Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

2025 Renewable Energy Outlook: Full speed ahead as second Trump administration begins

The renewables industry begins 2025 with the Inflation Reduction Act continuing to spur record investment, and spiking load growth providing new opportunities for deployment. At the same time, interconnection queues across the country remain clogged, siting, permitting, financial and other challenges continue, and industry critic Donald Trump just began his second term as president. “It’s an […]

The renewables industry begins 2025 with the Inflation Reduction Act continuing to spur record investment, and spiking load growth providing new opportunities for deployment. At the same time, interconnection queues across the country remain clogged, siting, permitting, financial and other challenges continue, and industry critic Donald Trump just began his second term as president.

“It’s an interesting moment, because there is this really rapid change, and yet we’re stuck in some really key ways,” said Heather O’Neill, president and CEO of Advanced Energy United. “The interconnection queue is one really clear example where, yes, there’s some progress — FERC’s putting out reform measures — and yet we’re not unleashing the full promise and the economic opportunity and activity that we could.”

After decades of flat load growth, U.S. electricity demand could rise 128 GW over the next five years, according to a report last month from Grid Strategies. At the same time, the number of new transmission interconnection requests has risen by 300% to 500% over the last decade, with 2.5 TW of clean energy and storage capacity currently waiting to connect to the grid, said an October report from the Department of Energy.

However, O’Neill said, the “the macro trends are incredibly positive … We are in the middle of an energy transformation.” She attributed some of her optimism to the scale of investment and growth that the industry has been seeing. 

The energy storage sector is especially dynamic right now, O’Neill said: “A few years ago, [there was] very little in the way of storage capacity showing up, but with so much innovation in the technology, the cost curves are coming down. When we think about how to manage load, storage plays a key role in that.”

Global energy storage installations boomed 76% in 2024 and are projected to continue that streak in 2025, according to a November report from BloombergNEF, but BNEF noted that growth may be impacted by “uncertainties stemming from the new Trump administration.”

Trump has spoken out against electric vehicles and said he will “rescind all unspent funds under the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act.” Congress is expected to try to claw back EV tax credits from the IRA, which could impact the battery industry. Trump has also said he would end offshore wind “on day one” and embraced oil and gas generation, but vowed last month to expedite federal permits and environmental reviews for construction projects that represent an investment of $1 billion or more — a move that could benefit clean energy.

Felisa Sanchez, a partner with law firm K&L Gates’ maritime and finance practice groups, said that Trump’s goal to end offshore wind may come into conflict with his goal of boosting the U.S. economy and its domestic manufacturing. 

“It’s hard to say ‘we’re going to end offshore wind’ when you’re also impacting a vast supply chain that has already been going for the last few years that has been implemented — when ports have been developed, and vessels have started to either be under construction or have come out of the yard ready to work in offshore wind,” she said.


The need to meet load growth on the electric side is not going away. And any administration – Republican, independent, Democratic – foremost in their mind is going to be a strong resilient economy. That’s going to be dependent upon a best-in-class electric distribution grid.

Paul DeCotis

Senior partner and head of East Coast energy and utilities at West Monroe


John Northington, a government affairs advisor and a member of K&L Gates’ public policy and law practice group, said he anticipates that the offshore wind industry may adapt to the new administration by shifting away from “‘steel in water is good for the environment’ as the main message.”

“Maybe for the next four years, it’s that steel in water is good for jobs, it’s money, it’s good for America,” he said. “Talking about the business benefits, rather than environmental benefits, could be a change in trend for some of these companies.”

When speaking to Utility Dive in December, Northington said he was also hopeful about the bipartisan Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024, sponsored by Sen. Joe Manchin, I-W.Va., and Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo. — but the bill was not included in the continuing resolution passed later that month, “taking permitting off the table for this Congress,” said Manchin, who retired in early January.

