Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

Winning the war against adversarial AI needs to start with AI-native SOCs

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Faced with increasingly sophisticated multi-domain attacks slipping through due to alert fatigue, high turnover and outdated tools, security leaders are embracing AI-native security operations centers (SOCs) as the future of defense. This year, attackers are setting […]

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More


Faced with increasingly sophisticated multi-domain attacks slipping through due to alert fatigue, high turnover and outdated tools, security leaders are embracing AI-native security operations centers (SOCs) as the future of defense.

This year, attackers are setting new speed records for intrusions by capitalizing on the weaknesses of legacy systems designed for perimeter-only defenses and, worse, of trusted connections across networks.

Attackers trimmed 17 minutes off their average eCrime intrusion activity time results over the last year and reduced the average breakout time for eCrime intrusions from 79 minutes to 62 minutes in just a year. The fastest observed breakout time was just two minutes and seven seconds.

Attackers are combining generative AI, social engineering, interactive intrusion campaigns and an all-out assault on cloud vulnerabilities and identities. With this playbook they seek to capitalize on the weaknesses of organizations with outdated or no cybersecurity arsenals in place.   

“The speed of today’s cyberattacks requires security teams to rapidly analyze massive amounts of data to detect, investigate and respond to threats faster. This is the failed promise of SIEM [security information and event management]. Customers are hungry for better technology that delivers instant time-to-value and increased functionality at a lower total cost of ownership,” said George Kurtz, president, CEO and cofounder of cybersecurity company CrowdStrike.

“SOC leaders must find the balance in improving their detection and blocking capabilities. This should reduce the number of incidents and improve their response capabilities, ultimately reducing attacker dwell time,” Gartner writes in its report, Tips for Selecting the Right Tools for Your Security Operations Center.

AI-native SOCs: The sure cure for swivel-chair integration

Visit any SOC, and it’s clear most analysts are being forced to rely on “swivel-chair integration” because legacy systems weren’t designed to share data in real time with each other.

That means analysts are often swiveling their rolling chairs from one monitor to another, checking on alerts and clearing false positives. Accuracy and speed are lost in the fight against growing multi-domain attempts that are not intuitively obvious and distinct among the real-time torrent of alerts streaming in.

Here are just a few of the many challenges that SOC leaders are looking to an AI-native SOC to help solve:

Chronic levels of alert fatigue: Legacy systems, including SIEMs, are producing an increasingly overwhelming number of alerts for SOC analysts with to track and analyze. SOC analysts who spoke on anonymity said that four out of every 10 alerts they produce are false positives. Analysts often spend more time triaging false positives than investigating actual threats, which severely affects productivity and response time. Making an SOC AI-native would make an immediate dent in this time, which every SOC analyst and leader has to deal with on a daily basis.

Ongoing talent shortage and churn: Experienced SOC analysts who excel at what they do and whose leaders can influence budgets to get them raises and bonuses are, for the most part, staying put in their current roles. Kudos to the organizations who realize investing in retaining talented SOC teams is core to their business. A commonly cited statistic is that there is a global cybersecurity workforce gap of 3.4 million professionals. There is indeed a chronic shortage of SOC analysts in the industry, so it’s up to organizations to close the pay gaps and double down on training to grow their teams internally. Burnout is pervasive in understaffed teams who are forced to rely on swivel-chair integration to get their jobs done.

Multi-domain threats are growing exponentially. Adversaries, including cybercrime gangs, nation-states and well-funded cyber-terror organizations, are doubling down on exploiting gaps in endpoint security and identities. Malware-free attacks have been growing throughout the past year, increasing in their variety, volume and ingenuity of attack strategies. SOC teams protecting enterprise software companies developing AI-based platforms, systems and new technologies are being especially hard-hit. Malware-free attacks are often undetectable, trading on trust in legitimate tools, rarely generating a unique signature, and relying on file-less execution. Kurtz told VentureBeat that attackers who target endpoint and identity vulnerabilities frequently move laterally within systems in under two minutes. Their advanced techniques, including social engineering, ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS), and identity-based attacks, demand faster and more adaptive SOC responses.

