“The big change that’s really started to happen in late 2024 early 2025 is that the FinOps practice started to expand past the cloud,” Storment said. “A lot of organizations got really good at using FinOps to manage the value of cloud, and then their organizations went, ‘oh, hey, we’re living in this happily hybrid state now where we’ve got cloud, SaaS, data center. Can you also apply the FinOps practice to our SaaS? Or can you apply it to our Snowflake? Can you apply it to our data center?’” The FinOps Foundation’s community has grown to approximately 100,000 practitioners. The organization now includes major cloud vendors, hardware providers like Nvidia and AMD, data center operators and data cloud platforms like Snowflake and Databricks. Some 96 of the Fortune 100 now participate in FinOps Foundation programs. The practice itself has shifted in two directions. It has moved left into earlier architectural and design processes, becoming more proactive rather than reactive. It has also moved up organizationally, from director-level cloud management roles to SVP and COO positions managing converged technology portfolios spanning multiple infrastructure types. This expansion has driven the evolution of FOCUS beyond its original cloud billing focus. Enterprises are implementing FOCUS as an internal standard for chargeback reporting even when their providers don’t generate native FOCUS data. Some newer cloud providers, particularly those focused on AI infrastructure, are using the FOCUS specification to define their billing data structures from the ground up rather than retrofitting existing systems. The FOCUS 1.3 release reflects this maturation, addressing technical gaps that have emerged as organizations apply cost management practices across increasingly complex hybrid environments. FOCUS 1.3 exposes cost allocation logic for shared infrastructure The most significant technical enhancement in FOCUS 1.3 addresses a gap in how shared infrastructure costs are allocated and

Enterprises will connect to and manage orbital workloads “the same way they manage cloud workloads today,” using optical links, the spokesperson added. The company’s approach is to “continuously launch new hardware and quickly integrate the latest architectures,” with older systems running lower-priority tasks to serve out the full useful lifetime of their high-end GPUs. The company declined to disclose pricing. Aetherflux plans to launch about 30 satellites at a time on SpaceX Falcon 9 rockets. Before the data center launch, the company will launch a power-beaming demonstration satellite in 2026 to test transmission of one kilowatt of energy from orbit to ground stations, using infrared lasers. Competition in the sector has intensified in recent months. In November, Starcloud launched its Starcloud-1 satellite carrying an Nvidia H100 GPU, which is 100 times more powerful than any previous GPU flown in space, according to the company, and demonstrated running Google’s Gemma AI model in orbit. In the same month, Google announced Project Suncatcher, with a 2027 demonstration mission planned. Analysts see limited near-term applications Despite the competitive activity, orbital data centers won’t replace terrestrial cloud regions for general hosting through 2030, said Ashish Banerjee, senior principal analyst at Gartner. Instead, they suit specific workloads, including meeting data sovereignty requirements for jurisdictionally complex scenarios, offering disaster recovery immune to terrestrial risks, and providing asynchronous high-performance computing, he said. “Orbital centers are ideal for high-compute, low-I/O batch jobs,” Banerjee said. “Think molecular folding simulations for pharma, massive Monte Carlo financial simulations, or training specific AI model weights. If the job takes 48 hours, the 500ms latency penalty of LEO is irrelevant.” One immediate application involves processing satellite-generated data in orbit, he said. Earth observation satellites using synthetic aperture radar generate roughly 10 gigabytes per second, but limited downlink bandwidth creates bottlenecks. Processing data in

He said he had earlier told analysts in a separate call that margins for AI workloads in these data centers would be in the 30% to 40% range over the life of a customer contract. Kehring reassured that there would be demand for the data centers when they were completed, pointing to Oracle’s increasing remaining performance obligations, or services contracted but not yet delivered, up $68 billion on the previous quarter, saying that Oracle has been seeing unprecedented demand for AI workloads driven by the likes of Meta and Nvidia. Rising debt and margin risks raise flags for CIOs For analysts, though, the swelling debt load is hard to dismiss, even with Oracle’s attempts to de-risk its spend and squeeze more efficiency out of its buildouts. Gogia sees Oracle already under pressure, with the financial ecosystem around the company pricing the risk — one of the largest debts in corporate history, crossing $100 billion even before the capex spend this quarter — evident in the rising cost of insuring the debt and the shift in credit outlook. “The combination of heavy capex, negative free cash flow, increasing financing cost and long-dated revenue commitments forms a structural pressure that will invariably finds its way into the commercial posture of the vendor,” Gogia said, hinting at an “eventual” increase in pricing of the company’s offerings. He was equally unconvinced by Magouyrk’s assurances about the margin profile of AI workloads as he believes that AI infrastructure, particularly GPU-heavy clusters, delivers significantly lower margins in the early years because utilisation takes time to ramp.

Addressing the challenge Modern AI accelerators now draw more than 700W per GPU, and multi-GPU nodes can reach 6kW, creating concentrated heat zones, rapid power swings, and a higher risk of interconnect degradation in dense racks, according to Manish Rawat, semiconductor analyst at TechInsights. Traditional cooling methods and static power planning increasingly struggle to keep pace with these loads. “Rich vendor telemetry covering real-time power draw, bandwidth behavior, interconnect health, and airflow patterns shifts operators from reactive monitoring to proactive design,” Rawat said. “It enables thermally aware workload placement, faster adoption of liquid or hybrid cooling, and smarter network layouts that reduce heat-dense traffic clusters.” Rawat added that the software’s fleet-level configuration insights can also help operators catch silent errors caused by mismatched firmware or driver versions. This can improve training reproducibility and strengthen overall fleet stability. “Real-time error and interconnect health data also significantly accelerates root-cause analysis, reducing MTTR and minimizing cluster fragmentation,” Rawat said. These operational pressures can shape budget decisions and infrastructure strategy at the enterprise level.

In a white paper describing how VESPA works, Arista wrote: The first component of VESPA involves Arista access points creating VXLAN tunnels to Arista switches serving as WLAN Gateways…. Second, as device packets arrive via the AP, it dynamically creates an Ethernet Segment Identifier (Type 6 ESI) based on the AP’s VTEP IP address. These dynamically created tunnels can scale to 30K ESI’s spread across paired switches in the cluster which provide active/active load sharing (performance+HA) to the APs. Third, the gateway switches use Type 2 EVPN NLRI (Network Layer Reachability Information) to learn and exchange end point MAC addresses across the cluster. … With this architecture, adding more EVPN WLAN gateways scales both AP and user connections, to tens of thousands of end points. To manage the forwarding information for hundreds of thousands of clients (e.g: FIB next hop and rewrite) would prove very complex and expensive if using conventional networking solutions. Arista’s innovation is to distribute this function across the WiFi access points with a unique MAC Rewrite Offload feature (MRO). With MRO, the access point is responsible for servicing mobile client ARP requests (using its own mac address), building a localized MAC-IP binding table, and forwarding client IP addresses to the WLAN gateways with the APs MAC address. The WLAN Gateways therefore only learns one (MAC) address for all the clients associated with the AP. This improves the gateway’s scaling from 10X to 100X, allowing these cost effective gateways to support hundreds of thousands of clients attached to the APs. AVA system gets a boost In addition to the new wireless technology, Arista is also bolstering the capabilities of its natural-language, generative AI-based Autonomous Virtual Assist (AVA) system for delivering network insights and AIOps.  AVA is aimed at providing an intelligent assistant that’s not there to replace

Cisco makes two AI deals: EzDubs and NeuralFabric Last month Cisco completed its acquisition of EzDubs, a privately held AI software company with speech-to-speech translation technology. EzDubs translates conversations across 31 languages and will accelerate Cisco’s delivery of next-generation features, such as live voice translation that preserves the characteristics of speech, the vendor stated. Cisco plans to incorporate EzDubs’ technology in its Cisco Collaboration portfolio. Also in November, Cisco bought AI platform company NeuralFabric, which offers a generative AI platform that lets organizations develop domain-specific small language models using their own proprietary data. Coreweave buys Core Scientific Nvidia-backed AI cloud provider CoreWeave acquired crypto miner Core Scientific for about $9 billion, giving it access to 1.3 gigawatts of contracted power to support growing demand for AI and high-performance computing workloads. CoreWeave said the deal augments its vertical integration by expanding its owned and operated data center footprint, allowing it to scale GPU-powered services for enterprise and research customers. F5 picks up three: CalypsoAI, Fletch and MantisNet F5 acquired Dublin, Ireland-based CalypsoAI for $180 million. CalypsoAI’s platform creates what the company calls an Inference Perimeter that protects across models, vendors, and environments. F5 says it will integrate CalypsoAI’s adaptive AI security capabilities into its F5 Application Delivery and Security Platform (ADSP). F5’s ADSP also stands to gain from F5’s acquisition of agentic AI and threat management startup Fletch. Fletch’s technology turns external threat intelligence and internal logs into real-time, prioritized insights; its agentic AI capabilities will be integrated into ADSP, according to F5. Lastly, F5 grabbed startup MantisNet to enhance cloud-native observability in F5’s ADSP. MantisNet leverages extended Berkeley Packet Filer (eBPF)-powered, kernel-level telemetry to provide real-time insights into encrypted protocol activity and allow organizations “to gain visibility into even the most elusive traffic, all without performance overhead,” according to an F5 blog