New demands on the grid

Regardless of how Trump’s second term shapes the U.S. generation mix, his administration will be dealing with an anticipated 3% annual average load growth over the next five years — a level which hasn’t been seen since the 1980s, according to a December report from Grid Strategies

“The need to meet load growth on the electric side is not going away. And any administration — Republican, independent, Democratic — foremost in their mind is going to be a strong resilient economy,” said Paul DeCotis, a senior partner and head of East Coast energy and utilities at West Monroe. “That’s going to be dependent upon a best-in-class electric distribution grid.”

Surging load growth is driven largely by data center demand, which a December report from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found has tripled over the past decade and is projected to double or triple again by 2028. The increase in demand is also the result of industry electrification and growth in domestic manufacturing.

That growth “means continued capital investment in the [energy] industry, regardless of the administration,” DeCotis said. “I don’t think any administration is going to want to come in and all of a sudden see brownouts and blackouts and not enough capacity to meet demand, or have to stall demand and the job growth that goes with it, because they can’t meet energy needs.”

O’Neill said she believes that states will also continue to drive the clean energy transition forward, as they’re where “energy policies happen …. where the investments become real.”

State governors and commissioners “want manufacturing in their state,” she said. “They want data centers in their state. The siting reform conversation is one that I think is not a partisan conversation. It’s: how do we help unlock some of this desired economic activity? For us, the siting and building issues will be something that we’re going to work on in the states, regardless of the landscape in D.C.”


The projects that are being facilitated through [the IRA] are not isolated in blue states. For example, we’re doing projects all over the country and seeing projects work in states like Ohio and Pennsylvania that didn’t used to work.

Dan Smith

Vice president of markets at DSD Renewables


In addition to states and utilities, companies like Microsoft, Amazon and Meta are also helping to drive the demand for clean energy — investing billions in renewable energy deployment in addition to seeking nuclear and natural gas generation to handle load from their data centers.

Molly Jerrard, head of demand response at Enel North America, said she expects that in 2025, “significant load growth …. will challenge our grid’s flexibility and put the reliability of local systems to the test.”

“Combine this with aging infrastructure, congestion, and the uptick in climate-driven grid stress, utilities and grid operators will need to put a bigger focus on adoption of demand response programs and distributed energy resources to address these challenges and increase grid stability,” Jerrard said.

However, she said, “inconsistent data access standards” from utilities continue to limit the scalability of virtual power plants, a potent demand response solution.

O’Neill is excited about VPPs, she said, as she sees “a ton of innovation” flowing into the sector and expanding the ways that VPPs can offer grid flexibility.

“We’re seeing virtual power plants across different regions of the country — whether it’s coastal or Texas — where you’ve got utilities and commissions really putting virtual power plants to the test,” she said. “They’re managing the load, they’re shaving peak loads, and they don’t have to build as much [generation].”

Solar and offshore wind

In 2025, the American Clean Power Association forecasts that utility-scale U.S. solar installations will shrink 16% from 2024, due to the risk of new tariffs under a second Trump administration and concerns that he might work with Congress to repeal aspects of the IRA.

The industry’s residential segment “continued to decline” last year, driven by California, where residential solar cratered following the state’s switch from net metering to net billing in 2023, said a third quarter 2024 report from the Solar Energy Industries Association.

While solar projects in the state “definitely don’t offer the same amount of savings that they used to,” said Dan Smith, vice president of markets at DSD Renewables, “we are continuing to see California be our largest market.”

This is due in part to utility rates “[continuing] to escalate at really extreme levels in California,” he said. “So while we’re experiencing [NEM 3.0] adversely, as utility rates increase, that increases our customers’ savings. So that’s making up a bit of that gap.”

Smith said that DSD Renewables is entering 2025 apprehensive about any potential repeal or reforms to the IRA’s solar tax credits, but hopeful that the Trump administration and Congress will see their value.

“The projects that are being facilitated through that are not isolated in blue states,” he said. “For example, we’re doing projects all over the country and seeing projects work in states like Ohio and Pennsylvania that didn’t used to work.” 

