
Johnny Yu, an IDC research manager, is not as impressed by the components of the solution as he is by the way Recovery Studio organizes them.
“I do see Commvault Recovery Studio as significant, but not from a capability standpoint,” Yu said, adding that all of the product’s components, including recovery runbooks, threat scans, and recovery testing, are already offered by Commvault, as well as by various competitors. “I think the significance comes from how Recovery Studio organizes different recovery workflows for different applications onto a single platform or hub, kind of like a library of validated recovery runbooks to be used for all kinds of scenarios.”
He explained that he liked how Studio standardizes recovery runbooks to follow a similar workflow to that of manually rebuilding the environment, recovering the components, such as data, applications and agents, and “validating the recovery before bringing it back into production, but allows recovery nuance for each runbook, such as if you want to do in-place vs secondary-site recovery or whether threat scanning is necessary, such as DR scenario vs cyber recovery scenario.”




