Increasingly complex cloud configurations increase the risks of an attack. Cloud intrusions have surged by 75% year-over-year, with adversaries exploiting native cloud vulnerabilities such as insecure APIs and identity misconfigurations. SOCs often struggle with limited visibility and inadequate tools to mitigate threats in complex multicloud environments.

Data overload and tool sprawl create defense gaps that SOC teams are called on to fill. Legacy perimeter-based systems, including many decades-old SIEM systems, struggle to process and analyze the immense amount of data generated by modern infrastructure, endpoints, and sources of telemetry data. Asking SOC analysts to keep on top of multiple sources of alerts and reconcile data across disparate tools slows their effectiveness, leads to burnout and holds them back from achieving the necessary accuracy, speed and performance.

How AI is improving SOC accuracy, speed and performance

“AI is already being used by criminals to overcome some of the world’s cybersecurity measures,” warns Johan Gerber, executive vice president of security and cyber innovation at MasterCard. “But AI has to be part of our future, of how we attack and address cybersecurity.”

“It’s extremely hard to go out and do something if AI is thought about as a bolt-on; you have to think about it [as integral],” Jeetu Patel, EVP and GM of security and collaboration for Cisco, told VentureBeat, citing findings from the 2024 Cisco Cybersecurity Readiness Index. “The operative word over here is AI being used natively in your core infrastructure.”

Given the many accuracy, speed and performance advantages of transitioning to an AI-native SOC, it’s understandable why Gartner is supportive of the idea. The research firm predicts that by 2028, multi-agent AI in threat detection and incident response (including within SOCs) will increase from 5% to 70% of AI implementations — primarily augmenting, not replacing, staff.

Chatbots making an impact

Core to the value that AI-driven SOCs bring to cybersecurity and IT teams are accelerated threat detection and triage based on improved predictive accuracy using real-time telemetry data.

SOC teams report that AI-based tools, including chatbots, are providing faster turnarounds on a broad spectrum of queries, from simple analysis to more complex analysis of anomalies. The latest generation of chatbots designed to streamline SOC workflows and assist security analysts include CrowdStrike’s Charlotte AI, Google’s Threat Intelligence Copilot, Microsoft Security Copilot, Palo Alto Networks’ series of AI Copilots, and SentinelOne Purple AI.

Graph databases are core to SOCs’ future

Graph database technologies are helping defenders see their vulnerabilities as attackers do. Attackers think in terms of traversing the system graph of a business, while SOC defenders have traditionally relied on lists they use to cycle through deterrent-based actions. The graph database arms race aims to get SOC analysts to parity with attackers when it comes to tracking threats, intrusions and breaches across the graph of their identities, systems and networks.  

AI is already proving effective in reducing false positives, automating incident responses, enhancing threat analysis and continually finding new ways to streamline SOC operations.

Combining AI with graph databases is also helping SOCs track and stop multi-domain attacks. Graph databases are core to SOC’s future because they excel at visualizing and analyzing interconnected data in real time, enabling faster and more accurate threat detection, attack path analysis, and risk prioritization.

John Lambert, corporate vice president for Microsoft Security Research, underscored the critical importance of graph-based thinking for cybersecurity, explaining to VentureBeat, “Defenders think in lists, cyberattackers think in graphs. As long as this is true, attackers win.”

AI-native SOCs need humans in the middle to reach their potential

SOCs that are deliberate in designing human-in-the-middle workflows as a core part of their AI-native SOC strategies are best positioned for success. The overarching goal needs to be strengthening SOC analysts’ knowledge and providing them with the data, insights and intelligence they need to excel and grow in their roles. Also implicit in a human-in-the-middle workflow design is retention.

Organizations that have created a culture of continuous learning and see AI as a tool for accelerating training and on-the-job results are already ahead of competitors. VentureBeat continues to see SOCs that put a high priority on enabling analysts to focus on complex, strategic tasks, while AI manages routine operations, retaining their teams. There are many stories of small wins, like stopping an intrusion or a breach. AI should not be seen as a replacement for SOC analysts or for experienced human threat hunters. Instead, AI apps and platforms are tools that threat hunters need to protect enterprises better.

AI-driven SOCs can significantly reduce incident response times, with some organizations reporting up to a 50% decrease. This acceleration enables security teams to address threats more promptly, minimizing potential damage.

AI’s role in SOCs is expected to expand, incorporating proactive adversary simulations, continuous health monitoring of SOC ecosystems, and advanced endpoint and identity security through zero-trust integration. These advancements will further strengthen organizations’ defenses against evolving cyber threats.

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

Versa bolsters data protection, AI-powered operations in SASE upgrade

Docker-containerized ML models execute data discovery and classification locally, maintaining data sovereignty while scanning file repositories, SaaS applications, and inline traffic flows, the authors stated.  “Versa DLP uses advanced transformer models and fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect sensitive information across diverse document types and formats. Unlike traditional pattern

Read More »

DKnife targets network gateways in long running AitM campaign

Beyond update hijacking, the framework supports DNS manipulation, binary replacement, and selective traffic forwarding, giving attackers control over how specific requests are handled. Indicators point to China-Nexus development and targeting Several aspects of DKnife’s design and operation suggested ties to China-aligned threat actors. Talos identified configuration data and code comments written in

Read More »

Four new vulnerabilities found in Ingress NGINX

NGINX is a reverse proxy/load balancer that generally acts as the front-end web traffic receiver and directs it to the application service for data transformation. Ingress NGINX is a version used in Kubernetes as the controller for traffic coming into the infrastructure. It takes care of mapping traffic to pods

Read More »

USA Boards Venezuela-Linked Oil Tanker

US forces boarded an oil tanker after a cat-and-mouse chase from the Caribbean to the Indian Ocean, the Pentagon said, as Washington expands its geographic scope in an ongoing crackdown on a global shadow fleet used to export sanctioned crude. The Aquila II had departed from the Jose terminal in Venezuela in early December and appeared to be bound for China, according to ship tracking data compiled by Bloomberg. The ship was intercepted while heading toward the Sunda Strait between the Indonesian islands of Java and Sumatra. It’s the latest Venezuela-linked ship the US has taken control of since December, and the furthest from Caribbean waters, underscoring how far Washington is prepared to go to enforce its energy quarantine worldwide. The Suezmax vessel, able to haul about 1 million barrels of oil, was sanctioned for its involvement in the Russian oil trade following Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Although it was sailing under the flag of Panama when it was sanctioned by the US, as a Treasury Sanctions list search shows, it now appears to be operating under an unknown flag, according to the Equasis international shipping database and Bloomberg data. Previous US tanker seizures were executed before and after US forces captured and removed former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in a highly-coordinated operation that included air strikes on Caracas. The last such incident took place in late January, when Motor Vessel Sagitta was captured in the Caribbean Sea. The Trump administration has pledged to crack down on Venezuela’s use of sanctioned ships, which often deploy deceptive satellite positioning signals, false flags and other misleading techniques to illegally export oil and other goods.  On Monday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the Pentagon was pursuing dark fleet vessels carrying Venezuelan crude around the world.  “The only guidance I gave to my military commanders is,

Read More »

India Seizes Three Tankers

The Indian Coast Guard seized three tankers that it said were involved in oil smuggling, the first sign of the country getting tough on the so-called dark fleet.  The three ships were taken in the waters off Mumbai on Friday by the coast guard, which said in a post on X that it had “busted an international oil-smuggling racket” and that the vessels had been known to “frequently change identity.”  It’s the first time New Delhi has taken such action, according to people familiar with the Indian shipping industry, and comes as the US and Europe lead an effort to get tougher on vessels moving sanctioned oil. Many dark fleet tankers have sub-standard documentation, improper or fake flag registrations and poor maintenance, posing security and maritime safety risks.  The seizures are also happening as Washington pressures New Delhi to stop taking Russian crude, as part of a deal to cut import tariffs on the South Asian nation. India said early last year that it wouldn’t allow sanctioned tankers to discharge at its ports. Explainer: How Trump Is Testing India’s US-Russia Balancing Act The coast guard didn’t name the vessels it had seized, but shared photos of them in its post. The pictures matched past images of the Chiltern, Asphalt Star and Stellar Ruby that can be found on MarineTraffic, a ship-tracking intelligence platform.  Ship-intelligence platform TankerTracker.com identified the same vessels through their unique seven-digit IMO numbers.  All three ships were sanctioned by Washington last year for links to the Iranian oil trade.  Nobody responded to emails seeking comment at offices of the registered owners of the tankers as listed on the Equasis database. Calls made to the owners and manager of Chiltern and Asphalt Star were directed to voice mail. Calls made to the owner and manager of Stellar Ruby were not answered. The three vessels seized by

Read More »

Expand CEO Steps Down

Expand Energy Corp. said Domenic “Nick” Dell’Osso, Jr. stepped down as chief executive officer as the largest US natural gas producer plans to relocate its headquarters to Houston from Oklahoma City in mid-2026. Michael Wichterich, Expand’s chairman, will assume the role of interim CEO while the board searches for a permanent replacement, the company said Monday in a statement. Dell’Osso will serve as an external adviser for an unspecified period. “The relocation, which will primarily focus on the executive leadership team, will strengthen Expand Energy’s relationships with key industry and commercial partners,” the company said in the statement. Moreover, “virtually all Oklahoma City employees will be unaffected” by the change in headquarters, beyond those executive leaders, Wichterich told employees in an internal email seen by Bloomberg. Expand’s shares dropped as much as 8.9%, the most since July. The abrupt change in leadership comes less than six months after the Chief Financial Officer Mohit Singh left the company, which cited his “termination without cause.” RBC Capital Markets equity analyst Scott Hanold, who said he met with Expand’s leadership Monday morning, wrote in a note to clients that the conversation indicated “there were no disagreements or anything improper” and the executive change is the result of Dell’Osso choosing to stay in Oklahoma City. Expand’s board of directors views the move of executive functions to Houston as “urgent” to supporting “marketing efforts and commercial efforts,” Hanold said. Dell’Osso joined Chesapeake Energy, which was renamed Expand Energy after acquiring rival driller Southwestern Energy, in 2008 after working as an investment banker at Jefferies. WHAT DO YOU THINK? Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

Read More »

Equinor Divesting Full Onshore Position in Vaca Muerta Basin

Equinor announced, in a statement posted on its website recently, that it has signed an agreement with Vista Energy to divest its full onshore position in Argentina’s Vaca Muerta basin. The company said the transaction includes Equinor’s 30 percent non-operated interest in the Bandurria Sur asset and its 50 percent non-operated interest in the Bajo del Toro asset. Equinor noted that its Argentinian offshore acreage is not affected by the transaction. The total consideration is valued at around $1.1 billion, Equinor highlighted in the statement, adding that, at closing, the company will receive an upfront cash payment of $550 million as well as shares in Vista. The consideration also includes contingent payments linked to production and oil prices over a five-year period, according to the statement, which noted that the transaction has an effective date of July 1, 2025. “We are realizing value from two high-quality assets we have actively developed as we continue to high-grade our international portfolio,” Philippe Mathieu, executive vice president for Exploration & Production International at Equinor, said in the statement. “This transaction strengthens Equinor’s financial flexibility as we evaluate opportunities in our core international markets, where we see substantial growth towards 2030. At the same time, we retain optionality through our offshore positions in Argentina,” he added. Chris Golden, senior vice president for the U.S. and Argentina in Exploration & Production International, said in the statement, “this is a value-driven decision that enhances the resilience of our international portfolio and sharpens our focus in Argentina”. Equinor noted in its statement that closing of the transaction “will, among other things, be subject to relevant approvals”. The company highlighted that it has been present in Argentina since 2017, “entering the Vaca Muerta through a joint exploration agreement with YPF on the Bajo del Toro asset”. The onshore

Read More »

BofA Report Compares Big Oil Cos

In a BofA Global Research report sent to Rigzone last month, analysts offered a comparison of global “big oil” companies. “After a portfolio comparison note on XOM/CVX last year, we respond to significant investor interest in widening the sample to all five integrated oil companies (ExxonMobil [XOM], Chevron [CVX], BP, TotalEnergies [TTE], Shell [SHEL]),” the analysts noted in the report. “The U.S. Integrateds on average have much bigger U.S. shale footprints, more oil in the upstream mix (vs gas), more near-term production growth, higher CF/bbl, longer reserve life, higher refining margins due to bigger U.S. footprints, and lower debt,” they added. “However, their remaining 3-4x EV/EBITDA premium still seems overdone – particularly considering the Europeans’ higher share of long-life assets,” they continued. In the report, the analysts stated that Chevron has “the highest share of upstream in earnings at 82 percent, with TTE the lowest at 62 percent”. “Europe’s Integrateds instead have more sizeable midstream, refining/chems and/or low carbon segments,” they added. “Notably, both XOM and CVX have ~40 percent of their upstream in U.S. shale, compared to ~25 percent for BP and “U.S. barrels tend to be relatively high cash flow for all five, but the longer-life barrels carry less capital intensity. Woodmac’s estimates of 2P reserves are 25 years for XOM, 20 for CVX, TTE, BP, and 16 for SHEL,” the analysts went on to state. The analysts also noted that XOM and TTE “offer highest production growth at 20 percent from 2025-30”. “Refining net cash margins are ~$10/bbl at CVX and XOM, $9/bbl at SHEL, $8/bbl at TTE and $6/bbl at BP,” they said. In the comparison report, the analysts said “XOM stands out for the most refining/chems, highest CF/boe, and the most production growth (mostly from US shale) to 2030”. “CVX stands out for its 2026 cash flow inflection and highest share of upstream in the

Read More »

Transocean to Buy Valaris in Near $6B Deal

Transocean Ltd and Valaris Limited announced, in a joint statement, the signing of a definitive agreement to combine the two companies. Under the agreement, Transocean will acquire Valaris in an all-stock transaction valued at approximately $5.8 billion, the statement noted. The shareholding percentages of the combined company, on a fully diluted basis, will be approximately 53 percent for Transocean and 47 percent for Valaris, according to the statement. Valaris shareholders will receive a fixed exchange ratio of 15.235 shares of Transocean stock for each common share of Valaris under the terms of the all-stock transaction, the statement highlighted. Based on the closing prices of Transocean and Valaris on February 6, the transaction implies a combined enterprise value of approximately $17 billion, the statement noted. The transaction was unanimously approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is expected to close in the second half of 2026, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, and approvals by the shareholders of each company, the joint statement said. The statement outlined that the deal “creates an industry leader with a diversified offshore fleet of 73 rigs, including 33 ultra-deepwater drillships, nine semisubmersibles and 31 modern jackups, to meet emerging growth opportunities”. It also “expands reach and customer access in world’s most attractive offshore basins” and “unlocks more than $200 million in identified cost synergies”, the statement highlighted, adding that it “increases cash flow, accelerates deleveraging, and strengthens financial flexibility”. Keelan Adamson, Transocean President and Chief Executive Officer, said in the statement, “this transaction creates a very attractive investment in the offshore drilling industry, differentiated by the best fleet, proven people, leading technologies, and unequalled customer service”. “The powerful combination is well-timed to capitalize on an emerging, multi-year offshore drilling upcycle. Investors and our global customers will benefit from our expanded fleet of best-in-class, high-specification rigs,” he added. “We have identified more than $200 million in

Read More »

