![](https://onmine.io/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/3823450-0-00073200-1739413979-VMware-Explore.jpg)
They went on to say, “the vast majority of those affected have been forced to accept new terms tying them into exorbitant licence fees for a minimum of three years because they [simply] could not replace the VMware software needed to service their customers … ECCO supports urgent calls for a formal investigation into Broadcom’s unfair software licensing practices.”
Dario Maisto, senior analyst at Forrester who covers public cloud vendors in EMEA, said Wednesday, “the ECCO report’s feedback on Broadcom leaves little to say, with the vendor showing reportedly little to no interest in collaborating. What is interesting is that the Broadcom issue is bigger than this due to and since the VMware acquisition.”
Since the Broadcom acquisition, he said, “VMware has changed the product bundling, licensing, pricing, and go-to-market strategy for its entire portfolio. This has been a major source of concern for our clients at Forrester for many months now, and Broadcom’s competition posture in Europe only adds to the frustration we see in the market. So, in this case we have concerns coming not only from competitors but also from end-users. This may speed up Broadcom’s course of action at some point.”
Microsoft rating: Amber
CCO was formed as result of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed last July between CISPE and Microsoft, and in their report on its progress, they give the firm an Amber rating.
The report stated that “both sides appear committed to finding solutions to open issues. Microsoft has dedicated significant resources, including engineering, development, legal, and senior leadership time to advancing the partnership.”
However, the authors state, “there was not sufficient progress on the hoster product between September 2024 and January 2025. There is a CISPE member concern that too much focus has been applied to the development of Azure Local as the route to delivering MOU requirements. Teams dedicated to the development of that product may not be working in full understanding of the legal requirements of the MOU and thus may not be prioritising the right work.”