
Despite affirming the jurisdictional shift, Wilson also ordered Sable to pay $1.5 million for violating a federal consent decree. Through its acquisition of the assets, Sable assumed obligations under the decree, including management and reporting requirements and provisions requiring state waivers before restarting operations.
“Sable has violated the express provisions of the consent decree, without justification,” Wilson wrote.
The judge said California’s proposed injunction “is not the proper remedy.” For one, he said, “the consent decree has been modified to replace OSFM as the regulatory authority with PHMSA, and the pre-restart requirements of the State Waivers are no longer applicable. Nor, too, are OSFM’s approval of a Restart Plan or authorization. PHMSA, the current regulator, has authorized Sable to restart the pipeline. Therefore, Sable is no longer in violation of the Consent Decree, and proactive, injunctive relief is inappropriate,” Wilson wrote. “Rather, the appropriate penalty for Sable’s violations is dictated by the consent decree.”
Sable resumed transporting crude oil from the Santa Ynez Unit (SYU) through SYPS in March under the DPA order. The order and company statements indicate gross oil throughput is expected to reach about 50,000 b/d following ramp-up. Current production from six wells is estimated at about 6,000 b/d. SYPS has capacity of up to 200,000 b/d.





