NetBox Labs ships AI copilot designed for network engineers, not developers

Natural language for network engineers Beevers explained that network operations teams face two fundamental barriers to automation. First, they lack accurate data about their infrastructure. Second, they aren’t software developers and shouldn’t have to become them. “These are not software developers. They are network engineers or IT infrastructure engineers,” Beevers said. “The big realization for us through the copilot journey is they will never be software developers. Let’s stop trying to make them be. Let’s let these computers that are really good at being software developers do that, and let’s let the network engineers or the data center engineers be really good at what they’re really good at.”  That vision drove the development of NetBox Copilot’s natural language interface and its capabilities. Grounding AI in infrastructure reality The challenge with deploying AI  in network operations is trust. Generic large language models hallucinate, produce inconsistent results, and lack the operational context to make reliable decisions. NetBox Copilot addresses this by grounding the AI agent in NetBox’s comprehensive infrastructure data model. NetBox serves as the system of record for network and infrastructure teams, maintaining a semantic map of devices, connections, IP addressing, rack layouts, power distribution and the relationships between these elements. Copilot has native awareness of this data structure and the context it provides. This enables queries that would be difficult or impossible with traditional interfaces. Network engineers can ask “Which devices are missing IP addresses?” to validate data completeness, “Who changed this prefix last week?” for change tracking and compliance, or “What depends on this switch?” for impact analysis before maintenance windows.

Read More »

US pushes voluntary pact to curb AI data center energy impact

Others note that cost pressure isn’t limited to the server rack. Danish Faruqui, CEO of Fab Economics, said the AI ecosystem is layered from silicon to software services, creating multiple points where infrastructure expenses eventually resurface. “Cloud service providers are likely to gradually introduce more granular pricing models across cloud, AI, and SaaS offerings, tailored by customer type, as they work to absorb the costs associated with the White House energy and grid compact,” Faruqui said.   This may not show up as explicit energy surcharges, but instead surface through reduced discounts, higher spending commitments, and premiums for guaranteed capacity or performance. “Smaller enterprises will feel the impact first, while large strategic customers remain insulated longer,” Rawat said. “Ultimately, the compact would delay and redistribute cost pressure; it does not eliminate it.” Implications for data center design The proposal is also likely to accelerate changes in how AI facilities are designed. “Data centers will evolve into localized microgrids that combine utility power with on-site generation and higher-level implementation of battery energy storage systems,” Faruqui said. “Designing for grid interaction will become imperative for AI data centers, requiring intelligent, high-speed switching gear, increased battery energy storage capacity for frequency regulation, and advanced control systems that can manage on-site resources.”

Read More »

Intel teams with SoftBank to develop new memory type

However, don’t expect anything anytime soon. Intel’s Director of Global Strategic Partnerships Sanam Masroor outlined the plans in a blog post. Operations are expected to begin in Q1 2026, with prototypes due in 2027 and commercial products by 2030. While Intel has not come out and said it, that memory design is almost identical to HBM used in GPU accelerators and AI data centers. HBM sits right on the GPU die for immediate access to the GPU, unlike standard DRAM which resides on memory sticks plugged into the motherboard. HBM is much faster than DDR memory but is also much more expensive to produce. It’s also much more profitable than standard DRAM which is why the big three memory makers – Micron, Samsung, and SK Hynix – are favoring production of it.

Read More »

Nvidia’s $100 Billion OpenAI Bet Shrinks and Signals a New Phase in the AI Infrastructure Cycle

One of the most eye-popping figures of the AI boom – a proposed $100 billion Nvidia commitment to OpenAI and as much as 10 gigawatts of compute for the company’s Stargate AI infrastructure buildout – is no longer on the table. And that partial retreat tells the data center industry something important. According to multiple reports surfacing at the end of January, Nvidia has paused and re-scoped its previously discussed, non-binding investment framework with OpenAI, shifting from an unprecedented capital-plus-infrastructure commitment to a much smaller (though still massive) equity investment. What was once framed as a potential $100 billion alignment is now being discussed in the $20-30 billion range, as part of OpenAI’s broader effort to raise as much as $100 billion at a valuation approaching $830 billion. For data center operators, infrastructure developers, and power providers, the recalibration matters less for the headline number and more for what it reveals about risk discipline, competitive dynamics, and the limits of vertical circularity in AI infrastructure finance. From Moonshot to Measured Capital The original September 2025 memorandum reportedly contemplated not just capital, but direct alignment on compute delivery: a structure that would have tightly coupled Nvidia’s balance sheet with OpenAI’s AI-factory roadmap. By late January, however, sources indicated Nvidia executives had grown uneasy with both the scale and the structure of the deal. Speaking in Taipei on January 31, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang pushed back on reports of friction, calling them “nonsense” and confirming Nvidia would “absolutely” participate in OpenAI’s current fundraising round. But Huang was also explicit on what had changed: the investment would be “nothing like” $100 billion, even if it ultimately becomes the largest single investment Nvidia has ever made. That nuance matters. Nvidia is not walking away from OpenAI. But it is drawing a clearer boundary around

Read More »

Data Center Jobs: Engineering, Construction, Commissioning, Sales, Field Service and Facility Tech Jobs Available in Major Data Center Hotspots

Each month Data Center Frontier, in partnership with Pkaza, posts some of the hottest data center career opportunities in the market. Here’s a look at some of the latest data center jobs posted on the Data Center Frontier jobs board, powered by Pkaza Critical Facilities Recruiting. Looking for Data Center Candidates? Check out Pkaza’s Active Candidate / Featured Candidate Hotlist Onsite Engineer – Critical FacilitiesCharleston, SC This is NOT a traveling position. Having degreed engineers seems to be all the rage these days. I can also use this type of candidate in following cities: Ashburn, VA; Moncks Corner, SC; Binghamton, NY; Dallas, TX or Indianapolis, IN. Our client is an engineering design and commissioning company that is a subject matter expert in the data center space. This role will be onsite at a customer’s data center. They will provide onsite design coordination and construction administration, consulting and management support for the data center / mission critical facilities space with the mindset to provide reliability, energy efficiency, sustainable design and LEED expertise when providing these consulting services for enterprise, colocation and hyperscale companies. This career-growth minded opportunity offers exciting projects with leading-edge technology and innovation as well as competitive salaries and benefits. Electrical Commissioning Engineer Ashburn, VA This traveling position is also available in: New York, NY; White Plains, NY;  Richmond, VA; Montvale, NJ; Charlotte, NC; Atlanta, GA; Hampton, GA; New Albany, OH; Cedar Rapids, IA; Phoenix, AZ; Salt Lake City, UT; Dallas, TX; Kansas City, MO; Omaha, NE; Chesterton, IN or Chicago, IL. *** ALSO looking for a LEAD EE and ME CxA Agents and CxA PMs *** Our client is an engineering design and commissioning company that has a national footprint and specializes in MEP critical facilities design. They provide design, commissioning, consulting and management expertise in the critical facilities space. They

Read More »

Operationalizing AI at Scale: Google Cloud on Data Infrastructure, Search, and Enterprise AI

The AI conversation has been dominated by model announcements, benchmark races, and the rapid evolution of large language models. But in enterprise environments, the harder problem isn’t building smarter models. It’s making them work reliably with real-world data. On the latest episode of the Data Center Frontier Show Podcast, Sailesh Krishnamurthy, VP of Engineering for Databases at Google Cloud, pulled back the curtain on the infrastructure layer where many ambitious AI initiatives succeed, or quietly fail. Krishnamurthy operates at the intersection of databases, search, and AI systems. His perspective underscores a growing reality across enterprise IT: AI success increasingly depends on how organizations manage, integrate, and govern data across operational systems, not just how powerful their models are. The Disconnect Between LLMs and Reality Enterprises today face a fundamental challenge: connecting LLMs to real-time operational data. Search systems handle documents and unstructured information well. Operational databases manage transactions, customer data, and financial records with precision. But combining the two remains difficult. Krishnamurthy described the problem as universal. “Inside enterprises, knowledge workers are often searching documents while separately querying operational systems,” he said. “But combining unstructured information with operational database data is still hard to do.” Externally, customers encounter the opposite issue. Portals expose personal data but struggle to incorporate broader contextual information. “You get a narrow view of your own data,” he explained, “but combining that with unstructured information that might answer your real question is still challenging.” The result: AI systems often operate with incomplete context. Vector Search Moves Into the Database Vector search has emerged as a bridge between structured and unstructured worlds. But its evolution over the past three years has changed how enterprises deploy it. Early use cases focused on semantic search, i.e. finding meaning rather than exact keyword matches. Bug tracking systems, for example, began

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »