Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

How I Became A Machine Learning Engineer (No CS Degree, No Bootcamp)

Machine learning and AI are among the most popular topics nowadays, especially within the tech space. I am fortunate enough to work and develop with these technologies every day as a machine learning engineer! In this article, I will walk you through my journey to becoming a machine learning engineer, shedding some light and advice […]

Machine learning and AI are among the most popular topics nowadays, especially within the tech space. I am fortunate enough to work and develop with these technologies every day as a machine learning engineer!

In this article, I will walk you through my journey to becoming a machine learning engineer, shedding some light and advice on how you can become one yourself!

My Background

In one of my previous articles, I extensively wrote about my journey from school to securing my first Data Science job. I recommend you check out that article, but I will summarise the key timeline here.

Pretty much everyone in my family studied some sort of STEM subject. My great-grandad was an engineer, both my grandparents studied physics, and my mum is a maths teacher.

So, my path was always paved for me.

Me at age 11

I chose to study physics at university after watching The Big Bang Theory at age 12; it’s fair to say everyone was very proud!

At school, I wasn’t dumb by any means. I was actually relatively bright, but I didn’t fully apply myself. I got decent grades, but definitely not what I was fully capable of.

I was very arrogant and thought I would do well with zero work.

I applied to top universities like Oxford and Imperial College, but given my work ethic, I was delusional thinking I had a chance. On results day, I ended up in clearing as I missed my offers. This was probably one of the saddest days of my life.

Clearing in the UK is where universities offer places to students on certain courses where they have space. It’s mainly for students who don’t have a university offer.

I was lucky enough to be offered a chance to study physics at the University of Surrey, and I went on to earn a first-class master’s degree in physics!

There is genuinely no substitute for hard work. It is a cringy cliche, but it is true!

My original plan was to do a PhD and be a full-time researcher or professor, but during my degree, I did a research year, and I just felt a career in research was not for me. Everything moved so slowly, and it didn’t seem there was much opportunity in the space.

During this time, DeepMind released their AlphaGo — The Movie documentary on YouTube, which popped up on my home feed.

From the video, I started to understand how AI worked and learn about neural networks, reinforcement learning, and deep learning. To be honest, to this day I am still not an expert in these areas.

Naturally, I dug deeper and found that a data scientist uses AI and machine learning algorithms to solve problems. I immediately wanted in and started applying for data science graduate roles.

I spent countless hours coding, taking courses, and working on projects. I applied to 300+ jobs and eventually landed my first data science graduate scheme in September 2021.

You can hear more about my journey from a podcast.

Data Science Journey

I started my career in an insurance company, where I built various supervised learning models, mainly using gradient boosted tree packages like CatBoost, XGBoost, and generalised linear models (GLMs).

I built models to predict:

  • Fraud — Did someone fraudulently make a claim to profit.
  • Risk Prices — What’s the premium we should give someone.
  • Number of Claims — How many claims will someone have.
  • Average Cost of Claim — What’s the average claim value someone will have.

I made around six models spanning the regression and classification space. I learned so much here, especially in statistics, as I worked very closely with Actuaries, so my maths knowledge was excellent.

However, due to the company’s structure and setup, it was difficult for my models to advance past the PoC stage, so I felt I lacked the “tech” side of my toolkit and understanding of how companies use machine learning in production.

After a year, my previous employer reached out to me asking if I wanted to apply to a junior data scientist role that specialises in time series forecasting and optimisation problems. I really liked the company, and after a few interviews, I was offered the job!

I worked at this company for about 2.5 years, where I became an expert in forecasting and combinatorial optimisation problems.

I developed many algorithms and deployed my models to production through AWS using software engineering best practices, such as unit testing, lower environment, shadow system, CI/CD pipelines, and much more.

Fair to say I learned a lot. 

I worked very closely with software engineers, so I picked up a lot of engineering knowledge and continued self-studying machine learning and statistics on the side.

I even earned a promotion from junior to mid-level in that time!

Transitioning To MLE

Over time, I realised the actual value of data science is using it to make live decisions. There is a good quote by Pau Labarta Bajo

ML models inside Jupyter notebooks have a business value of $0

There is no point in building a really complex and sophisticated model if it will not produce results. Seeking out that extra 0.1% accuracy by staking multiple models is often not worth it.

You are better off building something simple that you can deploy, and that will bring real financial benefit to the company.

With this in mind, I started thinking about the future of data science. In my head, there are two avenues:

  • Analytics -> You work primarily to gain insight into what the business should be doing and what it should be looking into to boost its performance.
  • Engineering -> You ship solutions (models, decision algorithms, etc.) that bring business value.

I feel the data scientist who analyses and builds PoC models will become extinct in the next few years because, as we said above, they don’t provide tangible value to a business.

That’s not to say they are entirely useless; you have to think of it from the business perspective of their return on investment. Ideally, the value you bring in should be more than your salary.

You want to say that you did “X that produced Y”, which the above two avenues allow you to do.

The engineering side was the most interesting and enjoyable for me. I genuinely enjoy coding and building stuff that benefits people, and that they can use, so naturally, that’s where I gravitated towards.

To move to the ML engineering side, I asked my line manager if I could deploy the algorithms and ML models I was building myself. I would get help from software engineers, but I would write all the production code, do my own system design, and set up the deployment process independently.

And that’s exactly what I did.

I basically became a Machine Learning Engineer. I was developing my algorithms and then shipping them to production.

I also took NeetCode’s data structures and algorithms course to improve my fundamentals of computer science and started blogging about software engineering concepts.

Coincidentally, my current employer contacted me around this time and asked if I wanted to apply for a machine learning engineer role that specialises in general ML and optimisation at their company!

Call it luck, but clearly, the universe was telling me something. After several interview rounds, I was offered the role, and I am now a fully fledged machine learning engineer!

Fortunately, a role kind of “fell to me,” but I created my own luck through up-skilling and documenting my learning. That is why I always tell people to show their work — you don’t know what may come from it.

My Advice

I want to share the main bits of advice that helped me transition from a machine learning engineer to a data scientist.

  • Experience — A machine learning engineer is not an entry-level position in my opinion. You need to be well-versed in data science, machine learning, software engineering, etc. You don’t need to be an expert in all of them, but have good fundamentals across the board. That’s why I recommend having a couple of years of experience as either a software engineer or data scientist and self-study other areas.
  • Production Code — If you are from data science, you must learn to write good, well-tested production code. You must know things like typing, linting, unit tests, formatting, mocking and CI/CD. It’s not too difficult, but it just requires some practice. I recommend asking your current company to work with software engineers to gain this knowledge, it worked for me!
  • Cloud Systems — Most companies nowadays deploy many of their architecture and systems on the cloud, and machine learning models are no exception. So, it’s best to get practice with these tools and understand how they enable models to go live. I learned most of this on the job, to be honest, but there are courses you can take.
  • Command Line — I am sure most of you know this already, but every tech professional should be proficient in the command line. You will use it extensively when deploying and writing production code. I have a basic guide you can checkout here.
  • Data Structures & Algorithms — Understanding the fundamental algorithms in computer science are very useful for MLE roles. Mainly because you will likely be asked about it in interviews. It’s not too hard to learn compared to machine learning; it just takes time. Any course will do the trick.
  • Git & GitHub — Again, most tech professionals should know Git, but as an MLE, it is essential. How to squash commits, do code reviews, and write outstanding pull requests are musts.
  • Specialise — Many MLE roles I saw required you to have some specialisation in a particular area. I specialise in time series forecasting, optimisation, and general ML based on my previous experience. This helps you stand out in the market, and most companies are looking for specialists nowadays.

The main theme here is that I basically up-skilled my software engineering abilities. This makes sense as I already had all the math, stats, and machine learning knowledge from being a data scientist.

If I were a software engineer, the transition would likely be the reverse. This is why securing a machine learning engineer role can be quite challenging, as it requires proficiency across a wide range of skills.

Summary & Further Thoughts

I have a free newsletter, Dishing the Data, where I share weekly tips and advice as a practising data scientist. Plus, when you subscribe, you will get my FREE data science resume and short PDF version of my AI roadmap!

Connect With Me

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

Western Digital wants to ramp-up hard disk drive speeds

Most enterprises are not using SATA drives, at least not with hot data. Perhaps cold storage but not frequently accessed data. They are using PCI Express based drives and those are considerably faster than anything Western Digital can engineer in a hard disk. Capacity aside, Western Digital is also aiming

Read More »

LoRaWAN reaches 125 million devices as industrial IoT expands

Satellite integration is set to grow Terrestrial LoRaWAN networks cannot achieve complete geographic coverage. Yegin cited Swisscom’s nationwide Switzerland deployment, which covers 97.2% of the population but cannot reach remote alpine terrain. Two LoRa Alliance members, Lacuna Space and Plan-S, already operate commercial LoRaWAN services from low Earth orbit. Standard

Read More »

Data stored in glass could last over 10,000 years, Microsoft says

Magnetic tape, the most widely deployed archival medium today, reflects those constraints. An LTO-10 (Linear Tape-Open) cartridge, the current enterprise benchmark, holds 30TB to 40TB native at 400MB/s, but its rated shelf life is just 30 years. It requires climate-controlled storage between 16°C and 25°C and migration roughly every five

Read More »

Arista hints at in-the-works telemetry tools to manage AI fabrics

“This greatly aids our customers in building an overall working solution, because the interactions between the network and the host can be complicated and difficult to debug when it’s different systems collecting them,” Duda said. Analysts react to telemetry preview Arista declined to share more details about its forthcoming AI

Read More »

Energy Department Approves Final Export Authorization for Venture Global CP2 LNG

WASHINGTON — U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright today signed the final export authorization for the Venture Global CP2 LNG Project in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, allowing exports of up to 3.96 billion cubic feet per day of U.S. natural gas as liquefied natural gas (LNG) to non-Free Trade Agreement (FTA) countries. “In less than ten months, President Trump’s administration is redefining what it means to unleash American energy by approving record new LNG exports,” said Kyle Haustveit, Assistant Secretary of the Office of Fossil Energy. “Finalizing the non-FTA authorization for CP2 LNG will enable secure and reliable American energy access for our allies and trading partners, while also providing well-paid jobs and economic opportunities at home.” Today’s authorization follows the Department’s conditional authorization to CP2 LNG in March 2025 and reflects the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s May 2025 decision approving the siting, construction, and operation of the facility. It also incorporates DOE’s May 2025 response to comments on the 2024 LNG Export Study, which reaffirmed that U.S. LNG exports strengthen America’s energy leadership, expand opportunities for American workers, and provide our allies with secure access to reliable U.S. energy. On day one, President Trump directed the Energy Department to end the Biden administration’s LNG export pause and to resume the consideration of pending applications to export LNG to countries without a free trade agreement (FTA). Under President Trump’s leadership, DOE has authorized more than 13.8 Bcf/d of LNG exports—greater than the volume exported today by the world’s second-largest LNG supplier. Today, U.S. exports are approximately 15 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d), an increase of approximately 25% from 2024 levels.

Read More »

Energy Department Grants Woodside Louisiana LNG Project Additional Time to Commence Exports

WASHINGTON – U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright today signed an amendment order granting an additional 44 months for Woodside Energy to commence exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to non-free trade agreement (non-FTA) countries from the Woodside Louisiana LNG Project under construction in Calcasieu Parish, LA. Once fully constructed, the project will be capable of exporting up to 3.88 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of natural gas as LNG.    Woodside Louisiana took final investment decision on its first phase earlier this year and has off-take agreements with Germany’s Uniper as well as U.S. pipeline operator Williams who will be marketing natural gas through the Woodside Louisiana LNG project.  “It is exciting to take this action to provide the needed runway for this project to fully take off and realize its potential in providing reliable and secure energy to the world,” said Kyle Haustveit, Assistant Secretary of the Office of Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy. “Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, the Department of Energy is redefining what it means to unleash American energy to strengthen energy reliability and affordability for American families, businesses, and our allies.” The United States is the largest global producer and exporter of natural gas. There are currently eight large-scale LNG projects operating in the United States and several additional projects are expanding or under construction. Under President Trump’s leadership, the Department has approved applications from projects authorized to export more than 17.7 Bcf/d of natural gas as LNG, an increase of approximately 25% from 2024 levels. So far in 2025, over 8 Bcf/d of U.S. LNG export capacity, including from Woodside Louisiana LNG, has reached a final investment decision and gone under construction.

Read More »

Energy Department Removes Barriers for American Energy Producers, Unleashing Investment in Domestic Hydrogen

The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office today removed barriers for the American hydrogen industry by updating its 45VH2-GREET modeling tool. The latest version of 45VH2 GREET employs a more flexible method for calculating methane loss from hydrogen supply chains, allowing a wider range of deserving companies to access resources supporting hydrogen production. “This update to the GREET model reflects the Department of Energy’s commitment to unleashing American energy dominance by removing bureaucratic burdens on industry,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Lou Hrkman. “We are expanding opportunities for companies to produce domestic hydrogen and spurring U.S. innovation in new technologies to pave the way for billions in private investment.” The 45VH2-GREET model, which has been adopted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is specifically designed to evaluate hydrogen production processes. The latest updates allow users to input company-specific methane loss data, rather than requiring the use of national averages. This change will allow companies to use data specific to their own facilities when assessing their eligibility under 45V. To download the latest GREET model, along with an updated user manual and a log of all changes, visit www.energy.gov/eere/greet. For questions on how to use the model, please contact [email protected]. First developed by Argonne National Laboratory in 1994, the GREET® (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies) suite of models assess the life cycle impacts of technologies, fuels, products, and energy systems across various stages of the supply chain. Today, there are multiple GREET models for specific use cases that guide decision-making, research and development, and regulations related to the transportation and energy sectors. The models are freely available for industry to use and play an integral role in DOE’s research, development, and deployment efforts.

Read More »

Eni delivers Congo LNG Phase 2 with first cargo from Nguya vessel

@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:[email protected]&display=swap’); a { color: var(–color-primary-main); } .ebm-page__main h1, .ebm-page__main h2, .ebm-page__main h3, .ebm-page__main h4, .ebm-page__main h5, .ebm-page__main h6 { font-family: Inter; } body { line-height: 150%; letter-spacing: 0.025em; font-family: Inter; } button, .ebm-button-wrapper { font-family: Inter; } .label-style { text-transform: uppercase; color: var(–color-grey); font-weight: 600; font-size: 0.75rem; } .caption-style { font-size: 0.75rem; opacity: .6; } #onetrust-pc-sdk [id*=btn-handler], #onetrust-pc-sdk [class*=btn-handler] { background-color: #c19a06 !important; border-color: #c19a06 !important; } #onetrust-policy a, #onetrust-pc-sdk a, #ot-pc-content a { color: #c19a06 !important; } #onetrust-consent-sdk #onetrust-pc-sdk .ot-active-menu { border-color: #c19a06 !important; } #onetrust-consent-sdk #onetrust-accept-btn-handler, #onetrust-banner-sdk #onetrust-reject-all-handler, #onetrust-consent-sdk #onetrust-pc-btn-handler.cookie-setting-link { background-color: #c19a06 !important; border-color: #c19a06 !important; } #onetrust-consent-sdk .onetrust-pc-btn-handler { color: #c19a06 !important; border-color: #c19a06 !important; } <!–> Eni SPA has delivered Phase 2 of the Congo LNG project with the first LNG cargo export from the 2.4-million tonne/year (tpy) Nguya floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) unit, lifting the Republic of Congo’s liquefaction capacity to 3 million tpy. ]–> Photo: Eni SPA <!–> ]–> <!–> Nov. 26, 2024 ]–> Photo from Eni. <!–> ]–> <!–> Aug. 26, 2025 ]–> Phase 2 leverages natural gas resources from Nené and Litchendjili fields in the offshore Marine XII license, which lies 20 km offshore Congo and is estimated to hold 1.3-billion boe proven and probable reserves. Phase 1 of Congo LNG, launched with the 600,000-tpy Tango FLNG vessel, reached start-up in December 2023, just over 1 year after the project definition. Phase 2 start-up comes only 35 months after construction of the Nguya FLNG unit began, Eni said in a release Feb. 7. map from Eni <!–> –> <!–> ]–>

Read More »

PTTEP takes FID on first greenfield development in Malaysia

PTT Exploration and Production Public Co. Ltd. (PTTEP) has reached a final investment decision (FID) to develop the Malaysia SK405B project offshore Malaysia, marking its first greenfield development project in the country. PTTEP Sarawak Oil Ltd., a subsidiary of PTTEP and operator of SK405B PSC will proceed with development of Sirung and Chenda fields. The development plan for both fields comprises a central processing platform and a wellhead platform with a target combined production capacity of about 15,000 b/d and 200 MMscfd of gas. SK405B lies in shallow water offshore Sarawak.  The field development plan, together with the FID, has been approved by the project partners, and the engineering, procurement, construction, installation, and commissioning (EPCIC) contract is expected to be signed in early 2026, with first production anticipated in 2028. The project is designed with Zero Routine Flaring and incorporates advanced remote-operated offshore operations, the company said.

Read More »

Russia’s crude exports signal narrowing buyer pool

A growing number of vessels sailing to unknown destinations and a sharp rise in Russian oil held on water—up as much as 49 million bbl since November 2025—suggest a shrinking pool of willing buyers. Russian crude exports declined by 350,000 b/d m-o-m, reversing most of December’s 360,000 b/d increase. The bulk of the drop came from the Black Sea, while product exports rose by 260,000 b/d, largely driven by heavy product flows (+200,000 b/d). Higher prices boosted revenues across both crude and products. Product revenues climbed by $330 million, more than offsetting a $210 million decline in crude export revenues. Separately, Russia reported a 24% year-on-year decline in 2025 oil and gas tax revenues to about $110 billion. Under the European Union (EU)’s revised mechanism, the price cap on Russian crude was lowered to $44.10/bbl as of Feb. 2. Urals Primorsk averaged $40.06/bbl in January. Of total crude exports, 65% were sold by Russian proxy companies, 13% by sanctioned firms, and 21% by other companies. Among the proxy companies, Redwood Global FZE LLC—Rosneft’s substitute—remained the largest crude exporter, supplying 1 million b/d to China and India last month. Russian crude imports EU enforcement measures are beginning to reshape trade flows. Since Jan. 21, EU buyers have been required to more rigorously verify the origin of imported products. In 2025, the EU-27 and UK sourced 12% of their middle distillate imports from refineries in India and Türkiye processing Russian crude. India’s Jamnagar refinery halted Russian crude imports in mid-December to comply, as Europe accounted for 40% of its middle distillate exports last year. As a result, EU and UK reliance on seaborne Russian-origin molecules fell to 1.6% in January, with most cargoes shipped before Jan. 21 and largely originating from Türkiye. Meanwhile, EU middle distillate imports from the US rose by

Read More »

ECL targets AI data centers with fuel-agnostic power platform

Power availability has become a gating factor for many data center projects, particularly where developers need larger connections or rapid delivery. Grid constraints can also influence where operators place compute for low-latency AI workloads. “Inference has to live close to people, data and applications, in and around major cities, smaller metros and industrial hubs where there is rarely a spare 50 or 100 megawatts sitting on the grid, and almost never a mature hydrogen ecosystem,” said Bachar. In typical data center design, the facilities are planned around 1 energy source, be it electrical grid, solar and other renewables, or diesel generated. All require different layouts and designs. One design does not fit all power sources. FlexGrid lets the data center use any power source it wants and switch to a new source without requiring a redesign of the facilities.

Read More »

AI likely to put a major strain on global networks—are enterprises ready?

“When AI pipelines slow down or traffic overloads common infrastructure, business processes slow down, and customer experience degrades,” Kale says. “Since many organizations are using AI to enable their teams to make critical decisions, disruptions caused by AI-related failures will be experienced instantly by both internal teams and external customers.” A single bottleneck can quickly cascade through an organization, Kales says, “reducing the overall value of the broader digital ecosystem.” In 2026, “we will see significant disruption from accelerated appetite for all things AI,” research firm Forrester noted in a late-year predictions post. “Business demands of AI systems, network connectivity, AI for IT operations, the conversational AI-powered service desk, and more are driving substantial changes that tech leaders must enable within their organizations.” And in a 2025 study of about 1,300 networking, operations, cloud, and architecture professionals worldwide, Broadcom noted a “readiness gap” between the desire for AI and network preparedness. While 99% of organizations have cloud strategies and are adopting AI, only 49% say their networks can support the bandwidth and low latency that AI requires, according to Broadcom’s  2026 State of Network Operations report. “AI is shifting Internet traffic from human-paced to machine-paced, and machines generate 100 times more requests with zero off-hours,” says Ed Barrow, CEO of Cloud Capital, an investment management firm focused on acquiring, managing, and operating data centers. “Inference workloads in particular create continuous, high-intensity, globally distributed traffic patterns,” Barrow says. “A single AI feature can trigger millions of additional requests per hour, and those requests are heavier—higher bandwidth, higher concurrency, and GPU-accelerated compute on the other side of the network.”

Read More »

Adani bets $100 billion on AI data centers as India eyes global hub status

The sovereignty question Adani framed the investment as a matter of national digital sovereignty, saying it would reserve a significant portion of GPU capacity for Indian AI startups and research institutions. Analysts were not convinced the structure supported the claim. “I believe it is too distant from digital sovereignty if the majority of the projects are being built to serve leading MNC AI hyperscalers,” said Shah. “Equal investments have to happen for public AI infrastructure, and the data of billions of users — from commerce to content to health — must remain sovereign.” Gogia framed the gap in operational terms. “Ownership alone does not define sovereignty,” he said. “The practical determinants are who controls privileged access during incidents, where critical workloads fail over when grids are stressed, and what regulatory oversight mechanisms are contractually enforceable.” Those are questions Adani has not yet answered and the market, analysts say, will be watching for more than just construction progress. But Banerjee said the market would not wait nine years to judge the announcement. “In practice, I think the market will judge this on near-term proof points, grid capacity secured, power contracting in place, and anchor tenants signed, rather than the headline capex or long-dated targets,” he said.

Read More »

Arista laments ‘horrendous’ memory situation

Digging in on campus Arista has been clear about its plans to grow its presence campus networking environments. Last Fall, Ullal said she expects Arista’s campus and WAN business would grow from the current $750 million-$800 million run rate to $1.25 billion, representing a 60% growth opportunity for the company. “We are committed to our aggressive goal of $1.25 billion for ’26 for the cognitive campus and branch. We have also successfully deployed in many routing edge, core spine and peering use cases,” Ullal said. “In Q4 2025, Arista launched our flagship 7800 R4 spine for many routing use cases, including DCI, AI spines with that massive 460 terabits of capacity to meet the demanding needs of multiservice routing, AI workloads and switching use cases. The combined campus and routing adjacencies together contribute approximately 18% of revenue.” Ethernet leads the way “In terms of annual 2025 product lines, our core cloud, AI and data center products built upon our highly differentiated Arista EOS stack is successfully deployed across 10 gig to 800 gigabit Ethernet speeds with 1.6 terabit migration imminent,” Ullal said. “This includes our portfolio of EtherLink AI and our 7000 series platforms for best-in-class performance, power efficiency, high availability, automation, agility for both the front and back-end compute, storage and all of the interconnect zones.” Ullal said she expects Ethernet will get even more of a boost later this year when the multivendor Ethernet for Scale-Up Networking (ESUN) specification is released.  “We have consistently described that today’s configurations are mostly a combination of scale out and scale up were largely based on 800G and smaller ratings. Now that the ESUN specification is well underway, we need a good solid spec. Otherwise, we’ll be shipping proprietary products like some people in the world do today. And so we will tie our

Read More »

From NIMBY to YIMBY: A Playbook for Data Center Community Acceptance

Across many conversations at the start of this year, at PTC and other conferences alike, the word on everyone’s lips seems to be “community.” For the data center industry, that single word now captures a turning point from just a few short years ago: we are no longer a niche, back‑of‑house utility, but a front‑page presence in local politics, school board budgets, and town hall debates. That visibility is forcing a choice in how we tell our story—either accept a permanent NIMBY-reactive framework, or actively build a YIMBY narrative that portrays the real value digital infrastructure brings to the markets and surrounding communities that host it. Speaking regularly with Ilissa Miller, CEO of iMiller Public Relations about this topic, there is work to be done across the ecosystem to build communications. Miller recently reflected: “What we’re seeing in communities isn’t a rejection of digital infrastructure, it’s a rejection of uncertainty driven by anxiety and fear. Most local leaders have never been given a framework to evaluate digital infrastructure developments the way they evaluate roads, water systems, or industrial parks. When there’s no shared planning language, ‘no’ becomes the safest answer.” A Brief History of “No” Community pushback against data centers is no longer episodic; it has become organized, media‑savvy, and politically influential in key markets. In Northern Virginia, resident groups and environmental organizations have mobilized against large‑scale campuses, pressing counties like Loudoun and Prince William to tighten zoning, question incentives, and delay or reshape projects.1 Loudoun County’s move in 2025 to end by‑right approvals for new facilities, requiring public hearings and board votes, marked a watershed moment as the world’s densest data center market signaled that communities now expect more say over where and how these campuses are built. Prince William County’s decision to sharply increase its tax rate on

Read More »

Nomads at the Frontier: PTC 2026 Signals the Digital Infrastructure Industry’s Moment of Execution

Each January, the Pacific Telecommunications Council conference serves as a barometer for where digital infrastructure is headed next. And according to Nomad Futurist founders Nabeel Mahmood and Phillip Koblence, the message from PTC 2026 was unmistakable: The industry has moved beyond hype. The hard work has begun. In the latest episode of The DCF Show Podcast, part of our ongoing ‘Nomads at the Frontier’ series, Mahmood and Koblence joined Data Center Frontier to unpack the tone shift emerging across the AI and data center ecosystem. Attendance continues to grow year over year. Conversations remain energetic. But the character of those conversations has changed. As Mahmood put it: “The hype that the market started to see is actually resulting a bit more into actions now, and those conversations are resulting into some good progress.” The difference from prior years? Less speculation. More execution. From Data Center Cowboys to Real Deployments Koblence offered perhaps the sharpest contrast between PTC conversations in 2024 and those in 2026. Two years ago, many projects felt speculative. Today, developers are arriving with secured power, customers, and construction underway. “If 2024’s PTC was data center cowboys — sites that in someone’s mind could be a data center — this year was: show me the money, show me the power, give me accurate timelines.” In other words, the market is no longer rewarding hypothetical capacity. It is demanding delivered capacity. Operators now speak in terms of deployments already underway, not aspirational campuses still waiting on permits and power commitments. And behind nearly every conversation sits the same gating factor. Power. Power Has Become the Industry’s Defining Constraint Whether discussions centered on AI factories, investment capital, or campus expansion, Mahmood and Koblence noted that every conversation eventually returned to energy availability. “All of those questions are power,” Koblence said.

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »