
For much of the AI boom, the industry’s attention has centered on GPUs, power availability, and liquid cooling. But according to Cisco Senior Business Development Manager Robin Olds, another critical constraint is rapidly moving to the forefront: the network itself.
Speaking with Data Center Frontier on the show floor at Fiber Connect 2026, Olds argued that AI represents a once-in-a-generation shift comparable to the birth of the commercial internet, fundamentally changing traffic patterns and forcing service providers, data center operators, hyperscalers, and emerging neoclouds to rethink infrastructure design.
“It’s really like the internet when it was created,” Olds said. “We’re at another intersection in time where we could really see things happening.”
AI Is Rewriting the Bandwidth Equation
The most significant change may not be compute density alone but the sustained demand AI places on transport networks.
According to Olds, service providers are already seeing AI traffic account for roughly 30% of utilization on backbone infrastructure; a dramatic increase from less than 1% only two years ago. As AI workloads continue to proliferate, those utilization levels are expected to rise further.
The next wave of agentic AI could amplify that trend.
Unlike consumer chatbots, which generate bursty request patterns, autonomous AI agents continuously interact with applications and external services, creating more persistent traffic flows.
“Everything’s about chatbots,” Olds observed. “It’s very spiky—up, down. Agentic AI is going to maintain utilization because now I have agents working on my behalf.”
For data center developers, network operators, and cloud providers alike, that implies planning not just for peak demand but for elevated baseline utilization across metro and long-haul infrastructure.
Compressing the Network Stack
Cisco’s response centers on architectural simplification.
Olds highlighted the company’s Agile Services Networking framework, which combines router and optical networking technologies with coherent optics to converge functions that historically occupied separate Layer 1, Layer 2, and Layer 3 platforms.
By embedding more intelligence directly into optical systems and collapsing multiple networking functions into a unified architecture, providers can reduce equipment footprint, lower power consumption, and decrease cooling requirements while freeing valuable rack space.
That reclaimed capacity may itself become an AI opportunity.
Olds suggested operators are evaluating deployments such as municipal video inferencing or colocated AI services within existing central offices, effectively transforming portions of telecommunications infrastructure into localized compute environments.
The concept mirrors a broader industry trend in which communications facilities increasingly resemble distributed edge data centers.
Bringing AI Closer to the User
The conversation also underscored how AI is reshaping edge architecture.
Cisco’s Unified Edge platform packages compute and networking into compact 3RU and 5RU systems while supporting multiple storage environments and GPU ecosystems, including NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel accelerators. The goal is to provide a flexible deployment model managed under a single operational framework.
But the larger architectural shift may be occurring at the metro layer.
Olds described a redesigned Metro Edge topology that moves peering capabilities closer to users, enabling enterprise and consumer traffic to reach AI services through shorter, more direct paths rather than traversing traditional hierarchical networks.
The approach effectively creates “shortcuts” to cloud and AI applications, reducing latency while supporting increasingly distributed inference workloads.
For an industry that has spent years debating the meaning of “the edge,” the discussion suggests that AI may finally be giving the concept practical definition: placing intelligence where proximity improves performance.
The Middle Mile Emerges as a Strategic Battleground
Perhaps the most revealing insight involved the middle mile.
Olds recounted discussions with a provider that upgraded directly from a 10 Gb network to 400 Gb infrastructure, bypassing 100 Gb economics altogether, only to discover that projected demand already requires tripling that new capacity.
The anecdote illustrates how AI-driven bandwidth growth is outpacing conventional planning cycles.
It also reinforces the increasingly interconnected nature of AI infrastructure. Data centers, neocloud operators, hyperscalers, internet service providers, and transport networks can no longer optimize independently; each layer depends on the others to sustain AI deployment at scale.
Data Center Infrastructure Is Becoming Network Infrastructure
For readers of Data Center Frontier, the interview highlights an important evolution in AI infrastructure strategy.
The industry’s first challenge was deploying enough compute. The second has become supplying enough power and cooling. Increasingly, the third may be ensuring sufficient network capacity to move data among users, inference engines, training clusters, and distributed edge locations.
As inference workloads expand and autonomous AI agents generate continuous demand, networking is shifting from supporting role to strategic differentiator.
If the first phase of AI was about building bigger GPU clusters, the next may be about building the connective fabric that allows them to operate as a coherent, low-latency system, stretching from hyperscale campuses through metro networks and ultimately to the edge.



