Smith said that if the domestic content adder in the IRA remains in place, and domestic solar supply continues to come online, he won’t be as concerned about potential tariffs. 

“But that’s the question that I think the whole industry has right now — do those suppliers continue to make investments in their domestic factories?” he said. “There are many factories either under construction or planned, and the big question on many of our minds right now is, will any of that federal policy change in such a way that it causes those companies to pull back on those commitments?”

The offshore wind industry also contains a lot of people “holding their breath,” Sanchez said, “waiting to see what happens when [Trump] does come into power at the end of January.”

The stock prices for offshore wind companies like Ørsted and Vestas fell following the election and have yet to recover. Sanchez said she sees this as a “temporary signal” that will depend on what actions Trump takes on offshore wind.

“There’s been a tremendous level of investment, and that has continued this year, even with the more cautious approach that the industry has taken,” Sanchez said. “And I do see that going forward. But again, I think everyone at this moment is in a pause waiting to see what happens over the next couple of months, to see whether it’s worth continuing additional investment.”

On his first day in office, Trump issued an executive order pausing offshore wind lease sales in federal waters and the issuance of approvals, permits and loans for onshore and offshore wind projects. The pauses don’t have a set expiration date, according to the order, but will remain in effect until revoked.


We don’t expect, and I think lots of people out there don’t expect, the IRA to completely be blown up and be obliterated.

Marlene Motyka

Deloitte’s U.S. renewable energy leader


Northington said he finds it promising that Trump’s pick to head the Department of the Interior, former North Dakota governor Doug Burgum, has overseen the development of onshore wind in his state.

“I think that the Trump energy policies are, yes, anti-wind, but when it comes to getting something done, it’s more pro-oil and gas,” he said. “At the end of the day, to dismantle something requires effort and energy, and to ignore something takes much less energy.” 

However, Northington said he’s concerned that the high bureaucratic turnover of Trump’s first administration may continue in his second, and civil servants at agencies like the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management may decide to retire. People might say, “‘Okay. I stuck through round one — am I going to stick through round two?’” he said. “I think that can have a certain deleterious effect on things like getting permits through, or holding lease sales.”

Both solar and offshore wind continue to advance technologically, with promising innovations on the horizon. There are still “a lot of discussions going on about the future of offshore wind, about floating wind, about the development of the technology and the infrastructure needed on the West Coast to support floating wind,” Sanchez said.

The solar industry benefits each year from “continued improvements in efficiency of solar modules,” Smith said. “Now we’re using almost exclusively bifacial solar modules, which increase the energy yield.”

Marlene Motyka, Deloitte’s U.S. renewable energy leader, said she’s hopeful that solar cell technology will continue to advance with further innovations in materials like silicon and perovskite, and she’s excited about a December report from SEIA and Wood Mackenzie that said U.S. solar module factories are now equipped to meet nearly all domestic demand.

Motyka said Deloitte expects “good momentum” for the industry in 2025: “We don’t expect, and I think lots of people out there don’t expect, the IRA to completely be blown up and be obliterated.”

“There are a lot of things that have been coming together over time, and that’s not going to be stopped on a dime,” she said. “I’ve been involved in renewable energy for 17 years, and all of it is kind of coming together now. I think it’s still an exciting time.”

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

Oil Rises but Logs Second Weekly Loss

Oil rose on Friday but still notched a second weekly loss as the market continued to weigh the threat to output from sanctions on Russia against a looming oversupply. West Texas Intermediate futures rose around 0.5% to settle below $60 a barrel, but were still down for the week. Adding to fears of a glut, oil prices have also been buffeted by swings in equity markets this week. Meanwhile, the White House’s move to clamp down on the buying of Russian crude led oil trading giant Gunvor Group to withdraw an offer for the international assets of Lukoil PJSC. The fate of the assets, which include stakes in oil fields, refineries and gas stations, remains unclear. One possible exception to that crackdown could emerge soon: President Donald Trump signaled an openness to exempting Hungary from sanctions on Russian energy purchases as he hosted Prime Minister Viktor Orban, briefly pushing futures to intraday lows. The development appeared to allay shortage fears, given that Budapest imports over 90% of its crude from Moscow. Senior industry figures have warned the latest US curbs on Russia’s two largest oil companies are beginning to have an impact on the market, particularly in diesel, where prices have been surging in recent days, with time spreads for the fuel signaling supply pressure. At the same time, the US measures have come against a backdrop of oversupply that has weighed on key crude oil metrics. The spread between the nearest West Texas Intermediate futures closed at the weakest level since February on Thursday. “If the market flips to contango, we may see more bearish funds enter the crude space,” said Dennis Kissler, senior vice president for trading at BOK Financial said of the potential that longer-dated contracts trade at a premium to nearer-term ones. “Most traders remain surprised

Read More »

Gunvor Scraps Lukoil Deal

Commodity trader Gunvor Group has withdrawn its offer for the international assets of sanctioned Russian oil producer Lukoil PJSC after the US Treasury Department called it “the Kremlin’s puppet” and said the oil and gas trader would never get a license. Gunvor pushed back on the Treasury comment on social media, calling it “fundamentally misinformed and false.” The Geneva-based company said it would seek to correct a “clear misunderstanding” but that it would withdraw its bid for now. President Trump has been clear that the war must end immediately. As long as Putin continues the senseless killings, the Kremlin’s puppet, Gunvor, will never get a license to operate and profit. — Treasury Department (@USTreasury) November 6, 2025 The comment is a remarkable volte-face after a week in which Gunvor has been in talks with the US Office of Foreign Assets Control, part of the Treasury Department, and other bodies in charge of sanctions to help press its case for a deal that would have transformed it into an integrated oil producing and processing colossus. Gunvor swooped on the assets at the end of last month following the US blacklisting of Lukoil and fellow Russian oil giant Rosneft PJSC, and its exit may leave the door open to other suitors. Gunvor on Thursday also announced it had raised $2.81 billion in a credit facility financed by US arms of global banks. Like other major commodity traders, the firm funds the bulk of its trades of oil, gas and metals around the world with bank financing. For the trader, the comments are likely to revive questions about its connections in Moscow at a time when many oil industry participants are wary of any links to Russia.  The trader’s co-founder, Gennady Timchenko, is a friend of Russian President Vladimir Putin, and when the US imposed sanctions

Read More »

Ship With Russia Oil Makes Rare Move Offshore India

A tanker carrying crude from recently-sanctioned Rosneft PJSC has made a rare cargo transfer off Mumbai, as the Trump administration ramps up its scrutiny of India’s oil trade with Russia. But the unusual move has puzzled traders. The cargo was transferred from one blacklisted tanker to another sanctioned ship, meaning there’s been no attempt to hide its origin — typical of such a move — and the crude is still heading for an Indian port: Kochi in the south, rather than Mumbai on the west coast. India’s purchases of Russian oil have drawn the ire of President Donald Trump, and the US penalties on Rosneft along with Lukoil PJSC are expected to severely impact the trade. The market is keenly watching for disruptions to established flows before a grace period related to the sanctions ends later this month. “What we’re seeing now is this uncertainty in the market about what the sanctions risks are,” said Rachel Ziemba, an analyst at the Center for a New American Security in Washington. “The net result is more ship-to-ship transfers, more subterfuge, longer routes, more complicated transactions.” The Fortis took around 720,000 barrels of Russian Urals from Ailana on Tuesday near Mumbai, according to ship-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg, Kpler and Vortexa. The cargo was collected from the Baltic port of Ust-Luga before the US sanctioned Rosneft, and Ailana had idled in the area for nearly two weeks with no clear reason.  Ailana is on its way back to Russia, while Fortis is expected to arrive at Kochi early next week with the cargo, ship-tracking data shows. Both vessels have been sanctioned by the European Union and the UK. Fortis’ owner and manager — Vietnam-based Pacific Logistic & Maritime and North Star Ship Management — didn’t respond to emailed requests for comment. There are no contact details on maritime database

