Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

One option for electric vehicle fires? Let them burn.

In the fall of 2024, a trucking company in Falls Township, Pennsylvania, temporarily stored a storm-damaged Tesla at its yard. A few weeks later, the car burst into flames that grew out of control within seconds, some shooting out 30 feet. A local fire company tried in vain to squelch the blaze, spraying more than 2,000 gallons of water on the vehicle. Eventually, the firefighters requested help from a fire company in neighboring Bristol Township, led by volunteer fire chief Howard McGoldrick. He’d been fighting fires since 1989, but this conflagration was unusual: It was a chemical fire in a lithium-ion battery, meaning it provided its own heat, fuel, and oxygen. And it was incredibly challenging to extinguish.   McGoldrick was encountering fires like this more and more often. The previous year, he says, several rowhouses were badly burned after overcharged lithium-ion batteries in racing drones ignited inside. In another nearby incident, old lithium-ion biomedical devices at a scrapyard got soaked in a rainstorm and combusted. The Tesla fire felt like a breaking point. “We were like, ‘Okay, this is just too many incidents in a short amount of time,’” McGoldrick recalls. He went in search of someone who could help his company get better at responding to fires in lithium-ion batteries. He found Patrick Durham. Durham is the owner of (and mustache behind) StacheD Training, one of a growing number of private companies helping first responders learn how to deal with lithium-ion battery safety, including electric-vehicle fires. Although there isn’t solid data on the frequency of EV battery fires, it’s no secret to EV makers that these fires are happening. Yet the manufacturers offer no standardized steps on how to fight them or avoid them in the first place, leaving first responders scrambling to search through each car’s emergency response guide—something that’s hard to do when you’re standing in front of an immolating vehicle. In this void, Durham offers a wealth of resources to first responders, from easy-to-follow video tutorials to hours-long in-person workshops. In 2024 alone, Durham says he trained approximately 2,000 first responders around the country. As more people buy EVs, in part to help address climate change, the need for this training has only grown; in less than two years, Durham’s YouTube channel has attracted almost 30,000 subscribers. (The US doesn’t currently collect data on the frequency or causes of EV fires, but this year the US Fire Administration and the Fire Safety Research Institute are rolling out a new data collection system for fire departments.) A circumspect man with a shaved head, brown eyes, and a thick horseshoe mustache framing his mouth, Durham previously worked as a mechanical engineer developing battery boxes for EVs. He is also a volunteer firefighter, and in 2020 he offered his first training on fires in lithium-ion batteries to his local department. From there, his reputation spread by word of mouth. Today, StacheD Training is Durham’s full-time work. He’s also the captain of his local volunteer fire department in Troy, Michigan.   As more EVs hit the road, what worries Durham most isn’t just the growing likelihood of battery fires—it’s their intensity. “The severity of the fire is significant compared to a regular vehicle fire,” he says. “The traditional car fires that you and I grew up with—the majority of those always start in the engine compartment,” says Jim Stevenson, a fire chief from rural Michigan who has taken Durham’s training. “So we basically get there, we pop the car hood, and then we put out the fire from there, and if it gets into the inner compartment of the car? Not a big deal. You spray it down with the hose, and it’s out in no time.” With EV fires, Stevenson says, “it’s just a completely different monster.”  SHAWN HAZEN An EV battery is essentially a tightly packed array of thousands of cells, each of which ranges from approximately the size and shape of an AA battery to the size of a legal envelope, depending on the battery model. If a single cell gets damaged–such as by getting crushed, overcharged, or waterlogged–that cell can heat uncontrollably in a process called thermal runaway. It will release so much heat and flammable gas that it generates its own fire, which spreads to the other cells.  Older lithium-ion battery packs exploded “like a pipe bomb” when that happened, Durham says; today’s battery packs have release valves so that during thermal runaway they avoid an explosion by instead spewing flames in what Durham describes as “essentially a blowtorch.” The location of an EV’s battery—underneath the car, between its axles, within a protective case—complicates things further. The batteries are much safer from collision damage than they would be under the hood, but they are also much harder to reach and douse if they ignite. The result? Fires such as one at an Illinois Rivian plant in 2024, where one EV caught fire and approximately 50 cars parked nearby ended up burning. Or one in Hollywood, Florida, in 2023, where a Tesla was accidentally driven off a dock and burst into flames even though it was underwater. Durham worries that if an EV battery catches fire in a high-speed crash, it will burn so intensely that first responders won’t be able to save anyone inside the vehicle. Putting out a fire in an internal-combustion car might take as little as 30 minutes and a few hundred gallons of water, he notes, while an electric car battery fire could take upwards of 4,000 gallons of water and many hours to extinguish—and much more for commercial trucks. Indeed, when a Tesla Semi drove off Interstate 80 in Northern California in 2024 and burst into flames, first responders had to douse it with 50,000 gallons of water and close the highway for 15 hours. What’s more, with EVs, it’s never entirely clear whether the fire is truly out. Cars may ignite, or reignite, weeks or even months after the battery is damaged or a battery fire is initially suppressed. Durham points to one salvaged Tesla in California that burst into flames 308 days after it had flooded in a Florida hurricane. The vehicle hadn’t initially ignited, but saltwater intrusion into the battery pack eventually corroded it enough to produce a chemical fire leading to thermal runaway. According to Durham, the simple truth is that the best way to manage EV fires right now is to let them burn—while making sure to protect the surrounding area, including other vehicles and people’s homes. Allowing the fire to run its course will ideally also destroy any cells that might otherwise ignite later. This goes against firefighters’ instincts. When they respond to EV fires, they will spray water “because they want to do something to fix the problem,” he says. [But] … it’s not really doing anything.” Stevenson worries about how bystanders will perceive  first responders waiting out a blaze. “It’s going to be ugly,” he says, “because the public’s going to see us standing on the side [of the] road just watching it burn, which looks bad for us.” But at the same time, he adds, “we don’t have [an] actual way of getting to the battery to knock it out.” For now, Durham’s training focuses on the options that first responders do have with EV fires. An important if simple one is using a fire blanket to cover a vehicle and prevent the blaze from spreading as it burns out. Although they hadn’t yet received Durham’s training, that’s exactly what McGoldrick and his crew did when they responded to the burning Tesla last fall: After the facility used a forklift to move the burning car to an isolated part of the yard, first responders covered it with a fire blanket. The car reignited several times over the next few days, McGoldrick says, “but it was contained. We just put it in the middle of an open lot and basically let it go.” It’s a significant cultural shift that first responders need to make, Durham says, and there’s another one, too: being extra-vigilant about the personal protective equipment they wear from the first moment they arrive at a burning EV. There isn’t yet enough information to compare the toxicity of EV fires and those in gas-powered cars, but Durham warns that first responders could inhale high levels of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and heavy metals from burning EVs. Overall, Durham says, he is not against EVs, but he thinks there needs to be a change in attitude to handle them safely. When an EV battery catches fire, he says, “until that battery has been removed from the vehicle and shredded and fully recycled, it’s always going be a hazard.” Maya L. Kapoor is an award-winning freelance journalist who writes about climate change, biodiversity, and environmental justice.

In the fall of 2024, a trucking company in Falls Township, Pennsylvania, temporarily stored a storm-damaged Tesla at its yard. A few weeks later, the car burst into flames that grew out of control within seconds, some shooting out 30 feet.

A local fire company tried in vain to squelch the blaze, spraying more than 2,000 gallons of water on the vehicle. Eventually, the firefighters requested help from a fire company in neighboring Bristol Township, led by volunteer fire chief Howard McGoldrick. He’d been fighting fires since 1989, but this conflagration was unusual: It was a chemical fire in a lithium-ion battery, meaning it provided its own heat, fuel, and oxygen. And it was incredibly challenging to extinguish.  

McGoldrick was encountering fires like this more and more often. The previous year, he says, several rowhouses were badly burned after overcharged lithium-ion batteries in racing drones ignited inside. In another nearby incident, old lithium-ion biomedical devices at a scrapyard got soaked in a rainstorm and combusted.

The Tesla fire felt like a breaking point. “We were like, ‘Okay, this is just too many incidents in a short amount of time,’” McGoldrick recalls. He went in search of someone who could help his company get better at responding to fires in lithium-ion batteries. He found Patrick Durham.

Durham is the owner of (and mustache behind) StacheD Training, one of a growing number of private companies helping first responders learn how to deal with lithium-ion battery safety, including electric-vehicle fires.

Although there isn’t solid data on the frequency of EV battery fires, it’s no secret to EV makers that these fires are happening. Yet the manufacturers offer no standardized steps on how to fight them or avoid them in the first place, leaving first responders scrambling to search through each car’s emergency response guide—something that’s hard to do when you’re standing in front of an immolating vehicle.

In this void, Durham offers a wealth of resources to first responders, from easy-to-follow video tutorials to hours-long in-person workshops. In 2024 alone, Durham says he trained approximately 2,000 first responders around the country. As more people buy EVs, in part to help address climate change, the need for this training has only grown; in less than two years, Durham’s YouTube channel has attracted almost 30,000 subscribers. (The US doesn’t currently collect data on the frequency or causes of EV fires, but this year the US Fire Administration and the Fire Safety Research Institute are rolling out a new data collection system for fire departments.)

A circumspect man with a shaved head, brown eyes, and a thick horseshoe mustache framing his mouth, Durham previously worked as a mechanical engineer developing battery boxes for EVs. He is also a volunteer firefighter, and in 2020 he offered his first training on fires in lithium-ion batteries to his local department. From there, his reputation spread by word of mouth. Today, StacheD Training is Durham’s full-time work. He’s also the captain of his local volunteer fire department in Troy, Michigan.  

As more EVs hit the road, what worries Durham most isn’t just the growing likelihood of battery fires—it’s their intensity. “The severity of the fire is significant compared to a regular vehicle fire,” he says.

“The traditional car fires that you and I grew up with—the majority of those always start in the engine compartment,” says Jim Stevenson, a fire chief from rural Michigan who has taken Durham’s training. “So we basically get there, we pop the car hood, and then we put out the fire from there, and if it gets into the inner compartment of the car? Not a big deal. You spray it down with the hose, and it’s out in no time.” With EV fires, Stevenson says, “it’s just a completely different monster.” 

matchbox on wheels

SHAWN HAZEN

An EV battery is essentially a tightly packed array of thousands of cells, each of which ranges from approximately the size and shape of an AA battery to the size of a legal envelope, depending on the battery model. If a single cell gets damaged–such as by getting crushed, overcharged, or waterlogged–that cell can heat uncontrollably in a process called thermal runaway. It will release so much heat and flammable gas that it generates its own fire, which spreads to the other cells. 

Older lithium-ion battery packs exploded “like a pipe bomb” when that happened, Durham says; today’s battery packs have release valves so that during thermal runaway they avoid an explosion by instead spewing flames in what Durham describes as “essentially a blowtorch.” The location of an EV’s battery—underneath the car, between its axles, within a protective case—complicates things further. The batteries are much safer from collision damage than they would be under the hood, but they are also much harder to reach and douse if they ignite.

The result? Fires such as one at an Illinois Rivian plant in 2024, where one EV caught fire and approximately 50 cars parked nearby ended up burning. Or one in Hollywood, Florida, in 2023, where a Tesla was accidentally driven off a dock and burst into flames even though it was underwater.

Durham worries that if an EV battery catches fire in a high-speed crash, it will burn so intensely that first responders won’t be able to save anyone inside the vehicle. Putting out a fire in an internal-combustion car might take as little as 30 minutes and a few hundred gallons of water, he notes, while an electric car battery fire could take upwards of 4,000 gallons of water and many hours to extinguish—and much more for commercial trucks. Indeed, when a Tesla Semi drove off Interstate 80 in Northern California in 2024 and burst into flames, first responders had to douse it with 50,000 gallons of water and close the highway for 15 hours.

What’s more, with EVs, it’s never entirely clear whether the fire is truly out. Cars may ignite, or reignite, weeks or even months after the battery is damaged or a battery fire is initially suppressed. Durham points to one salvaged Tesla in California that burst into flames 308 days after it had flooded in a Florida hurricane. The vehicle hadn’t initially ignited, but saltwater intrusion into the battery pack eventually corroded it enough to produce a chemical fire leading to thermal runaway.

According to Durham, the simple truth is that the best way to manage EV fires right now is to let them burn—while making sure to protect the surrounding area, including other vehicles and people’s homes. Allowing the fire to run its course will ideally also destroy any cells that might otherwise ignite later.

This goes against firefighters’ instincts. When they respond to EV fires, they will spray water “because they want to do something to fix the problem,” he says. [But] … it’s not really doing anything.”

Stevenson worries about how bystanders will perceive  first responders waiting out a blaze. “It’s going to be ugly,” he says, “because the public’s going to see us standing on the side [of the] road just watching it burn, which looks bad for us.” But at the same time, he adds, “we don’t have [an] actual way of getting to the battery to knock it out.”

For now, Durham’s training focuses on the options that first responders do have with EV fires. An important if simple one is using a fire blanket to cover a vehicle and prevent the blaze from spreading as it burns out. Although they hadn’t yet received Durham’s training, that’s exactly what McGoldrick and his crew did when they responded to the burning Tesla last fall: After the facility used a forklift to move the burning car to an isolated part of the yard, first responders covered it with a fire blanket. The car reignited several times over the next few days, McGoldrick says, “but it was contained. We just put it in the middle of an open lot and basically let it go.”

It’s a significant cultural shift that first responders need to make, Durham says, and there’s another one, too: being extra-vigilant about the personal protective equipment they wear from the first moment they arrive at a burning EV. There isn’t yet enough information to compare the toxicity of EV fires and those in gas-powered cars, but Durham warns that first responders could inhale high levels of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and heavy metals from burning EVs.

Overall, Durham says, he is not against EVs, but he thinks there needs to be a change in attitude to handle them safely. When an EV battery catches fire, he says, “until that battery has been removed from the vehicle and shredded and fully recycled, it’s always going be a hazard.”

Maya L. Kapoor is an award-winning freelance journalist who writes about climate change, biodiversity, and environmental justice.

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

AI agents drive up telemetry costs, complicate network observability

“A production agent emits 4-5x more data as telemetry,” said Kamal Hathi, senior vice president and general manager of Splunk at Cisco, in an interview with Network World. Beyond traditional application traces, agents generate telemetry about workflows, tool calls, retrieved context, model interactions, and authentication. As agents interact with other

Read More »

EIA: US crude oil inventories down 3.1 million bbl

US crude oil inventories for the week ended Oct. 16, excluding the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, decreased by 3.1 million bbl from the previous week, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). At 412.5 million bbl, US crude oil inventories are 3% below the 5-year average for this time of year, the EIA report indicated. Gasoline inventories decreased 3.0 million bbl, 5% below the 5-year average. Propane-propylene inventories decreased 500,000 bbl, 13% above the 5-year average. Total commercial petroleum inventories decreased by 8.5 million bbl for the week. Distillate inventories increased 1.7 million bbl, 9% below the 5-year average. US crude oil refinery inputs averaged 16.6 million b/d for the week ended Oct. 16, which was 34,000 b/d more than the previous week’s average. Refineries operated at 93.4% of capacity. Gasoline output averaged 9.8 million b/d, and distillate production increased to 5.2 million b/d. Crude oil imports decreased 291,000 b/d to 5.8 million b/d. The 4-week average of 6.1 million b/d is 2.8% above the year-ago level. Gasoline imports averaged 281,000 b/d; distillate imports averaged 117,000 b/d. Over the past four weeks, total product supplied averaged 21.1 million b/d, up 3.2% year over year. The 4-week average for gasoline product supplied increased 1.5% year over year to 8.7 million b/d, while the 4-week average for distillate product supplied decreased 2.4% to 3.9 million b/d. The 4-week average for jet fuel product supplied increased 1.4% year over year.

Read More »

Adura gets NSTA consent to develop Jackdaw North Sea gas field

Adura Energy has received North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) consent to develop Jackdaw natural gas and condensate field, off the coast of northeast Scotland, following consideration of the company’s environmental statement and agreement to the grant of consent.  NSTA originally granted development consent for Jackdaw to Shell UK in June 2022. But this consent was deemed unlawful and overturned by the Scottish courts in January 2025, following findings that initial environmental approvals had failed to account for the impact of secondary emissions. Estimated reserves at Jackdaw are 72-200 MMboe. The new approval clears the way for Jackdaw to start supplying gas to British homes, power stations, and businesses within weeks, according to Adura, substantially all of the project’s physical infrastructure already having been completed. Alongside Jackdaw’s reapproval, the UK government announced it will launch a £2-billion ($2.7-billion) energy wealth fund fueled by North Sea oil and gas tax revenues to reinvest directly into renewable projects. Adura is a joint venture formed when Shell and Equinor ASA merged their UK offshore oil and gas businesses. The associated Rosebank oil field is following Jackdaw in the regulatory process. An NSTA decision on it is anticipated in the coming weeks. A spokesperson for INEOS Group Ltd. said that “Jackdaw approval is welcome, but the government must stop taxing the North Sea into decline. Approving Jackdaw is the right decision, but this does not stop the damage being done to the North Sea. And it appears Rosebank remains stuck in political limbo.”

Read More »

Energy Department Authorizes Exchange from Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve

WASHINGTON— The U.S. Department of Energy today announced a Request for Proposal for an exchange of up to 315,000 barrels of ultra-low sulfur distillate (fuel oil) from the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve (NEHHOR). This solicitation is structured to mitigate supply chain challenges disrupting fuel oil supply. The announced exchange underscores the Trump Administration’s commitment to reliable energy access and lowering costs. Under the terms of the exchange, borrowing companies must return the same volume of fuel oil plus a premium, ensuring that NEHHOR is refilled ahead of the 2027–2028 heating season. “The Trump Administration is committed to doing everything in our power to lower energy costs for the American people,” said U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright. “After receiving Senators Collins’ and Kings’ letter and extensive discussions with Senator Collins, I have directed the Department to exchange barrels from our Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve to mitigate heightened home heating oil costs during the upcoming winter. Of course, this is a temporary measure to solve a temporary supply disruption. I encourage the governors of New York and New England to work with the Trump Administration to build the Constitution Pipeline and replace home heating oil with low-cost natural gas. Doing so would save their residents billions of dollars in home heating and electricity costs.” DOE will exchange up to 315,000 barrels of fuel oil from NEHHOR storage sites in South Portland, Maine; Boston, Massachusetts; and New Haven, Connecticut. Fuel transfers or deliveries are scheduled to be completed by November 13, 2026. The minimum offer quantity is 25,000 barrels, but not to exceed 30,000, and the volume available per site shall not exceed 150,000. Offerors may submit multiple offers. This approach ensures a competitive bidding process in which both fuel retailers and terminal holders can participate and that product can

Read More »

Shell plans well intervention, drilling campaign to extract more gas from Ormen Lange

A/S Norske Shell and its license partners are investing in a new drilling and well intervention campaign at Ormen Lange in the Norwegian Sea. An investment figure was not disclosed. The campaign, which follows the 2025 start of subsea compression to compensate for the natural pressure drop in the reservoir, includes two sidetracks from existing wells to access additional gas volumes, as well as an option for modifications to a third well. First production is expected in 2029, the operator said in an early October release. The campaign is expected to increase recovery by about 3.5 billion cu m of gas over the life of the field. “Ormen Lange has been producing for almost 20 years, but there is still room for further resources. This investment will enable us to produce gas volumes that today’s wells cannot reach efficiently, thereby creating additional value from the field while contributing to reliable gas supplies to Europe,” said Claire Richardson-Dissel, asset manager for Ormen Lange at Norske Shell. Ormen Lange  Norway’s second largest developed gas field, Ormen Lange was Norway’s first deepwater field development. The field is developed without a platform, with all production from subsea installations installed at depths of up to 1,100 m. Gas from sandstone at a depth of almost 3,000 m is piped up the Storeggakanten peninsula to the onshore plant at Nyhamna in Aukra municipality, where it is processed before export to the UK and the EU.  Shell is operator of Ormen Lange with 17.8% interest. License partners are Petoro AS (36.5%), Equinor Energy AS (25.4%), Orlen Upstream Norway AS (14%), and Vår Energi AS (6.3%).

Read More »

Saturn Oil & Gas adds light, oil-weighted assets of Corex Resources

Saturn Oil & Gas Inc., Calgary, has agreed to acquire privately held Corex Resources Ltd. for $302 million (Can.) through a plan of arrangement, expanding its light oil position from southeast Saskatchewan into southwest Manitoba. The acquisition adds about 7,000 b/d of 100% light oil-weighted production and increases Saturn’s forecast 2026 exit production rate to 54,000-56,000 boe/d from its previous outlook, the company said Oct. 19. Corex’s assets lie adjacent to Saturn’s existing southeast Saskatchewan operations. The company said the transaction adds 323 gross (279 net) identified drilling locations, including booked and unbooked development opportunities, as well as potential open-hole multilateral targets. The acquired asset base is characterized by an average working interest of about 96% and includes operated production infrastructure, pipelines, and other infrastructure. Saturn said it has identified about $6 million/year in operating and efficiency synergies. The addition of Corex’s production is not expected to affect Saturn’s full-year 2026 average production guidance of 43,000-44,000 boe/d, but, Saturn said, the deal, along with Saturn’s expanded 2026 capital program, positions the company to exit 2026 with production of 54,000-56,000 boe/d, establishing a base for 2027. The transaction is expected to close in December 2026, subject to customary conditions.

Read More »

Energy Department Announces New Investments to Strengthen America’s Power Grid and Lower Electricity Costs

WASHINGTON— The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced approximately $967 million in additional funding through its Grid Resilience State and Tribal Formula Grant program to modernize critical energy infrastructure, lower electricity costs and strengthen America’s power grid. The funding will support locally driven projects across states, territories, and tribes to upgrade critical infrastructure, prevent power disruptions, and meet growing electricity demand while helping lower costs for American families and businesses. The investment advances President Trump’s American energy dominance agenda. Projects funded through the program will help states, territories, and tribes invest in infrastructure improvements that protect against disruptive events, improve system performance, and ensure communities and businesses have dependable power when they need it most. “Lowering costs and unleashing prosperity are top priorities for President Trump,” said U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright. “These commonsense investments provide resources directly to states, territories, and tribes to lower electricity costs and strengthen grid reliability for American businesses and families.” “A strong and dependable grid is the backbone of American economic prosperity,” said Office of Electricity Assistant Secretary Katie Jereza. “This funding will help Americans across the country, including our tribal partners, optimize their electricity systems and prepare for future growth while strengthening energy security and deploying technologies that can lower the long-term cost of delivering reliable power.” States, tribes, and U.S. territories can view their funding allocations and application instructions here.

Read More »

AI’s Fragmented Regulatory Landscape Becomes a Data Center Design Challenge

Designing for Verifiable Operations For an operator serving tenants across jurisdictions, a claim about where a workload runs must be one that the responsible service provider can substantiate. That means identifying who can administer the workload, how data moves between regions, where backups are maintained, and which records document those arrangements. A tenant promising to run a workload within a particular jurisdiction needs assurance that its data, backups, and access arrangements satisfy the applicable requirements. Workload placement alone cannot establish where a backup resides or from where an administrator can access a system. Those questions must be addressed across compute, storage, network paths, security controls, and third-party access, with responsibilities established during procurement and verified before service begins. Not all of those controls necessarily reside with the data center operator. A colocation provider may be responsible for physical access, facility security, and designated infrastructure services, while a tenant or cloud provider controls the applications, storage configuration, backup locations, and logical access to workloads. The operating agreement must distinguish between what the facility provider can verify directly and what remains within the tenant’s systems. The EU AI Act makes that division of responsibility particularly important. Its requirements for covered high-risk AI systems include logging, documentation, human oversight, robustness, and cybersecurity, subject to the law’s applicable implementation dates. These obligations attach to the relevant providers and deployers of AI systems, rather than automatically to every company hosting them. A data center operator may nevertheless be required by contract to provide physical-access records, security evidence, or information about infrastructure location so that a tenant can substantiate its own compliance. A further distinction concerns data residency. The AI Act is not itself a general requirement to keep all AI workloads or associated data within the European Union. Geographic restrictions may instead arise from data-protection

Read More »

Microsoft exits UK AI data center project over electricity delays

“We remain committed to both the Loughton project and the UK, and we are exploring alternative power sources for the site, as well ​as other expansion sites in the UK,” Nscale added. “This decision relates to a single ​site,” a Microsoft spokesperson said of its termination of an agreement for the data ​center in Loughton, Essex, where Nscale had faced delays, with electricity grid ⁠officials telling the AI company they did not expect to supply power to the site ​until the 2030s. “Our relationship with Microsoft remains strong and long-term, and this unfortunate London-wide grid ​issue has no impact on our other contracts,” a spokesperson for Nscale told Reuters.

Read More »

AI networks drive SONiC boom

Aviz Networks: Aviz, which received early funding help from Cisco, offers a pre-tested, multi-ASIC, hardware agnostic, enterprise-ready SONiC distro with added features such as bug fixes, telemetry and support. Hedgehog Networks: Founded by former Cisco exec Marc Austin in 2022 to bring SONiC-based disaggregated networking to the enterprise, Hedgehog’s mission is to simplify the deployment of private cloud AI networks with automation and orchestration based on Kubernetes. Upscale AI: This startup has raised $500 million with the goal of building a new networking platform from ground up, starting with its own silicon. The company is targeting AI data centers as its sole market and is using SONiC as the NOS. Most recently, Upscale introduced Token Fabric architecture, which combines the company’s own SkyFabriX scale-up silicon, scale-out systems built on Nvidia Spectrum-X Ethernet, and a common software layer for operations. General availability is planned for early 2027. The announcement builds on two earlier milestones. Upscale, based in Santa Clara, Calif., emerged from stealth in September 2025 with a $100 million seed round. In June, it raised an additional $190 million  4. SONiC expands beyond the data center Community support is the lifeblood of any open-source project. Under the Linux Foundation, the SONiC community has grown to more than 4,300 contributors. Heavyweight members include Alibaba, Arista, Broadcom, Cisco, Dell, Google, Microsoft, Nokia, and Nvidia. The SONiC community is currently working to extend the technology from the data center to the network edge. The PoE Edge Networks with SONiC (PENS) workgroup, led by Aviz, Wistron, Cisco and Celestica, is working to adapt SONiC for edge LANs. Specifically, the group is integrating protocols consistent with Wi-Fi networks and IoT devices, such as Power Over Ethernet (PoE) and 802.1x.

Read More »

SONiC momentum continues at OCP Global Summit

This will complete SONiC integration across the Cisco multi-silicon Nexus switching portfolio, according to a blog post by Surbhi Paul, director, product management, for data center AI networking at Cisco.  “For organizations deploying Cisco 8000 Series across WAN backbones and core transport, extending Cisco-validated SONiC to the Nexus switches creates a unified, end-to-end, open network fabric,” Cisco stated. “Customers eliminate vendor silos, leveraging a single supply chain, shared FRR routing tools, and one Technical Assistance Center (TAC) contract from the WAN edge deep into the data center core.” “Built for AI infrastructure providers scaling 8000 to 32,000+ GPU clusters. High-density 400G/800G Cisco Nexus (N9100) switches (NVIDIA Spectrum-X) and Cisco Nexus (Cloud Scale) switches allow architects to tune RoCEv2 congestion algorithms (PFC/ECN) within SONiC, maximizing GPU training efficiency without risking multi-vendor support fragmentation,” Cisco stated.

Read More »

AI’s GPU Refresh Cycle Is Becoming a Stranded-Capital Problem

The AI infrastructure buildout is measured in gigawatts and successive generations of accelerators. But as operators bring new compute capacity online, a less visible question is gaining financial urgency: What happens to GPU systems when their first production assignment ends? For hardware that remains functional but no longer meets the performance or efficiency requirements of a leading-edge AI cluster, retirement need not mean obsolescence. Equipment may be redeployed, resold, harvested for components or processed to recover materials. The outcome depends on decisions made long before a system leaves its rack. That was the central argument advanced by Linda Li, chief strategy officer of Re-Teck and its parent company, Li Tong Group, in the latest onsite installment of the DCF Show podcast, hosted by Data Center Frontier Contributing Editor Doug Black at the DCF Trends Summit 2026 in Northern Virginia. For Li, the acceleration of GPU refresh cycles is making lifecycle management a question of capital preservation, facilities design and executive governance—not merely IT asset disposition. Plan for the Exit Before the Equipment Arrives Li draws on more than two decades of her company’s work in reverse supply chains for consumer electronics and telecommunications equipment. Both sectors have managed rapid generational shifts without assuming that every displaced device had exhausted its useful life. “We are dealing with a totally different organism,” she said, describing the combination of rapid accelerator iterations, rising rack power density and increasingly sophisticated thermal requirements. The response, in her view, has two levels. The first is physical infrastructure: facilities designed to accommodate successive generations of servers without extensive reconstruction. Scalable power distribution, adaptable raceways, modular rack systems and high-capacity air and liquid cooling can create room for hardware transitions that may arrive sooner than originally expected. The second is the network of partners and contracts around the

Read More »

Beyond Colossus: 5C Advances $575M Memphis AI Factory Expansion

Memphis has emerged as a major center of AI infrastructure development, driven largely by the extraordinary scale of xAI’s Colossus supercomputing operations. But the city’s growing AI computing market extends beyond Elon Musk’s flagship project. At the former headquarters and distribution complex of discount retailer Fred’s, 5C Data Centers is developing another substantial AI computing facility, combining industrial adaptive reuse with a phased expansion strategy and plans for behind-the-meter power generation. On October 6, 2026, a $575 million commercial alteration permit application was filed for the fourth phase of 5C’s MEM01 data center at 4300 Getwell Road. The application covers approximately 504,000 square feet of the property’s 1.1 million-square-foot building, representing the largest construction phase yet proposed at the site. MEM01 is already operating. According to September reporting from The Daily Memphian, 5C had established operations in approximately 200,000 square feet of the former Fred’s property, leaving substantial additional space available for conversion. The latest permit application marks a significant escalation in the scope of the development. The expansion also introduces a major new element to 5C’s power strategy. On October 11, 5C Group Chief Revenue Officer Brad Nimri told The Daily Memphian that the company plans to increase available power at MEM01 from approximately 20 MW to 84 MW over the next six months, using fuel cell technology to supply the additional capacity rather than relying on a corresponding increase in electricity from Memphis Light, Gas and Water (MLGW). Like Colossus, which began with the conversion of a former Electrolux manufacturing facility, 5C’s development reflects the growing role of industrial adaptive reuse in AI infrastructure. The projects differ considerably in scale and their approaches to on-site power generation, but both illustrate the challenge of transforming existing industrial properties into high-density computing environments with substantial electrical requirements. As Memphis considers

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »

We can do impossible things

I’d wager everyone has a rehearsed response to what’s absolutely one of the world’s worst interview questions: “What’s your biggest weakness?” Whenever I’ve gotten it,

Read More »