Stay Ahead, Stay ONMINE

From Coal to Compute: How Pennsylvania Is Rebuilding Power for AI Data Centers

Western Pennsylvania is becoming a test bed for one of the most consequential changes underway in data center development: the migration from simply finding grid capacity to building the power supply along with the data center. Two projects illustrate that transition particularly well. Aligned Data Centers is advancing the roughly $10 billion, 2-GW Project Phoenix […]

Western Pennsylvania is becoming a test bed for one of the most consequential changes underway in data center development: the migration from simply finding grid capacity to building the power supply along with the data center.

Two projects illustrate that transition particularly well. Aligned Data Centers is advancing the roughly $10 billion, 2-GW Project Phoenix campus at the former Bruce Mansfield coal-fired power station site in Shippingport, Beaver County. About 60 miles to the east, the former Homer City Generating Station is being transformed into the Homer City Energy Campus, centered on as much as 4.4 GW of new natural-gas generation and a proposed Amazon Web Services campus that could ultimately include 39 data center buildings.

The projects share a number of similarities. Both reuse former coal-generation properties. Both already possess much of the infrastructure that greenfield data center developers spend years trying to obtain: high-voltage transmission, industrial zoning, water infrastructure, pipeline access, large parcels and proximity to the Marcellus and Utica natural-gas fields.But technically and commercially, they are also very different.

Project Phoenix is essentially a data-center-led development using behind-the-meter generation, supplemented by a separate plan to repower the former coal station. While Homer City is the reverse: a power-generation project being constructed first, with the hyperscale data center development forming around the available power supply.

This isn’t a competition, but it is a comparison on speed of delivery and the issues both development models face.

Project Phoenix: Aligned Moves Into Pennsylvania

Aligned calls Shippingport its first Pennsylvania campus and a regional flagship. The company formally broke ground on Project Phoenix on September 10, 2026, describing it as a 2-GW campus spanning three data center facilities and representing roughly $10 billion in regional investment. Aligned estimates the development will support approximately 3,000 construction jobs and 640 full-time jobs in ongoing campus operations.

The site is adjacent to the former Bruce Mansfield Power Plant, once one of Pennsylvania’s largest coal facilities. Aligned reportedly completed its acquisition in July 2026 of approximately 650.9 acres for about $223 million. The planned development has been described in local planning documents and reporting as encompassing as many as three data center buildings totaling nearly 2 million square feet.

Shippingport Borough approved Aligned’s conditional-use application on March 31, 2026, subject to conditions incorporated in the borough’s written decision. The approval moved Project Phoenix through one of its most important local entitlement hurdles.

A Behind-the-Meter Data Center Rather Than Another Giant Grid Request

Aligned now says Project Phoenix will use its own dedicated onsite power source rather than the local electrical grid. That distinction goes directly to one of the project’s central selling points: the campus is being designed around power developed with the data center rather than around a multi-gigawatt utility request moving through an already constrained transmission and generation environment.

Aligned intends to use natural-gas-fed fuel-cell generation at the campus. The company says the arrangement will allow the facilities to operate without imposing additional infrastructure costs or instability on the surrounding electric grid.

Aligned’s September groundbreaking announcement resolves part of the earlier uncertainty around Project Phoenix’s scale: the company now describes it as a 2-GW, three-facility campus. That figure should still be distinguished from the separate multi-gigawatt generation projects associated with the broader Shippingport Industrial Park, including Frontier Group’s proposed 2.55-GW repowering of the former Bruce Mansfield plant. Aligned has not characterized the 2-GW campus figure specifically as critical IT load, so the numbers should not be treated as interchangeable.

The clearest evidence of the scale of the gas infrastructure supporting the behind-the-meter Aligned component instead comes from the natural-gas infrastructure being constructed to serve the site. National Fuel Gas disclosed that its new Shippingport Lateral will provide approximately 205,000 dekatherms per day of firm gas transportation capacity to the Shippingport development, specifically identifying demand associated with a behind-the-meter data center.

The roughly 7.5-mile pipeline entered construction in March 2026 and is targeted for service late in 2026. National Fuel says the developer contracted for 100% of the lateral’s capacity under a long-term agreement. That is not a speculative request for future pipeline capacity. It represents physical enabling infrastructure now being constructed specifically for the Shippingport power strategy.

Fuel Cells Change the Traditional Data Center Power Model

Natural-gas fuel cells differ from the reciprocating engines and gas turbines increasingly appearing at AI campuses because they generate electricity electrochemically rather than through combustion and mechanical generation. Depending on the technology and configuration, that can provide high efficiency, modular deployment and substantially lower emissions of conventional combustion pollutants such as nitrogen oxides. For data centers, modularity also creates a scheduling advantage: generation can potentially be added in blocks alongside successive phases of IT capacity.

They are not, however, zero-carbon. A system operating on natural gas still results in carbon emissions, and its overall climate impact also depends on methane leakage throughout the gas supply chain. Aligned’s characterization of the technology as exceptionally low-polluting includes the understanding that this is not a carbon-free alternative.

Aligned has also not publicly identified several important technical details: the fuel-cell supplier, specific fuel-cell technology, total installed generating capacity, the electrical topology connecting generation to individual buildings, or the amount of grid capacity retained for supplemental or emergency operation. Those disclosures will be important for understanding exactly how “grid independent” Project Phoenix will be in practice.

What Happens to the Old Bruce Mansfield Generators?

Aligned’s Project Phoenix is only half of the Shippingport story. Frontier Group, which acquired the former Bruce Mansfield assets in 2022 and has been redeveloping the broader property as the Shippingport Industrial Park, is separately pursuing the Shippingport Power Station project.

Its plan calls for repurposing major portions of the old coal plant rather than simply demolishing the generating infrastructure. Frontier proposes refurbishing three existing GE steam turbine-generator sets and modifying the former coal-fired boilers to operate on natural gas. The company lists planned output of approximately 2,550 MW, with three roughly 850-MW generating units. Existing 345-kV transmission infrastructure would be reused to reconnect the plant to PJM. The value of the existing transmission infrastructure can’t be overstated. This is part of the infrastructure development that generally delays the connection of new generation sources to the grid.

This unusual approach involves the conversion to new natural-gas burners, boiler modifications, controls upgrades and refurbishment of the turbines, generators, cooling towers, transformers and other balance-of-plant equipment.

Most coal-to-gas projects either replace the original boilers with new combined-cycle gas turbines or retire the old steam-generation system entirely. Shippingport instead proposes retaining a substantial portion of the original steam plant and converting the heat source from coal to natural gas.

Frontier puts the direct investment in the generating project at approximately $1.6 billion and currently targets power delivery around late 2028 or early 2029.

This means Shippingport could eventually contain two fundamentally different natural-gas power systems. The first is distributed, behind-the-meter generation serving Aligned’s data centers. The second is a massive central generating station using repowered legacy equipment and reconnecting to PJM. These two projects occupy the same broader industrial ecosystem, benefit from some of the same pipeline and electrical infrastructure, and could eventually interact commercially.

The Gas Infrastructure Is Being Built in Layers

National Fuel’s expansion plans reinforce that distinction. Beyond the approximately 205,000 Dth/day Shippingport Lateral associated with the behind-the-meter data center development, National Fuel is planning its larger Line N System Upgrade, which is expected to add approximately 294,000 Dth/day of transportation capacity. About 200,000 Dth/day of that expansion is targeted toward the Shippingport Industrial Park.

National Fuel has said total potential gas demand around the redevelopment could eventually approach 800,000 Dth/day when the behind-the-meter data center generation and full coal-to-gas power station conversion are considered together.

Aligned does not necessarily have to wait until the 2.55-GW Shippingport Power Station is operating in 2028 or 2029 to begin powering data center capacity. The dedicated lateral and behind-the-meter generation potentially provide an earlier path to energization.

That is arguably the key strategic advantage of Project Phoenix: Aligned potentially does not have to wait for the larger Shippingport Power Station to enter service before energizing data center capacity. At the same time, the wider natural-gas buildout extends beyond the data center campus itself, supporting the broader Shippingport Industrial Park and the proposed repowering of the former coal plant.

Cooling Is the Other Infrastructure Differentiator

Aligned has also made water consumption a central element of the Phoenix design. The company now says each of the three data centers is engineered to require zero water for operational cooling, using a closed-loop system that continuously recycles deionized water. Aligned says the resulting overall water footprint will be comparable to that of a standard commercial office building.  

The approach still requires water for initial fill and normal facility uses, and the comparison is Aligned’s own rather than an independently verified operating measurement. But if realized at the announced scale, the design would substantially reduce one of the most politically sensitive resource demands associated with large AI campuses.

Aligned Has Substantial Financial Backing

In July, a consortium including Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Partnership, MGX and BlackRock’s Global Infrastructure Partners completed the acquisition of Aligned at an enterprise value of approximately $40 billion. Aligned said the transaction included commitments for another $5 billion of growth capital. At the time, its portfolio included 51 campuses and more than 6.4 GW of operational and planned capacity.

Aligned is not attempting to finance Project Phoenix as an isolated Pennsylvania startup project. It is part of a heavily capitalized international data center platform with direct access to institutional infrastructure and AI investment capital. The major unanswered questions are customer and schedule related. Aligned has not publicly named Project Phoenix’s anchor tenant. Nor has it publicly disclosed the campus’s ultimate IT load or a detailed phase-by-phase construction schedule.

As of late September, Project Phoenix has secured land and local land-use approval, begun construction of enabling gas infrastructure and held its formal groundbreaking. Public evidence of full-scale vertical data center construction remains less developed, however, than the construction record at Homer City.

Pennsylvania’s regulatory environment has also tightened. On August 18, Gov. Josh Shapiro signed Executive Order 2026-05, removing data center projects from the state’s Permit Fast Track program and directing DEP to incorporate the state’s Responsible Infrastructure Development, or GRID, requirements into its review of new data center permit applications.

The order also makes local approvals a more consequential prerequisite in the state permitting process and ties development more directly to requirements covering energy affordability, environmental protection, transparency, workforce development and community engagement.

Homer City: Build the Power Plant and Bring the Data Centers to It

If Shippingport starts with a data center developer solving its own power problem, Homer City starts with the power plant itself. The original Homer City Generating Station permanently ceased coal generation in 2023. Its successor, Homer City Redevelopment, is converting the more than 3,200-acre property into the Homer City Energy Campus.

DCF has tracked Homer City’s transformation from a retired coal-generation site into a power-and-data infrastructure campus since the redevelopment strategy first began taking shape. At its center is what the developer describes as up to 4.4 GW of new natural-gas generation, making it one of the largest gas-fired generation projects under development anywhere in the United States. Early announcements rounded the figure to approximately 4.5 GW.

The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection permit documents provide an even more detailed look at the architecture; Homer City is permitted for seven GE Vernova 7HA.02 combined-cycle gas turbine trains, supplemented by ten Mitsubishi Power FT8 MOBILEPAC aeroderivative simple-cycle turbines. DEP describes the overall project’s purpose as providing approximately 4,678 MWe of dispatchable generation.

Seven Combined-Cycle Plants Form the Backbone

GE Vernova’s 7HA.02 is one of the company’s largest H-class gas turbines. In combined-cycle operation, each gas turbine generates electricity directly and then sends its extremely hot exhaust into a heat-recovery steam generator. Instead of discarding that thermal energy, the HRSG produces steam that drives a steam turbine, producing additional electricity without proportionately increasing fuel consumption.

The permit application describes each 1×1 7HA.02 train as producing approximately 525 MW net without duct firing and roughly 633 MW when additional fuel is burned in the HRSG.

Combined-cycle generation can be economically attractive for hyperscale AI campuses because they create extremely large, high-utilization electrical demand. But high utilization should not be confused with a steady load profile. Coordinated AI training workloads can produce rapid, repetitive swings in demand as large groups of accelerators ramp together, creating power-quality and grid-stability challenges alongside the sheer need for megawatts.

That makes the ten Mitsubishi FT8 MOBILEPAC units particularly interesting. Each is a relatively small aeroderivative gas turbine with output around 25 MW and can respond far more quickly than the large combined-cycle blocks.

The permit does not assign a specific commercial role to the FT8 fleet, but technically the units provide a fast-start layer capable of supporting plant startup, contingency response, peaking or rapid load changes. These are all issues that matter when the intended customer is a multi-gigawatt data center campus.

A central issue with dedicated power generation for AI is not simply producing enough megawatts. The system must maintain power quality and ride through generator trips, maintenance periods and sudden changes in IT demand.

The presence of both large, efficient combined-cycle blocks and smaller fast-response generation gives Homer City more operational flexibility than an architecture based solely on enormous baseload units.

EQT is Building the Fuel Strategy Around Appalachian Gas

Homer City’s gas requirements are themselves on a data-center scale. EQT Corporation has reached an agreement in principle to serve as the exclusive supplier and sourcing partner for the facility, with potential deliveries of as much as 665,000 MMBtu of gas per day.

The proposed supply architecture uses both the Texas Eastern Transmission system and Eastern Gas Transmission & Storage network, giving Homer City access to more than one interstate pipeline route. That redundancy is as important as the volume of gas delivered.

If an AI campus becomes dependent on gas generation rather than utility power, the gas pipeline becomes part of the data center’s critical infrastructure. A pipeline interruption can effectively become the equivalent of a transmission outage. Multiple sources and pipeline paths therefore perform a function like redundant utility feeds in a conventional data center.

Perhaps the most valuable part of the Homer City site is something the developer did not have to build. The former coal plant was already a major generating node with substantial transmission infrastructure, substations, water systems, industrial zoning and interconnection into the regional electric network.

The site has access to both the PJM and New York ISO transmission systems. That is enormously important in the current data center market. A developer can purchase hundreds of acres almost anywhere. What it cannot easily purchase is an existing multi-gigawatt transmission node with decades of power-generation history.

Reusing retired coal sites potentially eliminates several years of the work associated with acquiring rights of way, establishing industrial land use and building entirely new electrical corridors.

Homer City is No Longer a Paper Project

There is another important difference between Homer City and many announced gigawatt-scale data center power developments. The construction is visibly advanced.

Pennsylvania DEP issued Homer City’s principal air-quality plan approval in November 2025. By May 2026, Homer City Redevelopment said 14 of 18 material DEP permits and six of eight building permits had been issued. Vertical construction had begun with the site’s gas-insulated switchgear building after crews moved approximately 3 million cubic yards of material. By early September, Homer City Generation said the active construction workforce had surpassed 1,800 direct-hire tradespeople and skilled contractors, with the total expected to approach 2,000 by year-end.

Major generating equpment is now arriving at the site. Heavy-haul transport of the first heat-recovery steam generator components began September 16, part of a program to move 15 HRSGs weighing approximately 228,000 to 438,000 pounds apiece to Homer City during September and October. Those HRSGs are core equipment for the combined-cycle plants, marking the transition from site preparation and civil work into installation of the generating infrastructure itself.

Homer City continues to target first electricity during 2027, with full commissioning and build-out extending beyond the first generating units.

AWS Brings the Data Center Side Into Focus

For much of Homer City’s development, one of the largest unanswered questions was simply who needs the 4.4 GW of power? Amazon Web Services is now publicly advancing a data center campus at Homer City that is itself extraordinary in scale.

Documents presented to Indiana County describe an AWS development covering approximately 2,200 acres in Center and Blacklick townships. The current preliminary plan contemplates 39 data center buildings, along with electrical and operational support facilities, developed in phases over roughly a decade.

AWS has said the development would support existing customer demand and could eventually create approximately 1,500 to 2,000 permanent jobs. The company has also told local officials it does not intend to request county or local tax incentives and would cover costs associated with electrical infrastructure specifically required for its project.

Rather than building an enormous merchant gas plant and hoping data center customers eventually arrive, Homer City now has a publicly identified prospective hyperscale anchor with a campus proposal capable of absorbing enormous amounts of power. But all is not clear sailing.

On September 9, 2026, the Indiana County Planning Commission voted to table AWS’s preliminary land-development application.  The action followed a heavily attended public meeting at which AWS presented information on jobs, sound, water and other aspects of the campus while residents raised environmental, infrastructure and transparency concerns.

The commission’s action initiates a roughly 90-day review period rather than approving the AWS proposal immediately. That is the most important near-term distinction in assessing Homer City’s development risk.

The power plant is under active construction. The AWS data center campus is not yet fully approved. Those two timelines can move independently for a period, but eventually they must converge.

If AWS becomes the primary consumer of Homer City power, the commercial value of completing generation capacity will increasingly depend on how rapidly AWS can obtain land-development, environmental and building approvals and begin ramping IT load.

Water and Emissions Will Remain Central Issues

Homer City’s power architecture also differs dramatically from Aligned’s Shippingport approach on cooling. DEP’s air permit identifies seven eight-cell cooling towers associated with the new generating units. Combined-cycle plants use steam cycles, and rejecting heat from those systems can require significant cooling infrastructure. The former power station already had substantial water infrastructure, one of the reasons the brownfield site is attractive.

But the power plant’s cooling requirements should not be confused with the cooling design of AWS’s proposed data centers. Details about the ultimate AWS mechanical architecture, including the balance among air cooling, direct-to-chip liquid cooling and water-consuming heat rejection, have not yet been publicly established at the same level of detail.

Emissions will also remain central to the debate, even though Homer City’s developers say the new natural-gas generation will produce roughly 60% to 65% less carbon dioxide per unit of electricity than the former coal station.

That is plausible as a carbon-intensity comparison between efficient combined-cycle gas generation and an old coal plant, but it does not make Homer City a low-carbon power project in absolute terms. A multi-gigawatt natural-gas complex operating at high capacity factors will still consume enormous quantities of fossil fuel and produce substantial carbon emissions. The scale of the facility means environmental debates are likely to focus increasingly on absolute emissions and upstream methane as well as emissions per megawatt-hour.

DEP’s permitting analysis also addresses conventional pollutants. The combined-cycle units use selective catalytic reduction for NOx control and oxidation catalysts for carbon monoxide and volatile organic compounds. DEP’s review additionally examined hazardous-air-pollutant risks and air-quality modeling.

Pennsylvania’s Coal Fleet Is Becoming AI Infrastructure

The larger significance of Project Phoenix and Homer City extends beyond the individual developments. For decades, the most valuable feature of a coal plant was the generator. For AI data center developers, the more durable assets may be everything that surrounded it: high-voltage transmission, substations, pipeline and water infrastructure, industrial zoning, large contiguous sites, transportation access and communities accustomed to hosting industrial-scale energy facilities.

Retired power plants also solve one of the hardest problems confronting today’s hyperscale developers: acquiring firm power without waiting years for an entirely new high-voltage transmission system. Shippingport and Homer City are effectively monetizing those legacy assets in different ways.

Aligned is placing generation close to the servers and attempting to bypass the grid constraint through behind-the-meter fuel cells.  Homer City is rebuilding centralized generation at extraordinary scale and inviting hyperscale computing to locate next to the power.

Which Project Is Further Along?

Measured strictly by physical construction, Homer City is ahead. The generating plant has principal environmental approvals, thousands of workers have cycled through the project, vertical construction is underway and major HRSG components are arriving this month.

Project Phoenix has achieved several equally important development milestones, including local approval, an expensive land acquisition and construction of dedicated gas infrastructure, but there is less public evidence so far of Aligned’s full data-center vertical construction program.

On the data center side, however, both still have major questions. Aligned has yet to identify its tenant publicly or disclose Project Phoenix’s critical IT capacity.  Homer City has now identified AWS as the prospective hyperscale occupant, but AWS’s local application was just tabled for additional review.

Time to Usable Megawatts

If Aligned can deploy modular fuel-cell generation while the larger Shippingport Power Station remains under development, Project Phoenix could energize meaningful capacity without waiting for the traditional utility-generation cycle.

If Homer City can commission its first combined-cycle blocks beginning in 2027 while AWS moves through its approvals and starts constructing the first portion of a 39-building campus, the former coal plant could provide something extraordinarily scarce in the U.S. market: gigawatts of dispatchable power directly adjacent to a hyperscale development site.

That makes the two western Pennsylvania projects worth watching together. They are not simply giant data centers. They are contrasting blueprints for what the next generation of AI infrastructure may look like when the data center developer can no longer assume the grid will simply provide the power.

Shape
Shape
Stay Ahead

Explore More Insights

Stay ahead with more perspectives on cutting-edge power, infrastructure, energy,  bitcoin and AI solutions. Explore these articles to uncover strategies and insights shaping the future of industries.

Shape

AMD agrees to buy World Labs to fill out its AI stack

This is where World Labs fits into AMD’s ecosystem, according to Parv Sharma, Senior Research Analyst at Counterpoint Research. “World Labs builds AI that understands space, where models need to understand geometry, physics and time, unlike LLMs, which understand languages. These world models are used for training in physical AI

Read More »

Why a network digital twin is the missing piece for AI-era operations

The e-book draws an important distinction between two approaches that share the label. One emulates the network by running the actual device firmware against specific test scenarios. The other builds a deterministic mathematical model from the network’s configuration and state, computing all possible forwarding behaviors at once. The guide sums

Read More »

NetScaler admins told to patch critical zero-days in ADC and Gateway now

NetScaler appliances are an important part of many enterprise networks, providing VPN and remote access, load balancing and other application delivery services. Citrix is tracking the two exploited vulnerabilities as CVE-2026-88771 and CVE-2026-88772. It has released fixes in NetScaler ADC and Gateway 14.1-73.37 and later, 13.1-64.23 and later, with corresponding

Read More »

Dallas Fed survey: More than one in five firms plan to grow capex in 2027

The share of exploration and production (E&P) companies planning to add to their capital spending in 2027 versus this year has grown to 22% from 10% in June, a new Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas survey shows. Of the more than 80 E&P leaders in Texas, northern Louisiana, and southern New Mexico who responded to the latest Dallas Fed Energy Survey earlier this month, a third said their oil production has increased over the past 3 months and only 1 in 8 said they’re pumping less oil. On the capex side, 46% said their spending this quarter was up from this year’s second quarter. Both of those data points were down slightly from the Fed’s June poll. What appears to be changing more substantially on the ground in the Permian basin, Eagle Ford, and other areas in the Dallas Fed’s footprint are expectations about 2027 spending. Only 5% of E&P leaders now expect they’ll trim capex next year while 73% said they’ll keep spending level. Three months ago, those figures were 10% and 81%, respectively. That means 22% of executives now think their capex will climb in 2027 compared to less than 10% 3 months ago. And it suggests that production in the region will climb from here as producers look to take advantage of consistently high prices for their products—even if they’ve retreated from their recent highs. Jon Costello, an analyst at HFI Research, said an industry response—with Texas firms in the vanguard—to higher prices similar to how it recovered starting in late 2016 would grow total US production more than 4% to about 14.4 million b/d.

Read More »

EIA: US crude oil inventories up 900,000 bbl

US crude oil inventories for the week ended Sept. 25, excluding the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, increased by 900,000 bbl from the previous week, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). At 427.3 million bbl, US crude oil inventories are 2% above the 5-year average for this time of year, the EIA report indicated. Gasoline output averaged 9.5 million b/d, and distillate production decreased to 5.0 million b/d. Propane-propylene inventories increased 1.8 million bbl, 20% above the 5-year average. Total commercial petroleum inventories decreased by 7 million bbl for the week. Distillate inventories decreased 2.3 million barrels, 14% below the five-year average. US crude oil refinery inputs averaged 16.3 million b/d for the week ended Sept. 25, which was 554,000 b/d less than the previous week’s average. Refineries operated at 92.5% of capacity. Crude oil imports decreased 179,000 million b/d to 5.7 million b/d. The 4-week average of 6.4 million b/d is 4.8% above the year-ago level. Gasoline imports averaged 500,000 b/d; distillate imports averaged 153,000 b/d. Over the past four weeks, total product supplied averaged 20.8 million b/d, up 2.1% year over year. The 4-week average for gasoline product supplied increased 0.3% year over year to 8.7 million b/d, while the 4-week average for distillate product supplied increased 5.2% to 3.8 million b/d. The 4-week average for jet fuel product supplied increased 6.5% year over year.  

Read More »

INEOS begins commercial CCS at Project Greensand

INEOS Energy and its partners Harbour Energy PLC and Nordsøfonden AS have begun commercial operations at Project Greensand, the European Union’s (EU) first full-scale site for transport and permanent offshore storage of CO2. The CO2 will come mainly from Danish biomethane plants. Once captured, the CO2 is liquefied, sent by truck to a dedicated CO2 terminal at Port Esbjerg, Denmark, shipped aboard the purpose-built CO2 carrier Carbon Destroyer 1, and injected into the Nini West reservoir in the Danish North Sea. Nini West is a depleted oil field 250 km offshore, and roughly 1,800 m below the seabed in about 200-ft water depths. The initial commercial phase provides storage capacity of up to 400,000 tonnes/year (tpy) of CO2, with plans to expand to 4-8 million tpy as demand increases. The EU is working to meet carbon capture and storage targets of 50 million tpy by 2030, rising to 250–280 million tpy by 2040, but remains far from that scale.

Read More »

Morningstar DBRS: Global diesel squeeze boosts US refiners

US refiners are benefiting from a tightening global diesel market as disruptions in the Middle East and Russia constrain supply, lift crack spreads, and keep refinery utilization near capacity, according to Morningstar DBRS. Morningstar DBRS said the current market is creating a strong but likely temporary earnings and cash-flow tailwind for US refiners. High utilization, low inventories, and elevated diesel margins are supporting operating cash flow and EBITDA, although the benefit could fade if geopolitical disruptions ease. Global diesel supply has tightened since the start of the Iran war as refinery outages, lower crude runs, and constraints on product exports through the Strait of Hormuz reduced Middle East supply. Saudi Arabia and Kuwait diesel exports were down about 40% year over year in July. Russia, meanwhile, extended restrictions on most diesel exports into October. Russia exported more than 780,000 b/d of diesel in 2025, just under 10% of global exports. US refiners have increased output and exports to help fill the gap. Distillate production averaged 5.1 million b/d during January-August, the highest since 2019. Refinery utilization is already near capacity in several regions, leaving limited room for further increases in output. PADDs 2 and 4 are operating at or near capacity, supported by discounted Canadian crude, strong diesel export demand, and agricultural and rural consumption. Together, the two regions account for more than 27% of US refining capacity and have an average distillate yield of 32%, DBRS said. On the Gulf Coast, PADD 3 refinery utilization exceeded 98% in September. More than half of US refining capacity is concentrated in PADD 3, where complex refineries serve both export markets and other US regions. The stronger operating environment is translating into higher refining margins. The US Gulf Coast ultra-low-sulfur diesel premium over crude has risen to its highest level this year,

Read More »

US seeks to release another 40 million bbl from SPR despite low inventory levels

The Trump administration Sep. 29 said it would put another 40 million bbl of crude from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) into the market even as the emergency stockpile has fallen to its lowest level in more than four decades, raising fresh questions about how much of a buffer remains should another major supply disruption occur. The SPR held 283.8 million bbl as of the week ended Sept. 25. If companies take all 40 million bbl before they return replacement crude, the SPR’s physical inventory would temporarily fall to about 244 million bbl, before accounting for other inventory changes. That would put the stockpile below the 252-million-bbl statutory threshold that applies to certain limited SPR drawdowns. The threshold does not apply to the Department of Energy (DOE)’s exchange authority. SPR risks, exchange demand uncertain The Government Accountability Office (GAO) in May warned that the SPR’s ability to meet future drawdown and fill demands faced risks from aging infrastructure, maintenance backlogs, and low inventory levels. “The SPR’s operational capability is at risk,” the report noted, saying that as of last December, when inventories were over 410 million bbl, the SPR could withdraw oil at only 61% of its design rate and refill the reserve at 56% of its design rate. More than a quarter of the inventory was unavailable for drawdown at the time because of construction and cavern outages. GAO also warned that additional inventory declines from emergency releases could further limit the SPR’s drawdown capability. There is no guarantee that companies will take all 40 million barrels offered under the latest exchange. DOE offered the same amount in June, but only one company agreed to borrow about 500,000 bbl. The limited interest followed concerns among oil traders that the exchange’s repayment premiums and crude-quality requirements could make the SPR

Read More »

Plains names Liollio to succeed Chandler as EVP, COO

Plains All American Pipeline LP and Plains GP Holdings have appointed Dean Liollio to serve as executive vice-president and chief operating officer effective Oct. 2, 2026. Liollio will succeed Chris Chandler, who is resigning from Plains to pursue other interests, the company said in a release Sept. 29. Chandler joined Plains in 2018 after previously serving in leadership roles at Phillips 66. Liollio previously served as senior vice-president, special projects, prior to his appointment as executive vice-president and COO. Prior, the served as president of Plains Midstream Canada from 2020 until 2024, as president of PAA Natural Gas Storage from 2008 until 2020 and as president of Plains Gas Solutions from 2016 until 2020. Prior to joining Plains in 2008, Liollio held a number of executive roles including serving as president, ceief executive officer and director of EnergySouth Inc. and as president and COO of Centerpoint’s natural gas distribution operations across a five-state area.

Read More »

Data Center Thermal Management Series-Part 1 of 3

The biggest driver in today’s global economy is the data center, and in the process, data centers are generating and taking more heat than ever before. Heat — the generation of it and public concerns about it — is the most pressing issue facing the data center industry. In response, data center managers and engineers are viewing the problem in new ways, devising innovative, next-generation thermal control strategies that manage the problem more effectively. In the minds of IT managers and the public, data centers and AI are joined at the hip, along with increasing power demands and associated issues of environmental impact, water usage, and higher utility costs. As community activists, political leaders, and now even some prominent AI industry CEOs call for limits on AI development and data center construction, it’s imperative that the data center industry better manage the heat they’re producing — and taking. Sponsored Resources: Texas Instruments’ portfolio of data center thermal management systems spans the full coolant path. It’s been under active development at TI for decades and has evolved in response to the rising power, computing demands, and complexity of advanced data centers. Traditional thermal management techniques can’t keep up with AI’s intense computing requirements. For decades, air cooling was sufficient. Fans blew cool air across hot components and carried heat away, keeping data centers and AI servers operating reliably. But with AI training and inference pushing rack power beyond 20kW to 40kW, air alone can no longer remove heat quickly enough. In addition, air cooling is noisy and consumes too much energy. AI server racks are coming online now that draw 100kW of power, and they’re on their way to more than a megawatt in a few years. Each generation of servers grows denser, more powerful, and hotter as they move and compute massive volumes

Read More »

LiquidStack unveils liquid-cooling platform targeting AI data centers

“Operators need cooling infrastructure that can adapt as GPU platforms and rack densities evolve,” said Scott Smith, general manager of LiquidStack, in a statement. “CDU 2.X combines the performance and flexibility customers need today with the headroom to prepare for what comes next, allowing them to configure cooling around their facility and deployment strategy rather than designing the facility around the CDU.” A key feature is the platform’s support for different deployment configurations, including end-of-row and rack-adjacent installations. The idea is to give data center operators more flexibility in how they place their equipment with increasingly high thermal loads. The system offers configurable control-valve, power-feed and redundancy options, including dual-feed A/B configurations and automatic transfer switch support. These features allow operators to tailor the CDU to different facility architectures and resiliency requirements.

Read More »

If Apple returns to enterprise server game (with help from Nvidia), what market could it target?

Nvidia introduced NVLink Fusion as part of a broader effort to make its interconnect technology available to companies developing custom AI processors. The approach allows third-party silicon to be incorporated into Nvidia-oriented data center architectures, potentially extending Nvidia’s influence beyond its own GPUs. A similar strategy is already being pursued with inference-chip developer d-Matrix. Apple also already operates specialized servers for its Private Cloud Compute system, which handles Apple Intelligence workloads that require processing beyond the user’s device. Scaling that infrastructure, however, reportedly creates bandwidth, cost, and performance challenges. A commercial AI server would allow Apple to extend its silicon strategy into the data center while giving customers direct access to Apple processors rather than Apple’s own cloud services.

Read More »

From Coal to Compute: How Pennsylvania Is Rebuilding Power for AI Data Centers

Western Pennsylvania is becoming a test bed for one of the most consequential changes underway in data center development: the migration from simply finding grid capacity to building the power supply along with the data center. Two projects illustrate that transition particularly well. Aligned Data Centers is advancing the roughly $10 billion, 2-GW Project Phoenix campus at the former Bruce Mansfield coal-fired power station site in Shippingport, Beaver County. About 60 miles to the east, the former Homer City Generating Station is being transformed into the Homer City Energy Campus, centered on as much as 4.4 GW of new natural-gas generation and a proposed Amazon Web Services campus that could ultimately include 39 data center buildings. The projects share a number of similarities. Both reuse former coal-generation properties. Both already possess much of the infrastructure that greenfield data center developers spend years trying to obtain: high-voltage transmission, industrial zoning, water infrastructure, pipeline access, large parcels and proximity to the Marcellus and Utica natural-gas fields.But technically and commercially, they are also very different. Project Phoenix is essentially a data-center-led development using behind-the-meter generation, supplemented by a separate plan to repower the former coal station. While Homer City is the reverse: a power-generation project being constructed first, with the hyperscale data center development forming around the available power supply. This isn’t a competition, but it is a comparison on speed of delivery and the issues both development models face. Project Phoenix: Aligned Moves Into Pennsylvania Aligned calls Shippingport its first Pennsylvania campus and a regional flagship. The company formally broke ground on Project Phoenix on September 10, 2026, describing it as a 2-GW campus spanning three data center facilities and representing roughly $10 billion in regional investment. Aligned estimates the development will support approximately 3,000 construction jobs and 640 full-time jobs in

Read More »

OpenStack Hibiscus adds DNS security features and confidential computing to the open-source cloud platform

Type-5 support is aimed at data center integration. “It lets the tenant network prefixes be advertised directly into the physical fabric, so that really that’s basically how modern data center networks are built,” Carrez explained. “So really helps OpenStack fit into those environments without extra gateway layers that we’ve seen in use before.” Routable tenant addresses: The OVN BGP integration gains a route leaking option. An operator turns it on with the leak_routes attribute of a subnet. The extended OVN features follow the same approach. “OVN BGP features that let the tenant addresses be routable directly from the underlay, and that again is exposing how modern data centers are built directly into OpenStack,” Carrez said. Lower memory use: In deployments that use Open vSwitch, a monitoring daemon tracked keepalived state changes for HA routers. Hibiscus replaces the daemon with a shell script. The change applies to every HA router, so the savings add up across a deployment. “The 15 times reduction in memory footprint for the high availability router monitoring is, I think, really interesting,” Carrez said.

Read More »

DCF Trends Summit: ON.energy’s Asser Elsamahy – Using AI UPS Systems to Tame AI Load Swings

The power challenge surrounding artificial intelligence is increasingly about more than finding enough megawatts. AI data centers can also introduce rapid changes in electricity demand as large clusters of accelerators ramp workloads up and down. Those swings create a different kind of infrastructure problem: how to serve highly dynamic compute loads without passing that volatility directly onto the electric grid. That challenge is helping move battery energy storage deeper into data center power architecture. In an onsite podcast interview recorded live at the Data Center Frontier Trends Summit 2026, DCF Contributing Editor Doug Black spoke with Asser Elsamahy, P.E., vice president of engineering at ON.energy, about the emerging role of battery-based power quality infrastructure for AI data centers. Elsamahy said battery power systems themselves are hardly new. Energy storage has been deployed at gigawatt scale around the world for roughly two decades. What is new is the way the technology is being adapted to the operating characteristics of large AI facilities. “They’re new to the data center industry, but they’re not necessarily new in the market,” Elsamahy said. “They’ve been deployed at gigawatt scale already, multiple gigawatts all over the world.” The difference now is the load. Major swings in AI computing demand can create additional stress for grid operators already confronting rapid growth in large-load interconnection requests. Elsamahy said that dynamic is accelerating interest in energy storage as a way to manage the interface between AI infrastructure and the grid. From Battery Storage to an “AI UPS” ON.energy’s approach is built around what the company calls an AI UPS, or medium-voltage uninterruptible power supply. The architecture differs from the parallel battery energy storage system, or BESS, configuration commonly used for standalone grid storage. ON instead uses a double-conversion design with two sets of inverters. One inverter set faces the

Read More »

Microsoft will invest $80B in AI data centers in fiscal 2025

And Microsoft isn’t the only one that is ramping up its investments into AI-enabled data centers. Rival cloud service providers are all investing in either upgrading or opening new data centers to capture a larger chunk of business from developers and users of large language models (LLMs).  In a report published in October 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated that demand for generative AI would push Microsoft, AWS, Google, Oracle, Meta, and Apple would between them devote $200 billion to capex in 2025, up from $110 billion in 2023. Microsoft is one of the biggest spenders, followed closely by Google and AWS, Bloomberg Intelligence said. Its estimate of Microsoft’s capital spending on AI, at $62.4 billion for calendar 2025, is lower than Smith’s claim that the company will invest $80 billion in the fiscal year to June 30, 2025. Both figures, though, are way higher than Microsoft’s 2020 capital expenditure of “just” $17.6 billion. The majority of the increased spending is tied to cloud services and the expansion of AI infrastructure needed to provide compute capacity for OpenAI workloads. Separately, last October Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said his company planned total capex spend of $75 billion in 2024 and even more in 2025, with much of it going to AWS, its cloud computing division.

Read More »

John Deere unveils more autonomous farm machines to address skill labor shortage

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Self-driving tractors might be the path to self-driving cars. John Deere has revealed a new line of autonomous machines and tech across agriculture, construction and commercial landscaping. The Moline, Illinois-based John Deere has been in business for 187 years, yet it’s been a regular as a non-tech company showing off technology at the big tech trade show in Las Vegas and is back at CES 2025 with more autonomous tractors and other vehicles. This is not something we usually cover, but John Deere has a lot of data that is interesting in the big picture of tech. The message from the company is that there aren’t enough skilled farm laborers to do the work that its customers need. It’s been a challenge for most of the last two decades, said Jahmy Hindman, CTO at John Deere, in a briefing. Much of the tech will come this fall and after that. He noted that the average farmer in the U.S. is over 58 and works 12 to 18 hours a day to grow food for us. And he said the American Farm Bureau Federation estimates there are roughly 2.4 million farm jobs that need to be filled annually; and the agricultural work force continues to shrink. (This is my hint to the anti-immigration crowd). John Deere’s autonomous 9RX Tractor. Farmers can oversee it using an app. While each of these industries experiences their own set of challenges, a commonality across all is skilled labor availability. In construction, about 80% percent of contractors struggle to find skilled labor. And in commercial landscaping, 86% of landscaping business owners can’t find labor to fill open positions, he said. “They have to figure out how to do

Read More »

2025 playbook for enterprise AI success, from agents to evals

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More 2025 is poised to be a pivotal year for enterprise AI. The past year has seen rapid innovation, and this year will see the same. This has made it more critical than ever to revisit your AI strategy to stay competitive and create value for your customers. From scaling AI agents to optimizing costs, here are the five critical areas enterprises should prioritize for their AI strategy this year. 1. Agents: the next generation of automation AI agents are no longer theoretical. In 2025, they’re indispensable tools for enterprises looking to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Unlike traditional software, agents powered by large language models (LLMs) can make nuanced decisions, navigate complex multi-step tasks, and integrate seamlessly with tools and APIs. At the start of 2024, agents were not ready for prime time, making frustrating mistakes like hallucinating URLs. They started getting better as frontier large language models themselves improved. “Let me put it this way,” said Sam Witteveen, cofounder of Red Dragon, a company that develops agents for companies, and that recently reviewed the 48 agents it built last year. “Interestingly, the ones that we built at the start of the year, a lot of those worked way better at the end of the year just because the models got better.” Witteveen shared this in the video podcast we filmed to discuss these five big trends in detail. Models are getting better and hallucinating less, and they’re also being trained to do agentic tasks. Another feature that the model providers are researching is a way to use the LLM as a judge, and as models get cheaper (something we’ll cover below), companies can use three or more models to

Read More »

OpenAI’s red teaming innovations define new essentials for security leaders in the AI era

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More OpenAI has taken a more aggressive approach to red teaming than its AI competitors, demonstrating its security teams’ advanced capabilities in two areas: multi-step reinforcement and external red teaming. OpenAI recently released two papers that set a new competitive standard for improving the quality, reliability and safety of AI models in these two techniques and more. The first paper, “OpenAI’s Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems,” reports that specialized teams outside the company have proven effective in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise have made it into a released model because in-house testing techniques may have missed them. In the second paper, “Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-Generated Rewards and Multi-Step Reinforcement Learning,” OpenAI introduces an automated framework that relies on iterative reinforcement learning to generate a broad spectrum of novel, wide-ranging attacks. Going all-in on red teaming pays practical, competitive dividends It’s encouraging to see competitive intensity in red teaming growing among AI companies. When Anthropic released its AI red team guidelines in June of last year, it joined AI providers including Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, and even the U.S.’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which all had released red teaming frameworks. Investing heavily in red teaming yields tangible benefits for security leaders in any organization. OpenAI’s paper on external red teaming provides a detailed analysis of how the company strives to create specialized external teams that include cybersecurity and subject matter experts. The goal is to see if knowledgeable external teams can defeat models’ security perimeters and find gaps in their security, biases and controls that prompt-based testing couldn’t find. What makes OpenAI’s recent papers noteworthy is how well they define using human-in-the-middle

Read More »

Introducing SynthID Bio

Strengthening biosecurity and information integrityBiosecurity relies on layered defenses – think of it like a “Swiss cheese” defense model, where multiple independent safety measures work

Read More »