Read More »

Southwest Power Pool to develop 765-kV regional transmission ‘backbone’

Listen to the article 4 min This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback. Dive Brief: The Southwest Power Pool board of directors on Wednesday approved an $8.6 billion slate of 50 transmission projects across its 14-state footprint. The projects are intended to help the grid operator meet peak demand, which it expects will double, to reach 109 GW, in the next 10 years. Key to the 2025 Integrated Transmission Plan is development of a 765-kV regional transmission “backbone” that can carry four times the power SPP’s existing 345-kV lines do, and do so more efficiently. The grid operator’s transmission system “is at capacity and forecasted load growth will only exacerbate the existing strain,” it said. “Simply adding new generation will not resolve the challenges.” 765-kV transmission lines are the highest operating voltages in the U.S. but are new in both SPP and in the neighboring Electric Reliability Council of Texas market. Texas regulators approved the higher voltage lines for the first time in April. Dive Insight: Transmission developers in SPP and ERCOT are turning to 765-kV projects to mitigate line losses and move greater volumes of power into demand centers at a time when electricity demand is expected to rise significantly. “With the new load being integrated into the system, SPP could see an increase in the footprint’s annual energy consumption by as much as 136%,” the grid operator said in its ITP. “Investments in transmission are the key to keep costs low, maintain reliability, and power economic growth.” Even under conservative assumptions, SPP forecasts a 35% increase in demand, “making timely transmission investment essential,” the grid operator said. SPP selected Xcel Energy in February to construct the first 765-kV lines in its footprint. Those lines were identified in its 2024 plan. AEP Texas will build

Read More »

The week in 5 numbers: Gas valuations soar but solar leads new capacity

The price gas power merger and acquisitions have reached in some markets, according to energy analytics firm Enverus. The artificial intelligence boom, along with expectations of increased manufacturing and electrification, is driving a surge in natural gas investment, but thermal generation remains risky, some analysts say, drawing parallels to the dot com bubble at the turn of the century. 

Read More »

Our laws must catch up to data centers’ rising power

Alexandra Klass is the James G. Degnan Professor of Law at Michigan Law, and Dave Owen is the Albert Abramson ’54 Distinguished Professor of Law at UC Law San Francisco. The United States faces massive growth in electricity demand. If utilities’ projections are right, data centers will drive much of that growth. And if utilities try to meet that demand in traditional ways, the results could be bad for consumers, the environment and the tech industry. Those traditional ways assume that utilities must meet the needs of electricity customers at all times. This requires utilities to build new power plants and transmission and distribution lines and (in most states) pass those costs, plus a profit margin, on to consumers. Utilities also will not allow major new users to connect to the grid until those users’ needs can be met. These principles are a poor fit for the present moment. Building new power plants and transmission lines has become increasingly difficult. If data centers must wait until that infrastructure is fully built, they may wait for years. Worse, utilities and government officials are citing the potential data-center boom as a reason to extend the life of old, expensive, and heavily polluting coal plants or to build new gas plants. If they do so, and if they pass those costs on to consumers, retail electricity prices and pollution will rise. And if current demand projections turn out to be overestimates — which has happened during past tech booms — consumers will pay for new power plants that never needed to be built. But this unfortunate scenario is not inevitable. We are scholars of energy, natural resources, and environmental law, and in a paper we explore a better way of meeting this moment. Our inspiration comes from legal systems for allocating water, particularly in

Read More »

Designing the AI Century: 7×24 Exchange Fall ’25 Charts the New Data Center Industrial Stack

SMRs and the AI Power Gap: Steve Fairfax Separates Promise from Physics If NVIDIA’s Sean Young made the case for AI factories, Steve Fairfax offered a sobering counterweight: even the smartest factories can’t run without power—and not just any power, but constant, high-availability, clean generation at a scale utilities are increasingly struggling to deliver. In his keynote “Small Modular Reactors for Data Centers,” Fairfax, president of Oresme and one of the data center industry’s most seasoned voices on reliability, walked through the long arc from nuclear fusion research to today’s resurgent interest in fission at modular scale. His presentation blended nuclear engineering history with pragmatic counsel for AI-era infrastructure leaders: SMRs are promising, but their road to reality is paved with physics, fuel, and policy—not PowerPoint. From Fusion Research to Data Center Reliability Fairfax began with his own story—a career that bridges nuclear reliability and data center engineering. As a young physicist and electrical engineer at MIT, he helped build the Alcator C-MOD fusion reactor, a 400-megawatt research facility that heated plasma to 100 million degrees with 3 million amps of current. The magnet system alone drew 265,000 amps at 1,400 volts, producing forces measured in millions of pounds. It was an extreme experiment in controlled power, and one that shaped his later philosophy: design for failure, test for truth, and assume nothing lasts forever. When the U.S. cooled on fusion power in the 1990s, Fairfax applied nuclear reliability methods to data center systems—quantifying uptime and redundancy with the same math used for reactor safety. By 1994, he was consulting for hyperscale pioneers still calling 10 MW “monstrous.” Today’s 400 MW campuses, he noted, are beginning to look a lot more like reactors in their energy intensity—and increasingly, in their regulatory scrutiny. Defining the Small Modular Reactor Fairfax defined SMRs

Read More »

Top network and data center events 2025 & 2026

Denise Dubie is a senior editor at Network World with nearly 30 years of experience writing about the tech industry. Her coverage areas include AIOps, cybersecurity, networking careers, network management, observability, SASE, SD-WAN, and how AI transforms enterprise IT. A seasoned journalist and content creator, Denise writes breaking news and in-depth features, and she delivers practical advice for IT professionals while making complex technology accessible to all. Before returning to journalism, she held senior content marketing roles at CA Technologies, Berkshire Grey, and Cisco. Denise is a trusted voice in the world of enterprise IT and networking.

Read More »

Google’s cheaper, faster TPUs are here, while users of other AI processors face a supply crunch

Opportunities for the AI industry LLM vendors such as OpenAI and Anthropic, which still have relatively young code bases and are continuously evolving them, also have much to gain from the arrival of Ironwood for training their models, said Forrester vice president and principal analyst Charlie Dai. In fact, Anthropic has already agreed to procure 1 million TPUs for training and its models and using them for inferencing. Other, smaller vendors using Google’s TPUs for training models include Lightricks and Essential AI. Google has seen a steady increase in demand for its TPUs (which it also uses to run interna services), and is expected to buy $9.8 billion worth of TPUs from Broadcom this year, compared to $6.2 billion and $2.04 billion in 2024 and 2023 respectively, according to Harrowell. “This makes them the second-biggest AI chip program for cloud and enterprise data centers, just tailing Nvidia, with approximately 5% of the market. Nvidia owns about 78% of the market,” Harrowell said. The legacy problem While some analysts were optimistic about the prospects for TPUs in the enterprise, IDC research director Brandon Hoff said enterprises will most likely to stay away from Ironwood or TPUs in general because of their existing code base written for other platforms. “For enterprise customers who are writing their own inferencing, they will be tied into Nvidia’s software platform,” Hoff said, referring to CUDA, the software platform that runs on Nvidia GPUs. CUDA was released to the public in 2007, while the first version of TensorFlow has only been around since 2015.

Read More »

Cisco launches AI infrastructure, AI practitioner certifications

“This new certification focuses on artificial intelligence and machine learning workloads, helping technical professionals become AI-ready and successfully embed AI into their workflows,” said Pat Merat, vice president at Learn with Cisco, in a blog detailing the new AI Infrastructure Specialist certification. “The certification validates a candidate’s comprehensive knowledge in designing, implementing, operating, and troubleshooting AI solutions across Cisco infrastructure.” Separately, the AITECH certification is part of the Cisco AI Infrastructure track, which complements its existing networking, data center, and security certifications. Cisco says the AITECH cert training is intended for network engineers, system administrators, solution architects, and other IT professionals who want to learn how AI impacts enterprise infrastructure. The training curriculum covers topics such as: Utilizing AI for code generation, refactoring, and using modern AI-assisted coding workflows. Using generative AI for exploratory data analysis, data cleaning, transformation, and generating actionable insights. Designing and implementing multi-step AI-assisted workflows and understanding complex agentic systems for automation. Learning AI-powered requirements, evaluating customization approaches, considering deployment strategies, and designing robust AI workflows. Evaluating, fine-tuning, and deploying pre-trained AI models, and implementing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Monitoring, maintaining, and optimizing AI-powered workflows, ensuring data integrity and security. AITECH certification candidates will learn how to use AI to enhance productivity, automate routine tasks, and support the development of new applications. The training program includes hands-on labs and simulations to demonstrate practical use cases for AI within Cisco and multi-vendor environments.

Read More »

Chip-to-Grid Gets Bought: Eaton, Vertiv, and Daikin Deals Imply a New Thermal Capital Cycle

This week delivered three telling acquisitions that mark a turning point for the global data center supply chain; and more specifically, for the high-density liquid cooling mega-play now unfolding across the power-thermal continuum. Eaton is acquiring Boyd Thermal for $9.5 billion from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Vertiv is buying PurgeRite for about $1 billion from Milton Street Capital. And Daikin Applied has moved to acquire Chilldyne, one of the most proven negative-pressure direct-to-chip pioneers. On paper, they’re three distinct transactions. In reality, they’re chapters in the same story: the acceleration of strategic vertical integration around thermal infrastructure for AI-class compute. The Equity Layer: Private Capital Builds, Strategics Buy From an equity standpoint, these are classic handoff moments between private-equity construction and corporate consolidation. Goldman Sachs built Boyd Thermal into a global platform spanning cold plates, CDUs, and high-density liquid loop design, now sold to Eaton at an enterprise multiple north of 5× 2026E revenue. Milton Street Capital took PurgeRite from a specialist contractor in fluid flushing and commissioning into a nationwide services platform. And Daikin, long synonymous with chillers and air-side thermal, is crossing the liquid Rubicon by buying its way into the D2C ecosystem. Each deal crystallizes a simple fact: liquid cooling is no longer an adjunct; it’s core infrastructure. Private equity did its job scaling the parts. Strategic players are now paying up for the system. Eaton’s Bid: The Chip-to-Grid Thesis For Eaton, Boyd Thermal is the final missing piece in its “chip-to-grid” thesis. The company already owns the electrical side of the data center: UPS, busway, switchgear, and monitoring. Boyd plugs the thermal gap, allowing Eaton to market full rack-to-substation solutions for AI loads in the 50–100 kW+ range. It’s a statement acquisition that places Eaton squarely against Schneider Electric, Vertiv and ABB in the race to

Read More »

Space: The final frontier for data processing

There are, however, a couple of reasons why data centers in space are being considered. There are plenty of reports about how the increased amount of AI processing is affecting power consumption within data centers; the World Economic Forum has estimated that the power required to handle AI is increasing at a rate of between 26% and 36% annually. Therefore, it is not surprising that organizations are looking at other options. But an even more pressing reason for orbiting data centers is to handle the amount of data that is being produced by existing satellites, Judge said. “Essentially, satellites are gathering a lot more data than can be sent to earth, because downlinks are a bottleneck,” he noted. “With AI capacity in orbit, they could potentially analyze more of this data, extract more useful information, and send insights back to earth. My overall feeling is that any more data processing in space is going to be driven by space processing needs.” And China may already be ahead of the game. Last year, Guoxing Aerospace  launched 12 satellites, forming a space-based computing network dubbed the Three-Body Computing Constellation. When completed, it will contain 2,800 satellites, all handling the orchestration and processing of data, taking edge computing to a new dimension.

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »