Valar then supplied the most visible connection between the criticality program and data center technology. After reaching criticality, Valar advanced Ward 250 to approximately 10 kilowatts of thermal output and conducted a separate demonstration in which power from the reactor was used to run Nvidia Blackwell-based computing hardware. On July 1, Valar and Nvidia also announced that they were exploring a small Utah data center using closed-loop cooling and behind-the-meter advanced nuclear generation.
The demonstration load was microscopic beside a hyperscale campus that may require hundreds of megawatts. Nvidia described the work as an exploration of how behind-the-meter advanced nuclear systems could support future AI factories, not as an agreement to purchase a specified quantity of electricity.
Deployable Energy became the third developer to achieve zero-power criticality when its Unity reactor completed its experiment at Idaho National Laboratory on June 30. DOE announced the result July 1, noting that the three companies had satisfied the administration’s objective of achieving three advanced reactor criticality milestones by July 4.
The commercial follow-up came quickly. On July 7, Deployable Energy and energy-infrastructure facilitator GridMarket announced a partnership aimed at data centers, hyperscalers and industrial customers. The agreement includes a committed pilot project and priority access to future Unity capacity. The companies said they were targeting 500 megawatts of annual deployments from 2030 through 2035 and more than 3 gigawatts cumulatively.
The companies have not publicly named the pilot host or end customers. Even so, the committed pilot and access provisions put the arrangement ahead of a conventional memorandum of understanding. GridMarket is attempting to assemble sites, customers, technology and capital before commercial Unity units become available.
Aalo Atomics completed the fourth criticality experiment on July 4, with DOE announcing the achievement July 6. Aalo-X went from groundbreaking to a sustained chain reaction in approximately eight months, according to the company.
Aalo said the test would support a commercial-scale system designed to produce 10 megawatts of electricity for an on-site data center in 2027. That is a specific deployment objective, but no named data center operator or binding power buyer was disclosed.
Collectively, the four experiments demonstrated that developers can assemble fuel, components, safety documentation and qualified teams on compressed schedules when working through DOE-authorized test programs. They also supplied investors and potential customers with evidence that the underlying reactor physics works.
As yet, these startups have not demonstrated full-power conversion systems, multi-year reliability, commercial operating costs or repeatable manufacturing at scale. Those are the metrics that will determine whether microreactors can compete in the data center market.
Savannah River Introduces the Federal “Gas First, Nuclear Later” Model
On July 20, the National Nuclear Security Administration selected Amentum to negotiate a phased lease for an AI data center and dedicated power project at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina.
The proposed development would combine a 1-gigawatt data center with approximately 2 gigawatts of on-site generation. NNSA described the energy plan as natural gas “bridging to nuclear energy.” The additional generating capacity is intended both to support the data center and potentially increase power availability to the surrounding grid.
The announcement places nuclear power inside a federally sponsored data center development rather than adding it later as an unrelated clean-energy purchase. It also reflects growing political pressure to prevent large computing campuses from transferring the cost of new generation and grid upgrades to residential customers.
Amentum was selected to enter negotiations; it did not receive a final lease. The announcement did not identify a hyperscale tenant, reactor developer, nuclear technology, construction schedule or power purchase price. Permitting, security reviews, negotiations and other federal approvals remain outstanding.
Natural gas is expected to provide the bridge because the data center can be developed faster than new nuclear capacity. Nuclear could eventually replace or supplement that generation after reactors are licensed and constructed.
Private energy campuses being planned elsewhere have talked about a similar process: install gas turbines, grid connections or other immediately available generation first, establish the computing load and revenue stream, and then take advantage of SMR or other compact nuclear technologies when they become available.
This approach acknowledges an uncomfortable timing problem. AI infrastructure developers want power as soon as possible. Gas can satisfy near-term load, while dependable commercial capacity from many first-of-a-kind nuclear projects remains a 2030s proposition.
Washington Offers $17.5 Billion to Restart the Large-Reactor Supply Chain
The most consequential large-reactor announcement came June 23, when DOE issued a conditional commitment for up to $17.5 billion in American Nuclear Supply Chain Loans.
The structure could finance long-lead components for up to five projects, each containing two Westinghouse AP1000 reactors. Ten units at 1.1 gigawatts each would represent approximately 11 gigawatts of new nuclear capacity. DOE said bulk purchasing and early component orders could accelerate deployment by as much as three years. The AP1000 is established nuclear power technology, with 6 units in operation and 14 more currently under construction.
For each two-reactor project, Westinghouse and a participating utility or energy company would each contribute $500 million in equity before drawing federal loan funds. Westinghouse has signed letters of intent with seven potential partners that have identified sites, although DOE did not disclose their names or locations. The commitment remains conditional on technical, financial, legal and environmental requirements.
The financing addresses a fundamental obstacle to new large reactors. Components such as reactor vessels, steam generators and specialized forgings require long manufacturing schedules, but utilities are reluctant to order them before a project has final regulatory approval, customer commitments and financing. A coordinated order for 10 standardized reactors could give manufacturers enough visibility to expand factories, train workers and negotiate lower prices. It could also reduce the risk that every AP1000 project effectively begins by rebuilding its own supply chain.
Data center demand is driving some reactor-restart and new-build discussions, but no hyperscaler or other anchor customer has been disclosed for any of the five proposed AP1000 projects. That is where the large-reactor program still lags the Crane model. Federal financing can reduce equipment and schedule risk, but it cannot substitute for a customer willing to pay for the electricity over several decades. The unnamed projects will eventually need regulated utility cost recovery, long-term corporate contracts, government procurement or some combination of the three.
Existing Nuclear Plants Continue to Attract Buyers Beyond Data Centers
Not every significant nuclear contract is being driven by artificial intelligence. The Walmart agreement shows that demand for long-duration nuclear contracts also extends beyond hyperscalers and data center operators.
On June 23, Constellation and Walmart announced a long-term PPA for approximately 176 megawatts from the Dresden Clean Energy Center in Illinois. The total includes 30 megawatts of added capacity expected from uprates, or improvements that increase the output of existing reactors. Walmart will purchase electricity, capacity and environmental attributes during two 15-year terms beginning in 2029 and 2030. This is Walmart’s first nuclear-derived PPA.
Adding 30 megawatts at an operating plant will not satisfy a gigawatt-scale data center campus, but uprates can generally deliver incremental capacity faster and with less execution risk than new reactors.
At another nuclear plant restart that has already received federal funding, Palisades in Michigan, Holtec announced July 2 that it had completed the major physical-project phase of its restart effort. Work included inspections, turbine-generator preparation, fuel-handling equipment, steam-generator refurbishment and other plant upgrades. More than 5,000 individual work activities remained, followed by testing, verification, fuel loading and operational-readiness procedures before startup.
Palisades is not being restarted around a disclosed data center power contract. Importantly, as Crane and Palisades successfully return to service, utilities and technology companies may gain confidence that additional retired plants can be evaluated as near-term capacity resources.
The available pool is limited, but successful restarts would add another category to the nuclear development pipeline between operating-plant uprates and entirely new construction.
Fuel and Licensing Reforms Build the Foundation Beneath the Announcements
On June 22, DOE said it was negotiating with five companies—Exodys Energy, Flibe Energy, Oklo, SHINE Technologies and Standard Nuclear—over potential use of nearly 20 metric tons of surplus government plutonium. The material could be converted into advanced reactor fuel or used for nuclear research and development. The participants would be responsible for the cost and security of processing facilities and related operations. The initiative comes as the United States remains heavily dependent on foreign nuclear-fuel supplies and services. In 2025, approximately 77% of the enrichment services purchased by U.S. reactor operators were foreign-origin, while U.S.-origin material accounted for just 7% of uranium deliveries.
The NRC has simultaneously proposed major regulatory revisions. On June 18, the commission proposed changes intended to accelerate advanced nuclear fuel infrastructure. On July 1, it announced what it described as its most comprehensive reactor-licensing modernization in decades. The proposal would introduce more risk-informed and performance-based options, allow certain early site activities after an application is docketed, and revise requirements affecting construction, emergency planning, operations and decommissioning.
In July, the NRC proposed a broad modernization of environmental reviews. Among other changes, it would focus reviews more narrowly on impacts within the commission’s statutory authority and expand the potential use of categorical exclusions for some actions. The proposal remains subject to public review and follows recently completed NRC rules covering categorical exclusions and generic environmental findings for new reactors.
Faster and more predictable licensing could improve the economics of data center-backed projects by reducing the amount of time capital remains committed without producing revenue.
A Consequential Start to Summer, With the Hardest Work Still Ahead
A major restart moved closer to supplying Microsoft. Kairos advanced manufacturing and licensing work behind a binding agreement serving Google data centers. Four advanced reactors achieved criticality. A microreactor developer assembled a multigigawatt data center pipeline. Nvidia participated in a small nuclear-powered AI demonstration. DOE proposed financing 10 AP1000 units, and federal regulators opened broad efforts to streamline reactor, fuel and environmental reviews. Momentum, but no material new capacity yet.
Data center demand is helping to accelerate that rebuilding because data center developers have enormous capital resources, concentrated electricity requirements and a strong interest in round-the-clock generation. They can provide something nuclear projects have often lacked: a large buyer prepared to make a long-term commitment before construction is complete.
But data center demand does not repeal the disciplines of nuclear development. Reactors still have to be licensed, fueled, financed, constructed and operated safely. Power agreements must allocate schedule and cost risks. Transmission must be available unless generation is truly isolated behind the meter. Customers must remain committed through years of development.
Crane and Hermes 2 show what more fully defined, contract-backed nuclear projects look like, even though they remain on very different timelines—Crane as the restart of a previously operating commercial reactor, and Hermes 2 as a first-of-a-kind demonstration project targeted for 2030. The criticality demonstrations show how quickly technical progress can occur under an accelerated federal framework. Savannah River and the AP1000 loan program show how government is trying to assemble sites, capital and supply chains at unprecedented scale.
The coming year will reveal whether the other projects can close the remaining gap—turning demonstrations into products, pipelines into contracts, and nuclear ambition into dependable megawatts for both data centers and the American grid.
