshoring of American manufacturing, and increased electrification in building operations, transportation, and industry—will strain equipment supply chains, especially gas turbines, which provide more than 40% of electricity in the United States. Further, with the recent spike in electricity demand, the delivery wait time for gas turbines has doubled from two to three years to as many as seven years, resulting in price increases due to the limited supply. Such long lead times and high prices threaten to constrain the effective supply of electricity to meet demand.  To assist DOE in evaluating the gaps that constrain the production capacity of U.S. manufacturers of gas turbines, DOE is seeking input from interested parties in the categories of manufacturing technology, workforce, sub-suppliers, and materials. To review the RFI, please click here. Responses must be submitted electronically to [email protected], with the subject line “U.S.

Read More »

Lukoil Dissolves International Board

Russian energy giant Lukoil PJSC dissolved the supervisory board of its international business, the latest sign of how US sanctions — the first of which begin on Friday — are affecting the firm. As part of the dissolution, the Moscow-based firm “recalled” Sergei Kochkurov, chief executive officer of the parent company, as well as Evgeny Khavkin and Gennady Fedotov. The step, taken during an Oct. 28 board meeting, was posted by Lukoil International GmbH on Austria’s corporate register on Friday.  The US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control announced on Oct. 22 that it was sanctioning Lukoil and fellow Russian giant Rosneft PJSC. The measures start today although some actions against Lukoil assets have been delayed until Dec. 13. The move stressed the firm globally: Russian oil prices plunged, its international trading business Litasco has shed staff and wound up at least some operations. Lukoil’s share of revenue from the West Qurna 2 oil field in Iraq has been frozen by Baghdad and western suitors are circling the firm’s global assets. The decision to dissolve the board and recall Lukoil International’s overseers will leave the company’s managing director Alexander Matytsyn in charge. The company is still fully owned by Lukoil. On Wednesday, the Vienna-based unit also published its fully audited group report for 2022 — taking about two years longer than normal to do so. The move offered a first detailed view of how the company fared in the first year of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. According to those accounts, completed by KPMG on Oct. 9 this year, Lukoil International booked €95 billion of revenue and a net income of €7.8 billion in 2022 — a period that reflected the height of the European energy crisis. Some of the world’s largest energy companies, including Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and

Read More »

Microsoft’s Fairwater Atlanta and the Rise of the Distributed AI Supercomputer

Microsoft’s second Fairwater data center in Atlanta isn’t just “another big GPU shed.” It represents the other half of a deliberate architectural experiment: proving that two massive AI campuses, separated by roughly 700 miles, can operate as one coherent, distributed supercomputer. The Atlanta installation is the latest expression of Microsoft’s AI-first data center design: purpose-built for training and serving frontier models rather than supporting mixed cloud workloads. It links directly to the original Fairwater campus in Wisconsin, as well as to earlier generations of Azure AI supercomputers, through a dedicated AI WAN backbone that Microsoft describes as the foundation of a “planet-scale AI superfactory.” Inside a Fairwater Site: Preparing for Multi-Site Distribution Efficient multi-site training only works if each individual site behaves as a clean, well-structured unit. Microsoft’s intra-site design is deliberately simplified so that cross-site coordination has a predictable abstraction boundary—essential for treating multiple campuses as one distributed AI system. Each Fairwater installation presents itself as a single, flat, high-regularity cluster: Up to 72 NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs per rack, using GB200 NVL72 rack-scale systems. NVLink provides the ultra-low-latency, high-bandwidth scale-up fabric within the rack, while the Spectrum-X Ethernet stack handles scale-out. Each rack delivers roughly 1.8 TB/s of GPU-to-GPU bandwidth and exposes a multi-terabyte pooled memory space addressable via NVLink—critical for large-model sharding, activation checkpointing, and parallelism strategies. Racks feed into a two-tier Ethernet scale-out network offering 800 Gbps GPU-to-GPU connectivity with very low hop counts, engineered to scale to hundreds of thousands of GPUs without encountering the classic port-count and topology constraints of traditional Clos fabrics. Microsoft confirms that the fabric relies heavily on: SONiC-based switching and a broad commodity Ethernet ecosystem to avoid vendor lock-in and accelerate architectural iteration. Custom network optimizations, such as packet trimming, packet spray, high-frequency telemetry, and advanced congestion-control mechanisms, to prevent collective

Read More »

Land & Expand: Hyperscale, AI Factory, Megascale

Land & Expand is Data Center Frontier’s periodic roundup of notable North American data center development activity, tracking the newest sites, land plays, retrofits, and hyperscale campus expansions shaping the industry’s build cycle. October delivered a steady cadence of announcements, with several megascale projects advancing from concept to commitment. The month was defined by continued momentum in OpenAI and Oracle’s Stargate initiative (now spanning multiple U.S. regions) as well as major new investments from Google, Meta, DataBank, and emerging AI cloud players accelerating high-density reuse strategies. The result is a clearer picture of how the next wave of AI-first infrastructure is taking shape across the country. Google Begins $4B West Memphis Hyperscale Buildout Google formally broke ground on its $4 billion hyperscale campus in West Memphis, Arkansas, marking the company’s first data center in the state and the anchor for a new Mid-South operational hub. The project spans just over 1,000 acres, with initial site preparation and utility coordination already underway. Google and Entergy Arkansas confirmed a 600 MW solar generation partnership, structured to add dedicated renewable supply to the regional grid. As part of the launch, Google announced a $25 million Energy Impact Fund for local community affordability programs and energy-resilience improvements—an unusually early community-benefit commitment for a first-phase hyperscale project. Cooling specifics have not yet been made public. Water sourcing—whether reclaimed, potable, or hybrid seasonal mode—remains under review, as the company finalizes environmental permits. Public filings reference a large-scale onsite water treatment facility, similar to Google’s deployments in The Dalles and Council Bluffs. Local governance documents show that prior to the October announcement, West Memphis approved a 30-year PILOT via Groot LLC (Google’s land assembly entity), with early filings referencing a typical placeholder of ~50 direct jobs. At launch, officials emphasized hundreds of full-time operations roles and thousands

Read More »

The New Digital Infrastructure Geography: Green Street’s David Guarino on AI Demand, Power Scarcity, and the Next Phase of Data Center Growth

As the global data center industry races through its most frenetic build cycle in history, one question continues to define the market’s mood: is this the peak of an AI-fueled supercycle, or the beginning of a structurally different era for digital infrastructure? For Green Street Managing Director and Head of Global Data Center and Tower Research David Guarino, the answer—based firmly on observable fundamentals—is increasingly clear. Demand remains blisteringly strong. Capital appetite is deepening. And the very definition of a “data center market” is shifting beneath the industry’s feet. In a wide-ranging discussion with Data Center Frontier, Guarino outlined why data centers continue to stand out in the commercial real estate landscape, how AI is reshaping underwriting and development models, why behind-the-meter power is quietly reorganizing the U.S. map, and what Green Street sees ahead for rents, REITs, and the next wave of hyperscale expansion. A ‘Safe’ Asset in an Uncertain CRE Landscape Among institutional investors, the post-COVID era was the moment data centers stepped decisively out of “niche” territory. Guarino notes that pandemic-era reliance on digital services crystallized a structural recognition: data centers deliver stable, predictable cash flows, anchored by the highest-credit tenants in global real estate. Hyperscalers today dominate new leasing and routinely sign 15-year (or longer) contracts, a duration largely unmatched across CRE categories. When compared with one-year apartment leases, five-year office leases, or mall anchor terms, the stability story becomes plain. “These are AAA-caliber companies signing the longest leases in the sector’s history,” Guarino said. “From a real estate point of view, that combination of tenant quality and lease duration continues to position the asset class as uniquely durable.” And development returns remain exceptional. Even without assuming endless AI growth, the math works: strong demand, rising rents, and high-credit tenants create unusually predictable performance relative to

Read More »

The Flexential Blueprint: New CEO Ryan Mallory on Power, AI, and Bending the Physics Curve

In a coordinated leadership transition this fall, Ryan Mallory has stepped into the role of CEO at Flexential, succeeding Chris Downie. The move, described as thoughtful and planned, signals not a shift in direction, but a reinforcement of the company’s core strategy, with a sharpened focus on the unprecedented opportunities presented by the artificial intelligence revolution. In an exclusive interview on the Data Center Frontier Show Podcast, Mallory outlined a confident vision for Flexential, positioning the company at the critical intersection of enterprise IT and next-generation AI infrastructure. “Flexential will continue to focus on being an industry and market leader in wholesale, multi-tenant, and interconnection capabilities,” Mallory stated, affirming the company’s foundational strengths. His central thesis is that the AI infrastructure boom is not a monolithic wave, but a multi-stage evolution where Flexential’s model is uniquely suited for the emerging “inference edge.” The AI Build Cycle: A Three-Act Play Mallory frames the AI infrastructure market as a three-stage process, each lasting roughly four years. We are currently at the tail end of Stage 1, which began with the ChatGPT explosion three years ago. This phase, characterized by a frantic rush for capacity, has led to elongated lead times for critical infrastructure like generators, switchgear, and GPUs. The capacity from this initial build-out is expected to come online between late 2025 and late 2026. Stage 2, beginning around 2026 and stretching to 2030, will see the next wave of builds, with significant capacity hitting the market in 2028-2029. “This stage will reveal the viability of AI and actual consumption models,” Mallory notes, adding that air-cooled infrastructure will still dominate during this period. Stage 3, looking ahead to the early 2030s, will focus on long-term scale, mirroring the evolution of the public cloud. For Mallory, the enduring nature of this build cycle—contrasted

Read More »

Centersquare Launches $1 Billion Expansion to Scale an AI-Ready North American Data Center Platform

A Platform Built for Both Colo and AI Density The combined Evoque–Cyxtera platform entered the market with hundreds of megawatts of installed capacity and a clear runway for expansion. That scale positioned Centersquare to offer both traditional enterprise colocation and the higher-density, AI-ready footprints increasingly demanded through 2024 and 2025. The addition of these ten facilities demonstrates that the consolidation strategy is gaining traction, giving the platform more owned capacity to densify and more regional optionality as AI deployment accelerates. What’s in the $1 Billion Package — and Why It Matters 1) Lease-to-Own Conversions in Boston & Minneapolis Centersquare’s decision to purchase two long-operated but previously leased sites in Boston and Minneapolis reduces long-term occupancy risk and gives the operator full capex control. Owning the buildings unlocks the ability to schedule power and cooling upgrades on Centersquare’s terms, accelerate retrofits for high-density AI aisles, deploy liquid-ready thermal topologies, and add incremental power blocks without navigating landlord approval cycles. This structural flexibility aligns directly with the platform’s “AI-era backbone” positioning. 2) Eight Additional Data Centers Across Six Metros The acquisitions broaden scale in fast-rising secondary markets—Tulsa, Nashville, Raleigh—while deepening Centersquare’s presence in Dallas and expanding its Canadian footprint in Toronto and Montréal. Dallas remains a core scaling hub, but Nashville and Raleigh are increasingly important for enterprises modernizing their stacks and deploying regional AI workloads at lower cost and with faster timelines than congested Tier-1 corridors. Tulsa provides a network-adjacent, cost-efficient option for disaster recovery, edge aggregation, and latency-tolerant compute. In Canada, Toronto and Montréal offer strong enterprise demand, attractive economics, and grid advantages—including Québec’s hydro-powered, low-carbon energy mix—that position them well for AI training spillover and inference workloads requiring reliable, competitively priced power. 3) Self-Funded With Cash on Hand In the current rate environment, funding the entire $1 billion package

Read More »

Fission Forward: Next-Gen Nuclear Power Developments for the AI Data Center Boom

Constellation proposes to begin with 1.5 GW of fast-tracked projects, including 800 MW of battery energy storage and 700 MW of new natural gas generation to address short-term reliability needs. The remaining 4.3 GW represents longer-term investment at the Calvert Cliffs Clean Energy Center: extending both units for an additional 20 years beyond their current 2034 and 2036 license expirations, implementing a 10% uprate that would add roughly 190 MW of output, and pursuing 2 GW of next-generation nuclear at the existing site. For Maryland, a state defined by a dense I-95 fiber corridor, accelerating data center buildout, and rising AI-driven load, the plan could be transformative. If Constellation moves from “option” to “program,” the company estimates that 70% of the state’s electricity supply could come from clean energy sources, positioning Maryland as a top-tier market for 24/7 carbon-free power. TerraPower’s Natrium SMR Clears a Key Federal Milestone On Oct. 23, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) for TerraPower’s Natrium small modular reactor in Kemmerer, Wyoming. While not a construction permit, FEIS completion removes a major element of federal environmental risk and keeps the project on track for the next phase of NRC review. TerraPower and its subsidiary, US SFR Owner, LLC, originally submitted the construction permit application on March 28, 2024. Natrium is a sodium-cooled fast reactor producing roughly 345 MW of electric output, paired with a molten-salt thermal-storage system capable of boosting generation to about 500 MW during peak periods. The design combines firm baseload power with flexible, dispatchable capability, an attractive profile for hyperscalers evaluating 24/7 clean energy options in the western U.S. The project is part of the DOE’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program, intended to replace retiring coal capacity in PacifiCorp’s service territory while showcasing advanced fission technology. For operators planning multi-GW

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »