Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

One option for electric vehicle fires? Let them burn.

In the fall of 2024, a trucking company in Falls Township, Pennsylvania, temporarily stored a storm-damaged Tesla at its yard. A few weeks later, the car burst into flames that grew out of control within seconds, some shooting out 30 feet. A local fire company tried in vain to squelch the blaze, spraying more than 2,000 gallons of water on the vehicle. Eventually, the firefighters requested help from a fire company in neighboring Bristol Township, led by volunteer fire chief Howard McGoldrick. He’d been fighting fires since 1989, but this conflagration was unusual: It was a chemical fire in a lithium-ion battery, meaning it provided its own heat, fuel, and oxygen. And it was incredibly challenging to extinguish.   McGoldrick was encountering fires like this more and more often. The previous year, he says, several rowhouses were badly burned after overcharged lithium-ion batteries in racing drones ignited inside. In another nearby incident, old lithium-ion biomedical devices at a scrapyard got soaked in a rainstorm and combusted. The Tesla fire felt like a breaking point. “We were like, ‘Okay, this is just too many incidents in a short amount of time,’” McGoldrick recalls. He went in search of someone who could help his company get better at responding to fires in lithium-ion batteries. He found Patrick Durham. Durham is the owner of (and mustache behind) StacheD Training, one of a growing number of private companies helping first responders learn how to deal with lithium-ion battery safety, including electric-vehicle fires. Although there isn’t solid data on the frequency of EV battery fires, it’s no secret to EV makers that these fires are happening. Yet the manufacturers offer no standardized steps on how to fight them or avoid them in the first place, leaving first responders scrambling to search through each car’s emergency response guide—something that’s hard to do when you’re standing in front of an immolating vehicle. In this void, Durham offers a wealth of resources to first responders, from easy-to-follow video tutorials to hours-long in-person workshops. In 2024 alone, Durham says he trained approximately 2,000 first responders around the country. As more people buy EVs, in part to help address climate change, the need for this training has only grown; in less than two years, Durham’s YouTube channel has attracted almost 30,000 subscribers. (The US doesn’t currently collect data on the frequency or causes of EV fires, but this year the US Fire Administration and the Fire Safety Research Institute are rolling out a new data collection system for fire departments.) A circumspect man with a shaved head, brown eyes, and a thick horseshoe mustache framing his mouth, Durham previously worked as a mechanical engineer developing battery boxes for EVs. He is also a volunteer firefighter, and in 2020 he offered his first training on fires in lithium-ion batteries to his local department. From there, his reputation spread by word of mouth. Today, StacheD Training is Durham’s full-time work. He’s also the captain of his local volunteer fire department in Troy, Michigan.   As more EVs hit the road, what worries Durham most isn’t just the growing likelihood of battery fires—it’s their intensity. “The severity of the fire is significant compared to a regular vehicle fire,” he says. “The traditional car fires that you and I grew up with—the majority of those always start in the engine compartment,” says Jim Stevenson, a fire chief from rural Michigan who has taken Durham’s training. “So we basically get there, we pop the car hood, and then we put out the fire from there, and if it gets into the inner compartment of the car? Not a big deal. You spray it down with the hose, and it’s out in no time.” With EV fires, Stevenson says, “it’s just a completely different monster.”  SHAWN HAZEN An EV battery is essentially a tightly packed array of thousands of cells, each of which ranges from approximately the size and shape of an AA battery to the size of a legal envelope, depending on the battery model. If a single cell gets damaged–such as by getting crushed, overcharged, or waterlogged–that cell can heat uncontrollably in a process called thermal runaway. It will release so much heat and flammable gas that it generates its own fire, which spreads to the other cells.  Older lithium-ion battery packs exploded “like a pipe bomb” when that happened, Durham says; today’s battery packs have release valves so that during thermal runaway they avoid an explosion by instead spewing flames in what Durham describes as “essentially a blowtorch.” The location of an EV’s battery—underneath the car, between its axles, within a protective case—complicates things further. The batteries are much safer from collision damage than they would be under the hood, but they are also much harder to reach and douse if they ignite. The result? Fires such as one at an Illinois Rivian plant in 2024, where one EV caught fire and approximately 50 cars parked nearby ended up burning. Or one in Hollywood, Florida, in 2023, where a Tesla was accidentally driven off a dock and burst into flames even though it was underwater. Durham worries that if an EV battery catches fire in a high-speed crash, it will burn so intensely that first responders won’t be able to save anyone inside the vehicle. Putting out a fire in an internal-combustion car might take as little as 30 minutes and a few hundred gallons of water, he notes, while an electric car battery fire could take upwards of 4,000 gallons of water and many hours to extinguish—and much more for commercial trucks. Indeed, when a Tesla Semi drove off Interstate 80 in Northern California in 2024 and burst into flames, first responders had to douse it with 50,000 gallons of water and close the highway for 15 hours. What’s more, with EVs, it’s never entirely clear whether the fire is truly out. Cars may ignite, or reignite, weeks or even months after the battery is damaged or a battery fire is initially suppressed. Durham points to one salvaged Tesla in California that burst into flames 308 days after it had flooded in a Florida hurricane. The vehicle hadn’t initially ignited, but saltwater intrusion into the battery pack eventually corroded it enough to produce a chemical fire leading to thermal runaway. According to Durham, the simple truth is that the best way to manage EV fires right now is to let them burn—while making sure to protect the surrounding area, including other vehicles and people’s homes. Allowing the fire to run its course will ideally also destroy any cells that might otherwise ignite later. This goes against firefighters’ instincts. When they respond to EV fires, they will spray water “because they want to do something to fix the problem,” he says. [But] … it’s not really doing anything.” Stevenson worries about how bystanders will perceive  first responders waiting out a blaze. “It’s going to be ugly,” he says, “because the public’s going to see us standing on the side [of the] road just watching it burn, which looks bad for us.” But at the same time, he adds, “we don’t have [an] actual way of getting to the battery to knock it out.” For now, Durham’s training focuses on the options that first responders do have with EV fires. An important if simple one is using a fire blanket to cover a vehicle and prevent the blaze from spreading as it burns out. Although they hadn’t yet received Durham’s training, that’s exactly what McGoldrick and his crew did when they responded to the burning Tesla last fall: After the facility used a forklift to move the burning car to an isolated part of the yard, first responders covered it with a fire blanket. The car reignited several times over the next few days, McGoldrick says, “but it was contained. We just put it in the middle of an open lot and basically let it go.” It’s a significant cultural shift that first responders need to make, Durham says, and there’s another one, too: being extra-vigilant about the personal protective equipment they wear from the first moment they arrive at a burning EV. There isn’t yet enough information to compare the toxicity of EV fires and those in gas-powered cars, but Durham warns that first responders could inhale high levels of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and heavy metals from burning EVs. Overall, Durham says, he is not against EVs, but he thinks there needs to be a change in attitude to handle them safely. When an EV battery catches fire, he says, “until that battery has been removed from the vehicle and shredded and fully recycled, it’s always going be a hazard.” Maya L. Kapoor is an award-winning freelance journalist who writes about climate change, biodiversity, and environmental justice.

In the fall of 2024, a trucking company in Falls Township, Pennsylvania, temporarily stored a storm-damaged Tesla at its yard. A few weeks later, the car burst into flames that grew out of control within seconds, some shooting out 30 feet.

A local fire company tried in vain to squelch the blaze, spraying more than 2,000 gallons of water on the vehicle. Eventually, the firefighters requested help from a fire company in neighboring Bristol Township, led by volunteer fire chief Howard McGoldrick. He’d been fighting fires since 1989, but this conflagration was unusual: It was a chemical fire in a lithium-ion battery, meaning it provided its own heat, fuel, and oxygen. And it was incredibly challenging to extinguish.  

McGoldrick was encountering fires like this more and more often. The previous year, he says, several rowhouses were badly burned after overcharged lithium-ion batteries in racing drones ignited inside. In another nearby incident, old lithium-ion biomedical devices at a scrapyard got soaked in a rainstorm and combusted.

The Tesla fire felt like a breaking point. “We were like, ‘Okay, this is just too many incidents in a short amount of time,’” McGoldrick recalls. He went in search of someone who could help his company get better at responding to fires in lithium-ion batteries. He found Patrick Durham.

Durham is the owner of (and mustache behind) StacheD Training, one of a growing number of private companies helping first responders learn how to deal with lithium-ion battery safety, including electric-vehicle fires.

Although there isn’t solid data on the frequency of EV battery fires, it’s no secret to EV makers that these fires are happening. Yet the manufacturers offer no standardized steps on how to fight them or avoid them in the first place, leaving first responders scrambling to search through each car’s emergency response guide—something that’s hard to do when you’re standing in front of an immolating vehicle.

In this void, Durham offers a wealth of resources to first responders, from easy-to-follow video tutorials to hours-long in-person workshops. In 2024 alone, Durham says he trained approximately 2,000 first responders around the country. As more people buy EVs, in part to help address climate change, the need for this training has only grown; in less than two years, Durham’s YouTube channel has attracted almost 30,000 subscribers. (The US doesn’t currently collect data on the frequency or causes of EV fires, but this year the US Fire Administration and the Fire Safety Research Institute are rolling out a new data collection system for fire departments.)

A circumspect man with a shaved head, brown eyes, and a thick horseshoe mustache framing his mouth, Durham previously worked as a mechanical engineer developing battery boxes for EVs. He is also a volunteer firefighter, and in 2020 he offered his first training on fires in lithium-ion batteries to his local department. From there, his reputation spread by word of mouth. Today, StacheD Training is Durham’s full-time work. He’s also the captain of his local volunteer fire department in Troy, Michigan.  

As more EVs hit the road, what worries Durham most isn’t just the growing likelihood of battery fires—it’s their intensity. “The severity of the fire is significant compared to a regular vehicle fire,” he says.

“The traditional car fires that you and I grew up with—the majority of those always start in the engine compartment,” says Jim Stevenson, a fire chief from rural Michigan who has taken Durham’s training. “So we basically get there, we pop the car hood, and then we put out the fire from there, and if it gets into the inner compartment of the car? Not a big deal. You spray it down with the hose, and it’s out in no time.” With EV fires, Stevenson says, “it’s just a completely different monster.” 

matchbox on wheels

SHAWN HAZEN

An EV battery is essentially a tightly packed array of thousands of cells, each of which ranges from approximately the size and shape of an AA battery to the size of a legal envelope, depending on the battery model. If a single cell gets damaged–such as by getting crushed, overcharged, or waterlogged–that cell can heat uncontrollably in a process called thermal runaway. It will release so much heat and flammable gas that it generates its own fire, which spreads to the other cells. 

Older lithium-ion battery packs exploded “like a pipe bomb” when that happened, Durham says; today’s battery packs have release valves so that during thermal runaway they avoid an explosion by instead spewing flames in what Durham describes as “essentially a blowtorch.” The location of an EV’s battery—underneath the car, between its axles, within a protective case—complicates things further. The batteries are much safer from collision damage than they would be under the hood, but they are also much harder to reach and douse if they ignite.

The result? Fires such as one at an Illinois Rivian plant in 2024, where one EV caught fire and approximately 50 cars parked nearby ended up burning. Or one in Hollywood, Florida, in 2023, where a Tesla was accidentally driven off a dock and burst into flames even though it was underwater.

Durham worries that if an EV battery catches fire in a high-speed crash, it will burn so intensely that first responders won’t be able to save anyone inside the vehicle. Putting out a fire in an internal-combustion car might take as little as 30 minutes and a few hundred gallons of water, he notes, while an electric car battery fire could take upwards of 4,000 gallons of water and many hours to extinguish—and much more for commercial trucks. Indeed, when a Tesla Semi drove off Interstate 80 in Northern California in 2024 and burst into flames, first responders had to douse it with 50,000 gallons of water and close the highway for 15 hours.

What’s more, with EVs, it’s never entirely clear whether the fire is truly out. Cars may ignite, or reignite, weeks or even months after the battery is damaged or a battery fire is initially suppressed. Durham points to one salvaged Tesla in California that burst into flames 308 days after it had flooded in a Florida hurricane. The vehicle hadn’t initially ignited, but saltwater intrusion into the battery pack eventually corroded it enough to produce a chemical fire leading to thermal runaway.

According to Durham, the simple truth is that the best way to manage EV fires right now is to let them burn—while making sure to protect the surrounding area, including other vehicles and people’s homes. Allowing the fire to run its course will ideally also destroy any cells that might otherwise ignite later.

This goes against firefighters’ instincts. When they respond to EV fires, they will spray water “because they want to do something to fix the problem,” he says. [But] … it’s not really doing anything.”

Stevenson worries about how bystanders will perceive  first responders waiting out a blaze. “It’s going to be ugly,” he says, “because the public’s going to see us standing on the side [of the] road just watching it burn, which looks bad for us.” But at the same time, he adds, “we don’t have [an] actual way of getting to the battery to knock it out.”

For now, Durham’s training focuses on the options that first responders do have with EV fires. An important if simple one is using a fire blanket to cover a vehicle and prevent the blaze from spreading as it burns out. Although they hadn’t yet received Durham’s training, that’s exactly what McGoldrick and his crew did when they responded to the burning Tesla last fall: After the facility used a forklift to move the burning car to an isolated part of the yard, first responders covered it with a fire blanket. The car reignited several times over the next few days, McGoldrick says, “but it was contained. We just put it in the middle of an open lot and basically let it go.”

It’s a significant cultural shift that first responders need to make, Durham says, and there’s another one, too: being extra-vigilant about the personal protective equipment they wear from the first moment they arrive at a burning EV. There isn’t yet enough information to compare the toxicity of EV fires and those in gas-powered cars, but Durham warns that first responders could inhale high levels of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and heavy metals from burning EVs.

Overall, Durham says, he is not against EVs, but he thinks there needs to be a change in attitude to handle them safely. When an EV battery catches fire, he says, “until that battery has been removed from the vehicle and shredded and fully recycled, it’s always going be a hazard.”

Maya L. Kapoor is an award-winning freelance journalist who writes about climate change, biodiversity, and environmental justice.

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

SolarWinds launches Avior AI agents to automate network operations

The first Avior offering is a network engineering agent that can automate alert management, configuration automation, compliance checks, and incident remediation. “We started there because [the network is] kind of our bread and butter,” Childress explains. “Many of our customers, a large portion of our customers, are on our network

Read More »

Equinor plans tieback of Grimsnes discovery to Oseberg platform in North Sea

Equinor Energy AS made an oil and gas discovery in the Grimsnes prospect near Oseberg field in the North Sea about 15 km southwest of the Oseberg Sør (South) platform and 145 km west of Bergen in 96 m of water. Well 30/8-7 S, the fifth exploration well in production license (PL) 190, was drilled by the Deepsea Bergen semi-submersible drilling rig to a vertical depth of 3,752 m subsea. It was terminated in the Drake formation in the Lower Jurassic, the Norwegian Offshore Directorate reported. The primary exploration target was to prove petroleum in Middle Jurassic reservoir rocks in the Tarbert formation. The secondary target was to prove petroleum in Middle Jurassic rocks in the Ness and Etive formations. The well encountered a combined oil and gas column totaling 54 m (39-m gas column, 15-m oil column) in the Tarbert formation. The total thickness of the Tarbert formation was 264 m, 111 m of which were sandstone with moderate to good reservoir properties. In the secondary exploration target in the Ness formation, the well encountered a sandstone layer totaling 289 m with variable reservoir quality from poor to very good. The reservoir was aquiferous with a few potential hydrocarbon-filled zones. In the Etive formation, the well encountered aquiferous sandstones totaling 10 m, with moderate reservoir quality. The preliminary volume estimate of the discovery is 19-50 MMboe (3-8 million std cu m). Data has been collected and samples have been taken. The well has been permanently plugged, and the Deepsea Bergen rig will now proceed to Visund Sør field to drill a development well. Equinor plans to quickly tie the discovery back to existing subsea infrastructure and produce the volumes through the Oseberg Sør platform. Grimsnes will most likely be developed with 2-3 wells in a standard 4-slot template. The discovery

Read More »

DOE Alternative Fuels and Feedstocks Office Announces Intent to Award Up to $60 Million for Innovative Chemical, Fuel, and Fertilizer Technologies

WASHINGTON—The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Alternative Fuels and Feedstocks Office (AFFO) today announced its intent to award up to $60 million to expand domestic energy production and distribution through novel, high-impact chemicals, fertilizers, fuels, and feedstock technologies. The funding opportunity is in accordance with President Trump’s Executive Order, Unleashing American Energy, which calls for expanding domestic supply chains and the production of American energy to lower prices for hardworking Americans, including farmers, ranchers, and small businesses. “President Trump’s administration is strengthening America’s agricultural and energy sectors – both critical backbones of our prosperity and security – enabling our energy independence and benefiting all hardworking American families,” said Assistant Secretary Audrey Robertson. “Under President Trump’s and Energy Secretary Chris Wright’s leadership, we are empowering farmers, ranchers, and energy producers to lower prices, unleash American-made energy dominance, build a strong multi-generational workforce, and ensure the long-term prosperity and success for our great country.” DOE will seek research, development and scale-up projects that harness existing biomass, hydrogen, and pipeline resources to expand domestic energy production, distribution, and fertilizer technologies. AFFO expects to issue a notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) in November 2026, addressing the following topic areas: Topic Area 1: Biointermediate Depots – Enhance the production of liquid intermediate-products that are made from biomass and establish pilot sites to produce traditional intermediate products such as high impact chemicals, sugars, bio-crudes, or bio-oils, from biomass and wastes.  Topic Area 2: Refinery Integration – Advance the production of commodity chemicals and fuels from alternative feedstocks using existing refinery assets and achieving production-costs that enable competitive market pricing.  Topic Area 3: Pilot Site for Hydrogen/Natural Gas Blending – Establish pilot sites for hydrogen and natural gas blending and the distribution/utilization of those blends to improve the reliability, scalability, suitability, performance and durability of distribution networks.

Read More »

Energy Department Releases Emissions Value Request Process for 45Z Fuel Production Credit

WASHINGTON—The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Alternative Fuels and Feedstocks Office (AFFO) released a pre-publication draft of a federal register notice announcing the Emissions Value Request (EVR) process for the 45Z fuel production tax credit. Modified and extended under the Working Families Tax Cut, the Clean Fuel Production Tax Credit (Internal Revenue Code Section 45Z) provides a production incentive for certain feedstocks produced in the United States, Mexico, or Canada. “Thanks to President Trump’s Working Families Tax Cut, we are creating new opportunities for American farmers and fuel producers to strengthen domestic energy production, reduce costs, and unleash American energy dominance,” said Assistant Secretary of Energy Audrey Robertson. “Through the Department of Energy’s new 45Z Emissions Value Request process, we are expanding opportunities for American fuel producers to access critical tax incentives, supporting rural economies, and bringing more American-made fuels to market. In short: putting American energy first.” Transportation fuel producers seeking to claim the tax credit must obtain the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions rate of their transportation fuel using the applicable rate table for Section 45Z. If the fuel’s type, primary feedstock, or pathway is not included in the rate table, fuel producers must petition the Secretary of Treasury for a provisional emission rate (PER). The 45Z EVR process is the route through which fuel producers can obtain a rate value from DOE and petition U.S. Treasury for a PER. To request an emissions value from DOE, stakeholders must follow the EVR Application Instructions to submit the following requested materials: Engineering information/analyses consistent with the specified section of the front-end engineering and design (FEED) study or similar indication of project maturity, as determined by DOE. A completed EVR form. In addition to the required documents, an applicant also has the option to include additional information that may be

Read More »

IEA: Oil supply rebound remains fragile; diesel tightness persists

Supply recovery at risk Global oil supply increased by 2.5 million b/d month over month to 102.3 million b/d in September. OPEC+ accounted for 2.1 million b/d of the increase, led by Saudi Arabia. Renewed attacks on tankers and energy infrastructure threaten further gains, IEA warned. Despite September’s rebound, global supply is forecast to decline by 5.8 million b/d to 100.7 million b/d this year, before rising by 7.7 million b/d in 2027. Next year’s recovery remains contingent on sustained improvements in Hormuz flows. “Crude oil exports from Gulf producers, led by Saudi Arabia, surged by 4.4 million b/d to 13.9 million b/d in September, reaching over 75% of pre-war levels as supply recovered strongly and inventories were drawn down. Robust Gulf of Oman ship-to-ship transfers helped lift total oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz by 3.7 million b/d to 10.9 million b/d, while the swift return of East-West pipeline flows increased overall bypass exports by 970,000 b/d to 5.6 million b/d. The strong rebound raised estimated global supply for third-quarter 2026 by 190,000 b/d compared with last month’s Report. However, due to heightened security concerns amid increased Houthi attacks in the region in October, we have left the projections for the remainder of the year largely unchanged,” IEA said. North Sea Dated averaged $116.89/bbl in September, up $26.17/bbl from August. Diesel, inventories under pressure Global diesel exports in September were nearly 700,000 b/d below year-earlier levels, as increased shipments from other suppliers only partly offset losses from Russia and the Middle East. IEA expects diesel market tightness to extend well into 2027. “Refined product and LPG shipments from the Middle East have risen much more slowly than crude oil flows and remain below half of their pre-war levels. Refined products rose by 210,000 b/d to 1.9 million b/d

Read More »

Energy Department Awards $49.8 Million to Advance Methane Hydrate Production Research on Alaska North Slope

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy Office (HGEO) today announced a five-year contract valued at up to $49.8 million awarded to ASRC Consulting and Environmental Services, LLC (ACES), a subsidiary of Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Energy Services Alaska, Inc. (AES). The contract will advance research and production testing of methane hydrates, a potential source of natural gas found in subsurface formations on Alaska’s North Slope.  The award supports President Trump’s goal of unleashing American energy and U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright’s focus on advancing energy addition and American innovation by building the scientific and engineering knowledge needed to evaluate methane hydrates as a potential future domestic energy resource. The work will build on technical insights from prior production testing while maintaining a unique research site in the Prudhoe Bay Unit for potential follow-on operations.  “President Trump has made clear that America should use its extraordinary energy resources and innovation to strengthen our energy security and global leadership,” said DOE Acting Assistant Secretary of the Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy Office Curt Coccodrilli. “This investment will help build on years of field research in Alaska to move methane hydrate research from scientific discovery toward the real-world testing needed to determine its commercial production potential.”  Gas hydrates are naturally occurring, ice-like crystalline solids that hold vast quantities of natural gas beneath the permafrost and offshore. Unlocking these resources represents a vital component of the United States’ long-term energy strategy to secure abundant domestic supplies. Alaska’s North Slope research site provides a unique setting for long-duration field research because hydrate-bearing reservoirs can be studied using established infrastructure and continuously monitored wells.  The project will proceed in two phases. Phase 1 will maintain the existing research site and supporting equipment and develop detailed plans for a potential follow-on production test. Should

Read More »

HPCL taps Technip Energies for EPC on new Mumbai refinery unit

Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. (HPCL) has awarded Technip Energies an engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contract for two major units in the lube modernization and bottoms upgradation (LMBU) project at its 9.5-million tonne/year (tpy) Mumbai refinery in Maharashtra, India. The work covers a 550,000-tpy integrated hydrocracker and catalytic dewaxing (IHCD) unit and an 850,000-tpy solvent deasphalting (SDA) unit. Both will be integrated into the operating refinery, Technip Energies said in a release Oct. 12. The new units aim to increase production of lube oil base stocks (LOBS) used in automotive engine oils and industrial lubricants, while upgrading heavier refinery streams into higher-value products, according to the service provider. While Technip Energies did not reveal the precise value of the contract, the company confirmed the order would amount to between €250-500 million of revenue. This latest EPC contract for the project’s IHCD and SDA units follows HPCL’s earlier award to Chevron Lummus Global for licensing of technologies to outfit the IHCD unit. Project overview HPCL’s LMBU project is designed to raise the Mumbai refinery’s output of LOBS to 764,000 tpy from 475,000 tpy, including production of Group II+ and Group III base stocks. The project is also expected to increase bitumen production by about 487,000 tpy through fuel oil upgrading, as well as improve the refinery’s yield of distillate by about 4%, HPCL said in a release Jan. 23, 2025. HPCL began work on the LMBU project during the third quarter of its 2025 fiscal year at an estimated project cost of 46.79 billion rupees (US$541.1 million). Scheduled to be fully completed in March 2028, the LMBU project had reached 9.9% physical completion as of Mar. 31, 2026, at a then-current project cost of 57.40 billion rupees (US$600.4 million), HPCL said in an investor presentation dated May 13, 2026.

Read More »

Virginia’s New Data Center Bargain: Power, Permits and the Right to Build

What Took Effect—and What Still Requires Legislation Spanberger laid out the administration’s rationale in announcing the framework: “In the years before I took office, data centers came to Virginia and the Commonwealth did not have a clear or coordinated plan to address their impacts on Virginians — on their electric bills, their water, their land, their air, or their quality of life. That changes today. I have said many times that Virginia should be leading the nation in setting the highest standards for this industry. And now, I believe we are doing just that.” The distinction between what Virginia has already implemented and what the administration intends to pursue is consequential. Executive Order 22 establishes immediate directives for state agencies, while significant portions of the broader Data Center Accountability Framework remain proposals for the 2027 General Assembly or future regulatory action. Among the immediate changes, executive-branch agencies are prohibited from entering into or enforcing new nondisclosure agreements that conceal material information about proposed commercial data centers, public incentives, resource demands or community impacts. Existing contractual commitments are preserved, with limited exceptions contemplated for extraordinary circumstances, including national security. The prohibition does not yet extend automatically to local governments. The order also excludes new data center projects with anticipated peak electrical demand of 25 MW or greater from the Virginia Business Ready Sites Program and similar discretionary state site-readiness and expedited-review assistance. A separate, potentially more consequential proposal would eliminate by-right development approval for data centers using more than 25 MW, requiring local approval even for projects with prior authorizations. That provision has not been enacted statewide and could introduce significant legal questions concerning established development rights. The administration is also accelerating environmental oversight. Within 120 days of the order, the Office of the Chief Energy Officer must publish an initial

Read More »

OCP 2026: Agentic AI Drives the Data Center’s Chip-to-Grid Transformation

NVIDIA Opens More of the AI Factory Architecture NVIDIA’s Ian Buck closed the opening keynote program with an extensive presentation covering Vera Rubin systems, open rack designs, networking, power delivery and AI factory software. The company announced additional contributions to OCP based on its third-generation MGX 1.2 reference architecture. The specification includes high-density liquid-cooled computing systems, improved cooling connections, standardized power interfaces and modular mechanical designs. Buck emphasized that these developments are as much about manufacturing and serviceability as they are about computational performance. He described how NVIDIA reduced the assembly time for a compute tray from approximately 90 minutes in the Grace Blackwell generation to roughly one minute for Vera Rubin through simplified mechanical construction and more automated assembly. At the scale of thousands of racks, those manufacturing improvements can materially influence deployment schedules. NVIDIA also previewed its next-generation Vera Rubin Ultra architecture, designed to interconnect 576 GPUs using an advanced NVLink fabric with co-packaged optics. Open Data Center and Grid Resilience Specifications For data center developers and operators, however, NVIDIA’s most consequential OCP contributions may lie outside the computing rack. NVIDIA, AMD, Google and Meta have published an Open Data Center Specification, currently at version 0.7, intended to establish common design principles for AI factory facilities. The specification addresses power architecture, cooling infrastructure and physical layout, helping equipment suppliers and developers coordinate around shared infrastructure requirements. That shared facilities work unfolds alongside vendor-specific programs such as NVIDIA’s DSX Ready, which establishes qualification requirements for battery energy storage and liquid cooling equipment supporting its AI factory designs. NVIDIA also joined Google, Meta and Microsoft in publishing an OCP Grid Resilience Specification addressing the behavior of large AI installations during grid disturbances. The specification establishes expectations for facilities to remain connected, respond automatically to disturbances and recover toward normal operating

Read More »

NetBox Labs adds network design templates and AI agents to streamline infrastructure operations

“This is infrastructure, and so if an agent does the wrong thing, it breaks the company,” Beevers said. NetBox Designs turns repeatable infrastructure into templates AI data centers are full of racks that are almost all identical in design. Teams do not want to lay out each one by hand. The same applies to a retail chain with small, medium, and large store formats, where the IT footprint needs to line up. NetBox Designs, now in public preview, targets that repetition. Designs work like “templatized Lego bricks for infrastructure,” Beevers said. A team defines a site, rack or IP plan once and sets its parameters. NetBox then renders the plan as many times as needed, down to the low-level components and their configuration. That includes assigning IP addresses, prefixes, and virtual LANs across a fabric. The goal is to speed design down to the component level, reduce manual error and compress time to market.

Read More »

AMD unveils Helion as agentic AI fuels demand for data center CPUs

AMD has introduced Helion, an open blueprint for data center racks that aims to give CPUs a larger role in running AI agents while allowing customers to configure GPU resources around their inference requirements. Based on Open Compute Project (OCP) specifications, the architecture supports different combinations of computing hardware. AMD cited examples including CPU-only racks for hyperscalers, powered by sixth-generation EPYC processors with up to 32,768 cores, and all-in-one enterprise racks accommodating up to 16 Instinct MI350P GPUs. AMD has listed networking bandwidth of up to 102 Tbps for Helion, although the company has not specified how that figure is calculated. The specification represents a planned rack capability rather than demonstrated performance in customer environments.

Read More »

Land & Expand: North America’s Data Center Pipeline Expands Under Pressure

Land & Expand is Data Center Frontier’s periodic look at the latest data center development news, including new sites, land acquisitions and campus expansions across North America. This latest installment finds the development pipeline continuing to expand, even as the requirements for bringing large-scale projects online grow more complicated. Developers are securing land, planning new power infrastructure and advancing campuses measured in hundreds of megawatts or more. At the same time, local governments and residents are demanding greater clarity on electricity costs, water consumption, noise, tax incentives and the long-term effects of industrial-scale computing facilities. A succession of development disclosures and project milestones through September and early October 2026 illustrates both the geographical reach of North America’s expanding data center pipeline and the growing difficulty of measuring how much proposed capacity will ultimately be delivered. The projects range from preliminary discussions and newly secured development sites to campuses already under construction. Some are advancing through formal permitting and power studies; others remain contingent on customers, financing or local approvals. Together, they reveal an industry still expanding aggressively, but operating under increasingly complex development conditions. Fluidstack: Cameron County, Texas — Up to 1.5 GW One of the largest newly disclosed projects is Fluidstack’s AI data center development in Cameron County in the Rio Grande Valley. The project surfaced publicly September 10 when Cameron County announced that it had issued Fluidstack a worksite permit for property near Harlingen. The permit authorizes preliminary site work, including grading, utilities and related infrastructure, rather than construction of the data center buildings themselves. Fluidstack subsequently disclosed considerably more detail on September 21, saying construction had begun on a $4 billion first phase capable of supporting as much as 1.5 GW. Fluidstack expects the project to generate more than 2,500 construction jobs and several hundred permanent positions. 

Read More »

DCF Global: Five Markets Redrawing the AI Infrastructure Map

The Global Constraint Is Execution These five markets demonstrate that the worldwide AI infrastructure buildout is no longer organized around a single development model. Spain is using permitting reform to attract investment. China is concentrating construction around energy resources. India is translating enormous capital commitments into an expanding development pipeline. Latin America is combining hyperscale growth with national industrial objectives. And Southeast Asia is creating interconnected infrastructure markets whose boundaries increasingly extend beyond individual cities and countries. Not every market is competing for the same business. Sovereign cloud services, enterprise applications, AI training clusters, and large-scale inference platforms carry different requirements involving power, connectivity, latency, data residency, and operating economics. But the infrastructure questions remain remarkably consistent. Can a project obtain enough electricity? Can transmission and supporting networks be delivered on schedule? Will the supply chain provide the required equipment? Can the facility be constructed and commissioned efficiently? And will the development retain the regulatory certainty and community acceptance required to operate for decades? The gap between announced development and actual capacity is becoming a defining measurement of the industry. Cushman & Wakefield estimates that Asia-Pacific alone had approximately 26.5 GW of data center capacity in its development pipeline during H1 2026. Of that total, roughly 4.8 GW was under construction, with another 21.7 GW in planning. Those figures reveal both the extraordinary scale of the opportunity and the considerable infrastructure work still required to realize it. What the Global Buildout Means for North America For U.S. data center operators, developers, engineering firms, equipment suppliers, and investors, international expansion is not a separate story. It is increasingly part of the same global competition for capital, equipment, power infrastructure, and specialized expertise. The transformers, switchgear, generators, advanced cooling systems, fiber networks, and electrical distribution equipment required by a major AI campus

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »