Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

Building customer-centric convenience

In partnership withInfosys Cobalt In the U.S., two-thirds of the country’s 150,000 convenience stores are run by independent operators. Mom-and-pop shops, powered by personal relationships and local knowledge, are the backbone of the convenience sector. These neighborhood operators have long lacked the resources needed to compete with larger chains when it comes to technology, operations, and customer loyalty programs.  As consumer expectations evolve, many small business owners find themselves grappling with outdated systems, rising costs, and limited digital tools to keep up. “What would happen if these small operations could combine their knowledge of their market, of their neighborhood, with the state-of-the-art technology?” asks GM of digital products, mobility, and convenience for the Americas at bp, Tarang Sethia. That question is shaping a years-long, multi-pronged initiative to bring modern retail tools, like cloud-connected point-of-sale systems and personalized AI, into the hands of local convenience store operators, without stripping their independence.  Sethia’s mission is to close the digital gap. bp’s newly launched Earnify app centralizes loyalty rewards for convenience stores across the country, helping independent stores build repeat business with data-informed promotions. Behind the scenes, a cloud-based operating system can proactively monitor store operations and infrastructure to automate fixes to routine issues and reduce costly downtime. This is especially critical for businesses that double as their own IT departments.  “We’ve aggregated all of that into one offering for our customers. We proactively monitor it. We fix it. We take ownership of making sure that these systems are up. We make sure that the systems are personalizing offers for the customers,” says Sethia.  But the goal isn’t to corporatize corner stores. “We want them to stay local,” says Sethia. “We want them to stay the mom-and-pop store operator that their customers trust, but we are providing them the tools to run their stores more efficiently and to delight their guests.” From personalizing promotions to proactively resolving technical issues to optimizing in-store inventory, the success of AI should be measured, says Sethia, by its ability to make frontline workers more effective and customers more loyal. The future, Sethia believes, lies in thoughtful integration of technology that centers humans rather than replacing them.  “AI and other technologies should help us create an ecosystem that does not replace humans, but actually augments their ability to serve consumers and to serve the consumers so well that the consumers don’t go back to their old ways.” This episode of Business Lab is produced in association with Infosys Cobalt. Full Transcript  Megan Tatum: From MIT Technology Review, I’m Megan Tatum, and this is Business Lab, the show that helps business leaders make sense of new technologies coming out of the lab and into the marketplace.  This episode is produced in partnership with Infosys Cobalt.  Our topic today is innovating with AI. As companies move along in their journey to digitalization and AI adoption, we’re starting to see real-world business models that demonstrate the innovation these emerging technologies enable.  Two words for you: ecosystem innovation.  My guest today is Tarang Sethia, the GM of digital products, mobility and convenience for the Americas at BP.  Welcome, Tarang. Tarang Sethia: Thank you. Megan: Lovely to have you. Now, for a bit of context just to start with, could you give us some background about the current convenience store and gas station landscape in the United States and what the challenges are for owners and customers right now? Tarang: Absolutely. What is important to understand is, what is the state of the market? If you look at the convenience and mobility market, it is a very fragmented market. The growth and profitability are driven by consumer loyalty, store experience, and also buying power of the products that they sell to the customers that come into their stores. And from an operations perspective, there is a vast difference. If you put the bucket of these single-store smaller operators, these guys are very well run, they are in the community, they know their customers. Sometimes they even know the frequent buyers that are coming in, and they address them by name and keep the product ready. They know their communities and customers, and they have a personal affinity with them. They also know their likes and dislikes. But they also need to rapidly change to the changing needs of the customers. These mom-and-pop stores represent the core of the convenience market. And these constitute about 60% of the entire market. Now, where the fragmentation lies is, there are also larger operations that are equally motivated to develop strong relationships with customers and they have the scale. They may not match the personal affinity of these mom-and-pop store operators, but they do have the capital to actually leverage data, technology, AI, to personalize and customize their stores for the consumers or the customers that come to their stores.  And this is like the 25% or 30% of the market. Just to put that number in perspective, out of the 150,000 convenience stores in the US market, 60% constitute almost 100,000 stores, which are mom-and-pop operated. The rest are through organized retail. Okay.Now let me talk about the problems that they face. In today’s day and age, these mom-and-pop stores don’t have the capital to create a loyalty program and to create those offers that make customers choose to come to the store instead of going to somebody else. They also don’t have a simpler operations technology and the operations ecosystem. What I mean is that they don’t have the systems that stay up, these are still legacy POS systems that run their stores. So they spend a lot of time making the transaction happen. Finally, what they pay for, say, a bottle of soda, compared to the larger operation, because of the lack of buying power, also eats into their margin. So overall, the problems are that they’re not able to delight their guests with loyalty. Their operations are not simple, and so they do a lot of work to keep their operations up to date and pay a lot more for their operations, both technology and convenience operations. That’s kind of the summary. Megan: Right, and I suppose there’s a way to help them address these challenges. I know bp has created this new way to reach convenience store owners to offer various new opportunities and products. Could you tell us a bit about what you’ve been working on? For example, I know there’s an app, point of sale and payment systems, and a snack brand, and also how these sort of benefit convenience store owners and their customers in this climate that we’re talking about. Tarang: So bp is in pursuit of these digital first customer experiences that don’t replace the one-on-one human interactions of mom-and-pop store operators, but they amplify that by providing them with an ecosystem that helps them delight their guests, run their stores simply and more efficiently, and also reduce their cost while doing so. And what we have done as bp is, we’ve launched a suite of customer solutions and an innovative retail operating system experience. We’ve branded it Crosscode so that it works from the forecourt to the backcourt, it works for the consumers, it works for the stores to run their stores more efficiently, and we can leverage all kinds of technologies like AI to personalize and customize for the customers and the stores. The reason why we did this is, we asked ourselves, what would happen if these small operations could combine their knowledge of their market, of their neighborhood, with the state-of-the-art technology? That’s how we came up with a consumer app called Earnify. It is kind of the Uber of loyalty programs. We did not name it BPme. We did not name it BP Rewards or ampm or Thorntons. We created one standardized loyalty program that would work in the entire country to get more loyal consumers and drive their frequency, and we’ve scaled it to about 8,000 stores in the last year, and the results are amazing. There are 68% more active, loyal consumers that are coming through Earnify nationally.  And the second piece, which is even more important is, which a lot of companies haven’t taken care of, is a simple to operate, cloud-based retail operating system, which is kind of the POS, point of sale, and the ecosystem of the products that they sell to customers and payment systems. We have applied AI to make a lot of tasks automated in this retail operating system.What that has led to is 20% reduction in the operating costs for these mom-and-pop store operators. That 20% reduction in operating costs, goes directly to the bottom line of these stores. So now, the mom-and-pop store operators are going to be able to delight their guests, keeping their customers loyal. Number two, they’re able to spend less money on running their store operations. And number three, very, very, very important, they are able to spend more time serving the guests instead of running the store. Megan: Yeah, absolutely. Really fantastic results that you’ve achieved there already. And you touched on a couple of the sort of technologies you’ve made use of there, but I wondered if you could share a bit more detail on what additional technologies, like cloud and AI, did you adopt and implement, and perhaps what were some of the barriers to adoption as well? Tarang: Absolutely. I will first start with how did we enable these mom-and-pop store operators to delight their guests? The number one thing that we did was we first started with a basic points-based loyalty program where their guests earn points and value for both fueling at the fuel pump and buying convenience store items inside the store. And when they have enough points to redeem, they can redeem them either way. So they have value for going from the forecourt to the backcourt and backcourt to the forecourt. Number one thing, right? Then we leveraged data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to personalize the offer for customers. If you’re on Earnify and I am in New York, and if I were a bagel enthusiast, then it would send me offers of a bagel plus coffee. And say my wife likes to go to a convenience store to quickly pick up a salad and a diet soda. She would get offers for that, right? So personalization.  What we also applied is, now these mom-and-pop store operators, depending on the changing seasons or the changing landscape, could create their own offers and they could be instantly available to their customers. That’s how they are able to delight their guests. Number two is, these mom-and-pop store operators, their biggest problem with technology is that it goes down, and when it goes down, they lose sales. They are on calls, they become the IT support help desk, right? They’re trying to call five different numbers.So we first provided a proactively monitored help desk. So when we leveraged AI technology to monitor what is working in their store, what is not working, and actually look at patterns to find out what may be going down, like a PIN pad. We would know hours before, looking at the patterns that the PIN pad may have issues. We proactively call the customer or the store to say, “Hey, you may have some problems with the PIN pad. You need to replace it, you need to restart it.”What that does is, it takes away the six to eight hours of downtime and lost sales for these stores. That’s a proactively monitored solution. And also, if ever they have an issue, they need to call one number, and we take ownership of solving the problems of the store for them. Now, it’s almost like they have an outsourced help desk, which is leveraging AI technology to both proactively monitor, resolve, and also fix the issues faster because we now know that store X also had this issue and this is what it took to resolve, instead of constantly trying to resolve it and take hours. The third thing that we’ve done is we have put in a cloud-based POS system so we can constantly monitor their POS. We’ve connected it to their back office pricing systems so they can change the prices of products faster, and [monitor] how they are performing. This actually helps the store to say, “Okay, what is working, what is not working? What do I need to change?” in almost near real-time, instead of waiting hours or days or weeks to react to the changing customer needs. And now they don’t need to make a decision. Do I have the capital to invest in this technology? The scale of bp allows them to get in, to leverage technology that is 20% cheaper and is working so much better for them. Megan: Fantastic. Some really impactful examples of how you’ve used technology there. Thank you for that. And how has bp also been agile or quick to respond to the data it has received during this campaign? Tarang: Agility is a mindset. What we’ve done is to bring in a customer-obsessed mindset. Like our leader Greg Franks talks about, we have put the customer at the heart of everything that we do. For us, customers are people who come to our stores and the people on the frontline who serve them. Their needs are of the utmost importance. What we did was, we changed how we went to business about them. Instead of going to vendors and putting vendors in charge of the store technology and consumer technology, we took ownership. We built out a technology team that was trained in the latest tools and technologies like AI, like POS, like APIs. Then we changed the processes of how quickly we go to market. Instead of waiting two years on an enterprise project and then delivering it three years later, what we said was, “Let’s look at an MVP experience, most valuable experience delivered through a product for the customers.” And we started putting it in the stores so that the store owners could start delighting their guests and learning. Some things worked, some didn’t, but we learned much faster and were able to react almost on a weekly basis. Our store owners now get these updates on a biweekly basis instead of waiting two years or three years. Third, we’ve applied an ecosystem mindset. Companies like Airbnb and Uber are known for their aggregator business models. They don’t do everything themselves, and we don’t do everything ourselves. But what we have done is, we’ve become an aggregator of all the capabilities, like consumer app, like POS, like back office or convenience value chain, like pricing, like customer support. We’ve aggregated all of that into one offering for our customers. We proactively monitor it. We fix it. We take ownership of making sure that these systems are up. We make sure that the systems are personalizing offers for the customers. So the store owner can just focus on delighting their guests. We have branded this as Crosscode Retail Operating System, and we are providing it as a SaaS service. You can see in the name, there’s no bp in the name because, unlike the very big convenience players, we are not trying to make them into a particular brand that we want them. We want them to stay local. We want them to stay the mom-and-pop store operator that their customers trust, but we are providing them the tools to run their stores more efficiently and to delight their guests. Megan: Really fantastic. And you mentioned that this was a very customer-centric approach that you took. So, how important was it to focus on that customer experience, in addition to the  technology and all that it can provide? Tarang: The customer experience was the most important thing. We could have started with a project and determined, “Hey, this is how it makes money for bp first.” But we said, “Okay, let’s look at solving the core problems of the customer.” Our customer told us, “Hey, I want to pay frictionlessly at the pump, when I come to the pump.” So what did we do? We launched pay for fuel feature, where they can come to the pump, they don’t need to take their wallet out. They just take their app out and choose what pump and what payment method.  Then they said, “Hey, I don’t get any value from buying fuel every week and going inside. These are two different stores for me.” So what did we do? We launched a unified loyalty program. Then the store owner said, “Hey, my customers don’t like the same offers that you do nationally.” So what did we do? We created both personalized offers and build-your-own offers for the store owner.  Finally, to be even more customer-obsessed, we said that being customer-obsessed doesn’t just happen. We have to measure it. We are constantly measuring how the consumers are rating the offers in our app and how the consumers are rating that experience. And we made a dramatic shift. The consumers, if you go to the Earnify app in the app store, they’re rating it as 4.9.  We have 68% more loyal consumers. We are also measuring these loyal consumers, how often they are coming and what they are buying. Then we said, “Okay, from a store owner perspective, their satisfaction is important.” We are constantly measuring the satisfaction of these store operators and the frontline employees who are operating the systems. Customer satisfaction used to be three out of 10 when we first started, and now, it has reached an 8.7 out of 10, and we are constantly monitoring. Some stores go down because we haven’t paid enough attention. We learn from it and we apply.Finally, what we’ve also done is with this Earnify app, instead of a local store operator having their own loyalty program with a few hundred customers, how many people are going to download that app? We’ve given them a network of millions of consumers nationwide that can be part of the ecosystem. The technologies that we are using are helping the stores delight the consumers, helping the stores providing the value to the consumers that they see, helping the stores provide the experience to the consumers that they see, and also helping bp to provide the seamless experience to the frontline employees. Megan: Fantastic. There are some incredible results there in terms of customer satisfaction. Are there any other metrics of success that you’re tracking along the way? Any other kind of wins that you can share so far in the implementation of all of this? Tarang: We are tracking a very important deeper metric so that we can hold ourselves accountable, the uptime of the store. The meantime to resolve the issues, the sales uplift of the stores, the transaction uplift of the stores. Are the consumers buying more? Are the consumers rating their consumer experience higher? Are they engaging in different offers? Because we may do hundreds of offers. If consumers don’t like it, then they are just offers. On this journey, we are measuring every metric, and we are making it transparent. That entire team is on the same scorecard of metrics that the customers or the store owners have for the performance of their business. Their performance and the consumer delight are embedded into the metrics on how all of us digital employees are measured. Megan: Yes, absolutely. It sounds like you’re measuring success through several different lenses, so it’s really interesting to hear about that approach. Given where you are in your journey, as many companies struggle to adopt and implement AI and other emerging technologies, is there any advice that you’d offer, given the lessons you’ve learned so far? Tarang: On AI, we have to keep it very, very simple. Instead of saying that, “Hey, we are going to create, we are going to use AI technology for the sake of it,” we have to tie the usage of AI technology to the impact it has on the customers. I’ll use four examples on how we are doing that.  When we say we are leveraging AI to personalize the offers, leveraging data for consumers, what are we measuring, and what are we applying? We are looking at the data of consumer behavior and applying AI models to see, based on the current transactions, how would they react, what would they buy? People living in Frisco, Texas, age, whatever, what do they buy, when do they come, and what are they buying other places? So let’s personalize offers so that they make that left turn. And we are measuring, whether personalization is driving the delight enough that the consumers come back to the store and don’t go back to their old ways, number one. Number two, what we are also doing is, like I mentioned earlier, we are leveraging data and AI technologies to constantly monitor the trends right in the marketplace, and we’ve created some automation to leverage those trends and act quickly, which also leads to some level of personalization. It’s more regionalization.  Now, as we do that, we also look at the patterns of what equipment or what transactions are slowing down and we proactively monitor and resolve them. So if the store has issues and if payment has issue, loyalty has issue, or POS has issue, back office has issue, we proactively work on it to resolve that. Number three that we are doing is, we are looking at the convenience market and we are looking at what is selling and what is in stock, so we are optimizing our supply chain inventory, pricing, and inventory, so that we could enable the store owners to cater to their consumers who come to the stores. This is actually really helping us have the product in the store that the customer actually came for. Megan: Absolutely. Looking ahead, when you think about the path to generative AI and other emerging technologies? Is there something that excites you the most, kind of looking ahead in the years to come as well? Tarang: That’s a great question, Megan. I’m going to answer that question a little bit philosophically because as technologists, our tendency is, whenever there is a new technology like generative AI, to create a lot of toys with it, right? But I’ve learned through this experience that whatever technology we use, like generative AI, we need to tie it to the objectives and key results for the consumer and the store.  As an example, if we are going to leverage generative AI to do personalized offers, to do personalized creative, then we need to be able to create frameworks to measure the impact on the store, to measure the impact on the consumer, and tie that directly to the use of the technology. Are we making the consumers more loyal? Are they coming more often? Are they buying more? Because only then, we will have adopters of that technology, both the store and stores driving the consumers to adopt. Number two, AI and other technologies should help us create an ecosystem that does not replace humans, but actually augments their ability to serve consumers and to serve the consumers so well that the consumers don’t go back to their old ways. That’s where we have to stay very, very customer-obsessed instead of just business-obsessed. When I say ecosystem, what excites me the most is, think about it. These small mom-and-pop store operators, these generational businesses, which are the core of the American dream or entrepreneurialism, we are going to enable them with an ecosystem like an Airbnb of mobility and convenience, where they get a loyalty program with personalization, where they can delight their guests. They get technology to run their stores very, very efficiently and reduce their cost by 20%. Number three, and very important, their frontline employees look like heroes to the guests that are walking into the store. If we achieve these three things and create an ecosystem, then that will drive prosperity leveraging technology. And bp, as a company, we would love to be part of that. Megan: I think that’s fantastic advice. Thank you so much, Tarang, for that. Tarang: Thank you. Megan: That was Tarang Sethia, the GM of digital products, mobility and convenience for the Americas at bp, whom I spoke with from Brighton, England.  That’s it for this episode of Business Lab. I’m your host, Megan Tatum. I’m a contributing editor and host for Insights, the custom publishing division of MIT Technology Review. We were founded in 1899 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and you can find us in print on the web and at events each year around the world. For more information about us and the show, please check out our website at technologyreview.com. This show is available wherever you get your podcasts, and if you enjoy this episode, we hope you’ll take a moment to rate and review us. Business Lab is a production of MIT Technology Review. This episode was produced by Giro Studios. Thanks ever so much for listening. This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Review’s editorial staff. This content was researched, designed, and written entirely by human writers, editors, analysts, and illustrators. This includes the writing of surveys and collection of data for surveys. AI tools that may have been used were limited to secondary production processes that passed thorough human review.

In partnership withInfosys Cobalt

In the U.S., two-thirds of the country’s 150,000 convenience stores are run by independent operators. Mom-and-pop shops, powered by personal relationships and local knowledge, are the backbone of the convenience sector. These neighborhood operators have long lacked the resources needed to compete with larger chains when it comes to technology, operations, and customer loyalty programs. 

As consumer expectations evolve, many small business owners find themselves grappling with outdated systems, rising costs, and limited digital tools to keep up.

“What would happen if these small operations could combine their knowledge of their market, of their neighborhood, with the state-of-the-art technology?” asks GM of digital products, mobility, and convenience for the Americas at bp, Tarang Sethia. That question is shaping a years-long, multi-pronged initiative to bring modern retail tools, like cloud-connected point-of-sale systems and personalized AI, into the hands of local convenience store operators, without stripping their independence. 

Sethia’s mission is to close the digital gap. bp’s newly launched Earnify app centralizes loyalty rewards for convenience stores across the country, helping independent stores build repeat business with data-informed promotions. Behind the scenes, a cloud-based operating system can proactively monitor store operations and infrastructure to automate fixes to routine issues and reduce costly downtime. This is especially critical for businesses that double as their own IT departments. 

“We’ve aggregated all of that into one offering for our customers. We proactively monitor it. We fix it. We take ownership of making sure that these systems are up. We make sure that the systems are personalizing offers for the customers,” says Sethia. 

But the goal isn’t to corporatize corner stores. “We want them to stay local,” says Sethia. “We want them to stay the mom-and-pop store operator that their customers trust, but we are providing them the tools to run their stores more efficiently and to delight their guests.”

From personalizing promotions to proactively resolving technical issues to optimizing in-store inventory, the success of AI should be measured, says Sethia, by its ability to make frontline workers more effective and customers more loyal.

The future, Sethia believes, lies in thoughtful integration of technology that centers humans rather than replacing them. 

“AI and other technologies should help us create an ecosystem that does not replace humans, but actually augments their ability to serve consumers and to serve the consumers so well that the consumers don’t go back to their old ways.”

This episode of Business Lab is produced in association with Infosys Cobalt.

Full Transcript 

Megan Tatum: From MIT Technology Review, I’m Megan Tatum, and this is Business Lab, the show that helps business leaders make sense of new technologies coming out of the lab and into the marketplace. 

This episode is produced in partnership with Infosys Cobalt. 

Our topic today is innovating with AI. As companies move along in their journey to digitalization and AI adoption, we’re starting to see real-world business models that demonstrate the innovation these emerging technologies enable. 

Two words for you: ecosystem innovation. 

My guest today is Tarang Sethia, the GM of digital products, mobility and convenience for the Americas at BP. 

Welcome, Tarang.

Tarang Sethia: Thank you.

Megan: Lovely to have you. Now, for a bit of context just to start with, could you give us some background about the current convenience store and gas station landscape in the United States and what the challenges are for owners and customers right now?

Tarang: Absolutely. What is important to understand is, what is the state of the market? If you look at the convenience and mobility market, it is a very fragmented market. The growth and profitability are driven by consumer loyalty, store experience, and also buying power of the products that they sell to the customers that come into their stores.

And from an operations perspective, there is a vast difference. If you put the bucket of these single-store smaller operators, these guys are very well run, they are in the community, they know their customers. Sometimes they even know the frequent buyers that are coming in, and they address them by name and keep the product ready. They know their communities and customers, and they have a personal affinity with them. They also know their likes and dislikes. But they also need to rapidly change to the changing needs of the customers. These mom-and-pop stores represent the core of the convenience market. And these constitute about 60% of the entire market.

Now, where the fragmentation lies is, there are also larger operations that are equally motivated to develop strong relationships with customers and they have the scale. They may not match the personal affinity of these mom-and-pop store operators, but they do have the capital to actually leverage data, technology, AI, to personalize and customize their stores for the consumers or the customers that come to their stores. 

And this is like the 25% or 30% of the market. Just to put that number in perspective, out of the 150,000 convenience stores in the US market, 60% constitute almost 100,000 stores, which are mom-and-pop operated. The rest are through organized retail. Okay.

Now let me talk about the problems that they face. In today’s day and age, these mom-and-pop stores don’t have the capital to create a loyalty program and to create those offers that make customers choose to come to the store instead of going to somebody else. They also don’t have a simpler operations technology and the operations ecosystem. What I mean is that they don’t have the systems that stay up, these are still legacy POS systems that run their stores. So they spend a lot of time making the transaction happen.

Finally, what they pay for, say, a bottle of soda, compared to the larger operation, because of the lack of buying power, also eats into their margin. So overall, the problems are that they’re not able to delight their guests with loyalty. Their operations are not simple, and so they do a lot of work to keep their operations up to date and pay a lot more for their operations, both technology and convenience operations. That’s kind of the summary.

Megan: Right, and I suppose there’s a way to help them address these challenges. I know bp has created this new way to reach convenience store owners to offer various new opportunities and products. Could you tell us a bit about what you’ve been working on? For example, I know there’s an app, point of sale and payment systems, and a snack brand, and also how these sort of benefit convenience store owners and their customers in this climate that we’re talking about.

Tarang: So bp is in pursuit of these digital first customer experiences that don’t replace the one-on-one human interactions of mom-and-pop store operators, but they amplify that by providing them with an ecosystem that helps them delight their guests, run their stores simply and more efficiently, and also reduce their cost while doing so. And what we have done as bp is, we’ve launched a suite of customer solutions and an innovative retail operating system experience. We’ve branded it Crosscode so that it works from the forecourt to the backcourt, it works for the consumers, it works for the stores to run their stores more efficiently, and we can leverage all kinds of technologies like AI to personalize and customize for the customers and the stores.

The reason why we did this is, we asked ourselves, what would happen if these small operations could combine their knowledge of their market, of their neighborhood, with the state-of-the-art technology? That’s how we came up with a consumer app called Earnify. It is kind of the Uber of loyalty programs. We did not name it BPme. We did not name it BP Rewards or ampm or Thorntons. We created one standardized loyalty program that would work in the entire country to get more loyal consumers and drive their frequency, and we’ve scaled it to about 8,000 stores in the last year, and the results are amazing. There are 68% more active, loyal consumers that are coming through Earnify nationally. 

And the second piece, which is even more important is, which a lot of companies haven’t taken care of, is a simple to operate, cloud-based retail operating system, which is kind of the POS, point of sale, and the ecosystem of the products that they sell to customers and payment systems. We have applied AI to make a lot of tasks automated in this retail operating system.

What that has led to is 20% reduction in the operating costs for these mom-and-pop store operators. That 20% reduction in operating costs, goes directly to the bottom line of these stores. So now, the mom-and-pop store operators are going to be able to delight their guests, keeping their customers loyal. Number two, they’re able to spend less money on running their store operations. And number three, very, very, very important, they are able to spend more time serving the guests instead of running the store.

Megan: Yeah, absolutely. Really fantastic results that you’ve achieved there already. And you touched on a couple of the sort of technologies you’ve made use of there, but I wondered if you could share a bit more detail on what additional technologies, like cloud and AI, did you adopt and implement, and perhaps what were some of the barriers to adoption as well?

Tarang: Absolutely. I will first start with how did we enable these mom-and-pop store operators to delight their guests? The number one thing that we did was we first started with a basic points-based loyalty program where their guests earn points and value for both fueling at the fuel pump and buying convenience store items inside the store. And when they have enough points to redeem, they can redeem them either way. So they have value for going from the forecourt to the backcourt and backcourt to the forecourt. Number one thing, right? Then we leveraged data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to personalize the offer for customers.

If you’re on Earnify and I am in New York, and if I were a bagel enthusiast, then it would send me offers of a bagel plus coffee. And say my wife likes to go to a convenience store to quickly pick up a salad and a diet soda. She would get offers for that, right? So personalization. 

What we also applied is, now these mom-and-pop store operators, depending on the changing seasons or the changing landscape, could create their own offers and they could be instantly available to their customers. That’s how they are able to delight their guests. Number two is, these mom-and-pop store operators, their biggest problem with technology is that it goes down, and when it goes down, they lose sales. They are on calls, they become the IT support help desk, right? They’re trying to call five different numbers.

So we first provided a proactively monitored help desk. So when we leveraged AI technology to monitor what is working in their store, what is not working, and actually look at patterns to find out what may be going down, like a PIN pad. We would know hours before, looking at the patterns that the PIN pad may have issues. We proactively call the customer or the store to say, “Hey, you may have some problems with the PIN pad. You need to replace it, you need to restart it.”

What that does is, it takes away the six to eight hours of downtime and lost sales for these stores. That’s a proactively monitored solution. And also, if ever they have an issue, they need to call one number, and we take ownership of solving the problems of the store for them. Now, it’s almost like they have an outsourced help desk, which is leveraging AI technology to both proactively monitor, resolve, and also fix the issues faster because we now know that store X also had this issue and this is what it took to resolve, instead of constantly trying to resolve it and take hours.

The third thing that we’ve done is we have put in a cloud-based POS system so we can constantly monitor their POS. We’ve connected it to their back office pricing systems so they can change the prices of products faster, and [monitor] how they are performing. This actually helps the store to say, “Okay, what is working, what is not working? What do I need to change?” in almost near real-time, instead of waiting hours or days or weeks to react to the changing customer needs. And now they don’t need to make a decision. Do I have the capital to invest in this technology? The scale of bp allows them to get in, to leverage technology that is 20% cheaper and is working so much better for them.

Megan: Fantastic. Some really impactful examples of how you’ve used technology there. Thank you for that. And how has bp also been agile or quick to respond to the data it has received during this campaign?

Tarang: Agility is a mindset. What we’ve done is to bring in a customer-obsessed mindset. Like our leader Greg Franks talks about, we have put the customer at the heart of everything that we do. For us, customers are people who come to our stores and the people on the frontline who serve them. Their needs are of the utmost importance. What we did was, we changed how we went to business about them. Instead of going to vendors and putting vendors in charge of the store technology and consumer technology, we took ownership. We built out a technology team that was trained in the latest tools and technologies like AI, like POS, like APIs.

Then we changed the processes of how quickly we go to market. Instead of waiting two years on an enterprise project and then delivering it three years later, what we said was, “Let’s look at an MVP experience, most valuable experience delivered through a product for the customers.” And we started putting it in the stores so that the store owners could start delighting their guests and learning. Some things worked, some didn’t, but we learned much faster and were able to react almost on a weekly basis. Our store owners now get these updates on a biweekly basis instead of waiting two years or three years.

Third, we’ve applied an ecosystem mindset. Companies like Airbnb and Uber are known for their aggregator business models. They don’t do everything themselves, and we don’t do everything ourselves. But what we have done is, we’ve become an aggregator of all the capabilities, like consumer app, like POS, like back office or convenience value chain, like pricing, like customer support. We’ve aggregated all of that into one offering for our customers. We proactively monitor it. We fix it. We take ownership of making sure that these systems are up. We make sure that the systems are personalizing offers for the customers. So the store owner can just focus on delighting their guests.

We have branded this as Crosscode Retail Operating System, and we are providing it as a SaaS service. You can see in the name, there’s no bp in the name because, unlike the very big convenience players, we are not trying to make them into a particular brand that we want them. We want them to stay local. We want them to stay the mom-and-pop store operator that their customers trust, but we are providing them the tools to run their stores more efficiently and to delight their guests.

Megan: Really fantastic. And you mentioned that this was a very customer-centric approach that you took. So, how important was it to focus on that customer experience, in addition to the 

technology and all that it can provide?

Tarang: The customer experience was the most important thing. We could have started with a project and determined, “Hey, this is how it makes money for bp first.” But we said, “Okay, let’s look at solving the core problems of the customer.” Our customer told us, “Hey, I want to pay frictionlessly at the pump, when I come to the pump.” So what did we do? We launched pay for fuel feature, where they can come to the pump, they don’t need to take their wallet out. They just take their app out and choose what pump and what payment method. 

Then they said, “Hey, I don’t get any value from buying fuel every week and going inside. These are two different stores for me.” So what did we do? We launched a unified loyalty program. Then the store owner said, “Hey, my customers don’t like the same offers that you do nationally.” So what did we do? We created both personalized offers and build-your-own offers for the store owner. 

Finally, to be even more customer-obsessed, we said that being customer-obsessed doesn’t just happen. We have to measure it. We are constantly measuring how the consumers are rating the offers in our app and how the consumers are rating that experience. And we made a dramatic shift. The consumers, if you go to the Earnify app in the app store, they’re rating it as 4.9. 

We have 68% more loyal consumers. We are also measuring these loyal consumers, how often they are coming and what they are buying. Then we said, “Okay, from a store owner perspective, their satisfaction is important.” We are constantly measuring the satisfaction of these store operators and the frontline employees who are operating the systems. Customer satisfaction used to be three out of 10 when we first started, and now, it has reached an 8.7 out of 10, and we are constantly monitoring. Some stores go down because we haven’t paid enough attention. We learn from it and we apply.

Finally, what we’ve also done is with this Earnify app, instead of a local store operator having their own loyalty program with a few hundred customers, how many people are going to download that app? We’ve given them a network of millions of consumers nationwide that can be part of the ecosystem. The technologies that we are using are helping the stores delight the consumers, helping the stores providing the value to the consumers that they see, helping the stores provide the experience to the consumers that they see, and also helping bp to provide the seamless experience to the frontline employees.

Megan: Fantastic. There are some incredible results there in terms of customer satisfaction. Are there any other metrics of success that you’re tracking along the way? Any other kind of wins that you can share so far in the implementation of all of this?

Tarang: We are tracking a very important deeper metric so that we can hold ourselves accountable, the uptime of the store. The meantime to resolve the issues, the sales uplift of the stores, the transaction uplift of the stores. Are the consumers buying more? Are the consumers rating their consumer experience higher? Are they engaging in different offers? Because we may do hundreds of offers. If consumers don’t like it, then they are just offers.

On this journey, we are measuring every metric, and we are making it transparent. That entire team is on the same scorecard of metrics that the customers or the store owners have for the performance of their business. Their performance and the consumer delight are embedded into the metrics on how all of us digital employees are measured.

Megan: Yes, absolutely. It sounds like you’re measuring success through several different lenses, so it’s really interesting to hear about that approach. Given where you are in your journey, as many companies struggle to adopt and implement AI and other emerging technologies, is there any advice that you’d offer, given the lessons you’ve learned so far?

Tarang: On AI, we have to keep it very, very simple. Instead of saying that, “Hey, we are going to create, we are going to use AI technology for the sake of it,” we have to tie the usage of AI technology to the impact it has on the customers. I’ll use four examples on how we are doing that. 

When we say we are leveraging AI to personalize the offers, leveraging data for consumers, what are we measuring, and what are we applying? We are looking at the data of consumer behavior and applying AI models to see, based on the current transactions, how would they react, what would they buy? People living in Frisco, Texas, age, whatever, what do they buy, when do they come, and what are they buying other places?

So let’s personalize offers so that they make that left turn. And we are measuring, whether personalization is driving the delight enough that the consumers come back to the store and don’t go back to their old ways, number one. Number two, what we are also doing is, like I mentioned earlier, we are leveraging data and AI technologies to constantly monitor the trends right in the marketplace, and we’ve created some automation to leverage those trends and act quickly, which also leads to some level of personalization. It’s more regionalization. 

Now, as we do that, we also look at the patterns of what equipment or what transactions are slowing down and we proactively monitor and resolve them. So if the store has issues and if payment has issue, loyalty has issue, or POS has issue, back office has issue, we proactively work on it to resolve that.

Number three that we are doing is, we are looking at the convenience market and we are looking at what is selling and what is in stock, so we are optimizing our supply chain inventory, pricing, and inventory, so that we could enable the store owners to cater to their consumers who come to the stores. This is actually really helping us have the product in the store that the customer actually came for.

Megan: Absolutely. Looking ahead, when you think about the path to generative AI and other emerging technologies? Is there something that excites you the most, kind of looking ahead in the years to come as well?

Tarang: That’s a great question, Megan. I’m going to answer that question a little bit philosophically because as technologists, our tendency is, whenever there is a new technology like generative AI, to create a lot of toys with it, right? But I’ve learned through this experience that whatever technology we use, like generative AI, we need to tie it to the objectives and key results for the consumer and the store. 

As an example, if we are going to leverage generative AI to do personalized offers, to do personalized creative, then we need to be able to create frameworks to measure the impact on the store, to measure the impact on the consumer, and tie that directly to the use of the technology. Are we making the consumers more loyal? Are they coming more often? Are they buying more? Because only then, we will have adopters of that technology, both the store and stores driving the consumers to adopt.

Number two, AI and other technologies should help us create an ecosystem that does not replace humans, but actually augments their ability to serve consumers and to serve the consumers so well that the consumers don’t go back to their old ways. That’s where we have to stay very, very customer-obsessed instead of just business-obsessed.

When I say ecosystem, what excites me the most is, think about it. These small mom-and-pop store operators, these generational businesses, which are the core of the American dream or entrepreneurialism, we are going to enable them with an ecosystem like an Airbnb of mobility and convenience, where they get a loyalty program with personalization, where they can delight their guests. They get technology to run their stores very, very efficiently and reduce their cost by 20%.

Number three, and very important, their frontline employees look like heroes to the guests that are walking into the store. If we achieve these three things and create an ecosystem, then that will drive prosperity leveraging technology. And bp, as a company, we would love to be part of that.

Megan: I think that’s fantastic advice. Thank you so much, Tarang, for that.

Tarang: Thank you.

Megan: That was Tarang Sethia, the GM of digital products, mobility and convenience for the Americas at bp, whom I spoke with from Brighton, England. 

That’s it for this episode of Business Lab. I’m your host, Megan Tatum. I’m a contributing editor and host for Insights, the custom publishing division of MIT Technology Review. We were founded in 1899 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and you can find us in print on the web and at events each year around the world. For more information about us and the show, please check out our website at technologyreview.com.

This show is available wherever you get your podcasts, and if you enjoy this episode, we hope you’ll take a moment to rate and review us. Business Lab is a production of MIT Technology Review. This episode was produced by Giro Studios. Thanks ever so much for listening.

This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Review’s editorial staff.

This content was researched, designed, and written entirely by human writers, editors, analysts, and illustrators. This includes the writing of surveys and collection of data for surveys. AI tools that may have been used were limited to secondary production processes that passed thorough human review.

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

Many ways to use the date command on Linux

$ date +%s1746203311 You can also convert a timestamp back to a human-friendly date: $ date -d @1746203311Fri May 2 12:28:31 PM EDT 2025 The date -u commands displays the date and time in UTC (coordinated universal time): $ date -uFri May 2 04:30:55 PM UTC 2025 You can display

Read More »

Nvidia eyes China rebound with stripped-down AI chip tailored to export limits

“Nvidia’s region-specific, compliance-driven chip strategy introduces manageable fragmentation risks, but also unlocks significant opportunities for global enterprises,” said Prabhu Ram, VP of the industry research group at Cybermedia Research. “While hardware and software inconsistencies may complicate unified AI deployments, these variants enable legal market access, cost optimization, and hybrid architecture

Read More »

USA Issues Limited License for Chevron to Remain in Venezuela

The Trump administration issued a stripped-down license to Chevron Corp. to remain in Venezuela, allowing the company to conduct minimal maintenance on equipment but prohibiting it from producing oil in the sanctioned South American nation.  The waiver granted Tuesday by the Treasury Department is similar to the one the company operated under during President Donald Trump’s first term, according to a person familiar with the decision who asked not to be identified. Bloomberg News reported Friday that Chevron would receive the license.  This new license was issued just as a previous one, which required Chevron and other oil majors to wind down production operations in Venezuela, expires.  Chevron said in an email that its “continued presence in Venezuela remains in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, including the sanctions framework provided for by the US government.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced last week that the U.S. would let that previous license lapse as scheduled, dispelling earlier expectations of an extension to the wind-down period. Ric Grenell, a special envoy for the Trump administration, had said an extension was coming after he met with Venezuelan officials and returned with a US veteran who had been imprisoned there.  The latest, more restrictive license could represent a strategic win for all parties, potentially fostering continued talks between the two countries.  It wasn’t immediately clear whether other oil companies operating in Venezuela are receiving similar licenses to the one granted to Chevron.  WHAT DO YOU THINK? Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

Read More »

Vistra solar, battery projects in MISO face supply chain delays

Vistra on Tuesday asked federal regulators for two-year extensions to interconnection deadlines for solar and battery storage projects in Illinois totaling 833 MW, saying the independent power producer faces multi-year wait times to acquire key equipment. The projects include 440 MW of solar and 106 MW of battery storage at the retired coal-fired Edwards power plant in Bartonsville and 287 MW of storage at the retired coal-fired Joppa power plant in Joppa, according to filings Vistra made at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The projects have been in development since at least 2022. “The petitioners have been diligently pursuing the development of these resources, which can make an important contribution towards meeting resource adequacy needs in Illinois and the [Midcontinent Independent System Operator] region,” Vistra said in its requests at FERC. However, supply chain constraints, growing demand for electrical equipment spurred by Inflation Reduction Act incentives and rapid load growth have significantly increased the time it takes to get critical equipment, according to Vistra. “These supply chain constraints have been compounded by uncertainty and disruption arising from recent increases in import duties and continued uncertainty regarding the future trajectory of U.S. trade policy,” the Irving, Texas-based company said. Vistra has signed contracts reserving capacity with an equipment supplier for needed transformers, but the supplier expects it cannot deliver them until the fourth quarter of 2029, according to the filings. Also, Vistra’s suppliers expect it will take three years to deliver breakers for the projects rather than the 12 to 18 months that typically have been required to obtain the equipment, the company said. Vistra has interconnection agreements that set an Aug. 31, 2028, commercial operation deadline for the Joppa battery project and a Dec. 31, 2028, deadline for the Edwards project. The company asked FERC to extend the deadlines by

Read More »

Trump aims for 400 GW of nuclear by 2050, 10 large reactors under construction by 2030

Dive Brief: The White House wants to deploy 300 GW of net new nuclear capacity by 2050 and have 10 large reactors under construction in the U.S. by 2030 while expanding domestic nuclear fuel supplies, according to an executive order President Trump signed Friday.   Trump signed three other orders on Friday to accelerate Nuclear Regulatory Commission reviews of reactor license applications and reconsider strict NRC radiation limits; expand departments of Energy and Defense roles in nuclear power plant licensing and siting; and speed up deployment of new test reactors.  Nuclear power advocates hailed the orders as a boon for the industry, but warned that staff cuts at NRC and DOE could slow progress. A representative for the Union of Concerned Scientists said the proposed reforms would make the public less safe. Dive Insight: Shares of publicly-traded advanced nuclear and reactor fuel companies soared on Friday, suggesting investors see Trump’s orders as more than just words on paper.  Oklo, the advanced reactor developer previously chaired by Energy Secretary Chris Wright, was up more than 20% since Friday afternoon. Oklo’s shares got another boost Tuesday morning as it announced a design and development partnership with Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power to accelerate deployment of its Aurora powerhouses. Shares of small modular reactor developer NuScale and uranium suppliers Centrus Energy and Uranium Energy also rose more than 20% in Friday and early Tuesday trading. Trump’s “Reinvigorating the Nuclear Industrial Base” executive order called on Wright and other cabinet secretaries to develop a national policy for spent nuclear fuel management. The order singles out recycling and reprocessing activities that could benefit companies like Oklo, which plans to build fuel reprocessing capabilities and is developing reactors that can run on recycled fuel. Another order, “President Donald J. Trump Deploys Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technologies for National

Read More »

Making energy affordable again: The role of cities, states and utilities in enhancing the energy safety net

Diana Hernández is an associate professor of Sociomedical Sciences at Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University and co-managing director of the Energy Opportunity Lab in the Center of Global Energy Policy. Vivek Shastry is a senior research associate at the Center on Global Energy Policy in the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University. Millions of American families are struggling to afford their energy bills. This situation could worsen as electricity prices — particularly in the Northeast — face potential hikes due to reciprocal tariffs from Canada. As energy prices fluctuate, and federal assistance programs face potential cuts, cities, states and utilities must take proactive steps to ensure that their most vulnerable residents can keep their lights on and homes heated and cooled. Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright, in his introductory remarks after swearing in, shared a troubling statistic: one in 10 Americans had received a utility disconnection notice in the past year. In his new role, one of his goals would be to “shrink that number to zero” by making energy more abundant and affordable. By flooding the market with fossil fuels again, the price of electricity and gas would decrease. However, the primary federal program to tackle energy affordability — the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) — does not fall under Secretary Wright’s purview. LIHEAP is funded through the Department of Health and Human Services, and Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has reportedly terminated the entire staff running the $4 billion LIHEAP program. In 2023, more than 7 million Americans received assistance through LIHEAP. Despite its importance, LIHEAP reaches only 17% of eligible households, leaving a gaping hole in the energy safety net. Without it, those relying on it to meet energy needs will be at grave risk. Some have called

Read More »

Macquarie Strategists Forecast Week on Week USA Crude Inventory Build

In an oil and gas report sent to Rigzone late Tuesday by the Macquarie team, Macquarie strategists revealed that they are forecasting that U.S. crude inventories will be up by 2.4 million barrels for the week ending May 23. “This follows a 1.3 million barrel build in the prior week, with the crude balance realizing significantly looser than our expectations,” the strategists stated in the report. “For this week’s crude balance, from refineries, we model another increase in crude runs (+0.2 million barrels per day). Among net imports, we model a moderate increase, with exports (+0.2 million barrels per day) and imports (+0.8 million barrels per day) higher on a nominal basis,” they added. The strategists noted in the report that timing of cargoes remains a source of potential volatility in this week’s crude balance. “From implied domestic supply (prod.+adj.+transfers), we look for a reduction (-0.3 million barrels per day) following another strong nominal print last week,” the analysts went on to state in the report. “Rounding out the picture, we anticipate a similar increase in SPR [Strategic Petroleum Reserve] stocks (+0.8 million barrels) this week,” they added. The analysts went on to note in the report that, “among products”, they “look for a draw in gasoline (-0.5 million barrels), with builds in distillate (+0.7 million barrels) and jet (+0.6 million barrels”. “We model implied demand for these three products at ~14.5 million barrels per day for the week ending May 23,” the analysts added in the report. In its latest weekly petroleum status report at the time of writing, which was released on May 21 and included data for the week ending May 16, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) highlighted that U.S. commercial crude oil inventories, excluding those in the SPR, increased by 1.3 million barrels from the

Read More »

GIP in Advanced Talks for Controlling Stake in Eni CCUS Unit

Eni SpA has signed an agreement to enter exclusive talks with Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) for the New York City-based asset manager’s potential purchase of a co-controlling stake of 49.99 percent in the Italian energy major’s carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) business. Eni CCUS Holding operates the Hynet and Bacton projects in the United Kingdom and L10 in the Netherlands. It is also a co-venturer in the Ravenna project in Italy, with a future right for takeover. The agreement with BlackRock’s GIP is aimed at “progressing the confirmatory due diligence phase and completing the drafting of the documents related to the sale”, state-backed Eni said in an online statement. “According to the final agreement under negotiation, besides the initial acquisition of a 49.99 percent stake in Eni CCUS Holding, GIP will support investments in the CCUS projects”, Eni said. It added it has plans for more CCUS projects in the medium to long term. “The agreement follows a thorough selection process involving several prominent international players who expressed strong interest in the company, further confirming the great appeal of its business and its growth prospects”, Eni said, without disclosing the financial details of GIP’s planned acquisition. “This step represents another example of the development of Eni’s satellite model strategy, aiming at attracting strategically aligned capital from valuable new partners at attractive terms, confirming the value Eni is creating in its new energy transition-related businesses and funding their further growth. “CCUS is a mature and safe technological process and it is one of the key levers for the energy transition being the most efficient and effective decarbonization tool to support hard-to-abate industries in reducing their emissions”. Earlier this month Eni announced a similar deal with Ares Alternative Credit Management. This agreement locks in negotiations for Ares’ potential acquisition of a

Read More »

HPE Aruba unveils raft of new switches for data center, campus modernization

And in large-scale enterprise environments embracing collapsed-core designs, the switch acts as a high-performance aggregation layer. It consolidates services, simplifies network architecture, and enforces security policies natively, reducing complexity and operational cost, Gray said. In addition, the switch offers the agility and security required at colocation facilities and edge sites. Its integrated Layer 4 stateful security and automation-ready platform enable rapid deployment while maintaining robust control and visibility over distributed infrastructure, Gray said. The CX 10040 significantly expands the capacity it can provide and the roles it can serve for enterprise customers, according to one industry analyst. “From the enterprise side, this expands on the feature set and capabilities of the original 10000, giving customers the ability to run additional services directly in the network,” said Alan Weckel, co-founder and analyst with The 650 Group. “It helps drive a lower TCO and provide a more secure network.”  Aimed as a VMware alternative Gray noted that HPE Aruba is combining its recently announced Morpheus VM Essentials plug-in package, which offers a hypervisor-based package aimed at hybrid cloud virtualization environments, with the CX 10040 to deliver a meaningful alternative to Broadcom’s VMware package. “If customers want to get out of the business of having to buy VM cloud or Cloud Foundation stuff and all of that, they can replace the distributed firewall, microsegmentation and lots of the capabilities found in the old VMware NSX [networking software] and the CX 10k, and Morpheus can easily replace that functionality [such as VM orchestration, automation and policy management],” Gray said. The 650 Group’s Weckel weighed in on the idea of the CX 10040 as a VMware alternative:

Read More »

Indian startup Refroid launches India’s first data center CDUs

They use heat exchangers and pumps to regulate the flow and temperature of fluid delivered to equipment for cooling, while isolating the technology cooling system loop from facility systems. The technology addresses limitations of traditional air cooling, which industry experts say cannot adequately handle the heat generated by modern AI processors and high-density computing applications. Strategic significance for India Industry analysts view the development as a critical milestone for India’s data center ecosystem. “India generates 20% of global data, yet contributes only 3% to global data center capacity. This imbalance is not merely spatial — it’s systemic,” said Sanchit Vir Gogia, chief analyst and CEO at Greyhound Research. “The emergence of indigenously developed CDUs signals a strategic pivot. Domestic CDU innovation is a defining moment in India’s transition from data centre host to technology co-creator.” Neil Shah, VP for research and partner at Counterpoint Research, noted that major international players like Schneider, Vertiv, Asetek, Liquidstack, and Zutacore have been driving most CDU deployments in Indian enterprises and data centers. “Having a local indigenous CDU tech and supplier designed with Indian weather, infrastructure and costs in mind expands options for domestic data center demand,” he said. AI driving data center cooling revolution India’s data center capacity reached approximately 1,255 MW between January and September 2024 and was projected to expand to around 1,600 MW by the end of 2024, according to CBRE India’s 2024 Data Center Market Update. Multiple market research firms have projected the India data center market to grow from about $5.7 billion in 2024 to $12 billion by 2030. Bhavaraju cited aggressive projections for the sector’s expansion, with AI workloads expected to account for 30% of total workloads by 2030. “All of them need liquid cooling,” he said, noting that “today’s latest GPU servers – GB200 from Nvidia

Read More »

Platform approach gains steam among network teams

Revisting the platform vs. point solutions debate The dilemma of whether to deploy an assortment of best-of-breed products from multiple vendors or go with a unified platform of “good enough” tools from a single vendor has vexed IT execs forever. Today, the pendulum is swinging toward the platform approach for three key reasons. First, complexity, driven by the increasingly distributed nature of enterprise networks, has emerged as a top challenge facing IT execs. Second, the lines between networking and security are blurring, particularly as organizations deploy zero trust network access (ZTNA). And third, to reap the benefits of AIOps, generative AI and agentic AI, organizations need a unified data store. “The era of enterprise connectivity platforms is upon us,” says IDC analyst Brandon Butler. “Organizations are increasingly adopting platform-based approaches to their enterprise connectivity infrastructure to overcome complexity and unlock new business value. When enhanced by AI, enterprise platforms can increase productivity, enrich end-user experiences, enhance security, and ultimately drive new opportunities for innovation.” In IDC’s Worldwide AI in Networking Special Report, 78% of survey respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the statement: “I am moving to an AI-powered platform approach for networking.” Gartner predicts that 70% of enterprises will select a broad platform for new multi-cloud networking software deployments by 2027, an increase from 10% in early 2024. The breakdown of silos between network and security operations will be driven by organizations implementing zero-trust principles as well as the adoption of AI and AIOps. “In the future, enterprise networks will be increasingly automated, AI-assisted and more tightly integrated with security across LAN, data center and WAN domains,” according to Gartner’s 2025 Strategic Roadmap for Enterprise Networking. While all of the major networking vendors have announced cloud-based platforms, it’s still relatively early days. For example, Cisco announced a general framework for Cisco

Read More »

Oracle to spend $40B on Nvidia chips for OpenAI data center in Texas

OpenAI has also expanded Stargate internationally, with plans for a UAE data center announced during Trump’s recent Gulf tour. The Abu Dhabi facility is planned as a 10-square-mile campus with 5 gigawatts of power. Gogia said OpenAI’s selection of Oracle “is not just about raw compute, but about access to geographically distributed, enterprise-grade infrastructure that complements its ambition to serve diverse regulatory environments and availability zones.” Power demands create infrastructure dilemma The facility’s power requirements raise serious questions about AI’s sustainability. Gogia noted that the 1.2-gigawatt demand — “on par with a nuclear facility” — highlights “the energy unsustainability of today’s hyperscale AI ambitions.” Shah warned that the power envelope keeps expanding. “As AI scales up and so does the necessary compute infrastructure needs exponentially, the power envelope is also consistently rising,” he said. “The key question is how much is enough? Today it’s 1.2GW, tomorrow it would need even more.” This escalating demand could burden Texas’s infrastructure, potentially requiring billions in new power grid investments that “will eventually put burden on the tax-paying residents,” Shah noted. Alternatively, projects like Stargate may need to “build their own separate scalable power plant.” What this means for enterprises The scale of these facilities explains why many organizations are shifting toward leased AI computing rather than building their own capabilities. The capital requirements and operational complexity are beyond what most enterprises can handle independently.

Read More »

New Intel Xeon 6 CPUs unveiled; one powers rival Nvidia’s DGX B300

He added that his read is that “Intel recognizes that Nvidia is far and away the leader in the market for AI GPUs and is seeking to hitch itself to that wagon.” Roberts said, “basically, Intel, which has struggled tremendously and has turned over its CEO amidst a stock slide, needs to refocus to where it thinks it can win. That’s not competing directly with Nvidia but trying to use this partnership to re-secure its foothold in the data center and squeeze out rivals like AMD for the data center x86 market. In other words, I see this announcement as confirmation that Intel is looking to regroup, and pick fights it thinks it can win. “ He also predicted, “we can expect competition to heat up in this space as Intel takes on AMD’s Epyc lineup in a push to simplify and get back to basics.” Matt Kimball, vice president and principal analyst, who focuses on datacenter compute and storage at Moor Insights & Strategy, had a much different view about the announcement. The selection of the Intel sixth generation Xeon CPU, the 6776P, to support Nvidia’s DGX B300 is, he said, “important, as it validates Intel as a strong choice for the AI market. In the big picture, this isn’t about volumes or revenue, rather it’s about validating a strategy Intel has had for the last couple of generations — delivering accelerated performance across critical workloads.”  Kimball said that, In particular, there are a “couple things that I would think helped make Xeon the chosen CPU.”

Read More »

AWS clamping down on cloud capacity swapping; here’s what IT buyers need to know

As of June 1, AWS will no longer allow sub-account transfers or new commitments to be pooled and reallocated across customers. Barrow says the shift is happening because AWS is investing billions in new data centers to meet demand from AI and hyperscale workloads. “That infrastructure requires long-term planning and capital discipline,” he said. Phil Brunkard, executive counselor at Info-Tech Research Group UK, emphasized that AWS isn’t killing RIs or SPs, “it’s just closing a loophole.” “This stops MSPs from bulk‑buying a giant commitment, carving it up across dozens of tenants, and effectively reselling discounted EC2 hours,” he said. “Basically, AWS just tilted the field toward direct negotiations and cleaner billing.” What IT buyers should do now For enterprises that sourced discounted cloud resources through a broker or value-added reseller (VAR), the arbitrage window shuts, Brunkard noted. Enterprises should expect a “modest price bump” on steady‑state workloads and a “brief scramble” to unwind pooled commitments.  If original discounts were broker‑sourced, “budget for a small uptick,” he said. On the other hand, companies that buy their own RIs or SPs, or negotiate volume deals through AWS’s Enterprise Discount Program (EDP), shouldn’t be impacted, he said. Nothing changes except that pricing is now baselined.

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »